< Benchmarking Report > · 2018-12-03 · Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank...
25
< Benchmarking Report > TechGig Code Gladiators 2018
Transcript of < Benchmarking Report > · 2018-12-03 · Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank...
lt Benchmarking Report gt
TechGig Code Gladiators 2018
Analysis of Student vs Professional
Participation Analysis ndash Round Wise
Performance Analysis ndash Round Wise
Analysis by Candidate Region
Analysis by Candidate Skill Language
Analysis by Candidate Experience
Analysis by Candidate Gender
Index
DEVELOPER
BENCHMARKING
REPORTPARTICIPATION
ANALYSIS
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
Professional61
Student39
Professional Student
Ave
rage
Sco
res
Par
tici
pat
ion
38
365
Professionals Students
ProfessionalsScored better
Student Vs Professional Analysis
bull Over 22 Lakh coders registered amp over115 lakh coders participated in Code Gladiators 2018
bull Of these 61 were professionals and 39 were students bull Professionals scored a better average score as compared to Students
115 Lakh
102 Lakh
2K
780
bull 10 of the people who attempted question 1 of Screening and scoredgt0 also scored gt 0 in question 2 of Screening round
bull 85 of the people who attempted question 1 and scoredgt0 in Semi-Final round also participated in question 2 of Semi-final round and scored gt0
84 developers who Participated solved the Easy problem with Score gt 0
Complexity wise Participation Analysis
Participation
Screening
Semi-Final
Finale
Complexity wise Performance Analysis
32
32
19
16
participants with gt50 average marks
Participation
Screening
Semi-Final
Finale
bull All the people who were in the finale have scored above 50 in screening amp semi-finalbull Quality gets better as complexity increases
BengaluruBangalore11
HyderabadSecunderabad
8
Pune7
Delhi5
Chennai5
Mumbai5
NoidaGreater Noida3Kolkata
2Gurgaon
2Ahmedabad
1
Others 51
Region Wise Participation Analysis
Participation Stats
bull Maximum participation is from Bengaluru followed by Hyderabad Pune Chennai Mumbai and DelhiNCR bull Less participation from Ahmedabad and Kolkata
42
38 38
4541
43
55
48 49 4746
38
45
40 4138
46
37
4442
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Region Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students and professionals from NoidaGreater Noida have performed the best as compared to their counter parts in other cities
bull Students have scored better than professionals on an overall level However Professionals in Bengaluru and Pune have scored better than students
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
Student Professional
Language Wise Participation Analysis
bull The most preferred language for both Students as well as Professionals is C followed by Java bull Overall Professionals have shown better numbers in terms of participation as compared to students
42
2628
71
29
70
18
48
22
50
61
41
66
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Language Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students have performed the best in Cpp language and Professionals have performed the best in Python Language
bull Students have scored better than professionals in Cpp Python and C
6122
15 2
0
Participation
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Experience Wise Participation Analysis
bull Maximum participants are from ldquo0-2rdquo years experience band followed by ldquo3-5rdquo years experience bandbull Very few participants from 11-15 years and Beyond 15 years experience bands
35
4042 42
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Average Marks
Average Marks
Experience Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull People in 6-10 years experience band have performed the best bull People in 0-2 years and beyond 15 years experience bands have not performed as good as their counter
parts in other experience bands
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
Analysis of Student vs Professional
Participation Analysis ndash Round Wise
Performance Analysis ndash Round Wise
Analysis by Candidate Region
Analysis by Candidate Skill Language
Analysis by Candidate Experience
Analysis by Candidate Gender
Index
DEVELOPER
BENCHMARKING
REPORTPARTICIPATION
ANALYSIS
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
Professional61
Student39
Professional Student
Ave
rage
Sco
res
Par
tici
pat
ion
38
365
Professionals Students
ProfessionalsScored better
Student Vs Professional Analysis
bull Over 22 Lakh coders registered amp over115 lakh coders participated in Code Gladiators 2018
bull Of these 61 were professionals and 39 were students bull Professionals scored a better average score as compared to Students
115 Lakh
102 Lakh
2K
780
bull 10 of the people who attempted question 1 of Screening and scoredgt0 also scored gt 0 in question 2 of Screening round
bull 85 of the people who attempted question 1 and scoredgt0 in Semi-Final round also participated in question 2 of Semi-final round and scored gt0
84 developers who Participated solved the Easy problem with Score gt 0
Complexity wise Participation Analysis
Participation
Screening
Semi-Final
Finale
Complexity wise Performance Analysis
32
32
19
16
participants with gt50 average marks
Participation
Screening
Semi-Final
Finale
bull All the people who were in the finale have scored above 50 in screening amp semi-finalbull Quality gets better as complexity increases
BengaluruBangalore11
HyderabadSecunderabad
8
Pune7
Delhi5
Chennai5
Mumbai5
NoidaGreater Noida3Kolkata
2Gurgaon
2Ahmedabad
