ˆ! › indexing › wp-content › ...Pnaini’s Ashtadhyayi & Sibawayh’s Al-Kitab between...

26
257 : Pnaini’s Ashtadhyayi & Sibawayh’s Al-Kitab between Similarities and Deferences: A Comparative Study * Abstract The article deals with the linguistic treasure hidden in the world historical books Ashtadhyayi of Pnaini; an Indian linguist of 500 BC born near Attock on the Western side proposed Chota Lahore of Sawabi Area, the founding figure of Indian Lingistics, and the Arabic Al-Kitab of Sibawaihi; an Arab linguist of 8 cent AD born in Beyza; a village in Faras Iran, educated at Al-Basra Iraq, later on became the most influential figure of Basran School of Arabic Grammar. These two books are the real bases of Sanskrit and Arbaic grammar. Being the strong base of grammar thay have a positive influence over the modern linguistcs and linguists. Most of modern linguists observed a close resemblance in phonetics, morphology, syntax, semantics and lexicography and many other factors between these two treatises. " " " " . ____________________________ * .

Transcript of ˆ! › indexing › wp-content › ...Pnaini’s Ashtadhyayi & Sibawayh’s Al-Kitab between...

  • 257

    ������ �� ������� � �������� ������� ����� ���:

    ��!" �!�#$

    Pnaini’s Ashtadhyayi & Sibawayh’s Al-Kitab

    between Similarities and Deferences: A Comparative Study

    �������� �� ��*

    Abstract

    The article deals with the linguistic treasure hidden in the

    world historical books Ashtadhyayi of Pnaini; an Indian linguist

    of 500 BC born near Attock on the Western side proposed Chota

    Lahore of Sawabi Area, the founding figure of Indian Lingistics,

    and the Arabic Al-Kitab of Sibawaihi; an Arab linguist of 8 cent

    AD born in Beyza; a village in Faras Iran, educated at Al-Basra

    Iraq, later on became the most influential figure of Basran School

    of Arabic Grammar. These two books are the real bases of

    Sanskrit and Arbaic grammar. Being the strong base of grammar

    thay have a positive influence over the modern linguistcs and

    linguists. Most of modern linguists observed a close resemblance

    in phonetics, morphology, syntax, semantics and lexicography

    and many other factors between these two treatises.

    %&�'� ()*$

    ����� ��������� ��� !�� "#$�%���& " '����( !�� �"!�)��"* +,�-��� +.��/� 0��1�� 2 34��5&�* +�6�7��� +���7�� 8+��1�� �%��9��� +�:;

  • 258

    d�G�N� . ?�7N 0���efL ?��g 2 `9h� ��i j�N��� '=�k� ���;�� lmno !�)�� I�3��+��1� ?��N p\& +� �& Y3q��� . �G% d��.��K� ,�N >��1�� �� -�3� ��e&. !�� L&

    � !�� �46 '����( +1�� ����N r�3W rLA TL+� ���� �e& FG��U3;�� ��4s �%s tk�� l �� u� vK 4����� G�L 4�_f +� ���� b����, +��(�L '�f +.��/� +��1�� 0(����� �4;��

    +.��/� +��1�� b���� `9�L %��e 2 #^�x +��1�, F@ f '�&� ���� #A T)�$L �4s&� �(�(�N +_�� YL @^�(�&'����( !�)� +��< '���ky @���Q 2 � '���9� rk� u

    '_�� !�)�� "@. ��H�AD.Gustave Jahn "2 U^� ( F@ 4�6 ��& R�� ?:^�� �(�� R�� �%� +��1�� '���ky ���] �� 0 ((& ����/� +1�� `� . �G% M�e ��6 �H�� S

    �G%u� �e+��1�� (�u� 2 �� &. �G�� � ��� !�)q�& �e&�'�u �(�( F@ # �@� +����)H�H�� �@� ��� !�� '���ky �-�&34��. @�W� 3��� ���� �A��> ���

