© IPC, 2013 1

ARN

DUB CDGCHRONOKEF

Phase 1 Phase 3 Phase 4Phase 2

Impl level 2

Impl level 1

Impl level 4

Impl level 3

Impl level 5

BRUAMS

CPHOSL

HEL

MAD

ATH

* : In MIA a POP (Pickup) MRD is also installed. This grid only reports on the POD process implementation

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

BUD

**Please click on each cell for more detailed information about the implementation level and its different phases**

LIN VIE

CDG

MXP

LAX

SFO

LIS

MIA*

GVA ZRH

In blue font: MRD-like data sites (no physical MRD installed)

© IPC, 2013 2

Implementation level 1

• < 50% handler registration

• < 80% MRD label recording by Post

• Simultaneous processing mostly on several workstations

• Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level, 0% receptacle level.

• <50% unit delivery registration

• 0-10% receptacle level

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 1

• Partial MRD registration by handlers

• Not 100% handlers use the MRD

• No scan of MRD label by Post, or

• No possible link of MRD label with receptacle id’s in Postal system

IPC CAN reliably report: Date time stamp of delivery at

unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)

IPC CANNOT report: POD data in CAPE to sending

posts at receptacle level

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 3

Implementation level 1

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 2

• ~ 50%-80% handler registration

• ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post

• Mostly batch processing

• Simultaneous processing on several workstations at times

• Good quality of data for delivery time

• Not reliable receptacle level information

• Quantity: 50-80% unit delivery information

• 10-60% receptacles delivered

• Partial MRD registration by handlers

• Not 100% handlers use the MRD

• No scan of MRD label by Post, or

• No possible link of MRD label with receptacle id’s in Postal system

IPC CAN reliably report: Date time stamp of delivery at

unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)

IPC CANNOT report: POD data in CAPE to sending

posts at receptacle level

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 4

Implementation level 1

• Partial MRD registration by handlers

• Not 100% handlers use the MRD

• No scan of MRD label by Post, or

• No possible link of MRD label with receptacle id’s in Postal system

IPC CAN reliably report: Date time stamp of delivery at

unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)

IPC CANNOT report: POD data in CAPE to sending

posts at receptacle level

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 3

• ~ 80%-98% handler registration

• ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post

• Production mode based data transmission

• Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level

• 100% reliable receptacle level data

• Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration

• 65-95%receptacle level

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 5

Implementation level 2

• < 50% handler registration

• < 80% MRD label recording by Post

• Simultaneous processing mostly on several workstations

• Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level, 0% receptacle level.

• <50% unit delivery registration

• 0-10% receptacle level

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 1

• Partial MRD registration by handlers

• Not 100% handlers use the MRD

• Post scans MRD labels

• Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC

• Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing)

• IPC CAN reliably report:

Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)

• IPC CAN partially report:

POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok

• IPC CANNOT report:

POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 6

Implementation level 2

• Partial MRD registration by handlers

• Not 100% handlers use the MRD

• Post scans MRD labels

• Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC

• Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing)

• IPC CAN reliably report:

Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)

• IPC CAN partially report:

POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok

• IPC CANNOT report:

POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 2

• ~ 50%-80% handler registration

• ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post

• Mostly batch processing

• Simultaneous processing on several workstations at times

• Good quality of data for delivery time

• Not reliable receptacle level information

• Quantity: 50-80% unit delivery information

• 10-60% receptacles delivered

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 7

Implementation level 2

• Partial MRD registration by handlers

• Not 100% handlers use the MRD

• Post scans MRD labels

• Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC

• Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing)

• IPC CAN reliably report:

Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight level (mainly to airlines)

• IPC CAN partially report:

POD data receptacle level only when IPC data checks ok

• IPC CANNOT report:

POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 3

• ~ 80%-98% handler registration

• ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post

• Production mode based data transmission

• Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level

• 100% reliable receptacle level data

• Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration

• 65-95%receptacle level

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 8

Implementation level 3

• < 50% handler registration

• < 80% MRD label recording by Post

• Simultaneous processing mostly on several workstations

• Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level, 0% receptacle level.

