[ CHAPTER HI I - Shodhgangashodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/45762/10/10_chapter 3.pdf ·...
Transcript of [ CHAPTER HI I - Shodhgangashodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/45762/10/10_chapter 3.pdf ·...
Trends and Notable GIDS;-
Above studies based on investigated variables show the following trends and
notable gaps of studies. The review of literature of all the above cited variables exhibit
that extensive work bas been done in the area of glass ceiling in relation to wage and
salary structure in the corporate world, gender dilemmas of the work life balanced
women manager training modules, cross-cultural differences etc. but there is a dearth of
empirical evidence of glass ceiling in relation to psychological measures, i.e. self-esteem,
organizational commitment etc. Though the review really highlights that the constructs of
organizational commitment and advancement have been widely studied empirically in
relation to occupational stress, job satisfaction, morale etc. But major evidence is
available in relation to glass ceiling as an independent variable. Moreover, women are
upcoming and effectively dominating in every field from home to various kinds of work
set-up. But in spite of showing remarkable achievements and excellence in various fields,
they are suffering from gender discrimination. Whenever it is a myth or their false
perception or the ground reality of an traditional patrlarchical society, is a big question
mark and needs to be pondered over. After identifying these trends and notable gaps and
inclination of mind, the present problem was framed to make a comparative analysis of
glass ceiling perceivers and non-perceivers along with the role of glass ceiling in relation
of organizational commitment, self-esteem, adjustment and well-being. Following
hypotheses were formulated and tested in the present research: -
I. There would be significant difference in the normative, affective and continuance
commitment of high glass ceiling perceivers and low glass ceiling perceivers.
2. There would be significant difference in the emotional & occupational adjustment
of high glass ceiling perceivers and low glass ceiling perceivers.
3. There would be significant difference in the well-being of high glass ceiling
perceivers and low glass ceiling perceivers.
88
4. There would be significant difference in the self-esteem of high glass ceiling
perceivers and low glass ceiling perceivers.
5. There would be differential role of glass ceiling on the organizational
commitment, self-es~m, adjustment and well-being of female's executives of
different categories (Low Glass Ceiling Perceiver, High Glass Ceiling Perceiver,
Mixed Glass Ceiling Perceiver).
89
MULTINATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS (MNC)j-
A corporation that has its facilities and other assets in at least one country other
than its home country. Such companies have offices or factories in different countries and
usually have a centralized office where they coordinate global management. Very large
multinationals have budgets that exceed those of many small countries.
The first modern MNC is generally thought to be the Dutch East India company.
established in 1602. Very large multinationals have budgets that exceed some national
GDPs. Multinational Corporations can have a powerful influence in local economies as
well as the world economy and playa very important role in international relations and
globalization. Many MNC's that have succeeded remaricably elsewhere in the world have
yet to make a significant impact in India. The market entry and penetration strategies that
have worked so well for these companies in other countries have been for less successful
in India. Many MNC's have struggled to understand Indian customers and come up with
suitable products and services. At the same time. some MNC's have done pretty well for
themselves.
Today. virtually all the big MNC's in the world have operations in India. These
include Unilever. BAT, Colgate Palmolive &. Gamble, General Electric, General Motors.
Ford. Pepsi. ffiM. Pepsi. Intel. Coca-Cola, Oracle etc. India is now considered by many
MNC' s to be a strategically important market. In recent times. other reasons have made
India an attractive destination for MNC·s. India has emerged as a low cost back office.
manufacturing and research base. thanks to its skilled but relatively cheap manpower. In
the computer software induStry. many MNCs are establishing offshore development
centers to tap local manpower. ffiM. Accenture. EDS and Computer Associates have all
been strengthening their presence in the country. Not only are Indian software workers
among the best in the world. when it comes to technical skills but they are also more
comfortable with English. compared to their counterparts in countries such as China. Dell
and Deloitte have major back office operations in the country. General Electric (GE) is
looking at India as an important R&D base. which can contribute to their global
knowledge pool. GE's local outfit has filed for several patents in the last couple of years.
Nokia has set up three R&D centre that work on next-generation packet-switched mobile
90
technologies and communications solutions. Texas Instruments is also doing cutting edge
R&D work in the country.
Many MNCs are large in relation to the national income of the countries in which
they are located. This means that it is not as easy for the host governments to enforce
national laws on MNCs. Generally speaking. governments want investment from these
MNCs because they generate jobs and incomes. Other benefits include training of local
workers in neW and potentially transferable skills. In a highly competitive world.
companies seek to reduce their costs as much as possible. The prospect of a foreign
company setting up in a country where labor is cheap and attractive both for the company
and a host country's government.
While several MNCs have entered India, not all of them are doing well. This is
evident when performances are compared across industries. However. even within a
given industry. some MNCs seem to be doing better than the others. Consider the
automobile industry. Here. Suzuki and Hyundai are way ahead of formidable rivals such
as General Motors. Honda and Ford. Similarly in the FMCG sector. even after allowing
for its relative late entry. Procter & Gamble (P&G) remains a marginal player compared
to Hindustan Lever. In some industries. the local players have left the MNCs high and
dry.