1
Others 51
Region Wise Participation Analysis
Participation Stats
bull Maximum participation is from Bengaluru followed by Hyderabad Pune Chennai Mumbai and DelhiNCR bull Less participation from Ahmedabad and Kolkata
42
38 38
4541
43
55
48 49 4746
38
45
40 4138
46
37
4442
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Region Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students and professionals from NoidaGreater Noida have performed the best as compared to their counter parts in other cities
bull Students have scored better than professionals on an overall level However Professionals in Bengaluru and Pune have scored better than students
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
Student Professional
Language Wise Participation Analysis
bull The most preferred language for both Students as well as Professionals is C followed by Java bull Overall Professionals have shown better numbers in terms of participation as compared to students
42
2628
71
29
70
18
48
22
50
61
41
66
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Language Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students have performed the best in Cpp language and Professionals have performed the best in Python Language
bull Students have scored better than professionals in Cpp Python and C
6122
15 2
0
Participation
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Experience Wise Participation Analysis
bull Maximum participants are from ldquo0-2rdquo years experience band followed by ldquo3-5rdquo years experience bandbull Very few participants from 11-15 years and Beyond 15 years experience bands
35
4042 42
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Average Marks
Average Marks
Experience Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull People in 6-10 years experience band have performed the best bull People in 0-2 years and beyond 15 years experience bands have not performed as good as their counter
parts in other experience bands
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
DEVELOPER
BENCHMARKING
REPORTPARTICIPATION
ANALYSIS
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
Professional61
Student39
Professional Student
Ave
rage
Sco
res
Par
tici
pat
ion
38
365
Professionals Students
ProfessionalsScored better
Student Vs Professional Analysis
bull Over 22 Lakh coders registered amp over115 lakh coders participated in Code Gladiators 2018
bull Of these 61 were professionals and 39 were students bull Professionals scored a better average score as compared to Students
115 Lakh
102 Lakh
2K
780
bull 10 of the people who attempted question 1 of Screening and scoredgt0 also scored gt 0 in question 2 of Screening round
bull 85 of the people who attempted question 1 and scoredgt0 in Semi-Final round also participated in question 2 of Semi-final round and scored gt0
84 developers who Participated solved the Easy problem with Score gt 0
Complexity wise Participation Analysis
Participation
Screening
Semi-Final
Finale
Complexity wise Performance Analysis
32
32
19
16
participants with gt50 average marks
Participation
Screening
Semi-Final
Finale
bull All the people who were in the finale have scored above 50 in screening amp semi-finalbull Quality gets better as complexity increases
BengaluruBangalore11
HyderabadSecunderabad
8
Pune7
Delhi5
Chennai5
Mumbai5
NoidaGreater Noida3Kolkata
2Gurgaon
2Ahmedabad
1
Others 51
Region Wise Participation Analysis
Participation Stats
bull Maximum participation is from Bengaluru followed by Hyderabad Pune Chennai Mumbai and DelhiNCR bull Less participation from Ahmedabad and Kolkata
42
38 38
4541
43
55
48 49 4746
38
45
40 4138
46
37
4442
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Region Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students and professionals from NoidaGreater Noida have performed the best as compared to their counter parts in other cities
bull Students have scored better than professionals on an overall level However Professionals in Bengaluru and Pune have scored better than students
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
Student Professional
Language Wise Participation Analysis
bull The most preferred language for both Students as well as Professionals is C followed by Java bull Overall Professionals have shown better numbers in terms of participation as compared to students
42
2628
71
29
70
18
48
22
50
61
41
66
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Language Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students have performed the best in Cpp language and Professionals have performed the best in Python Language
bull Students have scored better than professionals in Cpp Python and C
6122
15 2
0
Participation
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Experience Wise Participation Analysis
bull Maximum participants are from ldquo0-2rdquo years experience band followed by ldquo3-5rdquo years experience bandbull Very few participants from 11-15 years and Beyond 15 years experience bands
35
4042 42
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Average Marks
Average Marks
Experience Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull People in 6-10 years experience band have performed the best bull People in 0-2 years and beyond 15 years experience bands have not performed as good as their counter
parts in other experience bands
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
Professional61
Student39
Professional Student
Ave
rage
Sco
res
Par
tici
pat
ion
38
365
Professionals Students
