I7 ª b p b ¥ - Tokyo University of Foreign...
8
1: Benedict 1972 4 1 2 1937 1 2 3 4 5 5 3 1 Sinitic Tibeto-Burman Sino-Tibetan Tibeto-Burman 2 Ethnologuehttp://www.ethnologue.com/subgroups/sino-tibetan 3 van Driem ‘The use of typological traits as indices of genetic affiliation has consistently misled comparativists in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.’ Sino-Bodic, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 60.3:470 － 125 －
Transcript of I7 ª b p b ¥ - Tokyo University of Foreign...
125
1: Benedict 1972
4
1
2
19371 2
3 4 55 3
1
Sinitic Tibeto-Burman Sino-Tibetan Tibeto-Burman
2 Ethnologuehttp://www.ethnologue.com/subgroups/sino-tibetan
3 van Driem ‘The use of typological traits as indices of genetic affiliation has consistently misled comparativists in the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.’ Sino-Bodic, Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 60.3:470
－ 125 －
126
2: Matisoff 2003
Klaproth 1823
Conrady 1896
4 link language
Benedict 1972 1960Benedict 1972 1 Matisoff 2003
2
Bradley, David 1997 ,"Tibeto-Burman languages and classification", in David
Bradley ed., Tibeto-Burman languages of the Himalayas, Papers in South East Asian linguistics, 14, Canberra: Pacific Linguistics, pp. 1–71.
Bradley, David 2002 , "The Subgrouping of Tibeto-Burman", in Beckwith, Chris; Blezer, Henk, Medieval Tibeto-Burman languages, BRILL, pp. 73–112. Thurgood,
Graham 2003 , "A subgrouping of the SinoTibetan languages", in Thurgood, Graham & LaPolla, Randy J., Sino-Tibetan Languages, London: Routledge, pp. 3-21.
Nungish
Dulong
Shafer 1955 Benedict1972 Matisoff2003 Jingpho-Nung-LuishJNL 5 Bradley 2002 Mishmi
Graham 2003
4 Conrady 1896 Tibeto-Burman SinoSiamese Indo-Chinese family
5 2013 “Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship.” JNL
－ 126 －
127
3:
rGyarongRung group
4
6 JinghpawRawang Lisu Zaiwa Lacid Lhaovo
3 6 6
6,2000
Daru
6
－ 127 －
128
Rameti R.Maliqti R.
Rameti R.Maliqti R.
4:
50
10
7 2012 5 1
Dukhatang
2km90
71
2
2
(1) 1
7
5:
－ 128 －
129
(1) m d ljà da rà à.
m -d -è- l-jà -da -rà- à
NEG-CAUS-N1- -RPST-DIR-OBLG-1PL.PST
verb
complex
1
1 1
e- (2) (3)
(2) w n nìg è-b n ì j nd gà è-pé- ì=n r
N1- N1- -SEQ
l -d -è- á -á = Ø.
[ ]-CAUS-N1- -2>1SG =IMP
(3) è-hwap lú -ù =n r dàngá =dèrn r è- m -ù -da
N1- [ ] -3O =SEQ =[ ] N1- -3O -[ ]
1: d
1
SG d -
DL d - d -
PL d -nì
2
SG è-d
DL è-d -
PL è-d -nì
3 d d -
－ 129 －
130
--u
(4) hú r m=s d d á-da - -ù =k t
LOC -DOWN-1SG-3O=[ ]
-ni
(5) mè jà - ì=n r=w ànì =í n nò k -nì -dik = á.
-REFL=TOP=[ ] 1PL=AGT 2SG -PL -IRR =[ ]
(6) (7) (8) (6) rì=g =í è- r jà -b - .
=CL=AGT N1 -[ ]-DL
(7) è- t - -w í= .
N1- -DL -NMLZ COP=NPT
(8) Kà t á =í z -w =s á-b -ù =k t
=AGT -NMLZ=LOC -PF -3O =[ ]
－ 130 －
131
4
1960 Robert H. Morse
20
Benedict Paul K. 1972 SinoTibetan: a conspectus. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.
van Driem, George 1997 , "Sino-Bodic", Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 60 (3): 455–488.
Klaproth, Julius Heinrich von. 1823 Asia Polyglotta. Paris: A. Shubart. SinoTibetan
1937 Languages and dialects. The Chinese yearbook. Shanghai: Commercial Press.
Matisoff, James A. (2003) Handbook of Proto-Tibeto-Burman. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.
___________ 2013 “Re-examining the genetic position of Jingpho: putting flesh on the bones of the Jingpho/Luish relationship.” Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman
-ù
-ù
-ù
-à / - à
4:
－ 131 －
132
Area 36.2:15-95. 1960 38: 1-32.
Shafer, Robert 1955 "Classification of the Sino-Tibetan languages", Word (Journal of the Linguistic Circle of New York) 11 (1): 94–111.
－ 132 －
