© Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML...

58
© Shamkant B. Navathe CC

Transcript of © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML...

Page 1: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

© Shamkant B. NavatheCC

Page 2: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

© Shamkant B. NavatheCC

Lesson 6Enhanced Entity-

Relationship and UML Modeling

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe.

Page 3: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Enhanced-ER (EER) Model Concepts

Includes all modeling concepts of basic ER Additional concepts: subclasses/superclasses,

specialization/generalization, categories, attribute inheritance

The resulting model is called the enhanced-ER or Extended ER (E2R or EER) model

It is used to model applications more completely and accurately if needed

It includes some object-oriented concepts, such as inheritance

Page 4: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Subclasses and Superclasses (1)

An entity type may have additional meaningful subgroupings of its entities

Example: EMPLOYEE may be further grouped into SECRETARY, ENGINEER, MANAGER, TECHNICIAN, SALARIED_EMPLOYEE, HOURLY_EMPLOYEE,…– Each of these groupings is a subset of EMPLOYEE entities – Each is called a subclass of EMPLOYEE – EMPLOYEE is the superclass for each of these subclasses

These are called superclass/subclass relationships.Example: EMPLOYEE/SECRETARY,

EMPLOYEE/TECHNICIAN

Page 5: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Subclasses and Superclasses (2)

These are also called IS-A relationships (SECRETARY IS-A EMPLOYEE, TECHNICIAN IS-A EMPLOYEE, …).

Note: An entity that is member of a subclass represents the same real-world entity as some member of the superclass – The Subclass member is the same entity in a distinct specific

role – An entity cannot exist in the database merely by being a

member of a subclass; it must also be a member of the superclass

Example: A salaried employee who is also an engineer belongs to the two subclasses ENGINEER and SALARIED_EMPLOYEE – It is not necessary that every entity in a superclass be a

member of some subclass

Page 6: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Attribute Inheritance in Superclass / Subclass Relationships

An entity that is member of a subclass inherits all attributes of the entity as a member of the superclass

It also inherits all relationships

Page 7: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Specialization (1)

Is the process of defining a set of subclasses of a superclass

The set of subclasses is based upon some distinguishing characteristics of the entities in the superclass

Example: {SECRETARY, ENGINEER, TECHNICIAN} is a specialization of EMPLOYEE based upon job type.– May have several specializations of the same superclass

Example: Another specialization of EMPLOYEE based in method of pay is {SALARIED_EMPLOYEE, HOURLY_EMPLOYEE}.

Page 8: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Specialization (2)

Superclass/subclass relationships and specialization can be diagrammatically represented in EER diagrams

Attributes of a subclass are called specific attributes. For example, TypingSpeed of SECRETARY

The subclass can participate in specific relationship types. For example, BELONGS_TO of HOURLY_EMPLOYEE

Page 9: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Example of a Specialization

Page 10: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Generalization

The reverse of the specialization process Several classes with common features are generalized into a

superclass; original classes become its subclasses Example: CAR, TRUCK generalized into VEHICLE; both

CAR, TRUCK become subclasses of the superclass VEHICLE.

– We can view {CAR, TRUCK} as a specialization of VEHICLE

– Alternatively, we can view VEHICLE as a generalization of CAR and TRUCK

Page 11: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Generalization and Specialization (1)

Diagrammatic notation sometimes used to distinguish between generalization and specialization

– Arrow pointing to the generalized superclass represents a generalization

– Arrows pointing to the specialized subclasses represent a specialization

– We do not use this notation because it is often subjective as to which process is more appropriate for a particular situation

– We advocate not drawing any arrows in these situations

Page 12: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Generalization and Specialization (2)

Data Modeling with Specialization and Generalization– A superclass or subclass represents a set of

entities – Shown in rectangles in EER diagrams (as are

entity types) – Sometimes, all entity sets are simply called

classes, whether they are entity types, superclasses, or subclasses

Page 13: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Constraints on Specialization and Generalization (1)

If we can determine exactly those entities that will become members of each subclass by a condition, the subclasses are called predicate-defined (or condition-defined) subclasses – Condition is a constraint that determines subclass

members – Display a predicate-defined subclass by writing the

predicate condition next to the line attaching the subclass to its superclass

Page 14: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Constraints on Specialization and Generalization (2)

If all subclasses in a specialization have membership condition on same attribute of the superclass, specialization is called an attribute defined-specialization – Attribute is called the defining attribute of the

specialization – Example: JobType is the defining attribute of the

specialization {SECRETARY, TECHNICIAN, ENGINEER} of EMPLOYEE

Page 15: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Constraints on Specialization and Generalization (3)

