“ Gender and Excellence ” in Marie Curie Actions 18-19 June 2009 – Istanbul/TR Kagider EU...

“Gender and Excellence”in Marie Curie Actions

18-19 June 2009 – Istanbul/TR Kagider EU Days

Dr. Barbara RhodeAdviser

Dir. T

European Commission DG Research

Nobel Prize Physics 1903 and Chemistry 1911

7 items

1. The role model2. The Marie Curie Actions3. Statistics for Turkey4. Marie Curie Policy actions5. The European Charter for Researchers

and the Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Researcher

6. The Grant Agreement7. The Selection Panels8. Gender Statistics

The Nobel Prize in Physics 2007"for the discovery of Giant Magneto resistance

The Nobel Prize in Physics 2007"for the discovery of Giant Magneto resistance

Peter Grünberg Albert Fert Forschungszentrum Jülich Unité Mixte de Physique Jülich, Germany CNRS/THALES

Orsay, France

European Philosophy

• Countries need to provide excellent training for their research communities.

• Excellent science careers today have to be international - “brain circulation or “brain exchange”.

– No excellent career today is made without mobility.• Global relations are changing rapidly

• Most Marie Curie Actions are open to researchers of the whole world

• EU mobility and exchange programmes for researchers are in addition to exchange programmes of our Member States (UK, Germany, France etc…)

• Guiding Principles: Human resource development in R&D in Europe For more numerous, well-trained, motivated researchers Attract students to research careers Skills and sustainable career development

– Excellence– No thematic priorities– increased private sector participation– Strengthened international dimension– Continuity of FP6, – with focus on structuring impact– Balanced gender objective, also reintegration

7 items

1. The role model2. The Marie Curie Actions3. Statistics for Turkey4. The European Charter for

Researchers and the Code of Conduct for the Recruitment of Researcher


In the frame of the PEOPLE programme:In the frame of the PEOPLE programme:“Marie Curie Actions”“Marie Curie Actions”

To date:

• Successful and well known• Career development for researchers• Mobility and exchange for scientists• The programme exists now for more than 12 years• Since FP6 a specific international component• The volume has been constantly increasing

With FP7• Duplication of the budget from FP6:

• Budget of € 4,75 billion, i.e.

– From €430 million in 2007 – to €900 million in 2013

FP7 – Specific ProgrammesFP7 – Specific Programmes

Cooperation – Collaborative research Cooperation – Collaborative research

People – Human PotentialPeople – Human Potential

JRC (nuclear) JRC (nuclear)

Ideas – Frontier ResearchIdeas – Frontier Research

Capacities – Research CapacityCapacities – Research Capacity

JRC (non-nuclear)JRC (non-nuclear)

Euratom Euratom

+

The European Research Aera (ERA)- gives access to the science of 39 countries

• Today there are 27 EU Member States

• Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, The Netherlands, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain , Sweden, United Kingdom

• the following 12 countries are associated to the FP:– Turkey, Croatia, ( candidate countries)– Switzerland, Norway, Iceland, Liechtenstein (EEA and all

EFTA countries)– Israel– the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM),

Serbia, Albania, Montenegro, Bosnia Herzegovina

1. Initial training:•Initial Training Networks (ITN)

1. Initial training:•Initial Training Networks (ITN)

3. Industry dimension:• Industry-academia partnership and pathways (IAPP)

3. Industry dimension:• Industry-academia partnership and pathways (IAPP)

2. Life long training and career development: • Intra European Fellowships (IEF)

•European Reintegration Grants (ERG)• Co-funding of national/regional/international programmes

2. Life long training and career development: • Intra European Fellowships (IEF)

•European Reintegration Grants (ERG)• Co-funding of national/regional/international programmes

4. International dimension: • International Outgoing fellowships (IOF)•International reintegration grants (IRG)• International Incoming fellowships (IIF)

•International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES) (S&T, ENP)

4. International dimension: • International Outgoing fellowships (IOF)•International reintegration grants (IRG)• International Incoming fellowships (IIF)

•International Research Staff Exchange Scheme (IRSES) (S&T, ENP)

