aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of...

27

Transcript of aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of...

Page 1: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 2: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 3: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 4: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 5: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 6: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 7: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 8: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 9: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 10: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 11: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 12: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 13: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 14: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 15: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 16: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 17: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 18: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 19: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 20: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 21: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 22: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 23: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 24: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 25: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 26: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was
Page 27: aftdelhi.nic.inaftdelhi.nic.in/benches/kochi_bench/judgments/may2013/TA...7. TA No.385/2009 age of 57 years and he should be retired on 30.06.2012 It is alleged that petitioner was