© Philippe Leliaert September 2004 Slide 1 Management of Change & Influencing Skills in China feat....
-
Upload
roland-flynn -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of © Philippe Leliaert September 2004 Slide 1 Management of Change & Influencing Skills in China feat....
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 1
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Management of Change & Influencing Skills
in China
feat. LingHe Simulation®
LingHe Simulation® is a registered trademark of AlphaLabs, France
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 2
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Change Management & Influencing Skills in China09:00 – 10:00 Introduction
change dynamics & resistance to change Introduction to the LingHe Simulation®
10:00 – 12:30 the LingHe Simulation® - Change Management business game
lunch 13:30 – 14:00 Lessons learned 14:00 – 15:00 innovators & resisters: how to spot them, …
and how to influence them 15:00 – 15:45 importance of Formal vs Informal structures15:45 – 16:30use and misuse of authority and coercion16:30 – 17:00Feedback, Key lessons & Closing Remarks
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 3
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Management of Change & Influencing Skills in China
An event organised byMaastricht School of ManagementINSEADNanjing University School of Business
… and co-financed bythe European ASIA IT&C Programme
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 4
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
The European ASIA IT&C Programme
an initiative from the European Commission designed to promote mutual benefit & understanding
between the European Union and Asia aims at improving eight key sectors through the
innovative use of information technology and communication
for non-profit making partnerships
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 5
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Change Initiatives
Benchmarking
Business Process Re-engineering
Customer Retention
Customer Satisfaction
Surveys
Cycle TimeReduction
Core Competencies
Self-Directed Teams
Shareholder Value Analysis & EVA
TQM
1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 20021988
Source: Management Tools & Techniques (Bain & Co, 1995)
EmpowermentNetwork
OrganisationseCommerceeBusiness
Knowledge Management
ERP XRP
Balanced Scorecard
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 6
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Typical outcomes:• 50 to 70% of Re-engineering Initiatives FAIL• <20% of IT projects
completed on time and within budget; • ~30% of IT projects cancelled before completion
(Standish Group report, 1995)
• sophisticated Management Systemsare seldom used or mis-used …
• … and generate a lot of FRUSTRATION
Change Initiatives: facts & figures
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 7
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Key Factors:• Organisational resistance
82%• Insufficient executive sponsoring/support
72%• Unrealistic expectations
65%• Inadequate programme management
54%• Unclear business case
46%• Lack of qualified resources
44%• Scope of expansion/uncertainty
44%• Ineffective leadership
43%
Change Initiatives: facts & figures
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 8
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Dynamics of Change
Change is a Process in 4 Steps: Awareness: people become aware of the need
Interest: people show an interest – they are curious to know more about it
Trial: people want to try – to test & evaluate
Adoption: people become regular users
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 9
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Dynamics of Change
Attitude towards Change / Resistance to Change
Attitude towards change
Early Adopters
Resisters“Outlaws”
Late Majority“10-proof people”
Early Majority“1-proof people”
5% 45% 45% 5%
Innovators“Pioneers”
positivenegative
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 10
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Dynamics of Change
Speed of Adoption / Ease to Convince
“easy”“very hard”
“hard” “normal”
5% 45% 45% 5%
Attitude towards change
positivenegative
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 11
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
LingHe Simulation®
a Business Game… ? Management “flight simulators”
Flexible Risk-free Fun
Used at major business schools and in corporateexecutive & management development programmes
LingHe Simulation® is a registered trademark of AlphaLabs, France
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 12
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
LingHe Simulation® - Briefing
ContextYour MissionTactics / InitiativesThe User InterfaceSupporting Materials
Turn to your PC
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 13
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Context click on “YOUR MISSION” Why this particular context ?
privatisation of State-owned Company local management have no real motivation to change HQ have no real power base to impose change traditional top-down ‘rule by edict’ no longer works
LingHe Simulation® - Briefing
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 14
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
The impact for LingHe Company click on “The Change Plan” What is a Performance Management System ? (PMS)
LingHe Simulation® - Briefing
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 15
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
What is the aim of the business game ? click on “YOUR CHALLENGE”
So what do we do ? click on “HOW TO GO ABOUT IT”
LingHe Simulation® - Briefing
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 16
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Define your Strategy from: clear objectives
to: “how to get there” Determine which tactics will you use,
with whom, and when
LingHe Simulation® - Briefing
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 17
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
choose among 20 different initiatives (tactics) initiatives are aimed at
gathering information taking direct action to convince one or several managers, and thus influence their willingness to adopt the proposed innovation.
immediate feedback on impact of your decision
LingHe Simulation® - Briefing
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 18
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
LingHe Simulation® - Briefing
Study the Tactics / Initiatives Do not take at face value (eg. “breaks”, “sandwich”)
Discuss & Agree on Strategy Determine which tactics will you use, with whom, and when You may at any time review your strategy
(take note of when & why)
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 19
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Good luck !