I. “People” = 5 I. “People” = 5 Marie Curie building blocksMarie Curie building blocksI. “People” = 5 I. “People” = 5 Marie Curie building blocksMarie Curie building blocks

5. Specific actionsEURAXESS: Researchers night

– Allowances given to “early-stage” ( up to five years after graduation, time for PhD +) researchers and senior « visiting scientists » positions

Networks linking, participants from 3 MS and Ass. Countries as the hosts of high quality training programmes –

• additional host from third countries possible

– Desirable, the involvement of private business sector– open to researchers from third countriesthird countries– Vacancies will be published and can be looked up on the Vacancies will be published and can be looked up on the “mobility “mobility

portal”portal” – –

– Containing short training events (conferences, summer schools, training courses) – “mobility portal”

1. Initial Training Networks ITN:Marie Curie Networks for early stage training

1. Initial Training Networks ITN:Marie Curie Networks for early stage training

Life-long training & career development(4 years + after graduation = post doc but also later)

In two modes

1. Traditional mode: selection/funding of fellows through call at EC level – international not excluded, but more sense to go for the international

directly

2. New « Co-funding » mode – with structuring effect - date: open now

Selection for « co-funding » of existing or new national, regional and international fellowship programmes

Researchers apply to the co-funded national programmes; programmes operate following own standards

“VacanciesVacancies”” mobility portalmobility portal

2. Marie Curie Intra European fellowships for career development

2. Marie Curie Intra European fellowships for career development

• Enhance cooperation and skills exchange between academia and industry on a common research project

– At least two different Member States or Associated countries (one from EU 27) and in addition possible: third countries partners

– At least one organisation from each sector – Funding for 3-4 years– Networking activities, workshops/conferences,

including for researchers from outside the partnership

3. Marie Curie Industry partnerships and pathways (IAPP)

Career development/ life-long training for EU researchers :

Experienced EU/AC outgoing individual fellowships, to be trained in a third country institute or organisation

– at least 4 years after graduation– Funding for up to 3 years in total

• -- with 1-2 years abroad

– To establish cooperation – Based on a personal ‘career development plan’– Mandatory return fellowship

4. World FellowshipsInternational Outgoing Fellowships IOF

4. World FellowshipsInternational Incoming Fellowships IIF

Incoming individual fellowships for experienced top class researchers to work in the EU and Ass .

• at least four years after graduation (post doc)• to develop cooperation • Proposal is submitted by the researcher together with

the host organisation• For 1 to 2 years• Salary plus contribution towards research related

costs

• ICPC = Possibility to apply for a one year return fellowship

4. IRSES International Research Staff Exchange Scheme

Objectives To establish or deepen

balanced partnerships and cooperation between MS/AC and science organisations in the 29 Countries covered by European

Neighbourhood policy and Countries with S&T Agreement

through a joint programmes of exchange of researchers

Participation rules Min: 2 independent research organisations in 2 different EU/AC

countries and min one organisations in one of the 29 third countries

Duration of exchange partnership: 2-4 years Scientific staff, management and technical staff

Short term exchanges (up to 1 year per person) Continuation of salary Coordinator from EU/AC

MARIE CURIE INTERNATIONALREINTEGRATION GRANTS (IRG)

grants provide financial assistance to researchers who wish to return and find a job in Europe after they have worked in research in a third country for at least three years.

The duration of the grants is between 2 and 4 years. Researchers from EU Member States or associated countries with

at least 4 years full-time postgraduate research experience or a doctoral degree, that have been active in research in a third country for at least 3 years.

The researcher applies in liaison with a (re)integration host organisation located in an EU Member State or associated country.

Marie Curie Actions 2009/10

MC Action Budget (M€) Next call

open Deadline

IRSES(Exchange)

30 m € 25/11/08 Closed for 2009

IIF(Incoming)

28 m€ 18/03/09 18/08/09

IOF(Outgoing)

30 m € 25/11/08 18/08/09

IAPP(Industry)

65 m € 24/04/09 27/07/09

ITN(Initial)

243,15 m € (2010)