If no condition determines membership, the subclass is called user-defined – Membership in a subclass is determined by the

database users by applying an operation to add an entity to the subclass

– Membership in the subclass is specified individually for each entity in the superclass by the user

Page 16: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Constraints on Specialization and Generalization (4)

Two other conditions apply to a specialization / generalization:1. Disjointness Constraint: – Specifies that the subclasses of the specialization must

be disjointed (an entity can be a member of at most one of the subclasses of the specialization)

– Specified by d in EER diagram – If not disjointed, overlap; that is the same entity may be

a member of more than one subclass of the specialization

– Specified by o in EER diagram

Page 17: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Constraints on Specialization and Generalization (5)

2. Completeness Constraint: – Total specifies that every entity in the

superclass must be a member of some subclass in the specialization/ generalization

– Shown in EER diagrams by a double line – Partial allows an entity not to belong to any of

the subclasses – Shown in EER diagrams by a single line

Page 18: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Constraints on Specialization and Generalization (6)

Hence, we have four types of specialization/generalization:– Disjoint, total – Disjoint, partial – Overlapping, total – Overlapping, partial

Note: Generalization usually is total because the superclass is derived from the subclasses.

Page 19: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Example of disjoint partial Specialization

Page 20: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Specialization / Generalization Hierarchies, Lattices and Shared Subclasses (1)

A subclass may itself have further subclasses specified on it Forms a hierarchy or a latticeHierarchy has a constraint that every subclass has only one

superclass (called single inheritance) In a lattice, a subclass can be subclass of more than one

superclass (called multiple inheritance) In a lattice or hierarchy, a subclass inherits attributes not only

of its direct superclass, but also of all its predecessor superclasses

Page 21: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Specialization / Generalization Hierarchies, Lattices and Shared Subclasses (2)

A subclass with more than one superclass is called a shared subclass

Can have specialization hierarchies or lattices, or generalization hierarchies or lattices

In specialization, start with an entity type and then define subclasses of the entity type by successive specialization (top down conceptual refinement process)

In generalization, start with many entity types and generalize those that have common properties (bottom up conceptual synthesis process)

In practice, the combination of two processes is employed

Page 22: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Specialization / Generalization Lattice Example (UNIVERSITY)

Page 23: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Categories or UNION TYPES (1)

All of the superclass/subclass relationships we have seen thus far have a single superclass

A shared subclass is subclass in more than one distinct superclass/subclass relationships, where each relationships has a single superclass (multiple inheritance)

In some cases, need to model a single superclass/subclass relationship with more than one superclass

Superclasses represent different entity types Such a subclass is called a category or UNION TYPE

Page 24: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Categories or UNION TYPES (2)

Example: Database for vehicle registration, vehicle owner can be a person, a bank (holding a lien on a vehicle) or a company.– Category (subclass) OWNER is a subset of the union of

the three superclasses COMPANY, BANK, and PERSON

– A category member must exist in at least one of its superclasses

Note: The difference from shared subclass, which is subset of the intersection of its superclasses (shared subclass member must exist in all of its superclasses).

Page 25: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Example of categories (UNION TYPES)

Page 26: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Formal Definitions of EER Model (1)

Class C: A set of entities; could be entity type, subclass, superclass, category.

Subclass S: A class whose entities must always be subset of the entities in another class, called the superclass C of the superclass/subclass (or IS-A) relationship S/C:

S C⊆Specialization Z: Z = {S1, S2,…, Sn} a set of subclasses

with same superclass G; hence, G/Si a superclass relationship for i = 1, …., n.

Page 27: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Formal Definitions of EER Model (2)

G is called a generalization of the subclasses {S1, S2,…, Sn}

Z is total if we always have:S1 S2 … Sn = G;∪ ∪ ∪Otherwise, Z is partial.

Z is disjoint if we always have:Si ∩ S2 empty-set for i ≠ j;Otherwise, Z is overlapping.

Page 28: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Formal Definitions of EER Model (4)

Subclass S of C is predicate defined if predicate p on attributes of C is used to specify membership in S; that is, S = C[p], where C[p] is the set of entities in C that satisfy p

A subclass not defined by a predicate is called user-defined

Attribute-defined specialization: if a predicate A = ci (where A is an attribute of G and ci is a constant value from the domain of A) is used to specify membership in each subclass Si in Z

Note: If ci ≠ cj for i ≠ j, and A is single-valued, then the attribute-defined specialization will be disjoint.