ProfessionalsScored better
Student Vs Professional Analysis
bull Over 22 Lakh coders registered amp over115 lakh coders participated in Code Gladiators 2018
bull Of these 61 were professionals and 39 were students bull Professionals scored a better average score as compared to Students
115 Lakh
102 Lakh
2K
780
bull 10 of the people who attempted question 1 of Screening and scoredgt0 also scored gt 0 in question 2 of Screening round
bull 85 of the people who attempted question 1 and scoredgt0 in Semi-Final round also participated in question 2 of Semi-final round and scored gt0
84 developers who Participated solved the Easy problem with Score gt 0
Complexity wise Participation Analysis
Participation
Screening
Semi-Final
Finale
Complexity wise Performance Analysis
32
32
19
16
participants with gt50 average marks
Participation
Screening
Semi-Final
Finale
bull All the people who were in the finale have scored above 50 in screening amp semi-finalbull Quality gets better as complexity increases
BengaluruBangalore11
HyderabadSecunderabad
8
Pune7
Delhi5
Chennai5
Mumbai5
NoidaGreater Noida3Kolkata
2Gurgaon
2Ahmedabad
1
Others 51
Region Wise Participation Analysis
Participation Stats
bull Maximum participation is from Bengaluru followed by Hyderabad Pune Chennai Mumbai and DelhiNCR bull Less participation from Ahmedabad and Kolkata
42
38 38
4541
43
55
48 49 4746
38
45
40 4138
46
37
4442
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Region Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students and professionals from NoidaGreater Noida have performed the best as compared to their counter parts in other cities
bull Students have scored better than professionals on an overall level However Professionals in Bengaluru and Pune have scored better than students
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
Student Professional
Language Wise Participation Analysis
bull The most preferred language for both Students as well as Professionals is C followed by Java bull Overall Professionals have shown better numbers in terms of participation as compared to students
42
2628
71
29
70
18
48
22
50
61
41
66
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Language Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students have performed the best in Cpp language and Professionals have performed the best in Python Language
bull Students have scored better than professionals in Cpp Python and C
6122
15 2
0
Participation
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Experience Wise Participation Analysis
bull Maximum participants are from ldquo0-2rdquo years experience band followed by ldquo3-5rdquo years experience bandbull Very few participants from 11-15 years and Beyond 15 years experience bands
35
4042 42
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Average Marks
Average Marks
Experience Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull People in 6-10 years experience band have performed the best bull People in 0-2 years and beyond 15 years experience bands have not performed as good as their counter
parts in other experience bands
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
115 Lakh
102 Lakh
2K
780
bull 10 of the people who attempted question 1 of Screening and scoredgt0 also scored gt 0 in question 2 of Screening round
bull 85 of the people who attempted question 1 and scoredgt0 in Semi-Final round also participated in question 2 of Semi-final round and scored gt0
84 developers who Participated solved the Easy problem with Score gt 0
Complexity wise Participation Analysis
Participation
Screening
Semi-Final
Finale
Complexity wise Performance Analysis
32
32
19
16
participants with gt50 average marks
Participation
Screening
Semi-Final
Finale
bull All the people who were in the finale have scored above 50 in screening amp semi-finalbull Quality gets better as complexity increases
BengaluruBangalore11
HyderabadSecunderabad
8
Pune7
Delhi5
Chennai5
Mumbai5
NoidaGreater Noida3Kolkata
2Gurgaon
2Ahmedabad
1
Others 51
Region Wise Participation Analysis
Participation Stats
bull Maximum participation is from Bengaluru followed by Hyderabad Pune Chennai Mumbai and DelhiNCR bull Less participation from Ahmedabad and Kolkata
42
38 38
4541
43
55
48 49 4746
38
45
40 4138
46
37
4442
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Region Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students and professionals from NoidaGreater Noida have performed the best as compared to their counter parts in other cities
bull Students have scored better than professionals on an overall level However Professionals in Bengaluru and Pune have scored better than students
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
Student Professional
Language Wise Participation Analysis
bull The most preferred language for both Students as well as Professionals is C followed by Java bull Overall Professionals have shown better numbers in terms of participation as compared to students
42
2628
71
29
70
18
48
22
50
61
41
66
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Language Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students have performed the best in Cpp language and Professionals have performed the best in Python Language
bull Students have scored better than professionals in Cpp Python and C
6122
15 2
0
Participation
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Experience Wise Participation Analysis
bull Maximum participants are from ldquo0-2rdquo years experience band followed by ldquo3-5rdquo years experience bandbull Very few participants from 11-15 years and Beyond 15 years experience bands