8/09/09 7/01/2010

7 items




All fellows Fellows from or to Turkey

submitted funded submitted funded

Intra European Fellowship 9094 1600 112 17

Incoming Internat. Fellowships 2158 380 5 -

Outgoing Internat. Fellowships 1401 302 15 -

International Reintegration Grant 40 37

European Reintegration Grant 1 -

total 54

All countries 3rd countries

Turkey

TRpartner

Fellows in TR

TR fellows

Partners in andfellows recruitedinto host driven actions

RTN 2769 439 7 10 69

EST 2431 404 - 52

EXT - 8

TOK 1582 185 8 15 31

Total 2769 439 16 25 160

Turkey

Statistics for FP6 Marie Curie fellowships with TR

http://ec.europa.eu/mariecurieactions

Both FP6 & FP7 projects

Fellows to and from Turkey

submitted funded

Intra European Fellowship (IEF) 69 12

Incoming Internat. Fellowships (IIF) 2 -

Outgoing Internat. Fellowships (IOF) 21 1

International Reintegration Grant (IRG) 125 25 (+ up to 15 to be funded) + 44 applications

European Reintegration Grant (ERG) 1 -

Partners in hostdriven actions

sub fund total 16

IRSES Exchange Scheme

6 3

Fellows in successful projects

Recruitment of fellowships not yet available

COFUND - -

ITN Initial Training Network

61 4

IAPP Industry 22 5

total partners 83 12 fellows …

Marie Curie FP7 fellowships with TRafter 1st or 2nd call

7 items




1. EURAXESS Mobility Portal

2. EURAXESS Service (ERA-More Network)3. EUEAXESS (ERA) LINK for the diaspora4. Scientific Visa5. EURAXESS rights -The European Charta and

the Code of conduct

EURAXESS = Specific actions (Dir C)to remove obstacles

and enhancing career perspectives

11 April 2008

The European Researcher’s The European Researcher’s Mobility Portal (Mobility Portal (EURAXESS EURAXESS

Jobs*Jobs*))

EURAXESS Services: the Network

EURAXESS Services• A Service Centres for

foreign researchers in Europe

• Former ERA more network

EURAXESS Services EURAXESS Services offers youoffers you

• Visas• Work permits• Accommodation• Legal issues• Tax regulations• Social security, health and

taxes• Everyday life• Family support• And MORE…

2004: Survey among European researchers in the US

2005:2005: Launch of EURAXESS-Links/USALaunch of EURAXESS-Links/USA

2007: Survey among European researchers in Japan

20082008: T1: Survey among European researchers in China

T2: Launch of EURAXESS-Links/JapanLaunch of EURAXESS-Links/Japan

T3/4: Feasibility studies for other EURAXESS-Links networks, NERA (Non-European Researchers

abroad)

T4: Launch of EURAXESS-Link/China

2009: Launch of EURAXESS-Links in other countries

EURAXESS Links

• « Charter » as reference point for the career management of researchers as professionals, addressing both researchers and employers/funders on minimum rights and obligations

• « Code of Conduct » as reference point for transparency and merit based recruitment, fair recognition of qualifications and mobility experiences

• Implemented by MS and other actors on a voluntary basis

EURAXESS EURAXESS RightsRights (II)

7 items




To be implemented....

on a voluntary

basis

To be implemented....

on a voluntary

basis

The Aim of the Charter and the Code

(4)The identified potential shortage of researchers, particularly in certain key disciplines, will pose a serious threat to EU’s innovative strength, knowledge capacity and productivity growth in the near future and may hamper the attainment of the Lisbon and Barcelona objectives.

Consequently, Europe must dramatically improve its attractiveness to researchers and strengthen the participation of women researchers by helping to create the necessary conditions for more sustainable and appealing careers for them in R&D

Hereby recommends:

2. That Member States endeavour to take, wherever necessary, the crucial steps to ensure that employers or funders of researchers improve the recruitment methods and career evaluation/appraisal systems in order to create a more transparent, open, equal and internationally accepted system of recruitment and career development as a prerequisite for a genuine European labour market for researchers.

Structuring effect for those countries signing

In so doing they should take into account the great diversity of the laws, regulations and practices which, in different countries and in different sectors, determine the path, organisation and working conditions of a career in R&D.