One must be careful while explaining the good performance of some MNCs and
the poor performance of others. An important point to note here is that different MN Cs
have entered India at different points in time and responded to the needs of the
environment accordingly. For example. MNCs. which entered India since the 199Os. have
in general been more aggressive and proactive in a liberalized business environment. than
those which began operations during the license Raj. Hyundai. Samsung and LG are good
examples.
At the same time. some of the successful MNCs have also realized that price is
not the only factor driving purchase decisions. Value conscious consumers. will pay a
premium if the benefits of superior features and quality are seen to far outweigh their
cost. LG for example. has reengineered its TV product specifications in order to develop
three offerings specifically for India. including a no-frills one to expand the market at the
91
low end and a premium 21-inch flat TV for the middle segment. By keeping the price of
the premium offering to within 10 percent of the price of TVs with conventional screens,
LG has persuaded many consumers to buy it. These innovations have helped the
company to establish a very strong competitive position in the country's consumer
durable-goods and electronics appliances market.
Sample-
A total sample of 350 female executives, working at middle level of
management, having at least five years managerial experience belonging to an age group
of 35-40 years were selected for the present study.
Desip-
A two independent group design was used. One group (n=IOO) was of high glass
ceiling perceivers or those who could not cross the barrier and the second matched group
(n=IOO) was of those women who crossed the barrier and reach at elite leadership
positions (low glass ceiling perceivers).
92
Table No. 3.1
Frequency of Female Managers in different MNCs N=350
Organization Faridabad Delhi Gurgaon Noida
Escorts India Pvt. 30 - - -Ltd.
Newchem 25 - - -
Goodyear 29 - - -
HDFCBank II 28 19 -
ICICIBank 9 19 14 -
ICICI Prudential 13 15 7 -Life Insurance
HCL - 19 8 25
Technologies
Ltd.
Whirlpool 18 - - -
Tata Consultancy - 15 - \0
Services
Infosys - 12 - -
Wipro - 10 8 6
Total 135 118 56 41
93
Material-
Standardized tests and scales were selected to measure the glass ceiling,
organizational commitment, adjustment, well-being and self-esteem of female executives
of various multinational organizations. The following material was used in the study: -
(i) Glass Ceiling Questionnaire (self-construed and operationalized).
(ii) Organizational Commitment (Allen and Meyer, 1990).
(iii) Bell Adjustment Inventory (Bell 1934).
(iv) PGI Well-Being Measure (Verma & Verma, 1989).
(v) Self-Esteem Inventory (Coopersmith, 1967).
Description of the Tests;
Glass Ceiling: -
A sixteen-item questionnaire was construed and operationalized to measure the
glass ceiling phenomena among female executive of multinational organization. These
items were taken on the basis of different parameters, i.e., equal employment
opportunities and affirmative actions, appropriate job openings at higher levels, training
and development opportunities to improve skills, assigning challenging tasks, decision
making etc. It was a forced-choice questionnaire having inverse scoring pattern. The
higher the score, the lower is the glass ceiling and lower the score, the higher is the glass
ceiling.
ORGANIZATIONAL COMMITMENT SCALK=
The organizational commitment scale was developed by Allen and Meyer in
1990.They developed three scale using items from Mowday et. al (1979), Buchanan
(1974) and Quinn & Staines (1979) to measure the normative, affective and continuance
conceptualizations of organizational commitment. Each scale contained eight statements
presented in a seven-point Likert scale response format with the following anchors:
94
Strongly Disagree, Moderately Disagree, Slightly Disagree, Neither Agree nor Disagree,
Slightly Agree, Moderately Agree, Strongly Agree. It has 24 items deigned to measure
the various dimensions of organizational commitment. The reliability for each scale was
as follows: Affective Commitment Scale, 0 .87, Normative Commitment Scale,
0.79,Continuance Commitment Scale, 0 .75. Scale development had been supported by
acceptable levels ofreliability and validity (McGee & Ford, 1987; Meyer & Allen 1984).
There is no definite time limit for the administration of this test but it usually gets
completed withia 15 to 20 minutes.
ADMINISTRASTION & SCORING-
After collecting the data from different Multinational organizations, the response
was scored. In case of organizational commitment scale, there was three components i.e.
affective, normative and continuance commitment. There were eight items in each
component. Out of eight items, four items were positive, whereas, rest of four was
negative. Organizational commitment scale as a seven-point scale, the scoring of which
had been objectified by assigning 'One of Seven' scores respectively for seven
alternatives of the positive items, sequentially rated from "strongly disagree to strongly
agree". For negative items, the scores assigned to each of the alternatives had been
reversed. The scoring system is given as below:
95
Table:3.2
Scoring systems of organizational commiCment scale.
