© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright...

78
December 2008 December 2008 1 © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates Managing SEMAP Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Transcript of © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright...

Page 1: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 11

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Managing SEMAPManaging SEMAP

Gail Gail GillispieGillispie

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Page 2: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 22

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Steps to Success

1. Establish desired outcomes What will be quality controlled? What outcomes are acceptable?

Goals must be: Attainable Measurable Clearly defined

Page 3: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 33

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Steps to Success

2. Educate all staff on how their daily work impacts the PHA SEMAP score

Hold a series of workshops to discuss and train:

SEMAP indictors SEMAP requirements Related policies Application of requirements

Page 4: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 44

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Educate

Workshop discussion example: Determination of adjusted income requires

staff to follow verification requirements Discuss

Regulatory requirement PHA verification policies How staff applies these policies daily How staff documents verification attempts

Page 5: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 55

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Educate

Hold the workshops ongoing – and don’t be afraid to repeat a topic Provides emphasis, additional clarity, and

clears misunderstandings

Page 6: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 66

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Steps to Success

3. Assign SEMAP QC role to one or more key staff

Large PHA: QC department conducts SEMAP and non-SEMAP QC activities

Ongoing file reviews Ongoing financial reviews Ongoing HQS reviews

Page 7: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 77

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Assigning SEMAP QC Role

Midsize PHA: QC supervisor – but fewer support staff Rely more on supervisor review efforts

Small PHA: Assign to staff supervisors – but avoid assigning

indicators for which the supervisor is responsible

Work with neighboring PHAs to QC each other

Page 8: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 88

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Steps to Success

4. Establish a review schedule for each indicator: What are the program requirements? What will be reviewed? How will it be reviewed? How often reviewed? Who will review? How will results be communicated to staff and

management?

Page 9: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 99

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Establish an Indicator Review Schedule

Example: SEMAP indicator: Lease-up

What are program requirements?The percent of units leased or the

percent of allocated budget authority expended during the PHA fiscal year was 98% or more

Page 10: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 1010

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Example: SEMAP indicator: Lease-up

What will be reviewed? Internal financial records will be reviewed

to determine year-to-date lease up (units and budget authority)

VMS and software lease-up data will be compared

Establish an Indicator Review Schedule

Page 11: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 1111

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Example: SEMAP indicator: Lease-up

How will it be reviewed?What internal tracking document will be

used to capture:Unit months leased, year-to-date? Expended budget authority, year-to-

date?

Establish an Indicator Review Schedule

Page 12: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 1212

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Example: SEMAP indicator: Lease-up

How often reviewed?By the 15th of each month: year to date

status is to be reviewed through previous month

Who will review?Name specific staff

Establish an Indicator Review Schedule

Page 13: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 1313

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Example: SEMAP indicator: Lease-up

How will results be communicated to staff and management?

Options:Paper/electronic reports

Establish an Indicator Review Schedule

Page 14: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 1414

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Communicating results: Make sure all Key Performance Indicators

(KPIs) are addressedMake sure all KPIs are reported on timely,

as scheduled

Establish an Indicator Review Schedule

Page 15: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 1515

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Steps to Success

5. Establish a record keeping system Where will records be maintained? How will records be maintained?

Page 16: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 1616

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Establish Record Keeping System

One approach: Make up 15 (plus bonus if applicable) file

folders 1 general file folder

Random methodology 1 file folder for each indicator

Remember, you want PROOF

Page 17: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 1717

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Internal Audit Files

Description of indicator and performance standard

Place data from audit for each indicator reviewed

Any other “proof” of certification score Use auditor minimum file sample and

increase sample if needed

Page 18: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 1818

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Steps to Success

6. Conduct preliminary and ongoing audits PHA supervisory audits

Page 19: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 1919

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Supervisory QC Reviews

Periodic samples of files Drawn in unbiased manner (leave clear audit

trail) Reviewed by supervisor or other qualified

person other than the one who did the work Objective: determine compliance with

indicator

Page 20: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 2020

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Supervisory Audit Indicators

Selection from Waiting List 15Reasonable Rent 20Determination of Adjusted Income 20HQS Quality Control Inspections 5HQS Enforcement 10