General Principles and Requirements applicable

to Employers and Funders

Non-Discrimination

Employers and/or funders of researchers will not discriminate against researchers in any way on the basis of gender, age, ethnic, national or social origin, religion or belief, sexual orientation, language, disability, political opinion, social or economic condition.



Working Conditions

..allow both women and men researchers to combine family and work, children and career, flexible working hours, tele-working, part-time etc.



Stability and permanence of employmentEmployers and/or funders should ensure that the

performance of researchers is not undermined by instability of employment contracts, and should therefore commit themselves as far as possible to improving the stability of employment conditions for researchers, thus implementing and abiding by the principles and terms laid down in the EU Directive on Fixed-Term Work 10.



Funding and salaries

.. Fair and attractive conditions, parentel benefits in accordance with national legislation

Researchers at all carreer stages



Gender Balance Employers and/or funders should aim for a

representative gender balance at all levels of staff, including at supervisory and managerial level. .. Equal opportunities at recruitment and subsequent career stages… eveluation and selection committees should have adeaquate gender balance. Enhancement of quality



SelectionSelection committees should bring

together diverse expertise and competences and should have an adequate gender balance and, where appropriate and feasible, include members from different sectors (public and private) and disciplines, including from other countries and with relevant experience to assess the candidate…

7 items




Grant agreement

III. 2 – Performance obligations

1. In addition to the obligations identified in Article II.3.1, the consortium shall:

a)…

b) take all necessary and reasonable measures to select at least 40% women researchers in the project;

Grant Agreement

c) Equal opportunitiesPursuant to Article III.2.1.b), the contractors endeavour to assure a fair female

representation by promoting real equal access opportunities between men and women throughout the selection.

To that end, the contractors seek and encourage female candidates in the publicity referred to in point a) of this paragraph and pay, in the application of the selection criteria referred to in point b) of this paragraph, a particular attention to ensure no gender discrimination.

7 items




Table 2: Independent experts

Gender of independent experts

Male Female

Total % %

494 287 58,01% 207 41,90%

Professional affiliation of independent experts

Higher

Education Research

Organisationnon-researchpublic body

non-researchprivate body

Other Total

% % % % % %

Female 90 43,48 % 83 39,81 % 6 2,90 % 18 8,70 % 10 4,83 % 207 41,90%

Male 139 48,43 % 113 39,30 % 3 1,05 % 22 7,67 % 10 3,48 % 287 58,10%

Total 229 46,36 % 196 39,68 % 9 1,82 % 40 8,10 % 20 4,05 % 494 100,00%

Marie Curie Intra-European FellowshipsDeadline:14/08/2007



Male Female

Total % %

491 285 58,04% 206 41,96%


Higher

Education Research



Other Total

% % % % % %

Female 90 43,69 % 82 39,81 % 6 2,91 % 18 8,74 % 10 4,85 % 206 41,96%

Male 138 48,42 % 112 39,30 % 3 1,05 % 22 7,72 % 10 3,51 % 285 58,04%

Total 228 46,44 % 194 39,51 % 9 1,83 % 40 8,15 % 20 4,07 % 491 100,00%

Marie Curie International Incoming FellowshipsDeadline:14/08/2007



Male Female

Total % %

490 284 57,96% 206 42,04%


Higher

Education Research



Other Total

% % % % % %

Female 90 43,69 % 82 39,81 % 6 2,91 % 18 8,74 % 10 4,85 % 206 42,04%

Male 139 48,59 % 111 39,08 % 3 1,06 % 22 7,75 % 10 3,52 % 284 57,96%

Total 228 46,53 % 193 39,39 % 9 1,84 % 40 8,16 % 20 4,08 % 490 100,00%

Marie Curie International Outgoing FellowshipsDeadline:14/08/2007



Male Female

Total % %

69 46 67% 23 33%


Higher

Education Private

CommercialPublic Total

% % % %

Female4 16 % 13 41 % 6 50 % 23

33%

Male 21 84% 19 59% 6 50% 4667%

Total 25 36 % 32 46 % 12 17 % 69100,00%

Marie Curie Industry-Academia Partnership and Pathways

Deadline:31/05/2007

7 items






PublicSector

PrivateSector Total

% % %

Female86 78% 24 22 % 110

Male 117 71% 47 29% 164

Total 203 74 % 72 26 % 274

Marie Curie Initial Training Networks

Deadline:31/05/2007

Gender of project coordinators (scientist in charge) in proposals retained for funding proposals (ranked list) and evaluated

respectively


Instruments Gender of project coordinators (scientist in charge) in proposals and in the ranked list

