î ì î ì o ] W } Á Z Z / v ] µ U / v X o o ] P Z À X · 2020. 9. 7. · zzz hsul frp î ì î...
Transcript of î ì î ì o ] W } Á Z Z / v ] µ U / v X o o ] P Z À X · 2020. 9. 7. · zzz hsul frp î ì î...
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Demand Response OverviewEnergy Analytics & Market InsightsCustomer Technologies
Chris Holmes Technical Executive
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m2 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Schedule of Content
Demand Response Overview– Regulatory Compact– Cost versus Value (Welfare Analysis)– Cost of Service & Cost Studies– Resource Planning
Evaluation– EE&DR– Economic Tests– Program Design– Impact Evaluation
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m3 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
The Regulatory Compact
Regulators desire the most efficient use of resources and the unnecessary duplication of electric assetsUtilities desire a stable and reasonable level of profit for their uncertain activitiesThe Regulatory compact:1. Allows a guaranteed rate of return to utilities on capital assets that
are used and useful. 2. In exchange utilities offer to provide a guaranteed level of service in
exchange for a guaranteed rate of return on those capital assets3. …and to transmit, generate and distribute electricity in the most safe
and efficient manner possible.
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m4 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
The Regulatory Compact
Utilities make money only on the return on capital investments. O&M are strictly pass-thru’s Utilities may also make money on activities deemed important by Regulators Performance Mechanisms for safety and reliability EE&DR incentive mechanisms above and beyond lost revenues and implementation costs
EE&DR provide utilities in the U.S. and opportunity to earn additional revenues above and beyond their regulated rate or return as long as….
…they are allowed to recover implementation costs, lost revenues and may earn an additional returns through shared savings or other mechanisms. (Decoupling)
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m5 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
The Regulatory Compact – Some Implications
Generating assets are managed in total to minimize total costs– All kWh at the system peak cost the same– All kW at the system peak cost the sameClasses of customer are grouped to manage their load shape riskRates are based on averagesDemand and energy are separableRates are non-discriminatory - two customers with similar loads will pay the same amount
The Regulatory Compact for the use of long run marginal cost (LRMC) for program designCompetitive markets use short run marginal costs (SRMC) which may hamper program economics
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m6 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Cost of Service Perspectives – a Matter of Risk Assumption
Commodity Markets1. Hedging2. Speculation3. Arbitrage4. Market Maker
Regulated Markets
1. Portfolio under Regulatory Compact
2. Authorized Rate of Return
3. Class Allocations
4. Fuel Clause
5. Regulatory Assets• Lost Revenues and Program
Expenses
• Incentive Mechanisms
• Decoupling – fixed cost recovery
Returns should be commensurate with risk managed or assumed
• Average Cost of Service
• Marginal Cost of Service
• Market Based Pricing
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m7 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Marginal Cost of Service
Marginal costs are comprised of three components:– Energy Related Costs (the cost to provide power over time)
Generation, transmission and distribution Marginal energy costs are typically based on a small change in load for each hour of
the year - $/MWh– Capacity Related Costs (the cost to meet the needs for an additional kW at system
peak) - $/kW or $/kW-year– Customer Related costs for transmission and distribution - $/customer– Other relevant cost components (avoided costs)
Reserve margins Energy loss factors (marginal) Capacity loss factors (marginal)
(Note: risk and uncertainty are not included in these calculations)
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m8 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Resource Planning – Adding Resources
Note: Generating resources may be added for energy, capacity or both
Measures of reliability used to design DR programs (expected unserved energy or
LOLH)
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m9 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Three Basic Forms of Demand Response
For Economics– When a tariff rate (guaranteed price) differs from a market price there is an opportunity for
economic gains
For Long Term Reliability / Planning Purposes - To Maintain Reserve Margins – Use of least cost capacity as a proxy (LRMC)– Combustion turbine is generally the least cost option– Requires a regulatory compact to recover those costs– Customer buyback may be even cheaper
For Short Term Reliability and Operational Purposes– To maintain voltage and frequency requirements– Ancillary Services– Spatial and Temporal requirements– Useful for load following
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m10 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Cost Effectiveness
California Standard Practice Manual has been in use since 1987.• Its use is based on regulated utility markets whose costs can be recovered (to the
extent price elasticity allows) from customers• Its main principle is the avoidance of cross subsidies and efficient pricing (Prices
equal marginal costs and regulatory and societal initiatives)• Four (six) main perspectives using benefit cost ratios – participant (PCT), utility
(UC), ratepayers (RIM), participants and non-participants (TRC) • Other perspectives include societal and program administrators
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m11 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Program Design: Customer ValueThe value of consuming electricity is a derived demand, derived from the value of the products that consume electricity
The six “C”’s
• Cost
• Comfort
• Convenience
• Control
• Certainty
• Communication
There are others such as safety, environment, status, trust, aesthetics, innovation, etc.
