The Impact of Recent Court Decisions: Deference, Precedent ...
In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements...
-
Upload
priscilla-cadle -
Category
Documents
-
view
218 -
download
1
Transcript of In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements...
![Page 1: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Legal StudiesUnit 3 AOS 3
The Role of the Courts in law-making
![Page 2: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The ability of the courts and judges to make law
In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent
Precedent the judgment of court that sets a principle of law
Common law law made by the courts (a.k.a judge made law, case law, court-made law)
![Page 3: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
2 situations where judges make law:- When a case arises before them, on
which there is no statute or previous common law, or the the common law requires expansion
- Through the interpretation of legislation
![Page 4: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Limitations on a judge ability to make law
Judges can only make law on a case before them: must wait for a case to arise with a legal issue that has not previously been considered or tests the validity of an existing law
The position of the court in the hierarchy: only superior courts in the hierarchy can create precedent
![Page 5: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Type of legal case and mode of trial: precedent usually only established in cases w/o a jury. Juries cannot make precedent.
Personality of the judge: conservative = prefer to leave parliament to make law. However progressive = more likely to create precedent.
Existing precedent: judges may be bound by existing precedent (if facts are similar).
![Page 6: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
The Operation of the Doctrine of Precedent
Doctrine of precedent the process by which judges follow the reasons for the decisions, given by courts higher in the hierarchy when deciding on similar future cases
2 types of precedent:-Binding created by higher courts and must be
followed when making a decision on a similar case
-Persuasive does not have to be followed, however a judge may look to it as being influential on their decision
![Page 7: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Parts of a courts judgment
Ratio decidendi the reasons for the decision. The binding part of a precedent.
Obiter dictum statements made by a judge regarding a law and/or it’s application. This is only persuasive as it is not directly part of the matter in question that the judge has been asked to consider.
![Page 8: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Developing or avoiding precedent
4 methods used; overruling, reversing, distinguishing and disapproving
Overruling a judge in a higher court may not agree with precedent set in a lower court in an earlier case, and therefore overrule it.
Reversing when deciding a case on appeal (same case) a judge may rule that the lower court has made the wrong decision and change/reverse it
![Page 9: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Distinguishing if judges can identify significantly different facts in a case, they can distinguish the case before them, and are no longer bound by the precedent
Disapproving judges express disagreement with decision
In a lower court, judges may state their disapproval, however are still bound to follow precedent
In the same court where precedent was established, judges may create another precedent to show disapproval
Both precedents will exist until a higher court overrules
Lower court will have the choice of what precedent they will follow
![Page 10: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Reasons for interpretation of statutes by judges
Statutory interpretation is when a judge interprets the meaning of words/sections in a stature relevant to the case before them.
![Page 11: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Reasons for statutory interpretation
Mistakes in drafting bill: courts will need to interpret legislation according to the intention of parliament at the time
Changing nature of words: word meanings change over time due to society changing e.g Kevin’s case-changed the definition of ‘a man’ to include those who had gender reassignment surgery
![Page 12: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Words may be ambiguous: word meaning not clear and the courts need to clarify
Future and changing circumstances: Legislation may not encompass future circumstances, for example technology and file sharing-need to keep law up to date
![Page 13: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Tools used to interpret legislation
Common law rules:- Ejusdem generis: used when several specific
terms are followed by a general term-class rule e.g ‘motor vehicles’ would include cars, truck, buses, motorbikes etc.
- Expression unius exclusio alterius: the express mention of one to the exclusion of others e.g if an act said ‘motor vehicles; cars, trucks and buses,’ it would be assumed that motobikes would not be included in the act as parliament did not intend it to be
![Page 14: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Intrinsic materials evidence found within the legisaltion that is used to help interpretation e.g preamble, footnotes, long title
Extrinsic materials evidence found outside of the act to help with interpretation e.g Hansard, legal & english dictionaries, previous decisions
![Page 15: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Effects of statutory interpretation by judges
Creation of precedent-binding on lower courts with similar fact
situations-precedent remains in force on the
assumption that, if parliament hasn’t made any changes, it must be satisfied that the interpretation is consistent with parliament’s intention
![Page 16: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Words are given meaning- Clarifies act for future reference- Narrow interpretation = may restrict law
to certain situations e.g Deing v Tarola [1993]
- Broad interpretation = may extend the law to cover a new situation/area.
Parliamentary action- Decisions may alert parliament to the
need for change, therefore result in parliament taking action to:
- 1. Clarify an issue- 2. act to limit the powers of the courts
![Page 17: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Strengths and weaknesses of law-making through the courts
![Page 18: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
![Page 19: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
The relationship between the courts and parliament
Parliament creates courts: through legislation, parliament establish courts and their structure, procedure and jurisdiction e.g Magistrates’ Court act [1989]
Furthermore, parliament may amend this legislation at any time e.g The aforementioned act has been amended every year since enacted. These amendment have included the establishment of the Koori Court and Drug Court Divisions in 2002
![Page 20: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Courts apply and interpret legisaltion- Statutory interpretation- Interpretation and act read together to form
the law- May broaden or narrow the meaning of the
original legislation Parliament can change laws made by
courts- Parliament can override common law e.g
Trigwell case- May do so if law needs clarification or a
court was wrong in it’s interpretation- *Parliament cannot override interpretation in
the High Court regarding the Constitution
![Page 21: In the process of making decisions on a case being hear before a court, judges will make statements of law-precedent Precedent the judgment of court.](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022081515/551b85a3550346a10a8b53c9/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Courts can influence parliament to change law
-Statements made by judges (obiter dictum) regarding a law and/or its application may signify to parliament a need for change
- Parliament can codify law- making common law into statutes e.g Mabo case