Page 21: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 2121

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Size of Universe

Determines file sample size Different for each indicator

e.g., # number of admissions vs. number of families assisted

Page 22: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 2222

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Audit Sample Selection

50 or less 51-600

601-2000

Over 2000

5 5 + 1 for each 50

(or part of 50) over 50 16 + 1 for each 100 (or part)

over 600 30 + 1 for each 200 (or part)

over 2000

Page 23: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 2323

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

File Sampling

Determine the universe Determine number of files to be selected

for review Determine “nth” file this represents Include all staff in sample FY is period for analysis

Page 24: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 2424

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Minimum Files Example

Waiting List Selection: Based on # of new admissions per FY

Example: PHA has admitted 260 families minimum # of files to audit? # of files which must meet criteria to receive

15 points? Note: 98%

10

98.8 (10) files

51-600 = 5 + 1 for each 50 (or part of 50) over 50

Page 25: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 2525

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Random Sampling Example

Universe requirement 260 files File sample 10 files Files to be pulled Every 26th

file

If all staff are not represented, select closest file below 26th file

Page 26: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 2626

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

HUD SEMAP Indicators

Page 27: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 2727

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates 1. Selection from Waiting List

(15/0 points) Universe

Number of families admitted to program during audit period

Two separate samples drawn from: Applicant names that reached the top of the

waiting list during the audit period Families admitted to the program during the

audit period

Page 28: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 2828

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

1. Selection from Waiting List (Supervisory Audit)

PHAs must have written selection policies in administrative plan

At least 98% of families must be selected from the waiting list in accordance with the PHA’s policies

Page 2-1

Page 29: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 2929

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

1. Selection from Waiting List

PHA follows policies in selecting families from waiting list

Families met selection criteria that determined their place on waiting list and order of selection

Page 30: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 3030

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Most Likely Error Points

Get up to date on preferences in 982.207 Income targeting 982.201(b)(2) Special admissions 982.203 Special program (targeted) admissions

982.204(e)

Page 31: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 3131

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Policies for Audit File

Document policy charges during PHA FY Example: October FY PHA

10/1/XX 10/1/XX-2/28/XX 3/1/XX 3/1/XX-6/30/XX 7/1/XX 7/1/XX-9/30/XX

Page 32: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 3232

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

2. Reasonable Rent(20/15/0 points)

Universe Number of families assisted for PHA FY

Sample drawn from Number of families assisted for PHA FY

Page 33: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 3333

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

2. Reasonable Rent (Supervisory Audit)

The PHA must have a reasonable written method to determine Rent to owner is reasonable based on current

rents charged for comparable unassisted units

Page 2-16

Page 34: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 3434

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

2. Reasonable Rent

The method may take into consideration Location Size Type Quality Age

Amenities Housing services Maintenance Utilities

Page 35: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 3535

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

2. Reasonable Rent

PHA must follow its written method Document determination that the rent to

owner is reasonable at required times Initial leasing of a unit Any increase in rent to owner 5% decrease in the FMR in effect 60 days

before HAPC anniversary date

Page 36: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 3636

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates 3. Determination of Adjusted Income (20/15/0

points) Universe

Number of families assisted for PHA FY Sample drawn from

Number of families assisted for PHA FY

Page 2-44

Page 37: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 3737

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates 3. Determination of Adjusted Income

(Supervisory Audit) At admission and reexamination, the PHA

must properly: Obtain third-party verification of income or

document why impossible to obtain Use the verified information Properly attribute allowances for expenses Use the appropriate utility allowances

Page 2-44

Page 38: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 3838

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Most Likely Error Points

Market/cash value of assets Asset income Training program income EID for persons with disabilities Disability assistance & medical expenses Conflict between utilities in lease and

worksheet

Page 39: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 3939

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Recommended Levels of Verification

Highest – Up-front income verification (UIV)

High – Written 3rd party Medium – Third party oral Medium-low – Document review Low – Tenant declaration

Page 40: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 4040

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Use of UIV for Verification

UIV is third-party verification Most preferred form Meets regulatory requirements

UIV is intended to streamline the verification process Eliminates the need for written third-party

verification in many cases

Page 41: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 4141

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

NEW! HUD Guidance on EIV HUD webcasts 1/16/08 and 8/26/08 contained

revised guidance on use of EIV Previous guidance is obsolete and has been

removed from EIV website Both webcasts available at

http://www.hud.gov/webcasts/archives/iv.cfm Training materials available at

http://www.hud.gov/offices/pih/programs/ph/

rhiip/training.cfm

Page 42: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 4242

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates 4. Utility Allowance Schedule