The creation of value ultimately determines the success of any product – however, customer value and utility value may be in conflict
Ultimately successful companies provide customers what they want at a competitive price
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m12 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
EE&DR Economic Tests
Economic Tests
• Participant Cost Test (PCT)
• Rate Impact (RIM)
• Total Resource Cost (TRC)
• Utility Cost (UC)
• Societal Cost
Load Shape Impacts
• Rebound
• Energy Recovery
A/C cycling (energy saving)
Refrigerator defrost ( 100% energy recovery)
• Impact Evaluation
• Opt-out and the option value
• Persistence
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m13 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Cost Tests Benefits Costs
Participant D + E +J C + F + I
Ratepayer B + C + F + H A + D + E + G
Total Resource (TRC) B + J + H A + G + I
Utility B + F + H A + E + G
Societal (same as TRC) B + H + J + L A + G + I + K
Breakdown of Costs and Benefits (PV$)
Increases Decreases
Change in Supply Costs A B
Change in Electric Revenues C D
Incentives E F
Utility Costs G H
Participant Costs I J
Externalities K L
Economic Evaluation of EE&DR
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m14 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Economic Evaluation of EE&DR (continued)
Sample - Energy Efficiency ProgramPresent Value Summary $2019
Perspectives Program Benefits Program Costs Net Benefits B/C Ratio
Participant (PCT) $603,149 $203,617 $399,532 2.96
Ratepayers (RIM) $566,698 $815,732 -$249,034 0.69
Total Resource Cost (TRC) $515,506 $365,008 $150,498 1.41
Utility Cost (UC) $532,991 $303,496 $229,495 1.76
Societal $515,506 $365,008 $150,498 1.41
Increases Decreases Net Benefit Change in Supply Costs $19,880 $515,506 $495,626
Change in Electric Revenues $33,707 $512,237 $478,530
Incentives $90,912 $17,484 -$73,428
Utility Costs $192,702 $0 -$192,702
Participant Costs $152,424 $0 -$152,424
Net Benefit (TRC) Load Savings Levelized CostLevelized Cost per kWh $150,498 2,000,000 $0.0752($/kWh)
Levelized Cost per kW $150,498 350 $429.99($/kW)
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m15 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Sample - Demand Response ProgramPresent Value Summary $2019
Perspectives Program Benefits Program Costs Net Benefits B/C Ratio
Participant (PCT) $675,255 $0 $675,255 NA
Ratepayers (RIM) $2,618,270 $675,255 $1,943,015 3.88
Total Resource Cost (TRC) $2,618,270 $1,924,266 $694,004 1.36
Utility Cost (UC) $2,618,270 $2,599,521 $18,749 1.01
Societal $2,618,270 $1,924,266 $694,004 1.36
Increases Decreases Net Benefit
Change in Supply Costs $0 $2,618,270 ($2,618,270)
Change in Electric Revenues $0 $0 $0
Incentives $675,255 $0 $675,255
Utility Costs $1,924,266 $0 $1,924,266
Participant Costs $0 $0 $0
Net Benefit (TRC) Load Savings Levelized Cost
Levelized Cost per kWh $694,004 2,000,000 $0.3470($/kWh)
Levelized Cost per kW $694,004 2,000 $347.00($/kW)
Economic Evaluation of EE&DR (continued)
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m16 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Program Design: Demand Response (DR) Service Design and Comparisons to Supply-side Options
The main service design dimensions for demand response are:
Notice – How far in advance is the call for interruption made? Is it five minutes or five days? Can it be updated?
