* NOV 2 7 2017
Transcript of * NOV 2 7 2017
IN CLERK'S OFFICEUS DISTRICT COURT E.D.N.Y.
* NOV 2 7 2017 ^UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK BROOKLYN OFFICEX
BLIMA KRAUS, On Behalf of Herself andAll Other Similarly Situated Consumers,
against -
Plaintiff, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER17-CV-3402
PROFESSIONAL BUREAU OF
COLLECTIONS OF MARYLAND, INC.,
Defendant.X
GLASSER, Senior United States District Judge:
Plaintiff Blima Kraus ("Kraus") brings this putative class action against Professional
Bureau of Collections of Maryland, Inc. ("PBCM")» alleging violations of the Fair DebtCollection
PracticesAct ("FDCPA"), 15 U.S.C. § \692 etseq. Beforethe Court is PBCM's motion to dismiss
the complaint under Rule 12(b)(6)of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
Kraus's claim is essentially as follows: Sheallegesthat PBCM's June 6,2016 letterto her
(the"Letter"),whichtransmitted an offerto settleherdebtfor 40%of her accountbalance, violated
15 U.S.C. § 1692e because it listed her account balance but did not indicate that the account
balance might increase due to interest or othercharges. Section 1692e prohibits the use of "any
false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any
debt," including "[t]he false representation of. . . the character, amount, or legal status of any
debt." 15 U.S.C. §§ 1692e, 1692e(2)(A). In Avila v. Riexinger & Associates, LLC^ the Second
Circuit held that a debt collector violates § 1692e if it notifies a consumer of his or her account
balance but fails to disclose that the consumer's balance may increase due to interest and fees. See
817 F.3d 72, 76-77 (2d Cir. 2016). But Avilaalso providesa safe harbor for a debt collectorwho
"fail[s] to disclose that the consumer's balance may increase due to interest and fees" but
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 1 of 20 PageID #: 91
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 2 of 20 PageID #: 92
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 3 of 20 PageID #: 93
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 4 of 20 PageID #: 94
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 5 of 20 PageID #: 95
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 6 of 20 PageID #: 96
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 7 of 20 PageID #: 97
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 8 of 20 PageID #: 98
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 9 of 20 PageID #: 99
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 10 of 20 PageID #: 100
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 11 of 20 PageID #: 101
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 12 of 20 PageID #: 102
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 13 of 20 PageID #: 103
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 14 of 20 PageID #: 104
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 15 of 20 PageID #: 105
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 16 of 20 PageID #: 106
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 17 of 20 PageID #: 107
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 18 of 20 PageID #: 108
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 19 of 20 PageID #: 109
Case 1:17-cv-03402-ILG-RML Document 16 Filed 11/27/17 Page 20 of 20 PageID #: 110