© MathMarketing, 2004 WHAT WILL CHANGE?

5
© MathMarketing, 2004 www.mathmarketing.co m WHAT WILL CHANGE?

Transcript of © MathMarketing, 2004 WHAT WILL CHANGE?

Page 1: © MathMarketing, 2004  WHAT WILL CHANGE?

© MathMarketing, 2004 www.mathmarketing.com

WHAT WILL CHANGE?

Page 2: © MathMarketing, 2004  WHAT WILL CHANGE?

© MathMarketing, 2004 www.mathmarketing.com

WHAT WILL CHANGE?

Page 3: © MathMarketing, 2004  WHAT WILL CHANGE?
Page 4: © MathMarketing, 2004  WHAT WILL CHANGE?

© MathMarketing, 2004 www.mathmarketing.com

WHAT OTHERS HAVE SAIDPast Funnel Camp participants speak of these changes:

● "Allowed us to improve our understanding of our market and how we approach our potential clients understanding the value proposition." Mike Sewell, General Manager

● "Excellent delivery. Lots of insight about the funnel and the tactics." Yau Wong, General Manager Product Marketing

● "The Funnel Camp really opens your eyes to where you should collectively go as a team." Mark Speirs, Account Manager

● "This was really valuable and has been an extremely-useful methodology. Being off-site and able to focus as a team was great." Michael Light, Managing Director

● "We needed a Sales and Marketing plan. We needed the roadmap to achieve our goals and MathMarketing made that possible." Craig Rodda, Account Manager

● "A worthwhile, focused, diligent and recommended approach. It's about maximising the Sales and Marketing utility, given limited resources. The Funnel Camp will strongly assist in this regard." Paul Caruso, Business Analyst

Page 5: © MathMarketing, 2004  WHAT WILL CHANGE?

© MathMarketing, 2004 www.mathmarketing.com

WHAT OTHERS HAVE SAIDDIY - Challenges we see:

● Lack of a planning methodology means process may be time inefficient

● Non-neutral adjudicator discourages completely open dialogue

● Conflict can become unmanaged - participants focus on personalities

● Insights become myopic, drawn only from group experience & known history

● No tools to model means no way to ‘what if’ planning outcomes

● Inability to predict gaps in revenue, market size, or resource requirements

● Lack of objectivity summarising the group’s viewpoints & reaching conclusions

● Lack of team buy-in