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 20
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
LingHe Simulation® - Debriefing
Lessons learned: DO’s & DON’Ts Informal Influence / Use of Power Types
How to spot them How to deal with themOvercoming Resistors
Choice of Tactics
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 21
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
DO’s DON’Ts
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
..
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 22
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Expectations of Adoption Process
Time
Results
AB
C
or something else … ?
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 23
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Expectations of Adoption Process
• Bandwagon effect (e.g. Jay-walkers, line cutters, stock markets)The presence of a critical mass of adopters is reason
enough for others to adopt without (much) management intervention
Hence:
• Tipping Point = point at which future adoption is
self-generating (Wow!)• “S-shaped” adoption curve
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 24
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
innovators early adopters
early majority
late majority
resisters
Adoption is self-generating past the Tipping Point
Tipping Point
© Brian Uzzi, Kellogg Graduate School of Management
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 25
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
How to Spot themAccumulate Knowledge (knows prices to the penny; warranty difference)Like to share knowledge all the timeHigh Awareness and Interest“experts”
What they doexperiment with risky but promising innovationsunselfish credibility is infectious to others
Influence TacticsMagazine, Email, Memo, Bulletin BoardFace-to-Face meeting ( time consuming !!)
Task Force ( risky !!)
Innovators …
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
innovators early adopters
early majority
late majority
resisters
“Experts”
© Brian Uzzi, Kellogg Graduate School of Management
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 26
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
innovators early adopters
early majority
late majority
resisters
How to Spot themKnow a lot of people in diverse parts of firmAre ‘Brokers’ close to key organizational playersdo many shared activitiesInterest increases with trial by ‘Experts’
What they DoStay well connected and well informedSpread ideas (contagious element that infects early majority)
Influence TacticsDinner Meetings; (Face-to-Face)Workshop, Staff Meeting, External Speaker, (Task Force)
Early Adopters …
Brokers
© Brian Uzzi, Kellogg Graduate School of Management
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 27
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
innovators early adopters
early majority
late majority
resisters
How to Spot themLook for percentage increasesLike predictable returnsRisk is not excitingThink ‘Experts’ waste their timePay attention to Brokers & Status
What they DoGet the bandwagon going with a critical mass of adopters
Influence TacticsTop Management meeting, Pilot testing, Staff Meeting (when enough adopters)
Directives, ‘Sandwich’, Neutralise Resisters ( risky !)
Early Majority …Bandwagon
begins
© Brian Uzzi, Kellogg Graduate School of Management
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 28
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
innovators early adopters
early majority
late majority
resisters
How to Spot them“if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it” mentality See change as a net gain of zeroThink ‘Experts’ waste their timeAre influenced by bandwagons, … but won’t admit it
What they Dothey want to fit in, so do what’s normativeJump on the bandwagon after a critical mass has adopted
Influence Tactics Make adoption rate salient: Broadcast, get message out, raise profile: Bulletin Board, Internal Magazine, Staff Meeting (when enough adopters)
Directives, ‘Sandwich’ ( very risky !)
Late Majority …Ride
Bandwagon
© Brian Uzzi, Kellogg Graduate School of Management
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 29
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
How to Spot themNever support an initiative but their ownAlways play “Devil’s Advocate.”
What they DoBlock change effort at every stage
Influence Tactics Trade-off and Conflict scale (see further)
Resisters …
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
innovators early adopters
early majority
late majority
resisters
Last efforts (?)
© Brian Uzzi, Kellogg Graduate School of Management
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 30
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
innovators early adopters
early majority
late majority
resisters
Establishing ‘Personal Profiles’
Fan WeiXia LanMao Ke
Xu XiaofenZhu Jie
Guo MingTang QuanZhang Hang
Ren AiPeng Yanyan
Ding PaiKang Guangtao
Ni Xiang
An ChengHua GangYang XuanQiu MengCai Zhen
Ou RanJia Ning
Shen NingjuanWan Dalin
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 31
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Causes of Resistance to Change
Resistance to Change may come from those who … Feel threatened by the change
(power, prestige, opportunity, career, …) Do not understand the implications of changes Lack trust in the ‘change agents’
F-U-D Other: plain laziness or obstinacy
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 32
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Causes of Resistance to Change
Resistance to Change may come from those who … Have a good reason to resist
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 33
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Use of Authority… • How did you react to:
The LingHe Simulation®
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 34
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
The LingHe Simulation®
Use of ‘Risky’ Tactics - neutralise resisters
- directive- ‘sandwich’
Pro
Con
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 35
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Tactics: Demonstrate: Show how your idea may help (Workshop, Pilot) Sell: Sell your ideas, use rewards (Face to Face, Staff Meeting) Train: Help people to adapt (Management Training) Negotiate: make trade-offs (Face to Face, Top Mgt Meeting, Staff Meeting) Co-opt: Use buy-in to align moderate opponents interests with yours
(Staff Meeting, Workshop, Dinner Meeting, Face to Face, Task Force) Network: Use third parties to sell, induce tipping points, and neutralize opposition
(Social Networks, Process Mapping, Short Breaks; Dinner Event) Build Coalition: Build political support (Top Mgt Meeting, Pilot, Dinner Event) Authority: Force compliance through punishments (Directive)
Demonstrate
Sell Negotiate Co-opt
Build CoalitionsTrain
Authority
CONFLICT POTENTIALCONFLICT POTENTIAL
Networks
based on © Brian Uzzi, Kellogg Graduate School of Management
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 36
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Change Management: using the ‘S’-curve
• Route of least resistance• Concentrate & Strategise
from the “waist down”– Focus resources on starting the process up to the
point where it is self-generating (i.e. Tipping Point)– Identify the Innovators & Early Adopters
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 37
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Change Management: using the ‘S’-curve
Neutralise
INNOVATORSEARLY ADOPTERS
INNOVATORSEARLY ADOPTERS
RESISTORSRESISTORS
high
Resistance to
Change
low early lateTiming of decision
Leverage Innovators to mobilise likely
supporters
EARLY MAJORITYEARLY MAJORITY
LATE MAJORITYLATE MAJORITY
based on © Brian Uzzi, Kellogg Graduate School of Management
Enlist champion
s
•Bandwagon Effect•Tipping Point
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 38
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Who are Key Influencers ? Are they Innovators or Resisters ?
