› METPEX Brussels, 10 th September 2015 01.11.2012, Hamm Christopher Irwin,// EUROPEAN...
-
Upload
sara-collins -
Category
Documents
-
view
234 -
download
4
Transcript of › METPEX Brussels, 10 th September 2015 01.11.2012, Hamm Christopher Irwin,// EUROPEAN...
›METPEXBrussels, 10th September 2015
01.11.2012, Hamm
Christopher Irwin,// EUROPEAN PASSENGERS‘ FEDERATION // www.epf.eu
The PASSENGERS’ PERSPECTIVE IN PUBLIC TRANSPORT–
What are the real needs?
›EPF MAP January 2015
• 34 member organisations
• 20 countries
›A UK perspective
• Established by Parliament to represent rail, bus & coach and tram passengers and users of the England’s strategic road network
• Mission: get the best deal for users
• Evidence-led: annual research spend of c. €3m
• More than 110,000 passengers surveyed annually
›
METPEX’s recognition of the possessive plural:The passengers’ perspectives, not the passenger’s
perspectives
METPEX’s recognition of the possessive plural:The passengers’ perspectives, not the passenger’s
perspectives
Many markets, not one market
›
• 60% reduction in emissions and oil-dependency by 2050
• No ‘conventionally-fuelled’ vehicles in urban areas by 2050
• Cut road’s share of longer-distance freight to less than half
• Majority of medium distance passenger journeys to rail
• 60% reduction in emissions and oil-dependency by 2050
• No ‘conventionally-fuelled’ vehicles in urban areas by 2050
• Cut road’s share of longer-distance freight to less than half
• Majority of medium distance passenger journeys to rail
The ambition of the 2011 Transport White Paper
›
2009 20500
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Planned rail v. road share of passenger kilometresSource: EU Transport in Figures, Statistical Pocketbook, 2011,
tables 2.2.2 & 2.3.2 & SEC(2011) 392
Rail Road
%
Modal shift: an enormous challenge
›
• Wider health impacts of transport:x8 more lethal than accidents
• Worsening congestion costs:
= 1.5% GDP by 2050
• Pressure on urban space:1 bus = 20 cars
• Wider health impacts of transport:x8 more lethal than accidents
• Worsening congestion costs:
= 1.5% GDP by 2050
• Pressure on urban space:1 bus = 20 cars
The pressure is getting greater
›
• ‘Command economy’ approach no longer credibletherefore
• ‘Distress purchase’ or
• Making public transport the mode of choice
• ‘Command economy’ approach no longer credibletherefore
• ‘Distress purchase’ or
• Making public transport the mode of choice
The business context
›EU CONSUMER MARKETS SCOREBOARD, 2014 Satisfaction with services : meeting expectations“To what extent did the service offered live up to what you wanted?”
Personal
care
Packa
ged holid
ays
Car ren
tal
Airlines
Cafés, b
ars et
c
Wate
r supply
EU27 M
EAN
Mobiles
Gas ser
vices
Loca
l tran
sport
Electr
icity
Banks
Train se
rvice
s
Real e
state
Investm
ent p
roducts0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
3 4 5 4 5 8 8 9 10 10 11 10 13 14 14
2831 34 35 37 32
37 36 38 39 36 3941
44 47
69 65 62 61 58 6055 54 52 51 53 50 46 42 39
HighModerateLow
›
• Demand-led approach: Understand users’ needs
• Recognise that necessary investment requires electoral support
• End-user satisfaction the key measure
• Demand-led approach: Understand users’ needs
• Recognise that necessary investment requires electoral support
• End-user satisfaction the key measure
The way ahead
›Understanding Users’ NeedsSpecial Eurobarometer 382a, 2013
25
33
23
19
Satisfaction with Rail
HighGoodMediumLow
›Understanding Users’ NeedsSpecial Eurobarometer 382b, 2013
35
34
22
9
Satisfaction with Urban Public Transport
HighGoodMediumLow
›• National Passenger Surveys:
• 33 key factors reported; analysing drivers• Value for money of the ticket, driven by:
• Reliability• Ability to get a seat at preferred travelling time• Handling of disruption (usable information)
• Safety (assumed)But• Different groups of passengers have different views• On-line survey analysis facility:
http://www.transportfocus.org.uk/research/publications/rail-passengers-priorities-simulator-2014014
• National Passenger Surveys:• 33 key factors reported; analysing drivers
• Value for money of the ticket, driven by:• Reliability• Ability to get a seat at preferred travelling time• Handling of disruption (usable information)
• Safety (assumed)But• Different groups of passengers have different views• On-line survey analysis facility:
http://www.transportfocus.org.uk/research/publications/rail-passengers-priorities-simulator-2014014
Passengers’ priorities: the UK experience
› The virtuous circle
Quality
Satisfied users
Modal shift
Political support
Funding
›
How do you launch a
Moonshot?
How do you launch a
Moonshot?
The underlying challenge
›Thank you for your attention!
www.epf.eu