& Qualitative Metrics Graphical Representation based on …€¦ · 4/2/2019 Graphical...

4/2/2019 Graphical Representation based on QnM & QlM

https://assessmentonline.naac.gov.in/public/index.php/hei/hei_graph_report/eyJpdiI6IklMZUtWWW9JU2hrdit3TE9jd1FmVUE9PSIsInZhbHVlIjoiM3NTRldGMVloUHMyMWF5elNIOGRQZz09IiwibWFjIjoiYzYzZjZiYjlmOTQzMG… 1/16

NAACInstitutional Assessment and Accreditation

(Effective from July 2017)

Accreditation - (Cycle: 3)

BHARATHIDASAN UNIVERSITY, TIRUCHIRAPALLI, TamilNadu

Track ID : TNUNGN10088AISHE-ID : U-0448

Graphical Representation based on Quantitative& Qualitative Metrics



NATIONAL ASSESSMENT AND ACCREDITATION COUNCILAn Autonomous Institution of the University Grants Commission

P.O. Box No. 1075, Nagarbhavi, Bengaluru - 560 072, INDIA

Graphical Representation based on Quantitative &Qualitative Metrics



QnM & QlM Weightage scored bythe institution in percentage

Curricular Aspects

Teaching‑learning

and Evaluation

Research,

Innovations and

Extension

Infrastructure and

Learning Resources

Student Support and

Progression

Governance,

Leadership and

Management

Institutional Values

and Best Practices

0

50

100

Metrics(Q M & Q M) Weightage scored by the institution in percentagen l

Fig: The criterion wise distribution of weighted scores (Q M & Q M) for the institutionn l



Key Indicators

GPA

High Performance Key IndicatorsAverage Performance Key IndicatorsLow Performance Key Indicators

Curriculum Design …

Academic Flexibility

Curriculum Enrichm…

Feedback System

Catering to Student…

Teaching Learning …

Teacher Profile and …

Student Performanc…

Student Satisfaction…

Promotion of Resea…

Resource Mobilizati…

Research Publicatio…

Consultancy

Collaboration

IT Infrastructure

Maintenance of Ca…

Student Progression

Strategy Developm…

Financial Managem…

Institutional Values …

Evaluation Process …

Innovation Ecosyste…

Extension Activities

Physical Facilities

Library as a Learnin…

Student Support

Student Participatio…

Alumni Engagement

Institutional Vision …

Faculty Empowerm…

Internal Quality Ass…

Best Practices

Institutional Distinc…

Student Enrollment …

0

1

2

3

4

5

Comparison of Q M & Q M in Key Indicators based on performance(GPA)n l

Fig: The comparison of Key Indicators (Q M & Q M) based on grade point average(GPA) extracted from the institutionn l



GPA

3.63.63.6 3.43.43.4444 444

000

3.753.753.75 3.753.753.75 4443.333.333.33 3.423.423.42 3.633.633.63 444

3.133.133.13444 444 3.673.673.67 444

3.253.253.25 3.23.23.23.83.83.8 3.663.663.66

LPKI (0‑2.0) HPKI (3.01‑4.0)

Curriculum Design…

Academic Flexibility

Curriculum Enrich…

Feedback System

Student Enrollme…

Catering to Stude…

Teaching Learnin…

Teacher Profile an…

Student Performa…

Student Satisfacti…

Promotion of Rese…

Resource Mobiliza…

Research Publicati…

Consultancy

Collaboration

IT Infrastructure

Maintenance of Ca…

Student Progression

Strategy Develop…

Financial Manage…

Institutional Value…

0

1

2

3

4

5

Comparison of LPKI and HPKI based on Q M & Q Mn l

Fig: Comparison of LPKI(0‑2.0) and HPKI(3.01‑4.0) based on Q M & Q Mn l



Distribution of High Performance Key Indicators (3.01‑4.0)

Fig: High Performance Key Indicators(3.01‑4.0) for the institution

Curriculum Enrichment:Curriculum Enrichment:5.4%5.4%Curriculum Enrichment:5.4%

Feedback System:Feedback System:5.4%5.4%Feedback System:5.4%

Catering to Student Diversity:Catering to Student Diversity:5.1%5.1%Catering to Student Diversity:5.1%