Both have a lot of support – even if not explicit Resisters often voice the concerns of the
Late Majority (ref. Maggie Thatcher)
Where are they on the track to adoption ? How to deal with laggards ?
Change Management:Formal vs Informal Structure
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 39
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Change Management:using the ‘Influencers’
Use of Power / Informal Influence
lowhigh
Resistance to
Change
low
Power-RESISTORS
Power-RESISTORS
LATE MAJORITYLATE MAJORITY
Power-INNOVATORS
Power-INNOVATORS
EARLY MAJORITYEARLY MAJORITY
Enlist champion
s
Leverage Innovators & Brokers to mobilise likely
supporters
Bandwagon Effect
Engage
BROKERSBROKERS
Implicate
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 40
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
The LingHe Simulation®
Main Pitfalls Underestimation of Informal Structure
key personnel, champions, gatekeepers, … Informal networks & power
Ignoring ‘resisters’ …(esp. Wan Dalin, Xia Ning)
… has an effect on others… makes it difficult to impossible to win them over
Over-estimation of Authority
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 41
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Change is a Process : People progress at Different Speeds It is not a one-way Evolution:
People may lose interest Create & Maintain Momentum (waves)
Evoking Change vs Enforcing Change
Key Lessons
(the Human Factor)
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 42
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Change is a Process : Match Tactics to
Profiles (e.g. Innovator vs Late Majority), Strategies (e.g. networking), and Timing (when in 4 phases of adoption)
Make use of the Bandwagon Effect
Key Lessons
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 43
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Appropriate Timing for Tactics:
The point at which tactics are likely to be more effective …
The LingHe Simulation®
BREAKS
PERSONAL PROFILE
PROCESS MAPPING
SOCIAL NETWORKS
FACE-TO-FACE MEETING
ELECTRONIC MAIL
MEMORANDUM
SEEK ADVICE
BULLETIN BOARD
INTERNAL MAGAZINE
MANAGEMENT TRAINING
TOP MANAGEMENT MEETING
EXTERNAL CONSULTANT
STAFF MEETING DISCUSSION
WORKSHOP
EXPERT TEAM
PILOT TEST
'SANDWICH'
NEUTRALISE RESISTERS
DIRECTIVE
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 44
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
LingHe Simulation®
East vs West: lessons for Chinese managers
overestimation of Emotional Intelligence Too much time spent on developing relations
ignoring lower management levels… may underestimate their (informal) influence
… may overestimate one’s authority
risk avoidance when faced with uncertainty… yet risk is inherent / unavoidable !
LingHe Simulation® is a registered trademark of AlphaLabs, France
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 45
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
LingHe Simulation®
East vs West : lessons for Western managers double "tipping point"
Lower management will not commit before top management
Top management will not commit unless certain of outcome
need to communicate at all levels… time consuming… use range of communication channels
reduce uncertainty & highlight benefits
LingHe Simulation® is a registered trademark of AlphaLabs, France
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 46
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
"It is not the strongest species that survive, nor the most intelligent, but the ones most responsive to
change"
(Charles Darwin)
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 47
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Thank you for your participation
Please fill in the Feedback Questionnaire
© Philippe Leliaert September 2004
Slide 48
co-financed byorganised by co-financed byorganised by
Contact information:
prof. Albert A Angehrn the Alcatel Chaired Professor of the Net Economy and E-
Management, Professor of Information Technology and Entrepreneurship
Director, Centre for Advanced Learning Technologies (INSEAD) [email protected]
ir. Philippe Leliaert MBA MScvisiting lecturer MsM & NJU
project [email protected]