Frequency – How many times may a call for interruption be made over the course of the contract term?
Duration – How long is the interruption once the call is made? Can the interruption be cancelled midway?
Contract Term – Is the program available all year long or by season? Can it be renewed automatically?
Quantity – How is the capacity determined? Can the quantity be resold by the customer? Is the quantity recallable by the supplier? These features are often referred to as the optionality of the commodity and may have a significant pricing effect on the demand response program design. Who holds the option? Are there limits to the number of calls?
Incentives – What is the structure of the incentives? Is the incentive based on a fixed amount? Is the incentive based on performance? Is the incentive paid only when events are called? What is the value of the incentive?
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m17 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
a. Technical Potential for Voluntary DR MeasuresDirect Control LM-Central AC 32%Direct Control LM-Water Heating 42%Price-Response Programs (TOU, CPP, RTP) 10.5%
b. Market Acceptance Ratios by DR Program Area
2010 2015 2020 2025 2030Direct Control LM-Central AC 5% 10% 10% 10% 10%Direct Control LM-Water Heating 10% 15% 15% 15% 15%Price-Response Programs (TOU, CPP, RTP) 10% 20% 30% 30% 30%
Market Acceptance Ratios (MARs)
Savings Potential
Residential Economic Potential Assumptions
Residential Demand Response Assumptions and Market Acceptance Ratios (MARs)
1
2
3
Based on GEP analysis of AC direct load control impact of 0.8 kW relative to cooling base peak demand of 2.5 kW (assumes 15-minute cycling strategy)Based on GEP analysis of WH direct load control impact of 0.5 kW relative to WH base peak demand of 1.2 kWBased on Brattle study for LBNL's Demand Response Research Center titled "Illustrating the Impact of Dynamic Pricing Rates in California" Jaunuary 25, 2008.
1
2
3
NOTE: Footnotes 1 and 2 above are from the EPRI National Study. Assessment of Achievable Potential from Energy Efficiency and Demand Response Programs in the U.S.: (2010-2030). EPRI, Palo Alto, CA: 2009. 1016987.
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m18 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Segmentation of Analysis – Sector, End-Use and Measure
Up to 10 equipment efficiency options per technology
Residential Commercial Industrial
Lighting Space Cooling
SpaceHeating
WaterHeating
Refrigeration Others...
Room ACCentral AC Heat Pump Other
Districts
ExampleSystem
Sector
End-Use
Measure SEER 13SEER 14SEER 16SEER 18
Ductless HP (VRF)
EER 9.8EER 10.2EER 10.8EER 11
EER 11.5
Air SourceGeothermal
Alabama
Kentucky
Mississippi
West Tennessee
Middle Tennessee
Northeast Valley
Southeast Valley
Directly Served
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m19 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Impact Evaluation
Goal of Impact evaluation is to determine the effect of a treatment compared to what it would have otherwise been Development of a baseline is complicated by the difficulty in observing
something that is not there DR baseline development is facilitated by using the own consumption Volatile loads do not lend themselves well to establishing baselines Treatment measures that differ from baseline measures make
measurement more complicated Seasonal, secondary and behavioral effects should be contemplated
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m20 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
12:00 18:00 20:00 22:00
Baseline (Unobserved)
Curtailment
Pow
er
DR Event Load Shape Impact
Example Load Shape Impacts
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m21 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Several Types of Baselines
Last Five of Ten Corresponding Hours Called Event Hour Statistical Estimation Protected Levels Metered (Backup generators)
Several Types of Designs
Upfront bill credit (monthly or seasonally, annual) Pay for Performance Rate Based (TOU) Opt-Out (capacity option held by customer)
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m22 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Questions?