(5/0 points) PHA has reviewed utility rate data within

prior 12 months

PHA has adjusted schedule if 10%+ change in rate since last utility allowance schedule revision

Page 2-54

Page 43: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 4343

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

5. HQS Quality Control Inspections (5/0 points)

Universe Units under HAPC during last completed FY

Page 2-61

Page 44: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 4444

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

5. HQS Quality Control Inspections (Supervisory

Audit) PHA performs QC inspection of units

under contract Sampling drawn from:

Recently completed inspections Cross section of neighborhoods Work of cross section of inspectors

Page 2-61

Page 45: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 4545

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

6. HQS Enforcement(10/0 points)

Universe Number of failed HQS inspections in last FY

Sample drawn from Number of failed HQS inspections in last FY

Page 2-68

Page 46: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 4646

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

HQS Enforcement (Supervisory Audit)

All life threatening fails corrected within 24 hours, and

98% of other fails corrected within 30 days or PHA approved extension or PHA took action Owner fails: abated HAP Family fails: enforced family obligations

Page 47: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 4747

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

7. Expanding Housing Opportunities (5/0 points)

A. Written policy to encourage owner participation outside areas of poverty or minority concentration

B. Documentation shows PHA followed policyC. PHA has created a briefing packet (e.g. maps,

job opportunities, schools and other services in the areas) to encourage voucher holders to seek these opportunities

Page 48: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 4848

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Expanding Housing Opportunities

D. Information packet has List of owners willing to lease Other organizations (housing counseling,

advocacy groups, service providers) which assist families in finding units

E. Information packet explains portability and provides list of contacts at neighboring PHAs

Page 49: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 4949

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Expanding Housing Opportunities

F. PHAs have analyzed: Difficulties of voucher holders finding units in

these areas If so, has analyzed

Whether to seek approval of exception payment standards

Sought approval for exception payment standards if needed

Page 50: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 5050

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

8. Payment Standards(5/0 points)

The PHA must adopt payment standards By unit size For each FMR area in the PHA jurisdiction Between 90-110% of the HUD-published FMR If applicable, for each PHA-designated part of

an FMR area

Page 2-85

Page 51: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 5151

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

8. Payment Standards

If any PS schedule contains a PS that is out of range from the appropriate FMR Field office will assign 0 points for the

indicator

Page 52: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 5252

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

8. Payment Standards

Example: FMR for 2 bedroom unit $756

$756 x 1.10 = $831.60 (round down) $756 x .90 = $680.40 (round up)

To be within range PS can be between: $681 - $831

Page 53: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 5353

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

HUD IndicatorsVerified by PIC

Page 2-91

Page 54: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 5454

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

PIC Reporting

If a PHA has not reported at least 95% of its program participants to PIC Any indicator for which HUD verifies

performance using PIC data will be rated zero!!

Page 55: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 5555

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

PIC Factors

Factors affected by the 95% reporting rate: Annual reexaminations 10 pts Correct tenant rent calculations 5 pts Pre-contract HQS inspections 5 pts Family self-sufficiency 10 pts Annual HQS inspections 10 pts

Zero pts for each if 95% not achieved

Page 56: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 5656

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

9. Annual Reexaminations(10/5/0 points)

PHA must complete a reexamination for each participating family at least every 12 months

Remember PIC reporting End participation (#6) Other change of unit (#7) vs.

annual reexam (#2) Annual reexam searching (#9)

Page 2-93

Page 57: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 5757

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

10. Correct Tenant Rent Calculations (5/0 points)

The PHA must correctly calculate family’s share of rent to owner Inaccurate or missing data from indictor 3

(adjusted income) will affect the accuracy of this indicator

Page 2-100

Page 58: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 5858

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

11. Pre-Contract HQS Inspections (5/0 points)

Newly leased units must pass HQS inspection before HAP contract effective date

Page 2-105

Page 59: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 5959

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

12.Annual HQS Inspections(10/5/0)

The PHA inspects each unit under contract at least annually

At least annually means within 12 months from date inspector conducted full HQS inspection

Page 2-111

Page 60: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 6060

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

12. Annual HQS Inspections

HUD-50058 form has an action code to allow reporting of the annual HQS inspection at the time it occurs

PIC extract will list % of inspections more than 2 months overdue The 2 month allowance is to accommodate a

possible lag in electronic reporting

Page 61: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 6161

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Annual HQS Inspection Only

If a 50058 is submitted within 2 months from annual HQS effective date Put HQS effective date on line 5i