Page 29: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Formal Definitions of EER Model (3)

Category or UNION type T– A class that is a subset of the union of n defining

superclasses D1, D2,…Dn, n>1:

T (D1 D2 … Dn)⊆ ∪ ∪ ∪A predicate pi on the attributes of T.

– If a predicate pi on the attributes of Di can specify entities of Di that are members of T.

– If a predicate is specified on every Di: T = (D1[p1] ∪D2[p2] … Dn[pn]∪ ∪

– Note: The definition of relationship type should have 'entity type' replaced with 'class'.

Page 30: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

UML Example for Displaying Specialization / Generalization

Page 31: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Alternative Diagrammatic Notations

Symbols for entity type / class, attribute and relationship

Displaying attributes

Displaying cardinality ratios

Various (min, max) notations

Notations for displaying specialization / generalization

Page 32: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Data Modelling - The Basics

• Fundamental Principle of Modeling:• Data Abstraction

• Basic Process of Modeling• Define building blocks for

• holding groups of data

• Use rules of a data model to establish

• relationships among blocks

• Add constraints - structural/ semantic

Page 33: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Fundamental Steps of Data Modeling

1 Inputs to Data Modeling2 The Process of Modeling3 Data Modeling Abstractions4 Classification5 Aggregation6 Identification7 Generalization8 Coverage Constraints in Generalization9 Cardinality and Participation Constraints

Page 34: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Inputs to Data Modeling

Using the products of requirements analysis

Verbal and written communication among users and designers

Knowledge of meaning of data– Existing Programs– Existing Files– Existing Documents– Existing Reports

Application Planning / Documentation and Design

Page 35: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Overall Process of Modeling

Abstraction

Use of some modeling discipline (Data Model)

Use of a representation technique

LanguageDiagrammingTools

Analysis of business rules/semantic constraints (these are typically beyond the capability of the data model)

Page 36: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Types of Abstractions

Classification A is a member of class B

Aggregation B,C,D are aggregated into AA is made of/composed of B,C,D

Generalization B,C,D can be generalized into A, B is-an A, C is- an A, D is-an A

Specialization A can be specialized into B,C,DB, C, D are specialization of A

Page 37: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Classification Abstraction Relationship between a class and its members

John Smith, Sheela Patel, and Peter Wang are all employees. They are all members of a class: EMPLOYEE class

EMPLOYEE

John Smith Peter Wang

Sheela Patel

Each individual employee is a member of the class EMPLOYEE

Page 38: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Classification Abstraction (contd.)

January, February etc. are members of the class “MONTH”

Represents “member-of” relationship

In object-oriented modeling :MONTH : an Object type or classJanuary … December : objects that belong to class MONTH

MONTH

January DecemberFebruary

Exhaustive enumeration of members:

Page 39: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Classification - Class Properties

Collection of similar entities or concepts into a higher level concept

EMPLOYEE class collects all employees into one class

A class has properties called “class properties”

EMPLOYEE class has class properties - e.g., average salary, total number of employees

Each member has values for own properties (e.g. name, address, salary): called member properties

Page 40: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Aggregation Abstraction

Defines a new class from a set of classes which are identified as components of the root class

CAR

Chasis OtherSystems

Drive-train

represents IS-PART-OF (component) relationshipRoot class: CARComponent Classes: Chassis, Drive-Train, Other Systems, WheelsRoot class: WheelsComponent Classes: Tires, Tubes, Hub-Caps

Wheels

Tires Hub-CapsTubes

Page 41: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Classification and Aggregation

Classification and Aggregation are used to build schemas

Example: class PersonRepresentation: Person

NameGender

Position

Ram John Carlos Male Female Manager Employee

1. Name, Gender, and Position are aggregated into Person. They are classes themselves.

2. Ram, John, Carlos are classified into Name. Name is a classification of Ram, John, Carlos.

Page 42: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Two Contexts for Aggregation

Aggregate two or more classes into a higher level concept. It may be considered a relationship or association between them.

Context1: CAR is an aggregate (composition) of Chassis, Drive-train, Other Systems, Wheels.

Context 2: OWNERSHIP is an aggregate (relationship) of CAR and OWNER

OWNERSHIP

CAR OWNER

Page 43: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Identification

Identifies one concept (an instance of it) from another concept.

BUILDING

ROOM

Name

Number

Identifies

Page 44: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Generalization Abstraction

Defines a set-subset relationship between a class and a set of member classes.