Total Female Male

Proposals evaluated Ranked list Success Proposals evaluated Ranked list Proposals evaluated Ranked list

% % % % %

CHE 27 8 29,63% 2 0,60% 0 0,00% 25 7,53% 8 8,00%

ECO 9 3 33,33% 3 0,90% 1 1,00% 6 1,81% 2 2,00%

ENG40 11 27,50% 5 1,51% 0 0,00% 35 10,54% 11 11,00%

ENV71 21 29,58% 14 4,22% 7 7,00% 57 17,17% 14 14,00%

LIF98 31 31,63% 24 7,23% 8 8,00% 74 22,29% 23 23,00%

MAT 11 3 27,27% 1 0,30% 0 0,00% 10 3,01% 3 3,00%

PHY43 13 30,23% 4 1,20% 1 1,00% 39 11,75% 12 12,00%

SOC 33 10 30,30% 11 3,31% 4 4,00% 22 6,63% 6 6,00%

Total332 100 30,12% 64 19,28% 21 21,00% 268 80,72% 79 79,00%


Gender of fellow in evaluated and retained for funding (ranked list) proposals by scientific panel

Funding Scheme Gender of fellow in evaluated proposals and in the ranked list

Total Female Male

Proposals evaluated

Ranked list Success Proposals evaluated Ranked list Proposals evaluated Ranked list

% % % % %

CHE27 8 29,63% 9 2,71% 2 2,00% 18 5,42% 6 6,00%

ECO

9 3 33,33% 4 1,20% 1 1,00% 5 1,51% 2 2,00%

ENG40 11 27,50% 3 0,90% 0,00% 37 11,14% 11 11,00%

ENV71 21 29,58% 24 7,23% 6 6,00% 47 14,16% 15 15,00%

LIF99 31 31,31% 47 14,16% 16 16,00% 52 15,66% 15 15,00%

MAT

11 3 27,27% 2 0,60% 0 0,00% 9 2,71% 3 3,00%

PHY42 13 30,95% 9 2,71% 4 4,00% 33 9,94% 9 9,00%

SOC33 10 30,30% 15 4,52% 6 6,00% 18 5,42% 4 4,00%

Total332 100 30,12% 113 34,04% 35 35,00% 219 65,96% 65 65,00%


Gender of fellow in evaluated and retained for funding (ranked list) proposals by scientific panel

Funding Scheme

Gender of person in charge in evaluated proposals and in the ranked list

Total Female Male

Proposals Ranked list Success Proposals Ranked list Proposals Ranked list

% % % % %

CHE 98 22 22,45% 21 3,74% 3 2,29% 77 13,70% 19 14,50%

ECO 7 2 28,57% 4 0,71% 2 1,53% 3 0,53% 0 0,00%

ENG 76 17 22,37% 10 1,78% 2 1,53% 66 11,74% 15 11,45%

ENV 85 20 23,53% 32 5,69% 5 3,82% 53 9,43% 15 11,45%

LIF 170 41 24,12% 69 12,28% 17 12,98% 101 17,97% 24 18,32%

MAT 23 4 17,39% 3 0,53% 1 0,76% 20 3,56% 3 2,29%

PHY 76 19 25,00% 10 1,78% 3 2,29% 66 11,74% 16 12,21%

SOC 27 6 22,22% 13 2,31% 3 2,29% 14 2,49% 3 2,29%

Total 562 131 23,31% 162 28,83% 36 27,48% 400 71,17% 95 72,52%


Instruments Gender of co-ordinators (scientist in charge) in proposals and in the ranked list

Total Female Male

Proposals evaluated

Ranked list Success Proposals evaluated Ranked list Proposals evaluated Ranked list