Teaching‑ Learning Process:Teaching‑ Learning Process:5.1%5.1%Teaching‑ Learning Process:5.1%

Teacher Profile and Quality:Teacher Profile and Quality:5.4%5.4%Teacher Profile and Quality:5.4%

Promotion of Research and Facilities:Promotion of Research and Facilities:4.9%4.9%Promotion of Research and Facilities:4.9%

Resource Mobilization for Research:Resource Mobilization for Research:5.4%5.4%Resource Mobilization for Research:5.4%

Consultancy:Consultancy:5.4%5.4%Consultancy:5.4%

Collaboration:Collaboration:5.4%5.4%Collaboration:5.4%

IT Infrastructure:IT Infrastructure:5.0%5.0%IT Infrastructure:5.0%

Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure:Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure:5.4%5.4%Maintenance of Campus Infrastructure:5.4%

Financial Management and Resource Mobilization:Financial Management and Resource Mobilization:5.2%5.2%Financial Management and Resource Mobilization:5.2%



Distribution of Average Performance Key Indicators (2.01‑3.0)

Fig: Average Performance Key Indicators(2.01‑3.0) for the institution

Evaluation Process and Reforms:Evaluation Process and Reforms:8.2%8.2%Evaluation Process and Reforms:8.2%

Innovation Ecosystem:Innovation Ecosystem:7.7%7.7%Innovation Ecosystem:7.7%

Extension Activities:Extension Activities:8.2%8.2%Extension Activities:8.2%

Physical Facilities:Physical Facilities:8.2%8.2%Physical Facilities:8.2%

Library as a Learning Resource:Library as a Learning Resource:6.7%6.7%Library as a Learning Resource:6.7%

Student Support:Student Support:8.2%8.2%Student Support:8.2%Student Participation and Activities:Student Participation and Activities:

7.5%7.5%Student Participation and Activities:7.5%

Alumni Engagement:Alumni Engagement:7.3%7.3%Alumni Engagement:7.3%

Institutional Vision and Leadership:Institutional Vision and Leadership:8.2%8.2%Institutional Vision and Leadership:8.2%

Internal Quality Assurance System:Internal Quality Assurance System:7.7%7.7%Internal Quality Assurance System:7.7%

Best Practices:Best Practices:8.2%8.2%Best Practices:8.2%

Institutional Distinctiveness:Institutional Distinctiveness:8.2%8.2%Institutional Distinctiveness:8.2%



Distribution of Low Performance Key Indicators (0‑2.0)

Fig: Low Performance Key Indicators(0‑2.0) for the institution



GPA

Comparison of Criteria based on Criteria Grade Point Average

Fig: Comparison of Criteria based on Criteria Grade Point Average

3.673.673.67 3.263.263.26 3.223.223.22 3.293.293.29 2.912.912.912.482.482.48

3.333.333.33

Criteria GPA

Curricular Aspects

Teachinglearning…

Research, Innovat…

Infrastructure and…

Student Support a…

Governance, Lead…

Institutional Value…

0

1

2

3

4

5



Metrics

Benchm

ark

Valu

e

Performance of metrics in Curricular Aspects, Teaching‑learning and Evaluation

Fig: Performance of metrics in Criteria I & II

333

444 444

333

444 444 444 444 444 444 444

333

444 444

333

444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444

000

222

444

333 333

4443.423.423.42

Score

1.1.11.1.21.1.31.2.11.2.21.3.11.3.21.3.31.3.41.4.11.4.22.1.12.1.22.1.32.2.12.2.22.2.32.3.12.3.22.3.32.4.12.4.22.4.32.4.42.4.52.5.12.5.22.5.32.5.42.5.52.6.12.6.22.6.32.7.1

0

1

2

3

4

5



Metrics

Benchm

ark

Valu

e

Performance of metrics in Research, Innovations and Extension, Infrastructure and Learning Resources

