The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

29
© The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

description

© The Progression Trust, 2014 From: What is preventing social mobility? ASCL.

Transcript of The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

Page 1: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

Whole person, whole journey progression.

Page 2: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

The Progressionometer

The problem The cause The vision The situation The plan The end

Page 3: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

From: What is preventing social mobility?. 2013. ASCL.

Page 4: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

From: National Strategy for Access and Student Success. 2014. HEFCE, OFFA. © Crown Copyright.

Page 5: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

From: National Strategy for Access and Student Success. 2014. HEFCE, OFFA. © Crown Copyright.

Page 6: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

From: National Strategy for Access and Student Success. 2014. HEFCE, OFFA. © Crown Copyright.

Page 7: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

From: National Strategy for Access and Student Success. 2014. HEFCE, OFFA. © Crown Copyright.

Page 8: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

Which means…

Disadvantage:– exists from (the accident of) birth– gaps widen through the life-course– affects cognitive and non-cognitive

intrinsic factors… and extrinsic factors (e.g. opportunities)… and the system reinforces disadvantage

(statutory targets don’t add up to success)

Page 9: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

The Progressionometer

The problem The cause The vision The situation The plan The end

Page 10: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

One person, many inputs: two problems

Page 11: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

Schizophrenia and the Anti-Vision

We separate cognitive and non-cognitive development… (cf. Heckman, J.)

Prevailing rhetoric provides for an anti-vision for young people – don’t be NEET, don’t be on benefits, don’t riot…

Statutory duties and targets do not add up to a compelling vision for our children

Ability matters to employment, earnings, education, crime and health;

Abilities are multiple: non-cognitive abilities have direct affects on employment, earnings, education, crime and health;

Ability and health gaps open up between different socio-economic groups very early;

Investment in young disadvantaged children delivers higher returns than those in adolescents;

But, the impact of early investment is lessened if not followed up later;

Socio-emotional (non-cognitive) skills foster cognitive skills.

Page 12: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

The Progressionometer

The problem The cause The vision The situation The plan The end

Page 13: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

The Vision

Whole person, whole journey progression

Cognitive

Non-cognitive

Social

Primary, secondary…

Learning and qualifications

Asset-based

… Post-16, HE, career

Career education and guidance

THRIVING ADULTHOOD

… for the whole system

Page 14: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

The Progressionometer

The problem The cause The vision The situation The plan The end

Page 15: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

The situation

National Strategy for Access and Student Success…– Closer collaboration (to what end?)– Stronger evidence (of what outcome?)– Lifecycle approach(outreach, transition, retention, success,

employability…)

Page 16: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

What it means

Whole journey ✓

Whole person ? Whole system (or Partnership) ?

A challenge and an opportunity

Page 17: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

The Progressionometer

The problem The cause The vision The situation The plan The end

Page 18: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

Our Conceptual Framework for Progression

What are the personal capacities that enable success through the lifecycle?

What contextual factors enable or disable success through the lifecycle?

What are the ‘active ingredients’ that grow personal capacities / build enabling contexts?

Page 19: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

Aspirations + Awareness + Attainment = Progression

The Progression Equation (whole person)

Aspiration

I want toand… I know

how toand…

I am able toso…

I will

19

+ Attainment+ Awareness

Page 20: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

The Determinants of Progression (CEI, 2010)

Inter-related

Unknown

Factors

Complex

Cyclical

Incremental

Lifelong

Learner-centred

Cumulative

20

Page 21: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 201421

ProgressionSmart learners

Aspirations Awareness Attainment

Progression

Page 22: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

Whole Journey

How do you ensure the complementarity of potentially disparate provision and interventions across the life-cycle?

How do you know that your inputs build on those before and alongside them – and contribute to a learners’ progression to thriving adulthood/career?

Page 23: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

The Progression Matrix (whole journey)

23

Progression priority

Contributing factors?

Contributing factors?

Progression priority

Time-basedPlanning

Theme-based Planning

Audit contributionsPlot overlapsAudit

contributions

… and gaps

Audit contributions

Page 24: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

In action…(whole system)

Page 25: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

The Progressionometer

The problem The cause The vision The situation The plan The end

Page 26: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

What can I do?

THINK like a progression-oriented practitioner; with an asset-based vision for whole person, whole journey progression

PLAN to build on what has gone before and with concurrent inputs (i.e. in partnership) – for a thriving adulthood

ACT to grow aspirations, awareness and attainment

Page 27: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

The Progression Whole Group

Page 28: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

Previous and Current Work

Page 29: The Progression Trust, 2014 Whole person, whole journey progression.

© The Progression Trust, 2014

Get in touch

Developing, delivering and evaluating lifecycle progression approaches through:Partnership/programme Health CheckStaff development and trainingProgramme and strategy developmentLeadership/management coachingChange and innovation projects

[email protected] to updateswww.theprogressiontrust.org/network