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m23 © 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Together…Shaping the Future of Electricity
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m
Angela ChuangPrincipal Technical Leader
July 21, 2020
Demand ResponseBridging Retail with Wholesale Markets
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m2
Overview
o Terminology
o Enabling DR
o DR Evolution
o Connecting Retail DR with Wholesale Needs
Flexible
DR
DR 1.00
kW
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m3
Demand Response (DR) from Distributed Resources
Source: EPRI Reports 3002010195 (2017) and 1020313 (2009) Source: EPRI Report # 3002010195 (2017)
DR is a change in load coordinated with system or market needs
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m4
Demand Response Objectives Vary
Traditional DR 1.00
kw
Load Increase
Load Decrease
Flexible DR
Load Shape Impact Objectives
▪ Peak Clipping
▪ Load Shifting
▪ Valley Filling
▪ Flexible Load Shape (i.e., Flexible DR)
i) Beyond fast DR
ii) Capable of targeting an increase in load too
Challenges
▪ DR Strategies needed per customer sector
– water pumping, refrigerated warehouses, office buildings, data centers, residences, etc.
▪ Automation technologies
▪ Customer disincentives
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m5
Stages of DR Advancement
Stage Location Value ExampleD
R
1.0
Resource Adequacy System-wide Annual peak load reduction
Forward Economics Generation or Energy Node Economic dispatch
Gri
d
Loca
tio
nal
DR Distribution Management Distribution Facility Transformer overload mitigation
T&D Deferral Network Node Substation deferral
Ancillary Service Reserve Transmission Facility Operating reserves
DR
2
.0 Balancing Resource Generation or Energy NodeImbalance energy, ramping energy, regulation
Cu
sto
me
r Lo
cati
on
al
DR Elastic Demand Customer Facility
Green, clean or local powerPremium or resilient powerFree or cheap power
Source: EPRI Report 2002010195 (2017)
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m6
Connecting Retail DR with Market Needs
Demand Response
Programs
Markets
Technol-ogies
▪ Flexible retail programs with provision for demand response
▪ Market designs supportive of cost avoidance (e.g., reduced procurement)
▪ Technology enablers implementing customer choices for flexibility surrounding electric service
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m7
Demand Response-Ready Technologies as Building Blocks for
Automation
▪ Built-in functionality for mass market loads
▪ Common criteria for demand response modes
▪ Common operational reporting functions
▪ Standards development
– Grid messages defined for CTA-2045 Demos
– OpenADR
– Australian/New Zealand DRET standards
▪ Advance product DR-Readiness with manufacturer
support, customer adoption and mutual industry
benefit
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m8
Lowering Telemetry Costs to Enable Mass Market DR
Objectives
▪ Understand existing telemetry requirements and rationale
▪ Identify lower-cost approaches more compatible with
mass market DR (e.g., residential and small commercial)
▪ Demonstrate alternatives
Findings
▪ Telemetry requirement details in comparison
– CAISO, ERCOT, ISO-NE, MISO, NYISO, PJM
▪ Methods to lower telemetry costs and rationale– Virtualization concept and hosting options
– Live demonstrations at CAISO (2/28/19)
▪ Recommendations for future work
Reference: Report #2002015273 (March 2019)
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m9
Relationship of Wholesale and Retail Market Prices
Wholesale and ISO/RTO Markets
Wholesale Prices
Capacity Energy Reserves Regulation
Capacity Energy Reserves Regulation
· Distribution Capacity and PQ Charges
· Loss Compensation
· Distribution / Delivery Service Charges
Retail Uplifts:
Retail Prices
End-Use Customers
Wholesale:
Retail:
Question for pause: Real-time pricing of what?
Retail Tariffs and DR Programs
Source: EPRI Report
© 2020 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. All rights reserved.w w w . e p r i . c o m10
Conclusion
▪ Challenges
– Alignment of retail programs with wholesale market needs
– Meeting power system and market requirements
▪ Pre-requisite enablers
– Market designs: Avoided cost capture and allocation methods
– Retail programs: Customer-driven choices for electric service flexibility
– Enabling technologies: Automate customer choices
▪ Market and Program Evolution towards Flexibility and Customer Choice
▪ Importance of Advancing DR Standards
– DR-Ready devices as building blocks to enable automation of response