% % % % %

CHE 98 22 22,45% 15 2,67% 4 3,05% 83 14,77% 18 13,74%

ECO 7 2 28,57% 1 0,18% 0 0,00% 6 1,07% 2 1,53%

ENG 76 17 22,37% 9 1,60% 0 0,00% 67 11,92% 17 12,98%

ENV 85 20 23,53% 17 3,02% 2 1,53% 68 12,10% 18 13,74%

LIF 170 41 24,12% 40 7,12% 12 9,16% 130 23,13% 29 22,14%

MAT 23 4 17,39% 2 0,36% 0 0,00% 21 3,74% 4 3,05%

PHY 76 19 25,00% 7 1,25% 4 3,05% 70 12,46% 15 11,45%

SOC 27 6 22,22% 11 1,96% 3 2,29% 15 2,67% 3 2,29%

Total 562 131 23,31% 102 18,15% 25 19,08% 460 81,85% 106 80,92%


Funding Scheme Gender of fellow in evaluated proposals and in the ranked list

Total Female Male

Proposals Ranked list Success Proposals Ranked list Proposals Ranked list

% % % % %

CHE 172 43 25,00% 59 3,53% 17 4,02% 113 6,76% 26 6,15%

ECO 36 10 27,78% 18 1,08% 5 1,18% 18 1,08% 5 1,18%

ENG 122 31 25,41% 25 1,50% 6 1,42% 97 5,80% 25 5,91%

ENV 286 71 24,83% 124 7,42% 31 7,33% 162 9,69% 40 9,46%

LIF 543 135 24,86% 263 15,73% 72 17,02% 280 16,75% 63 14,89%

MAT 69 18 26,09% 11 0,66% 4 0,95% 58 3,47% 14 3,31%

PHY 242 61 25,21% 63 3,77% 14 3,31% 179 10,71% 47 11,11%

SOC 202 54 26,73% 107 6,40% 24 5,67% 95 5,68% 30 7,09%

Total 1672 423 25,30% 670 40,07% 173 40,90% 1002 59,93% 250 59,10%


Instruments Gender of project coordinators (scientist in charge) in proposals and in the ranked list

Total Female Male

Proposals evaluated

Ranked list

Success Proposals evaluated Ranked listProposals evaluated

Ranked list

% % % % %

CHE 172 43 25,00% 29 16,86 7 16,28 143 83,14 36 83,72

ECO 36 10 27,78% 5 13,89 2 20,00 31 86,11 8 80,00

ENG 122 31 25,41% 18 14,75 5 16,13 104 85,25 26 83,87

ENV 286 71 24,83% 47 16,43 7 9,86 239 83,57 64 90,14

LIF 543 135 24,86% 112 20,63 37 27,41 431 79,37 98 72,59

MAT 69 18 26,09% 9 13,04 3 16,67 60 86,96 15 83,33

PHY 242 61 25,21% 30 12,40 7 11,48 212 87,60 54 88,52

SOC 202 54 26,73% 70 34,65 13 24,07 132 65,35 41 75,93

Total 1672 423 25,30% 320 19,14 81 19,15 1352 80,86 342 80,85

Gender of project coordinators (scientist in charge) in proposals retained for funding proposals (ranked list) and evaluated respectively

Marie Curie Industry-Academia Partnership and Pathways

Deadline:31/05/2007

Funding Scheme

Gender of person in charge in evaluated proposals and in the ranked list

Total Female Male

Proposals Ranked list

Success

Proposals Ranked list Success Proposals Ranked list Success

% % % % % % %

IAPP 102 41 40% 23 23% 10 24% 43% 79 77% 31 76% 39%

Marie Curie Initial Training NetworksDeadline:31/05/2007

Gender of participant in evaluated and retained for funding (ranked list) proposals by scientific panel