    '����(� ���� ' ;� ��-��� � +��1�� T$H�3�N >�� O�� ?��g 2

    34� �� . b�N 34�L ��u�"#$�%���& " b�N .��� O��� 2 F�1� !�� ��&"!�)�� " ��&

    +��1� +��(�L !���� �� !���� 4�L @^�(�. > �)�� Y�G% +�5& @�@I��� ��i 3>�L Q +6ka +�3�

  • 259

    +-�-K�T�A �� �@��� `�-�� �q�� �G% �@ ��^�� ^/ ���HL & �)� A]�

    � ���)( T3�;� !�)�� �G% !�� & +��  2 +3H-L ?��N p\& +� �& ��)adhyaya(* T��

    �& ��76 +� �& 2 `H-L ! &�IA ) pa:da(* �)�� >3��� Q �H��� YL bN�u * ��f6+=-� ¤ !��� �� ��� �H��� YL @���� .+=-� ¤ T7^�� �� ��� +=-��� �� .�� @����� *

    �� @���� ¤ *?��-�� �� ��� +=-��� �� ��.+��� +-��= @��X� 3��� 4��)�: (1.2.3) : !��� ̈ T7^��©¨ ?��-��)©.(

    �. ��0'� �,��

    +���)H�H�� +1� ��& A]�� ����L ��� �� !�� , F& �@ �$�� � @& S3��j ( �.L .� ��Q Y� O��� I�*mna�� +���3;�� '��H� !� +L��-��� ª�k����*

    ' �� b��� ��L '��Q ��& 3� *���� ��:���)P��X� �G��()«(* 0������ & pk&�¬�� T); �� Q `Xh& !�)�� �G% f ª�7� +���X�)(. �)�( ���� �H�6�� ��N T-��

    )Goldstucker( :"+����)H�H�� +1� ����=�� ³����� �́� YL �% �� D�@ L Q")µ(. �L��-�� +���)H�H�� +1�� 3� �-��� YL ����-�� b��������=�� +�Xa� 6S� +

    *+(��-�� ?�9� 4��Q ��9��� *����-�� Y� !�1�� +��9��

  • 260

    %���� #$� ��7�� F]����¨ �((I-Sing) 6 & '����GL ��] > YL ?:·Á¨·Á© *@S��3� YL L�3� '�6 T3W� M��)�

    ́�� �1g `K YL +N�� >eSe� Uà ��K '� !�)�� +�� M�)¿ vK ÄSe

    *?��%m ��(f L� '�& !��� � YL�*+����)H�H�� +1�� ����N r�3W T �G% TA& YL mna�*�<� @�^�

  • 261

    ���Q Tg� 4� ����(G�3� Q ]�(& YL +�4^;�� +������ +=(�� . F�^;�� THH��� �G% `��7� �1�� O' k� \�' \QT�k ��- ^��(\�� 0c�-�� È� 2)¹(.

    ". ��� ���� �$ /����� 869

    6��K 4��@ Y3q�� R�� ����-� +3$N '��� �H '346 �7� #$�%���&jK���� \�6&� Æ&� . ! ����-�� lG% YL +��3¶ �& +3$N T� �3H� �"����( " É� ��

    #-=��� f=V� YL �-��1�� ���N& HK @S� �-6 ��� 3��� L&

    ¼�� '� ��@�K . 2 P��& ��& �A�� �N>��� YLm *'�)L���Ì � �@��� r��7�� �G% L 4�36

    '�N :F@ .#(. ���()D. C. Sircar( إن ��K ��X� !� �» 2 Ñ �N #$����& �%@m� +��N 2 @S�

  • 262

    ÇL&+3� j=� j��� L :Ashtadhya:yi �&Aṣṭadhyāyī �������� 4-=��6 :Ashtadh‘yaayee’ #$�%@���)©(. � �k < ����� `(\� �G% @�� 2 ?�L ��u ���

    �B4L)`N� ����(: ½Á *T76:« *!��:·( ��� !�� �� .�� ª�;�� J����* +����� 0����H�� YL `(\� �G% J�� Î��(6 L HK �:�L�( tk�b. +_�� 2 F:��

    +�I�Òa� Q #$�%���& :

    `N� ����(: À *T76: * !��: ·* `N� ����(�: ¹* T76: ©* !��:À* ����(�`N�: ©* T76:* !��:* `N� ����(�: µ©* T76:* !��:©* `N� ����(�: µÀ*

    T76:* !�� :µ* ��76 +��( 2 F�¸ T3� Q �;� q�&)©©(. #$�%���& +3� `q� �L :*+��3.�� �& +��3.�� 0��G �& +��3.�� �)� ��G� �G��

    Y3.

  • 263

    +��u� �%� #$�%���& `46 2 >�� L�& ������ !@u� 4�3q�� : ����( ¨ sutra ¨ ?��N Õ��¨ vrtti ̈ gloss – +��K

    )����� ¨ va:rtika ̈ note ¨ +��K� ?��N > ?���

    �B ̈ bha:sha – exposition¨ t�k�� � ª��

    ����� ̈ brakriya ̈ derivation – +3)�� ¬-���� Î���(�

    ��%�(¨ siddha:nta ̈ +��9�¨ )©Á( theory

    @. =�&*>?,'� AB� C6�

    ¨ ����( :B @��

  • 264

    ��%�(� *����( b9� ª�� 2 +���L� +-�e� 0�g ����� � Õ�� > �)«©( +3� u �]�"����( "�� �H� �& =�� � FG�� b9��� �% �G%� ��X� á�N G�L �A��)««(.

    f ����( +���X� +��1�� 0(���� �V� p�� +1�g �� T3�;� ��efL ��N rL ?�7N *U�� F& YL �x� *p��/� YL Y)Z @�� TN&;�� 2 rN�� ��& �� P��Ì v��� *

    *�%�A +�-V�� +����=�� � �� � ����H��?��-)«¹(. D. ,* /�E$ 6������: (Vyakarana)

    +3)�� lG% ��Q ÊKS=g :"����� T�Ì "%��L� ��1�: Ç6 æ;�� . �N� Ç̀ � ¤ P�1�� T���� ?�L ��u ML��(� ����-� 4L���(�. +3)� ?@qL ������ +3��

    '���)HÆ(Samskarana) P�1�� %��L R��"r�3��� " +�3�

  • 265

    ��K YL +1�� t�, PG�� P�1�� d�H� `9��L ��� ����-�� p;��� �9� +1�� ���A����+L� bS)��� 0L������ 4�� 3�6 0S7�� t�k��� Ï��)L ���Ì +1�� T���� ((& �)�� �460��)

  • 266

    « ̈ ������" Dhatupata YL >^�u �46 �G% 0LS�� +��G�� ��7^�� 2 43�H-� rL +��^�� ��GW�

    +������� +�6�7�� Ï^g ^� R�� ?I�3

  • 267

    r H��� @H�� !�)��: �7�� �1���� 04�� W�� :+^�q

  • 268

    ̈ ����� Vidhi - ?��N #% +�@��� 0�3��� �7� R�� #$�%���& 2 ���� �.�& �%� +��1;�

    `N� ��u� T7^�� @H�� !�)�� 2 ?��-�� & �.��p��/�: (akaḥ savarṇe dīrghaḥ) )·,,½( p��K +��� ) �¨ F– �¨� ̈ � (L��� ��=� �N '�� p�K ÄZ +� (savarṇa))µµ(

    © ̈ ��N,� �� ��N�� Sanjñā/Samjna-

    46���� ?���W� +��=7

  • 269

    ����( ��%���� �G��`N� :) ̈¨«( >�� Ç& rL TL�� ��.��� .��� ��u� !�)��0-KS�� . +31� 0����H�� lG% T.L +�g �%;�� "�����( " 4��(� �=�� p��� #�

    0����H�� YL �.� @�� Q r(��� R�� ,����( #$%@� ¬�6 3��� %��6. µ ̈ �6��� �$��� ¨Niyama Sūtra

    ��-� ����( L�� j��=� ?��-�� #$%@� ?��N \Q X +- H��. · ̈ �6��� ��

  • 270

    m ̈ ��( 0�6 �N : ?�7�ä ?�)6 �� R�� +-�� �% ��� b9� 2 #((u� �)� \� Q���-�� ����� ����-�� b9�� ����-�� 0-� Q Tg�� R�� +6���L M)� �N� �

    !�1�� 2 p���L �% 3� ðHK T�);� ��)·(. �¨ @ M�N� . ÕB A��()Saroja Bhate( �6�� T -6 +3)�� ë�� \ #$�%@��� &

    b9���� ��:�� �G% ��� +���3;�� '�^g� +� H/� '����= � +3W� T���� L9�+3W�� +3)� ������ �)��)�L)·©(.

    b¨ +1�� ?:6 & P��& ?I�L '�� YLm &��� � ' �� �q �4��� +���^�� +����)H�H���G% �� +�)�(S)�� +����)H�H��.

    �. ��0'� =�Q�6� F:�� á� �:L�( �N)Sumitra M. Katre:( +�I�Òa� Q #$�%���& `A:L : Q

    >^�u� 2 ª�� ��& '� �� �N !�)�� �G%.·« 0K��;�� �4�& ��G #^�)�: ̈ )���6)Verttikas( ����� Katayayana

    )«½½ ̈½½b ¬( © ̈ �:��� )Katantra( YL�66�( )Sarvavarman(

    )½½ b ¬( ) 0��1�� ³���Á·(

    « ̈ �B4L )Mahabhashya( J�� )Patanjals( )µ½ b ¬(

    ̈ ��� ��^��)Vakyapadiya( F�4����B )Bhartrihari( )¹½½ F@S�L(

    µ ̈ )�(�)Kasika( ��@�A��L6 )Vamana & Jayaditya( )¹½½ F@S�L(

    · ̈F@�3���)�� )Prakriyakaumudi( �����L�� )Ramacandra( )µ½½ F@S�L(

    ¹ ̈ �(n@ #A��B F@��3���%�( �;� r H�� �-�� +��� F@S�3�

  • 271

    Siddhantakumvdi Bhattoji Diksita ) 0��1�� ³���Á·b( !. ������ �� RS�6� �P�*N�T� U*'� /'V

    `%� ?G�(u� YL @�� #$�%���& +_: bN: ̈ +�( +�I�ÒQ +_�� b�N& �(�� ����A H��( +_��ÀÁ. © ̈+_�� ��H�6�� L�� '�� L�� :K&� >���)H�H�� 3���2 >77�� �1�� ?���� b3�% !�� > '�� +��-

  • 272

    � & �7� � '����( F�1�� �=����-� ����� c�- ' �� �7�: " ��� `�& �% ÇÆ FG�� ' �� ��& � ���� Ç��� l����� c�N "

    )·¹(. Ç���?�.)� ���� @- H�� >.K��� ��7y Q")¹½(.

    Çk� �S$N ' �� +�5& t: "L b�N& �46 '����( !�� L&+6� ð���� ����� T$HL r_ ��7* ���f����� ����� �g-L ���Ì* Ç�)� ���@)� O `4 �� '��Q �^�q�L � �] � +LX� 09KS

  • 273

    +������* T-��� 2 '��L& �� '��g�L ¬^��I�3�?,'� � 5"�,'� X��6�

    Ç�� Y T�V� l]�(& YL 4�Æ R�� ?@

  • 274

    �L��-�� ?���� '��Q 4�H�� R�� +�(��� `( p��� � á�-��� YL + .Ô)À(. ". ��U*'� 5"�,'� !"�?$��0'� �7

    ÇT� ?�K 2 ���/�� c�-�� +�5& p��� � '����( & ���� ��] r_ �G46 `HL Ç@

  • 275

    � . $)

  • 276

    T�V� & �� �`�6��A ! �k/� MN��� 2 p��� L 6��� �� �L '����( lG�3� Grapheme* `���6� Phoneme* `�6��L� Morpheme)Á¹(.