7items Strongly Moderately SJigbdy Neither S1igbdy Moderately Strongly
agree agree agree agree agree disagree disagree
Nor
disagree
Positive 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
Statements
Negative 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
Statements
The AdjusCmept Ipyeptory:-
The adjustment inventory has been developed by Bell (1934). The adult form of
the adjustment inventory provides five separate measures of personal and social
adjustment Le. Home Adjustment, Health Adjustment, Social Adjustment, Emotional
Adjustment and Occupational Adjustment. But we had taken only occupational
adjustment and emotional adjustment.
This adjustment inventory was suitable for both sexes. The high reliabiJities of the
separate measures made possible comparison of one individual with another. The
measurement of five types of adjustment by the one blank permits location of specific
adjustment difficulties. The use of small letters a, b. c. d & e corresponding to the five
measures of adjustment. There was no time limit but not more than 25 minutes. The
reliability for emotional adjustment .90 and for occupational adjustment is .85.
96
Administration and Scoring: -
After administration of the test next step was scoring. Thus, to obtain the score on
emotional adjustment, we took the scoring stencil entitled "Emotional" and laid the
column for page of the inventory. So that the top and bottom of the number of instances
where the vertical marks on the scoring stencil fall immediately over a circle on the test,
writing that total at the bottom of the page or keeping it in memory. Then similarly
applied the column on the stencil for next page of the inventory. After that total the
scores of emotional adjustment. Similarly obtain the scores of occupational adjustment in
the same manner. There was no score for the question marks.
PGI Genera! WeD ReiDl Scale:-
It was 20 item scale in simple English constructed on the lines of scales by Faizo
(1977) & Dupuy (1970), modified & simplified (or Indian population. Since it deals with
the construct pertaining to subjective feeling which was difficult to fathom & measure
objectively but it was useful in a variety of research and applied setting such as a quality
of life index, a mental health status appraisal, a measured psychotherapy outcome
evaluation & a social indicator of measuring population changes in the sense of well
being over time (Faizo, 1977). It was found to have satisfactory highly significant
reliability, i.e. KR 98 & discriminatory value. The scale correlated significantly with
Bradburn's Scale (Verma & Verma 1989). The higher the score the higher the well being.
SELF-Esteem Inventory -
Self-Esteem Inventory was developed by Coopersmith in 1967. He developed
three different types of inventories for different age groups i.e. the school form. the short
school form and the adult form.
The School form was used with student's aged 5 to 15 and it consists of 58 items.
The School short form was used with the same age group as the school form. It was
consisted of 25 items.
97
The Adult form was used with the person's aged 16 and above. It was consisted of
twenty-five statements adapted from the school short form and Adult form exceeds 80.
Every statement has two types of option "Like me" or "Unlike me". Before starting
following instructions were given to subject. Those 25 statements were about feelings. If
a statement describe how he feel usually, put an x in the column" Like me and if that
statement does not describes how he usually feel put an X "Unlike me". There is no
option for right or wrong answers. The reliability is .80 (Battle, 97).
Administration and ScOriJU!i-
After collecting the data from the female managers, once the inventories had
completed then the next step had started. The Self-Esteem was scored in a few minutes
by using the scoring keys and if the key was not available then general rules listed below
were followed:
a. Score negative items correct if they have been answered "Unlike me". For ego "I
get upset easily at home".
b. Scale positive items correct if they have been answered "Like me". (For eg- I am
pretty sure of myself. If the answer is "Like me" then give her a point.)
Procedurei -
After completing the preliminary requirement of sample selection and tools
selection, data collection was started. The appointments were pre-fixed with the female
managers at individual level of different Multinational Organizations. The purpose of the
study was explained in detail to these female managers to make a rapport and collect
information on selected questionnaires with their consent. At the time of explaining about
the purpose of the study, it was assured to maintain the confidentiality of the information
given by them. Necessary instructions to be followed were given in a submissive way,
before filling up the scales/questionnaire etc. Some of the managers in the first instance
were hesitating in sparing time to fill the scale/questionnaire due to time constraint but
after convincing about the study they agreed to give information on the tools. A set of
Organizational Commitment scale, Bell's Adjustment Inventory, Self-Esteem, PGI Well
98
Being and Glass Ceiling was given to female managers. Most of the female managers
were not interested to fill the scale/questionnaires. They raised some equerries about the
procedure of filling up the scale/questionnaires. All the equerries were resol ved
immediately. In some cases the set of tools were misplaced by female managers, another
set of tools was given to them. It was a long process to collect data from various
Multinational Organizations. Approximately 30 minutes were taken by one female
manager in completion of these five scales/questionnaires.
Analysis:
The data was analyzed a light of descriptive statistics, frequency analysis and
multiple regression analysis:
DesgjpUve Statistics:
Descriptive statistics was used to study the interrelationship between eight
variables i.e., mean, median and SO (100 low glass ceiling perceivers and 100 high glass
ceiling perceivers).
Frequency Analysis:
Frequency analysis of mixed 150 female executives.
Mu!tlpJe Reemsion Analysis:
Where one dependent variable i.e., glass ceiling was regressed upon seven
dependent variable i.e., normative commitment, affective commitment, continuance
commitment, emotional adjustment, occupational adjustment, well-being and self-esteem.
99