+

WELCOME!

TISP: Uruguay

10 May 2009

+

Results from Day 1:

Sort it OutShip the Chip

TISP: Uruguay

10 May 2009

+

Sort it Out

3

+Sort it Out: General Statistics

43 designs were tested 31 Parallel7 Serial5 Unknown (type not recorded)

16 designs had a perfect score13 parallel designs (42%)2 serial designs (28%)

4

It appears that serial designs were more difficult to create than parallel designs

+Distribution of error measure 2[Number of correctly sorted coins]/16Lowest: 0 Highest:0.5 (half the coins)

5

0 0.125 0.25 0.375 0.5 0.6250

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Number of designs

Performance index

+Distribution of error measure 1

Lowest: 0; Highest: 5.1

6

Number of designs

Performance index0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18There were several instances where Design A was better than Design B in one PI but Design A was worse than design B in the other PI

+

Ship The Chip

90 packages were submitted for testing

7

+In case you have been wondering what the TISP team did all night

They put all the chip packages in a box…

8

+In case you have been wondering what the TISP team did all night

9

Here is the box

+In case you have been wondering what the TISP team did all night

10

Here is the box

+In case you have been wondering what the TISP team did all night

11

Here is the box

+In case you have been wondering what the TISP team did all night

12

Here is the box

+(Normalized) Results…Maximum: 25; Minimum: 0.25

18 groups had the best score (25)

11 groups had the next best (16.67)

11 groups had 12.5

10 groups had 10

23 groups had more than 5 but less than 10

17 groups had a score of less than 5

13

+Histogram: “ship the chip” score distribution

14

0 5 10 15 20 25 300

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Score

Number of Groups Best:18 Groups

+

Questions or Comments ?

15