FEMALE MALE TOTAL

Evaluated

Proposals - Stage 1

Evaluated Proposals - Stage

2

Ranked Proposals

Success Rate

Evaluated Proposals - Stage 1

Evaluated Proposals - Stage 2

Ranked ProposalsSuccess

Rate Evaluated-1

Evaluated-2

Ranked

Sucees rate

Total % Total % Total % % Total % Total % Total % %

CHE 142, 11% 38, 12,7 % 13, 12,6 % 9,2 % 762, 12,6 % 213, 14,3 % 63, 11,9 % 8,3 % 904 251 76 8,4 %

ECO 32, 2% 9, 3,0 % 4, 3,9 %12,5 %

139, 2,3 % 34, 2,3 % 7, 1,3 % 5,0 % 171 43 11 6,4 %

ENG 171, 13% 44, 14,7 % 14, 13,6 % 8,2 % 1.306, 21,5 % 329, 22,1 % 135, 25,5 % 10,3 % 1.477 373 149 10,1 %

ENV 137, 11% 26, 8,7 % 12, 11,7 % 8,8 % 672, 11,1 % 123, 8,3 % 60, 11,3 % 8,9 % 809 149 72 8,9 %

LIF 439, 34% 89, 29,7 % 41, 39,8 % 9,3 % 1.414, 23,3 % 330, 22,2 % 128, 24,2 % 9,1 % 1.853 419 169 9,1 %

MAT 25, 2% 4, 1,3 % 1, 1,0 % 4,0 % 232, 3,8 % 39, 2,6 % 15, 2,8 % 6,5 % 257 43 16 6,2 %

PHY 154, 12% 41, 13,7 % 7, 6,8 % 4,5 % 1.114, 18,4 % 330, 22,2 % 87, 16,4 % 7,8 % 1.268 371 94 7,4 %

SOC 192, 15% 49, 16,3 % 11, 10,7 % 5,7 % 427, 7,0 % 91, 6,1 % 34, 6,4 % 8,0 % 619 140 45 7,3 %

1.292, 300, 103, 8,0 % 6.066, 1.489, 529, 8,7 % 7.358 1.789 632 8,6 %

18% 17% 16% 82% 83% 84%

Gender of project coordinators (scientist in charge) in proposals retained for funding proposals (ranked list) and evaluated

respectively

Marie Curie Initial Training Networks

Deadline:31/05/2007

FEMALE MALE TOTAL

Evaluated

Proposals - Stage 1

Evaluated Proposals -

Stage 2

Ranked Proposals

Success Rate


Stage 1


Stage 2

Ranked Proposals

Success Rate Evaluated-1

Evaluated-2

Ranked

Success rate

Total % Total % Total % % Total % Total % Total % %

CHE 22 12,8% 7, 20,0 % 3, 23,1 % 13,6 %93 12,7 % 19, 11,8 % 5, 9,1 % 5,4 % 115 26 8 7,0 %

ECO 8 4,7% 3, 8,6 % 1, 7,7 % 12,5 %13 1,8 % 3, 1,9 % 1, 1,8 % 7,7 % 21 6 2 9,5 %

ENG 28 16,3% 6, 17,1 % 2, 15,4 % 7,1 %155 21,2 % 32, 19,9 % 12, 21,8 % 7,7 % 183 38 14 7,7 %

ENV 12 7,0% 4, 11,4 % 3, 23,1 % 25,0 %83 11,4 % 13, 8,1 % 5, 9,1 % 6,0 % 95 17 8 8,4 %

LIF 51 29,7% 5, 14,3 % 2, 15,4 % 3,9 %178 24,4 % 46, 28,6 % 17, 30,9 % 9,6 % 229 51 19 8,3 %

MAT 2 1,2% 0, 0,0 % 0, 0,0 % 0,0 %27 3,7 % 5, 3,1 % 2, 3,6 % 7,4 % 29 5 2 6,9 %

PHY 25 14,5% 3, 8,6 % 0, 0,0 % 0,0 %127 17,4 % 34, 21,1 % 10, 18,2 % 7,9 % 152 37 10 6,6 %

SOC 24 14,0% 7, 20,0 % 2, 15,4 % 8,3 %54 7,4 % 9, 5,6 % 3, 5,5 % 5,6 % 78 16 5 6,4 %

172 35, 13, 7,6 % 730 161, 55, 7,5 % 902 196 68 7,5 %

19% 18% 19% 81 % 82% 81%

Thank you for your Attention!

[email protected]

“ Gender and Excellence ” in Marie Curie Actions 18-19 June 2009 – Istanbul/TR Kagider EU...

Documents

Transcript of “ Gender and Excellence ” in Marie Curie Actions 18-19 June 2009 – Istanbul/TR Kagider EU...