• <50% unit delivery registration

• 0-10% receptacle level

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 1

• Full MRD registration by 100% of handlers

• Post scans MRD labels

• Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC

• Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing)

• IPC CAN reliably report: Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight

level (mainly to airlines)

• IPC CAN partially report: POD data receptacle level only when

IPC data checks ok

POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 9

Implementation level 3

• Full MRD registration by 100% of handlers

• Post scans MRD labels

• Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC

• Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing)

• IPC CAN reliably report: Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight

level (mainly to airlines)

• IPC CAN partially report: POD data receptacle level only when

IPC data checks ok

POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

• ~ 50%-80% handler registration

• ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post

• Mostly batch processing

• Simultaneous processing on several workstations at times

• Good quality of data for delivery time

• Not reliable receptacle level information

• Quantity: 50-80% unit delivery information

• 10-60% receptacles delivered

Phase 2

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 10

Implementation level 3

• Full MRD registration by 100% of handlers

• Post scans MRD labels

• Post sends RESCON from MRD label scan to IPC

• Post does not comply with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing)

• IPC CAN reliably report: Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight

level (mainly to airlines)

• IPC CAN partially report: POD data receptacle level only when

IPC data checks ok

POD data in CAPE to sending posts and carriers receptacle level

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 3

• ~ 80%-98% handler registration

• ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post

• Production mode based data transmission

• Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level

• 100% reliable receptacle level data

• Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration

• 65-95%receptacle level

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 11

Implementation level 4

• < 50% handler registration

• < 80% MRD label recording by Post

• Simultaneous processing mostly on several workstations

• Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level, 0% receptacle level.

• <50% unit delivery registration

• 0-10% receptacle level

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 1

• Partial MRD registration by handlers

• Not 100% handlers use the MRD

• Post scans ALL MRD labels

• Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing)

• IPC CAN reliably report: Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight

level (mainly to airlines)

Receptacle ID POD where receptacles are registered

Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct

• IPC CANNOT report: POD data in CAPE to sending posts and

carriers receptacle level where deliveries are not registered by handlers

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 12

Implementation level 4

• Partial MRD registration by handlers

• Not 100% handlers use the MRD

• Post scans ALL MRD labels

• Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing)

• IPC CAN reliably report: Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight

level (mainly to airlines)

Receptacle ID POD where receptacles are registered

Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct

• IPC CANNOT report: POD data in CAPE to sending posts and

carriers receptacle level where deliveries are not registered by handlers

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

• ~ 50%-80% handler registration

• ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post

• Mostly batch processing

• Simultaneous processing on several workstations at times

• Good quality of data for delivery time

• Not reliable receptacle level information

• Quantity: 50-80% unit delivery information

• 10-60% receptacles delivered

Phase 2

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 13

Implementation level 4

• Partial MRD registration by handlers

• Not 100% handlers use the MRD

• Post scans ALL MRD labels

• Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing)

• IPC CAN reliably report: Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight

level (mainly to airlines)

Receptacle ID POD where receptacles are registered

Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct

• IPC CANNOT report: POD data in CAPE to sending posts and

carriers receptacle level where deliveries are not registered by handlers

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 3

• ~ 80%-98% handler registration

• ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post

• Production mode based data transmission

• Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level

• 100% reliable receptacle level data

• Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration

• 65-95%receptacle level

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 14

Implementation level 4

• Partial MRD registration by handlers

• Not 100% handlers use the MRD

• Post scans ALL MRD labels

• Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing)

• IPC CAN reliably report: Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight

level (mainly to airlines)

Receptacle ID POD where receptacles are registered

Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct

• IPC CANNOT report: POD data in CAPE to sending posts and

carriers receptacle level where deliveries are not registered by handlers

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 4

• ~ 100% handler registration

• ~100% MRD label recording by Post

• Production mode based data transmission

• ~ 100% quality at unit and receptacle level

• Quantity: ~ 100% unit and receptacle level data

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 15

Implementation level 5

• 100% MRD use by handlers

• Post scans ALL MRD labels

• Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing)

• IPC CAN reliably report: Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight

level (mainly to airlines)

Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct

Full POD at receptacle level availability for posts and airlines

• IPC CANNOT report: Potential missing registrations because of

operational process failures

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 3

• ~ 80%-98% handler registration

• ~ 80-98% MRD label recording by Post

• Production mode based data transmission

• Good quality for delivery time at unit/flight level

• 100% reliable receptacle level data

• Quantity: 80-98% delivery registration

• 65-95%receptacle level

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing

© IPC, 2013 16

Implementation level 5

• 100% MRD use by handlers

• Post scans ALL MRD labels

• Post complies with Production Mode (Start/end scan+Workstation ID+XML file sharing)

• IPC CAN reliably report: Date time stamp of delivery at unit/flight

level (mainly to airlines)

Receptacle POD data in CAPE are 100% correct

Full POD at receptacle level availability for posts and airlines

• IPC CANNOT report: Potential missing registrations because of

operational process failures

Operations

Expected quality/quantity of data

Phase 4

• ~ 100% handler registration

• ~100% MRD label recording by Post

• Production mode based data transmission

• ~ 100% quality at unit and receptacle level

• Quantity: ~ 100% unit and receptacle level data

Back to grid

POD MRD- Implementation phasing