Copyright © 2007 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant B. Navathe Slide 2- 1.
© Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML...
-
Upload
simon-rich -
Category
Documents
-
view
227 -
download
2
Transcript of © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML...
© Shamkant B. NavatheCC
© Shamkant B. NavatheCC
Lesson 6Enhanced Entity-
Relationship and UML Modeling
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe.
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Enhanced-ER (EER) Model Concepts
Includes all modeling concepts of basic ER Additional concepts: subclasses/superclasses,
specialization/generalization, categories, attribute inheritance
The resulting model is called the enhanced-ER or Extended ER (E2R or EER) model
It is used to model applications more completely and accurately if needed
It includes some object-oriented concepts, such as inheritance
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Subclasses and Superclasses (1)
An entity type may have additional meaningful subgroupings of its entities
Example: EMPLOYEE may be further grouped into SECRETARY, ENGINEER, MANAGER, TECHNICIAN, SALARIED_EMPLOYEE, HOURLY_EMPLOYEE,…– Each of these groupings is a subset of EMPLOYEE entities – Each is called a subclass of EMPLOYEE – EMPLOYEE is the superclass for each of these subclasses
These are called superclass/subclass relationships.Example: EMPLOYEE/SECRETARY,
EMPLOYEE/TECHNICIAN
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Subclasses and Superclasses (2)
These are also called IS-A relationships (SECRETARY IS-A EMPLOYEE, TECHNICIAN IS-A EMPLOYEE, …).
Note: An entity that is member of a subclass represents the same real-world entity as some member of the superclass – The Subclass member is the same entity in a distinct specific
role – An entity cannot exist in the database merely by being a
member of a subclass; it must also be a member of the superclass
Example: A salaried employee who is also an engineer belongs to the two subclasses ENGINEER and SALARIED_EMPLOYEE – It is not necessary that every entity in a superclass be a
member of some subclass
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Attribute Inheritance in Superclass / Subclass Relationships
An entity that is member of a subclass inherits all attributes of the entity as a member of the superclass
It also inherits all relationships
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Specialization (1)
Is the process of defining a set of subclasses of a superclass
The set of subclasses is based upon some distinguishing characteristics of the entities in the superclass
Example: {SECRETARY, ENGINEER, TECHNICIAN} is a specialization of EMPLOYEE based upon job type.– May have several specializations of the same superclass
Example: Another specialization of EMPLOYEE based in method of pay is {SALARIED_EMPLOYEE, HOURLY_EMPLOYEE}.
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Specialization (2)
Superclass/subclass relationships and specialization can be diagrammatically represented in EER diagrams
Attributes of a subclass are called specific attributes. For example, TypingSpeed of SECRETARY
The subclass can participate in specific relationship types. For example, BELONGS_TO of HOURLY_EMPLOYEE
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Example of a Specialization
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Generalization
The reverse of the specialization process Several classes with common features are generalized into a
superclass; original classes become its subclasses Example: CAR, TRUCK generalized into VEHICLE; both
CAR, TRUCK become subclasses of the superclass VEHICLE.