35
4042 42
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Average Marks
Average Marks
Experience Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull People in 6-10 years experience band have performed the best bull People in 0-2 years and beyond 15 years experience bands have not performed as good as their counter
parts in other experience bands
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
Complexity wise Performance Analysis
32
32
19
16
participants with gt50 average marks
Participation
Screening
Semi-Final
Finale
bull All the people who were in the finale have scored above 50 in screening amp semi-finalbull Quality gets better as complexity increases
BengaluruBangalore11
HyderabadSecunderabad
8
Pune7
Delhi5
Chennai5
Mumbai5
NoidaGreater Noida3Kolkata
2Gurgaon
2Ahmedabad
1
Others 51
Region Wise Participation Analysis
Participation Stats
bull Maximum participation is from Bengaluru followed by Hyderabad Pune Chennai Mumbai and DelhiNCR bull Less participation from Ahmedabad and Kolkata
42
38 38
4541
43
55
48 49 4746
38
45
40 4138
46
37
4442
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Region Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students and professionals from NoidaGreater Noida have performed the best as compared to their counter parts in other cities
bull Students have scored better than professionals on an overall level However Professionals in Bengaluru and Pune have scored better than students
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
Student Professional
Language Wise Participation Analysis
bull The most preferred language for both Students as well as Professionals is C followed by Java bull Overall Professionals have shown better numbers in terms of participation as compared to students
42
2628
71
29
70
18
48
22
50
61
41
66
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Language Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students have performed the best in Cpp language and Professionals have performed the best in Python Language
bull Students have scored better than professionals in Cpp Python and C
6122
15 2
0
Participation
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Experience Wise Participation Analysis
bull Maximum participants are from ldquo0-2rdquo years experience band followed by ldquo3-5rdquo years experience bandbull Very few participants from 11-15 years and Beyond 15 years experience bands
35
4042 42
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Average Marks
Average Marks
Experience Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull People in 6-10 years experience band have performed the best bull People in 0-2 years and beyond 15 years experience bands have not performed as good as their counter
parts in other experience bands
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
BengaluruBangalore11
HyderabadSecunderabad
8
Pune7
Delhi5
Chennai5
Mumbai5
NoidaGreater Noida3Kolkata
2Gurgaon
2Ahmedabad
1
Others 51
Region Wise Participation Analysis
Participation Stats
bull Maximum participation is from Bengaluru followed by Hyderabad Pune Chennai Mumbai and DelhiNCR bull Less participation from Ahmedabad and Kolkata
42
38 38
4541
43
55
48 49 4746
38
45
40 4138
46
37
4442
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Region Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students and professionals from NoidaGreater Noida have performed the best as compared to their counter parts in other cities
bull Students have scored better than professionals on an overall level However Professionals in Bengaluru and Pune have scored better than students
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
Student Professional
Language Wise Participation Analysis
bull The most preferred language for both Students as well as Professionals is C followed by Java bull Overall Professionals have shown better numbers in terms of participation as compared to students
42
2628
71
29
70
18
48
22
50
61
41
66
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Language Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students have performed the best in Cpp language and Professionals have performed the best in Python Language
bull Students have scored better than professionals in Cpp Python and C
6122
15 2
0
Participation
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Experience Wise Participation Analysis
bull Maximum participants are from ldquo0-2rdquo years experience band followed by ldquo3-5rdquo years experience bandbull Very few participants from 11-15 years and Beyond 15 years experience bands
35
4042 42
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Average Marks
Average Marks
Experience Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull People in 6-10 years experience band have performed the best bull People in 0-2 years and beyond 15 years experience bands have not performed as good as their counter
parts in other experience bands
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
42
38 38
4541
43
55
48 49 4746
38
45
40 4138
46
37
4442
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Region Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students and professionals from NoidaGreater Noida have performed the best as compared to their counter parts in other cities
bull Students have scored better than professionals on an overall level However Professionals in Bengaluru and Pune have scored better than students