    +��=7?,'� E��Z

    & '�Kg ��� 3� ' æL '����H� !�)��� �m¶ �)� & t=7���1� >���L + .Ô 5S� &� G�L ��u� u¾��µ½½ ��X� 2 @S�

  • 277

    � +�3�3HN 2 43H-�: ��u�: -� ' ;���> �)�� >

    .�� -� pS��\�> �)�� > [�\� : ]�#����^'� ����0'� ���

    • bN 5S� �)�� 34�6 ��� >��� >�1�� +L�ù • � +L�� ��� !�� rk�� �- +N�=� �)�� ¾L +�K��� lG% Y3

    5�7� 2 `)��� ¬�, +L���� +gV� �3� 03)�� b���(��. • ���� Y�G�� 3��� YL +��3¶ �)�� ��] 3��� T$�& YL 2

    �1��*+� ����� +����)H�H�� > `X3�& Q ���&�. • �@ �)�� ª���K ?�.) �Ì v 3� ��� p^�Q YL !�1��

    34�� `%��� 34����. • %����N� +1�� 0���HL r�_ �)�� K&. • 5S� �)�� T3�;� *+���7�� T$H

  • 278

    ?������ 0\�� ?�7�

  • 279

    `$��I'�

    ¨ Bahte, Saroja(2002) Panini, Ahitya Akademi, New Delhi, p.14. ©¨ Sharma, Rama Nath, The Ashtadhyayi of Panini, Motilal Barsi das Dehli, v.1, p.2. «¨William, Monier, Indian Wisdom or Example of the religious philosophical and ethical Doctrine of the Hindues, p.172

    ¨ Ibid. µ¨ Ibid. p.176. ·¨ Ibid. ¹¨ Sharma, Rama Nath, The Ashtadhyayi of Panini, v.1, p.4.

    À¨ ��� YL��� %���� 0��7 >HKÅ *��� B�� 2 ÕBA��( 4�-� * :«. Á¨ William, Monier, Indian Wisdom or Example of the religious philosophical and ethica

    Doctrine of the Hindues,p.176.

    ¨½ Hunter, W.W. (1985), Imperial Gazetter of india,2/263, Trubner & Co. London. ¨ Bahte, Saroja (2002 ), Panini, Ahitya Akademi, New Delhi, p.1.

    ١٢¨+����)H�H�� +1�� `�� ���\� '(��L ����-���(Nalanda) +���X� b���� 0�LW� �4�& YL M�� v�� http://dilipchandra12.hubpages.com/hub/History-of-Nalanda-University ( 10-9-2013).

    «¨ Bahte, Saroja (2002 ), Panini, P. 2, Ahitya Akademi, New Delhi.: +������ ��q�� :?]��f

  • 280

    ©©¨ Katre, Sumitra M. Ashtadhyayi of Panini, Delhi,1989, p. xix. ©«¨ ��* ^�6: Å *0��1�� ³���: Áµ. +)�;�� ��:

    www.mohamedrabeea.com/books/book1_1697.pdf ú¨ Sharma, Rama Nath. The Astadhyayi of Panini, v.1, p. 2. úµ¨ Cardona, George (1996) Panini: his work and its importance, v.1, p.2. ú·¨ Hartmute Sharfe (--------) Grammatical literature, p.142. úû¨ Cardona, G. (1996) Panini, His work and its importance, V.1, P.6, Vasu, Sarisa Chandra,(1898) Ashtadhyayi of Panini.