– We can view {CAR, TRUCK} as a specialization of VEHICLE
– Alternatively, we can view VEHICLE as a generalization of CAR and TRUCK
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Generalization and Specialization (1)
Diagrammatic notation sometimes used to distinguish between generalization and specialization
– Arrow pointing to the generalized superclass represents a generalization
– Arrows pointing to the specialized subclasses represent a specialization
– We do not use this notation because it is often subjective as to which process is more appropriate for a particular situation
– We advocate not drawing any arrows in these situations
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Generalization and Specialization (2)
Data Modeling with Specialization and Generalization– A superclass or subclass represents a set of
entities – Shown in rectangles in EER diagrams (as are
entity types) – Sometimes, all entity sets are simply called
classes, whether they are entity types, superclasses, or subclasses
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Constraints on Specialization and Generalization (1)
If we can determine exactly those entities that will become members of each subclass by a condition, the subclasses are called predicate-defined (or condition-defined) subclasses – Condition is a constraint that determines subclass
members – Display a predicate-defined subclass by writing the
predicate condition next to the line attaching the subclass to its superclass
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Constraints on Specialization and Generalization (2)
If all subclasses in a specialization have membership condition on same attribute of the superclass, specialization is called an attribute defined-specialization – Attribute is called the defining attribute of the
specialization – Example: JobType is the defining attribute of the
specialization {SECRETARY, TECHNICIAN, ENGINEER} of EMPLOYEE
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Constraints on Specialization and Generalization (3)
If no condition determines membership, the subclass is called user-defined – Membership in a subclass is determined by the
database users by applying an operation to add an entity to the subclass
– Membership in the subclass is specified individually for each entity in the superclass by the user
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Constraints on Specialization and Generalization (4)
Two other conditions apply to a specialization / generalization:1. Disjointness Constraint: – Specifies that the subclasses of the specialization must
be disjointed (an entity can be a member of at most one of the subclasses of the specialization)
– Specified by d in EER diagram – If not disjointed, overlap; that is the same entity may be
a member of more than one subclass of the specialization
– Specified by o in EER diagram
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Constraints on Specialization and Generalization (5)
2. Completeness Constraint: – Total specifies that every entity in the
superclass must be a member of some subclass in the specialization/ generalization
– Shown in EER diagrams by a double line – Partial allows an entity not to belong to any of
the subclasses – Shown in EER diagrams by a single line
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Constraints on Specialization and Generalization (6)
Hence, we have four types of specialization/generalization:– Disjoint, total – Disjoint, partial – Overlapping, total – Overlapping, partial
Note: Generalization usually is total because the superclass is derived from the subclasses.
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Example of disjoint partial Specialization
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Specialization / Generalization Hierarchies, Lattices and Shared Subclasses (1)
A subclass may itself have further subclasses specified on it Forms a hierarchy or a latticeHierarchy has a constraint that every subclass has only one
superclass (called single inheritance) In a lattice, a subclass can be subclass of more than one
superclass (called multiple inheritance) In a lattice or hierarchy, a subclass inherits attributes not only
of its direct superclass, but also of all its predecessor superclasses
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Specialization / Generalization Hierarchies, Lattices and Shared Subclasses (2)
A subclass with more than one superclass is called a shared subclass
Can have specialization hierarchies or lattices, or generalization hierarchies or lattices
In specialization, start with an entity type and then define subclasses of the entity type by successive specialization (top down conceptual refinement process)
In generalization, start with many entity types and generalize those that have common properties (bottom up conceptual synthesis process)
In practice, the combination of two processes is employed
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Specialization / Generalization Lattice Example (UNIVERSITY)
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Categories or UNION TYPES (1)
All of the superclass/subclass relationships we have seen thus far have a single superclass
A shared subclass is subclass in more than one distinct superclass/subclass relationships, where each relationships has a single superclass (multiple inheritance)
In some cases, need to model a single superclass/subclass relationship with more than one superclass
Superclasses represent different entity types Such a subclass is called a category or UNION TYPE
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Categories or UNION TYPES (2)
Example: Database for vehicle registration, vehicle owner can be a person, a bank (holding a lien on a vehicle) or a company.– Category (subclass) OWNER is a subset of the union of
the three superclasses COMPANY, BANK, and PERSON
– A category member must exist in at least one of its superclasses
Note: The difference from shared subclass, which is subset of the intersection of its superclasses (shared subclass member must exist in all of its superclasses).
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Example of categories (UNION TYPES)
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Formal Definitions of EER Model (1)
Class C: A set of entities; could be entity type, subclass, superclass, category.
Subclass S: A class whose entities must always be subset of the entities in another class, called the superclass C of the superclass/subclass (or IS-A) relationship S/C:
S C⊆Specialization Z: Z = {S1, S2,…, Sn} a set of subclasses
with same superclass G; hence, G/Si a superclass relationship for i = 1, …., n.
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Formal Definitions of EER Model (2)
G is called a generalization of the subclasses {S1, S2,…, Sn}
Z is total if we always have:S1 S2 … Sn = G;∪ ∪ ∪Otherwise, Z is partial.
Z is disjoint if we always have:Si ∩ S2 empty-set for i ≠ j;Otherwise, Z is overlapping.