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
Student Professional
Language Wise Participation Analysis
bull The most preferred language for both Students as well as Professionals is C followed by Java bull Overall Professionals have shown better numbers in terms of participation as compared to students
42
2628
71
29
70
18
48
22
50
61
41
66
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Language Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students have performed the best in Cpp language and Professionals have performed the best in Python Language
bull Students have scored better than professionals in Cpp Python and C
6122
15 2
0
Participation
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Experience Wise Participation Analysis
bull Maximum participants are from ldquo0-2rdquo years experience band followed by ldquo3-5rdquo years experience bandbull Very few participants from 11-15 years and Beyond 15 years experience bands
35
4042 42
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Average Marks
Average Marks
Experience Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull People in 6-10 years experience band have performed the best bull People in 0-2 years and beyond 15 years experience bands have not performed as good as their counter
parts in other experience bands
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
0
5000
10000
15000
20000
25000
30000
35000
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
Student Professional
Language Wise Participation Analysis
bull The most preferred language for both Students as well as Professionals is C followed by Java bull Overall Professionals have shown better numbers in terms of participation as compared to students
42
2628
71
29
70
18
48
22
50
61
41
66
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Language Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students have performed the best in Cpp language and Professionals have performed the best in Python Language
bull Students have scored better than professionals in Cpp Python and C
6122
15 2
0
Participation
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Experience Wise Participation Analysis
bull Maximum participants are from ldquo0-2rdquo years experience band followed by ldquo3-5rdquo years experience bandbull Very few participants from 11-15 years and Beyond 15 years experience bands
35
4042 42
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Average Marks
Average Marks
Experience Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull People in 6-10 years experience band have performed the best bull People in 0-2 years and beyond 15 years experience bands have not performed as good as their counter
parts in other experience bands
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
42
2628
71
29
70
18
48
22
50
61
41
66
46
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
java c csharp cpp php python nodejs
STUDENT PROFESSIONAL
Language Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull Students have performed the best in Cpp language and Professionals have performed the best in Python Language
bull Students have scored better than professionals in Cpp Python and C
6122
15 2
0
Participation
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Experience Wise Participation Analysis
bull Maximum participants are from ldquo0-2rdquo years experience band followed by ldquo3-5rdquo years experience bandbull Very few participants from 11-15 years and Beyond 15 years experience bands
35
4042 42
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Average Marks
Average Marks
Experience Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull People in 6-10 years experience band have performed the best bull People in 0-2 years and beyond 15 years experience bands have not performed as good as their counter
parts in other experience bands
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
6122
15 2
0
Participation
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Experience Wise Participation Analysis
bull Maximum participants are from ldquo0-2rdquo years experience band followed by ldquo3-5rdquo years experience bandbull Very few participants from 11-15 years and Beyond 15 years experience bands
35
4042 42
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Average Marks
Average Marks
Experience Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull People in 6-10 years experience band have performed the best bull People in 0-2 years and beyond 15 years experience bands have not performed as good as their counter
parts in other experience bands
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
35
4042 42
35
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Average Marks
Average Marks
Experience Wise Performance Analysis
Note Score out of 200 Excludes participants who scored zero or did not provide relevant information
bull People in 6-10 years experience band have performed the best bull People in 0-2 years and beyond 15 years experience bands have not performed as good as their counter
parts in other experience bands
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
32 68
Participants
38
33
42
36
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
45
Male Female
Student Professional
Gender Wise Participation Analysis
Relative Marks
bull 68 of the participants were males and 32 of the participants were females bull Both Male professionals and Female professionals have performed better than the students
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
0-2 18
3-518