Establishes a mapping (or a relationship) from the generic class to the member class (or subclass, or subset class).

EMPLOYEE

Staff ManagerEngineer

GENERIC CLASS: EMPLOYEE

MEMBER CLASS: Engineer, Staff, Manager

Implies that all properties associated with the Employee class are inherited by the three leaf classes.

Page 45: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Data Abstraction (contd.)

Process of hiding (suppressing) unnecessary details so that the high level concept can be made more visible.

This enables programmers, designers, etc., To communicate easily and to understand the application’s data and functional requirements easily.

TYPES OF ABSTRACTION

Classification: IS-A-MEMBER-OF Aggregation: IS-MADE-OF, IS-ASSOCIATED-WITHComposition: IS-MADE-OF (similar to aggregation) (A COMPRISES of B,C,D)Identification: IS-IDENTIFIED-BY Generalization: IS-A IS-LIKE IS-KIND-OF

Page 46: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Coverage Constraints for Generalization Abstraction

TYPE 1 : TOTAL vs. PARTIAL coverage

Total: The coverage is total if each member of the generic class is mapped to at least one member among the member classes

Partial: The coverage is partial if there are some member(s) of the generic class that cannot be mapped to any member among the member classes

STUDENT

Graduate SpecialUndergraduate

(t) total EMPLOYEE

HourlySalaried

(t) total

Page 47: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Coverage Constraints for Generalization Abstraction (contd.)

Partial Coverage Constraint examples:

STUDENT

FellowshipStudent

ScholarshipStudent

(p) partial

EMPLOYEE

ScientistEngineer

(p) partial

Page 48: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Coverage Constraints for Generalization Abstraction (contd.)

TYPE 2: DISJOINT VS. OVERLAPPING (Disjointedness Constraint)

DISJOINT constraint: A member of the generic class is mapped to one element of at most one subset class.

OVERLAPPING constraint: There exists some member of the generic class that can be mapped to two or more of the subset classes.

STUDENT

ForeignAmerican

(t, d) total, disjoint

STUDENT

Research AssistantGraduate

(p, o) partial, overlapping

Aid Recipient Foreign

Page 49: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Coverage Constraints for Generalization Abstraction (contd.)

More examples of different combinations:

VEHICLE

VanCar

(t, o) total, overlapping

Two-wheeler Three-wheeler

EMPLOYEE

Technical Stuff

(p, d) partial, disjoint

Non-technical Stuff Manager

Truck

Page 50: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Cardinality Constraints

Cardinality Constraint: Quantification of the relationship between two concepts or classes (a constraint on aggregation)

MINIMUM (A,B) = n

At a minimum, one instance of A is related to at least n instances of B.

n = 0 MIN(A,B) = 0 MIN(Person, Car) = 0

n = 1 MIN(A,B) = 1 MIN(Cust, Ship-address) = 1

n = inf. MIN(A,B) = inf. NOT POSSIBLE

n = x (fixed) MIN(A,B) = x MIN(Car, Wheels) = 4

Page 51: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Cardinality Constraints (contd.)

MAXIMUM (A,B) = n

At a maximum, one instance of A is related to at least n instances of B.

n = 0 MAX(A,B) = 0 DOES NOT ARISE

n = 1 MAX(A,B) = 1 MAX(Cust, Ship-address) = 1

n = inf. MAX(A,B) = inf. MAX(Cust, Orders) = inf.

n = x (fixed) MAX(A,B) = x MAX(Stud, Course) = 6

Page 52: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Participation Constraints

MIN (A,B) = 0 Optional Participation

MIN (A,B) = 1 Mandatory Participation

MAX (A,B) = 0 No Participation

MIN (A,B) = x, MAX (A,B) = y Range Constrained

Participation

Page 53: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Summary of Modeling Concepts

ABSTRACTIONS

CLASSIFICATION

AGGREGATION (COMPOSITION AND ASSOCIATION)

IDENTIFICATION

GENERALIZATION AND SPECIALIZATION

CONSTRAINTS

CARDINALITY (Min. and Max)

PARTICIPATION

COVERAGE (Total vs. Partial, Exclusive vs. Overlapping)

Page 54: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Page 55: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Page 56: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Page 57: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe

Page 58: © Shamkant B. Navathe CC. © Shamkant B. Navathe CC Lesson 6 Enhanced Entity- Relationship and UML Modeling Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant.

Elmasri and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database Systems, Fourth Edition

Copyright © 2004 Ramez Elmasri and Shamkant Navathe