If more than 2 months, annual HQS must have its own 50058

Page 62: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 6262

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

13. Lease-Up(20/15/0 points)

The PHA enters into HAP contracts for the number of units under ACC for at least one year PHA has leased at least 98% or 95% of the

units under ACC, or PHA has used at least 98% or 95% of its

allocated budget authority

Page 63: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 6363

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

14. FSS(10/8/5/3/0)

Applies only to PHAs required to administer an FSS program

PHA checks off on the certification form if the indicator does not apply to them If checked, HUD field office will verify that the

PHA is not required to administer an FSS program

Page 2-124

Page 64: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 6464

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

14a. FSS EnrollmentPHA Certifies:

A. # of mandatory slots or # slots with HUD-approved exception

B. # of FSS families currently enrolled

Page 65: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 6565

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

14a. FSS EnrollmentPHA Certifies:

C. Portability: If you are the initial PHA, enter # families currently enrolled but who have moved under portability and whose S8 assistance is administered by another PHA

D. % of FSS slots filled (b + c divided by a)

Page 66: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 6666

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Rating FSS Enrollment

The HUD field office will verify the # of mandatory FSS slots (or with exception) reported on the PHA’s certification

PIC supplies the number of FSS families currently enrolled

Page 67: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 6767

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

14b. % of FSS Participantswith Escrow Balances

The PHA has made progress in supporting family self-sufficiency as measured by the % of currently enrolled FSS families with escrow account balances (need 30% for full points)Yes___ No___

$

Page 68: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 6868

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

14 b. % of FSS Participantswith Escrow Balances

Portability: If you are the initial PHA Enter the number of families with FSS escrow

accounts currently enrolled in your FSS program, but who have moved under portability and whose Section 8 assistance is administered by another PHA

Page 69: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 6969

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Rating FSS Escrow Account Balances

The percent of FSS families with escrow account balances comes directly from PIC# of FSS families with positive escrow balance or with a positive amount of escrow disbursed# of families in PIC w/progress reports

= % with escrow accounts balance

Page 2-124

Page 70: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 7070

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Deconcentration BONUS

Mandatory for PHA using PS amount(s) that exceed 100% of FMR set at 50th percentile

Optional for all other PHAs Criterion 1

50% or more of all S8 families with children resided in low poverty census tracts last FY

Page 2-136

Page 71: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 7171

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Deconcentration BONUS

Criterion 2 and 32. % of S8 families with children who have

moved to low poverty census tracts last FY At least 2% higher than % of All S8 families with

children living in low poverty census tracts last FY

3. Same as (2), except over past two FY 5 points

Page 2-136

Page 72: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 7272

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Deconcentration Bonus

Criterion 4 State and regional PHAs

Must complete data for each metro area or portion of a metro area where the PHA has assisted 20 or more S8 families with children last FY

5 Points

Page 73: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 7373

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Success Rate of Voucher Holders

Applies only to PHAs with HUD approval to establish success rate PS amounts

Initially effective for 2nd full PHA FY following date of HUD approval of success rate PS amounts

>>>>>>>>>

Page 2-140

Page 74: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 7474

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Success Rate of Voucher Holders

Measures whether voucher holders were successful in leasing units

HUD verification method: PIC 5 Points

Page 75: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 7575

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Additional Information

A PHA may include with its SEMAP certification any information bearing on the accuracy or completeness of the information used by the PHA in completing its certification (comments)

A PHA may also send paper documentation to the HUD field office

Page 2-141

Page 76: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 7676

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

So what’s a PHA to do???

Page 77: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 7777

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

Review Steps to Success

1. Establish desired outcomes2. Educate all staff on how their daily work

impacts the PHA SEMAP score3. Assign SEMAP QC role to one or more key

staff 4. Establish an indicator review schedule5. Establish record keeping system6. Conduct preliminary and ongoing audits

Page 78: © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates December 20081 Managing SEMAP Gail Gillispie © Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates.

December 2008December 2008 7878

© Copyright 2008 Nan McKay & Associates

January 16 – Earned Income Disallowance January 23 – Rent Reasonableness January 30 – Managing the Maintenance Function February 13 – EIV Security and Update March 6 - Income Exclusions (not including Earned Income Disallowance)

UPCOMING LUNCH ‘N’ LEARNS