    úü¨ Sharma, Rama Nath,The Ashtadhyayi of Panini, v.1.p.3. úý¨ Ibid. v.1, p.1. þ�¨ Ibid. þ�¨ Ibid. þú¨ Ibid. V.1, P.2 þþ¨ Kiparsky, Paul, Paninian Linguistic: http://www.stanford.edu/~kiparsky/Papers/encycl.pdf ( 24-9-2013). þ¨ Sivanarda, Sri Sawami. All about Hinduism by: http://www.rsl.ukans.edu/~pkanagar/divine/, (WWW) Edition: 1999.

    þµ¨ Rumer, Sachin. Sandhi Spitter and Nalyzer for 37 Sanskrt. þ·¨ Sharma, Rama Nath, Ashtadhyayi of Panini, v.1, p.45. þû¨ Ibid. v.1, p.46.

    ¨ þü Panini Sivasutrani extracted from Kasikavrtti and Sidhanta Kaumudi , P.vi. þý¨ Peter M Scharf -71. �¨ Bahte, Saroja (2002 ), Panini, Ahitya Akademi, New Delhi p. 3. �¨ Ibid. ©¨ Ibid.

    ¨« Sharma, Rama Nath, Ashtadhyayi of Painini, v.1 p.46. ¨ Imperial Gazetter of india,vol. 2, p.263. ¨µ Panini: A servey of research, p. 160. ¨· Ibid. ¨¹ Ibid. ¨À Kiparsky, Paul, Paninian Linguistic:

    http://www.stanford.edu/~kiparsky/Papers/encycl.pdf( 24-9-2013). ¨Á The Astadhyayi of Panini , translated by Rama Nath Sharma, v.1, p.75

  • 281

    µ½¨ Kiparsky & Stall(1969) Sytactic and Semantic Relation in Panini, Foundation of Language,(5: 83-117), Professors of Standford University., Bronkhorst (1979), The role of meaning in Panini grammar, Indian linguistic (40: 146-157). µ¨ The Astadhyayi of Panini , translated by Rama Nath Sharma, v. 1, p. 75.

    µ©¨ !���� ��� F�1�� ����� * .À *©½½«* �)�� O�¨ �7LÅ *: «¹µ* � A History of Sanskrit, by MacDonnell, p. 39.

    µ«¨A History of Sanskrit Literature, P. 38. µ¨ Ashtadhyayi translated by Sarisa Chandra Vasu, V. VI, Page 1087, A History of

    Sanskrit Literature, P. 37.

    µµ¨ Ibid. v. VI, p. 1087. µ·¨ Ibid. v. I, p. 178. µ¹¨ Ibid. v. I, p. 35. µÀ¨ Ibid. v. 1, p. 11. µÁ¨ Ibid. vol. 1, p.13. ·½¨ Vasu, Srisa Cahndra(1891), Ashtadhyayi of Panini, v.1 p.1. ·¨ Stall, Firit. Ritual and Mantras: Rules without meaning, p.43. ·©¨ Panini Grammar and Computer Science (pp.-79-94) Annal of the Bhadarkar Oriental

    Research Institute vol. 72, 1993. ·«¨ Katre, Sumitra. M. Ashtadhyayi. Book. 1, p.1.

    · ̈ �.��/�* ?������� +�� :'����( !�� 2 p�7�� +�� &* Å: ·«. �ى��u� +��=�� ̈ Á·µ ,+q4��� +��)L 0���;�L ̈@��1 .

    ·µ ̈ ����* á& .#A :'����( *@��^H�& +�LA +��=L *+�LS(a� 0(����� I��L *©½½* Å: « . ·· ̈ '����( :!�)��* ��% bSH�� ���� +L�-L *?�%-�� *#ÒV� +��)L *ÁÀÀ* Å: ©·* ��k* #N�� : ���

  • 282

    ¹« ̈ ��