Fig: Performance of metrics in Criteria III & IV

444

222

444 444 444 444 444

333

444 444

111

444 444

222

333

444

222

444 444 444 444

333

111

444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444

111

333 333

444

111

444 444

111

333

444 444 444 444 444

Score

3.1.1

3.1.3

3.1.5

3.2.1

3.2.3

3.3.2

3.3.4

3.4.2

3.4.4

3.4.6

3.4.8

3.5.2

3.6.1

3.6.3

3.7.1

3.7.3

4.1.2

4.1.4

4.2.2

4.2.4

4.2.6

4.3.1

4.3.3

4.4.1

0

1

2

3

4

5



Metrics

Benchm

ark

Valu

e

Performance of metrics in Student Support and Progression, Governance, Leadership and Management,Institutional Values and Best Practices

Fig: Performance of metrics in Criteria V,VI & VII

444 444 444

111 111

444

333 333

444

222

333

444

222

444

333 333 333 333

444

222

333

000

333

222

333 333

444

333 333

111

333 333

444

333

111

000

444 444

333

444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444 444

333 333 333 333

Score

5.1.15.1.35.1.55.2.15.2.35.3.25.4.15.4.36.1.26.2.26.2.46.3.26.3.46.4.16.4.36.5.26.5.47.1.17.1.37.1.57.1.77.1.9

7.1.11

7.1.13

7.1.15

7.1.17

7.1.19

7.3.1

0

1

2

3

4

5



Metrics

Score

Score

2.1.1

2.1.3

2.5.3

3.2.1

1.1.2

1.2.2

1.3.2

1.3.4

1.4.2

2.2.3

2.3.3

2.4.2

2.4.4

2.5.2

2.6.3

3.1.4

3.1.6

3.2.3

3.3.3

3.4.2

3.4.7

3.5.1

3.6.3

3.7.1

3.7.3

0

1

2

3

4

5

Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on Q M & Q M (Criteria I,IIand III)

n l

Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on Q M & Q M (Criteria I,II and III)n l



Metrics

Score

Score

5.4.26.3.26.4.27.1.44.1.14.1.24.1.34.2.34.2.54.2.64.3.24.3.34.3.44.4.14.4.25.1.15.1.25.1.35.1.65.2.35.3.35.4.36.2.36.4.37.1.1

7.1.10

7.1.11

7.1.12

7.1.13

7.1.14

7.1.15

7.1.16

7.1.177.1.57.1.67.1.87.1.9

0

1

2

3

4

5

Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on Q M & Q M (CriteriaIV,V,VI and VII)

n l

Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on Q M & Q M (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)n l



Score

2.1.1 2.1.22.1.32.4.5

2.5.33.1.2

3.2.1

3.5.3

1.1.2

1.1.3

1.2.2

1.3.1

1.3.2

1.3.3

1.3.4

1.4.1

1.4.2

2.2.2

2.2.3

2.3.2

2.3.32.4.1

2.4.22.4.32.4.42.5.12.5.2

2.5.52.6.3

3.1.1

3.1.4

3.1.5

3.1.6

3.2.2

3.2.3

3.3.2

3.3.3

3.4.1

3.4.2

3.4.5

3.4.7

3.4.8

3.5.1

3.5.2

3.6.33.6.4

3.7.13.7.23.7.3

0

2

4

Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on Q M & Q M (Criteria I,II and III)n l

Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths(4) and Weakness(0) of the institution based on Q M & Q M (Criteria I,II and III)n l



Score

5.4.2 6.3.26.4.2

7.1.4

4.1.1

4.1.2

4.1.3

4.2.3

4.2.5

4.2.6

4.3.2

4.3.3

4.3.4

4.4.1

4.4.2

5.1.1

5.1.25.1.35.1.65.2.35.3.3

5.4.3

6.2.3

6.4.3

7.1.1

7.1.10

7.1.11

7.1.12

7.1.13

7.1.14

7.1.15

7.1.16

7.1.17

7.1.5

7.1.67.1.8

7.1.9

0

2

4

Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on Q M & Q M (Criteria IV,V,VI andVII)

n l

Fig: Graphical representation of Strengths and Weakness of the institution based on Q M & Q M (Criteria IV,V,VI and VII)n l

& Qualitative Metrics Graphical Representation based on …€¦ · 4/2/2019 Graphical...

Documents

Transcript of & Qualitative Metrics Graphical Representation based on …€¦ · 4/2/2019 Graphical...