© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014 IntellaTip MiFi ™ XP Ablation Catheter...
-
Upload
juniper-greene -
Category
Documents
-
view
224 -
download
0
Transcript of © 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014 IntellaTip MiFi ™ XP Ablation Catheter...
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
IntellaTip MiFi™ XP Ablation Catheter
Atrial Flutter Playbook
Information for the use in countries with applicable Health Authority product registrations.
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
The Power of the Mini-electrodes
Using IntellaTip MiFi™ XP multi-sense technology for Atrial Flutter cases
Entrainment & Pacing Maneuvers
CTI Identification
HIS Recording Contact Assessment
Real-Time Ablation Feedback
Post-Ablation Gap Analysis
Identify tip location with mini-electrodes vs. conventional bipoles
Isolate entrainment circuit with mini-electrodes vs. conventional bipoles
Analyze mini-electrode saturation recovery period vs. conventional bipoles
Confirm appropriate ablation sites with mini-electrodes
Evaluate tissue contact with enhanced near-field signals
Reveal lesion progress through EGM attenuation on mini-electrodes
Evaluate lesion gaps with mini-electrodes
Click for more information.
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
HIS Recording
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
MiFi vs. Common Bipoles – His?
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Another HIS Recording
Courtesy of University of Alabama Birmingham
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Entrainment and Pacing Maneuvers
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Pace slightly faster than the tachycardia from an area believed to be within the circuit, the CTI, using the ablation catheter!
The pacing output must be adequate to capture the chamber.
When pacing is stopped, the timing to the next intrinsic beat should be very near the Tachycardia Cycle Length (TCL).
Kalman J et al. Circulation 1996;94:398-406
An Oversimplified Explanation of Entrainment
Circuit
PacingSite
Timing is measured on the pacing channel. Therefore, the pacing channel must recover at a timing interval less than the Tachycardia Cycle Length! (TCL)
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Pacing from the ABL D
PPI? TCL? Returning to
Baseline
Courtesy of University of Alabama Birmingham
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Pacing from MiFi pair 1-2
Final Pacing Impulse
Returning to Baseline
**No Saturation on ABL D
Courtesy of University of Alabama Birmingham
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Traditional Entrainment From Ablation Distal @ 5mA – Saturation on CBP
Courtesy of University of Alabama Birmingham
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Traditional Entrainment From Ablation Distal @ 2mA – No Capture
Courtesy of University of Alabama Birmingham
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Entrainment From Mini 1-2 @ 2mA – Capture
Courtesy of University of Alabama Birmingham
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
EntrainmentFrom Mini 1-2 @ 1mA – Capture
Courtesy of University of Alabama Birmingham
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
CTI Identification
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
MiFi Catheter on CTI?
Courtesy of William Maddox, MD, FHRS, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Georgia Regents University
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
CTI?
Courtesy of University of Alabama Birmingham
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
CTI
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Fluoro Image Comparison
Common Bipole CTI Placement MiFi CTI Placement
Courtesy of University of Alabama Birmingham
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Catheter Positioning Based on MiFi
V Pulled back to A AV Junction
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
True CTI
Another Example of CTI Identification
Abl:ON
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Contact Assessment
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Perpendicular Contact?
Courtesy of William Maddox, MD, FHRS, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Georgia Regents University
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
MiFi Good Contact – ME 1 Touching
Courtesy of University of Alabama Birmingham
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
More Parallel Contact – SVC pullback
Parallel Tissue Contact with ME 1 in Primary Contact
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Real-Time Ablation Feedback
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
EGM Attenuation – CBP vs. MEs
Courtesy of William Maddox, MD, FHRS, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Georgia Regents University
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
An Example of ME Attenuation Prior To Block
RF ON
Courtesy of William Maddox, MD, FHRS, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Georgia Regents University
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Another Example of ME Attenuation Prior To Block
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
EGM-Guided Drag Lesion
Catheter Drag Here
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Post-Ablation Gap Analysis
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
Breakthrough on MiFi Not Evident on CBP
Courtesy of William Maddox, MD, FHRS, Assistant Professor of Medicine, Georgia Regents University
© 2014 Boston Scientific Confidential EP-242101-AA APR2014
MiFi Gap Detection – Block Achieved