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Formal Definitions of EER Model (4)
Subclass S of C is predicate defined if predicate p on attributes of C is used to specify membership in S; that is, S = C[p], where C[p] is the set of entities in C that satisfy p
A subclass not defined by a predicate is called user-defined
Attribute-defined specialization: if a predicate A = ci (where A is an attribute of G and ci is a constant value from the domain of A) is used to specify membership in each subclass Si in Z
Note: If ci ≠ cj for i ≠ j, and A is single-valued, then the attribute-defined specialization will be disjoint.
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Formal Definitions of EER Model (3)
Category or UNION type T– A class that is a subset of the union of n defining
superclasses D1, D2,…Dn, n>1:
T (D1 D2 … Dn)⊆ ∪ ∪ ∪A predicate pi on the attributes of T.
– If a predicate pi on the attributes of Di can specify entities of Di that are members of T.
– If a predicate is specified on every Di: T = (D1[p1] ∪D2[p2] … Dn[pn]∪ ∪
– Note: The definition of relationship type should have 'entity type' replaced with 'class'.
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
UML Example for Displaying Specialization / Generalization
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Alternative Diagrammatic Notations
Symbols for entity type / class, attribute and relationship
Displaying attributes
Displaying cardinality ratios
Various (min, max) notations
Notations for displaying specialization / generalization
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Data Modelling - The Basics
• Fundamental Principle of Modeling:• Data Abstraction
• Basic Process of Modeling• Define building blocks for
• holding groups of data
• Use rules of a data model to establish
• relationships among blocks
• Add constraints - structural/ semantic
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Fundamental Steps of Data Modeling
1 Inputs to Data Modeling2 The Process of Modeling3 Data Modeling Abstractions4 Classification5 Aggregation6 Identification7 Generalization8 Coverage Constraints in Generalization9 Cardinality and Participation Constraints
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Inputs to Data Modeling
Using the products of requirements analysis
Verbal and written communication among users and designers
Knowledge of meaning of data– Existing Programs– Existing Files– Existing Documents– Existing Reports
Application Planning / Documentation and Design
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Overall Process of Modeling
Abstraction
Use of some modeling discipline (Data Model)
Use of a representation technique
LanguageDiagrammingTools
Analysis of business rules/semantic constraints (these are typically beyond the capability of the data model)
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Types of Abstractions
Classification A is a member of class B
Aggregation B,C,D are aggregated into AA is made of/composed of B,C,D
Generalization B,C,D can be generalized into A, B is-an A, C is- an A, D is-an A
Specialization A can be specialized into B,C,DB, C, D are specialization of A
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Classification Abstraction Relationship between a class and its members
John Smith, Sheela Patel, and Peter Wang are all employees. They are all members of a class: EMPLOYEE class
EMPLOYEE
John Smith Peter Wang
Sheela Patel
Each individual employee is a member of the class EMPLOYEE
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Classification Abstraction (contd.)
January, February etc. are members of the class “MONTH”
Represents “member-of” relationship
In object-oriented modeling :MONTH : an Object type or classJanuary … December : objects that belong to class MONTH
MONTH
January DecemberFebruary
Exhaustive enumeration of members:
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Classification - Class Properties
Collection of similar entities or concepts into a higher level concept
EMPLOYEE class collects all employees into one class
A class has properties called “class properties”
EMPLOYEE class has class properties - e.g., average salary, total number of employees
Each member has values for own properties (e.g. name, address, salary): called member properties
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Aggregation Abstraction
Defines a new class from a set of classes which are identified as components of the root class
CAR
Chasis OtherSystems
Drive-train
represents IS-PART-OF (component) relationshipRoot class: CARComponent Classes: Chassis, Drive-Train, Other Systems, WheelsRoot class: WheelsComponent Classes: Tires, Tubes, Hub-Caps
Wheels
Tires Hub-CapsTubes
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Classification and Aggregation
Classification and Aggregation are used to build schemas
Example: class PersonRepresentation: Person
NameGender
Position
Ram John Carlos Male Female Manager Employee
1. Name, Gender, and Position are aggregated into Person. They are classes themselves.
2. Ram, John, Carlos are classified into Name. Name is a classification of Ram, John, Carlos.
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Two Contexts for Aggregation
Aggregate two or more classes into a higher level concept. It may be considered a relationship or association between them.
Context1: CAR is an aggregate (composition) of Chassis, Drive-train, Other Systems, Wheels.
Context 2: OWNERSHIP is an aggregate (relationship) of CAR and OWNER
OWNERSHIP
CAR OWNER
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Identification
Identifies one concept (an instance of it) from another concept.