6-1020
11-1522
Beyond 1522
Male
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
0-2 29
3-5 30
6-10 21
11-15 15
Beyond 15 13
Female
0-2 3-5 6-10 11-15 Beyond 15
Gender Analysis By Experience
bull Female participation from 3-5 amp 0-2 years experience band is the highestbull Females in 0-2 3-5 amp 6-10 years experience bands have scored better than their male counterparts in the
same experience bands
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
Top 100
Companies Ranking
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
1 to 20
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
1 TCS 11 Oracle
2 Cognizant 12 Mindtree
3 Wipro 13 Tech Mahindra
4 Accenture 14 Deloitte
5 Jio Digital Life 15 Credit Suisse
6 Capgemini 16 Aricent
7 HCL Technologies Limited 17 Sapient Corporation
8 IBM 18 Amdocs Ltd
9 Infosys 19 Samsung India Electronics Limited
10 Sopra Steria 20 Persistent Systems
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
21 Amazon Alexa 31 NIIT
22 Hexaware Technologies 32 CDAC
23 Ericsson 33 Allscripts
24 Cisco 34 Nagarro Inc
25 Hewlett Packard 35 Mphasis Ltd
26 Cybage Software Pvt Ltd 36 Virtusa India Pvt Ltd
27 Scientific Games India Pvt Ltd 37 India Mart
28 CGI 38 Syntel Limited
29 Symantec Software India Pvt Ltd 39 Lampt Infotech
30 Vodafone 40 Microsoft
21 to 40
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
41 Times Business Solutions Limited 51 ADP Private Limited
42 Computer Sciences Corporation India P Ltd (CSC) 52 Colruyt IT Consultancy India Pvt Ltd
43 Amadeus 53 Zensar Technologies Limited
44 Talentica 54 Nokia Corporation
45 Newgen Software Technologies Limited 55 SG
46 AltiMetrik 56 Allstate India
47 UST Global 57 Thomson Reuters
48 Infogain 58 Siemens Information Systems Ltd
49 ValueLabs 59 Genpact
50 Harman Connected Services 60 zoho
41 to 60
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
61 to 80
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
61 OPTUM 71 Avalara Technologies
62 Daffodil Software Ltd 72 SAP Private imited
63 Ness Technologies Ltd 73 Robert Bosch
64 Iris Software 74 Verizon Data Services ( India ) P Ltd
65 Polaris Financial Technology Limited 75 National Informatics Centre
66 Cerner HealthCare Solutions Pvt Ltd 76 GE Digital
67 Dell International Services India Pvt Ltd 77 ABB
68 Here Technologies 78 Honeywell Technology Solutions
69 Synechron Technologies Pvt Ltd 79 GlobalLogic
70 Atos Origin 80 iNautix Technologies
61 to 80
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
Rank Company Name Rank Company Name
81 Infosoft Technologies 91 Google India Pvt Ltd
82 Mindfire Solutions 92 DXC technology
83 Gemalto 93 NTT data
84 JP Morgan Chase Bank 94 Sasken Communication Technologies Ltd
85 KPIT Cummins Infosystems Ltd 95 CMC Limited
86 Sonata Software Ltd 96 Gilbarco Veeder Root
87 Qualcomm India Pvt Ltd 97 Yash Technologies
88 Sears Holdings 98 Societe Generale Global Solution Center
89 ITC Infotech Ltd 99 IGATE Global Solutions Ltd
90 Huawei Technologies Private Limited 100 Manhattan Associates
Top 100 Companies
Denotes Participating Company
81 to 100
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
1 Methodology and Report Presentation
Annexure
2 Ranking Method
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
Students20
Professionals80
Students Professionals
Participation Split Represents the share of observations for each categoryFor Eg In Sample 1 of the total 80 of candidates were professionals while remaining 20 candidates were studentsIn Sample 2 out of the total professional developers 49 participants coded in Java as compared to 55 student candidates
55
49
25
20
7
18
StudentsProfessionals
Java C Sharp CC++
Methodology and Report Presentation
Participation Split Participation Split
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
125
47
138
35
139
41
ProfessionalsStudents
Category 1 Category 2 Category 3
Ave
rage
Sco
re Average Score Represents the Average Score for each category For Eg In Sample 3 professionals had an average score of 125 for Category 1 as compared to 47 for Students
Note All average Scores are out of 300 unless specified
Sam
ple
3Methodology and Report Presentation
SkillsLanguage This is the language that the contestant choose for solving the coding problems Languages include Java C CPP C Sharp Ruby Python and many others
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
Rank is calculated on the basis of Participation Rank (30 Weightage) and Performance Rank (70 Weightage)
Participation Rank (Company Employees Participated in any of the level) (Company Employee Registered)
Level-1 In case there is tie between two companies then we will give preference to the company whose most no of employees have participated
Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to whose employees have taken all the three Easy Medium and Expert
Performance Rank (Company participant who scored marks gt=60) (Total no of sponsor company employees who scored marks gt= 60)bull Level-1 In case there is tie will give preference to higher average score of company
bull Level-2 If still there is a tie we will give preference to the company whose maximum employees have scored 300 marks
Note If two or more employees of the company are found to have identical codes companyrsquos ranking will be decreased
Ranking Method
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
Thank You
For More Details Please ContactJagatjit Turuk| Jagatjitturuktimesinternetin
Akshay Kukreja|AkshayKukrejatimesinternetin
Corporate Care| corporatecaretechgigcom
