s-coeK'H'!'.1;ffi.; ,i,i'fr(K I''lY- fl:f,Hffi1,ig;. ' ry41OFNIVIAR INE PARARK

o Brooklyn, NY 11234TeL Qa7) 875-7874

BDmillbasin@ gmail. com

\

A,\uJ-

@ J"of

PSAK DIN

Having Come Before the Beit Din,the Matter of the Marital Issues between the followingparties:

Claimant: Rivka Weiss, the wife24yearc, born:November 30, 1989

Residing at: 1609 East 34th StreetBrooklvn. NY 11234

-and-

Respondent: Yoel Weiss, the husband31 years, bornJuly 8, 1982

Residing at: 1234 47ffi StreetBrooklvn. NY 11219

Whereas the claimant was married with Chuppa & Keddushintothe respondent on July 16,

2008; and

Whereas, there were two children born from the said marriage; and

Whereas the couple resided together until July 2,2012; and

Whereas the respondent husband during the four years of marriage had not been associated

with attending any shul,bothduring the week and4or on Shabbos and Yom Tov; and

Whereas the respondent husband during the four years of marriage failed to comply with even

the basic Hilchos Shabbos and Taharas Hamishpacha: and

Whereas the claimant wife during the first four years of marriage was forced against her will by

the respondent husband via means of threats and violence against her to actinviolation of those

Issurai Torah, both in private and in public; and

(over)

(continued)PSAK DIN12 AdarII,5774PageZ of 3 pages

Whereas on July 2,2012 the claimant wife took the two children and ran away forever from therespondent husband; and

Whereas the claimant has been demanding aGet Peturin from the respondent husband sincetime immediately following the maniage to this day; and

Whereas the husband has stated that he has no intention to give the claimant wife a Get; and

Whereas the Beit Din, onrequest of the clairnant wife, sent the respondent husband three (3)separate Hazmanot to appear before the Beit Din, for a Din Torah relating to the issuance of aGet and other matters; and

Whereas the respondent husband after receiving each of the said Hazmanot contacledthe BeitDin and after acknowledging his receipt of the Beit Din Hazmana failed to appear for a DinTorah or state his willingness to proceed to another Beit Din for a Din Torah; and

Whereas the Beit Din, after three weeks since the respondent husband's refusal to appear for a

Din Torah, sent the respondent as a courtesy a fourth Hazmanawhich provided him with afinal opportunity to appear before the Beit Din at a convenient location situated in BoroughPark, Brooklyn, and where the respondent husband was advised within the said Hazmanathatshould he again fail to appear that the Beit Din will proceed in his absentia; and

Whereas the scheduled time set forth in the Hazmana passed, and the Dayyanim of the Beit Dinafter having allowed a sufficient grace period for the respondent husband to appear, and wherethe respondent husband againfailed to appear before the Beit Din andlor request an adjoumed

date; the Av Beit Din inthe absence of the respondent husband called the Beit Din to order, and

asked that the claims of the claimant wife be presented; and

The Beit Din after hearing the claims of Rivka Stein, the claimant wife, and the Beit Dinfinding her claims credible, and there being no person appearing on behalf of the respondent

husband to refute or contradict the claimant wife; the Beit Din rules as follows:

1. The respondent husband, Yoel Weiss is obligated (Chayiv)to issue immediately aGet to his wife, Rivka Stein, the claimant herein, with the entire cost of the Gelprocess to be paid by the respondent husband, Yoel Weiss, and with the cost of said

procedure set at no higher than one thousand dollars ($1,000.00); ana

2. That Yoel Weiss, the respondent husband, within twenty-four hours after service oftltrs Beit Din Psakupon him by either personal service and/or via email, shall

deposit with the Beit Din the sum of $1,000.00 for the Get cost in the form of a bank

check

(over)

funfi*rrtd)FSAKn{}{12 &.d*t II,5?74F*g*,3 **"3 pogec

et.

{with*!*ck a+ade Sraya}xe to H*it sin i4edek of il,{nr:ine Fark & ,&fitrt $sxin}, andssnd sqffie {a tre Bcit,[}inf,edek at *3?S Sasr ?:ft}d litreet, I$r$ek}yq, Nern" y*rkI,1234 via {Jf$ ax#llr Fed lix" bfeut fllgpr l}elivery, ancl provide }le "$rr-r #inirnmediately thereafter via eniail to: S"l?-Frillbasin'?).gllqii.csry of the rsspectivetr*cking number; and

That ftrllowing <ielivery, by the rcsponrtrent husban4 Yoel Weiss" of the aforesaidone thn$eextd dollaw to csver the Get c$st, {hs Srj, i}fr will,sdviss the rnspertivepnrti*s ts eppsnr befCIrs the #r'dl.#rs iri:bum*rl nt 1?7$ Ilnst T?nd $treet, Hrooklyn"l,tY I 1234 *r arry. other addr$sg don.(6trinted by tXre "Sejf Illr lbr the pqrpnse ofelYeeilra{ing e #eJ fsr.fke *lairyent,r*i$ Rjc,lrx $rerni and

That in the event the respondent limband continues 1o flout the fieff Din andconfinues to refuse to abide with f{alacha by fbiting to promptly comply rvith thisP'lsft 8e# $in, thon t&p # fr Si.ru, r,vill:ic$ffie irmrmediatCIly * writ of refuoal lurorvn as a

",Siru,rv Sait il.tn't against the rcspondent husbanrl" tha..r,an-5r penrriti,ng the olailllffitwifb an#or any other hala&icffy pr$psr lSeit Din ilre futl \lalachie right to use anylegal rneans to eftectuate ccrmpliance wittr tire herein Psak Beit Din.

In view nli*l{ the afur'ernentioned circLlmstffir*es, i**.cfudkg tl,ta rcupon$*rt kusbatrdstspsated oumtwm,pf of ,lrhs Seit S.lm and his fniXur,e t$ flip,,,panr fuefer* the Beit Sin, nll*thev claims &md

'issucs *f ths $lai*,na*t wife againsl"'the respondenf hurbia*d, ?"oel

Wsiss, hnvs rlo $lace in the srirse$t &*!t Sin p,rCI$$,$$ sn{ tlRor'ofcre may b*r,ssstrv$d

in the secu.lar courts

Dated: BroahlSnr, Ne'r,r Y,nrk13 Adar trI" 57?4Mnr*h. xj{,2{l14

rJ$S r,**; DeYyEr-t

f):g

dplc i'I.!p ffi'i j Dalry*t