BUILDING
ROOM
Name
Number
Identifies
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Generalization Abstraction
Defines a set-subset relationship between a class and a set of member classes.
Establishes a mapping (or a relationship) from the generic class to the member class (or subclass, or subset class).
EMPLOYEE
Staff ManagerEngineer
GENERIC CLASS: EMPLOYEE
MEMBER CLASS: Engineer, Staff, Manager
Implies that all properties associated with the Employee class are inherited by the three leaf classes.
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Data Abstraction (contd.)
Process of hiding (suppressing) unnecessary details so that the high level concept can be made more visible.
This enables programmers, designers, etc., To communicate easily and to understand the application’s data and functional requirements easily.
TYPES OF ABSTRACTION
Classification: IS-A-MEMBER-OF Aggregation: IS-MADE-OF, IS-ASSOCIATED-WITHComposition: IS-MADE-OF (similar to aggregation) (A COMPRISES of B,C,D)Identification: IS-IDENTIFIED-BY Generalization: IS-A IS-LIKE IS-KIND-OF
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Coverage Constraints for Generalization Abstraction
TYPE 1 : TOTAL vs. PARTIAL coverage
Total: The coverage is total if each member of the generic class is mapped to at least one member among the member classes
Partial: The coverage is partial if there are some member(s) of the generic class that cannot be mapped to any member among the member classes
STUDENT
Graduate SpecialUndergraduate
(t) total EMPLOYEE
HourlySalaried
(t) total
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Coverage Constraints for Generalization Abstraction (contd.)
Partial Coverage Constraint examples:
STUDENT
FellowshipStudent
ScholarshipStudent
(p) partial
EMPLOYEE
ScientistEngineer
(p) partial
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Coverage Constraints for Generalization Abstraction (contd.)
TYPE 2: DISJOINT VS. OVERLAPPING (Disjointedness Constraint)
DISJOINT constraint: A member of the generic class is mapped to one element of at most one subset class.
OVERLAPPING constraint: There exists some member of the generic class that can be mapped to two or more of the subset classes.
STUDENT
ForeignAmerican
(t, d) total, disjoint
STUDENT
Research AssistantGraduate
(p, o) partial, overlapping
Aid Recipient Foreign
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Coverage Constraints for Generalization Abstraction (contd.)
More examples of different combinations:
VEHICLE
VanCar
(t, o) total, overlapping
Two-wheeler Three-wheeler
EMPLOYEE
Technical Stuff
(p, d) partial, disjoint
Non-technical Stuff Manager
Truck
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Cardinality Constraints
Cardinality Constraint: Quantification of the relationship between two concepts or classes (a constraint on aggregation)
MINIMUM (A,B) = n
At a minimum, one instance of A is related to at least n instances of B.
n = 0 MIN(A,B) = 0 MIN(Person, Car) = 0
n = 1 MIN(A,B) = 1 MIN(Cust, Ship-address) = 1
n = inf. MIN(A,B) = inf. NOT POSSIBLE
n = x (fixed) MIN(A,B) = x MIN(Car, Wheels) = 4
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Cardinality Constraints (contd.)
MAXIMUM (A,B) = n
At a maximum, one instance of A is related to at least n instances of B.
n = 0 MAX(A,B) = 0 DOES NOT ARISE
n = 1 MAX(A,B) = 1 MAX(Cust, Ship-address) = 1
n = inf. MAX(A,B) = inf. MAX(Cust, Orders) = inf.
n = x (fixed) MAX(A,B) = x MAX(Stud, Course) = 6
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Participation Constraints
MIN (A,B) = 0 Optional Participation
MIN (A,B) = 1 Mandatory Participation
MAX (A,B) = 0 No Participation
MIN (A,B) = x, MAX (A,B) = y Range Constrained
Participation
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Summary of Modeling Concepts
ABSTRACTIONS
CLASSIFICATION
AGGREGATION (COMPOSITION AND ASSOCIATION)
IDENTIFICATION
GENERALIZATION AND SPECIALIZATION
CONSTRAINTS
CARDINALITY (Min. and Max)
PARTICIPATION
COVERAGE (Total vs. Partial, Exclusive vs. Overlapping)
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe
Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition
Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe