2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

12
2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 Chapter 1 The Art of The Art of Problem Problem Solving Solving

Transcript of 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

Page 1: 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1

Chapter 1Chapter 1The Art of The Art of Problem SolvingProblem Solving

Page 2: 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-2

Chapter 1: Chapter 1: The Art of Problem SolvingThe Art of Problem Solving

1.1 Solving Problems by Inductive Reasoning

1.2 An Application of Inductive Reasoning: Number Patterns

1.3 Strategies for Problem Solving

1.4 Calculating, Estimating, and Reading Graphs

Page 3: 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-3

Section 1-1Section 1-1

Solving Problems by Inductive Reasoning

Page 4: 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-4

Solving Problems by Inductive Solving Problems by Inductive ReasoningReasoning

• Characteristics of Inductive and Deductive Reasoning

• Pitfalls of Inductive Reasoning

Page 5: 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-5

Characteristics of Inductive and Characteristics of Inductive and Deductive ReasoningDeductive Reasoning

Inductive Reasoning

Draw a general conclusion (a conjecture) from

repeated observations of specific examples. There

is no assurance that the observed conjecture is

always true.

Deductive Reasoning

Apply general principles to specific examples.

Page 6: 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-6

Example: determine the type of Example: determine the type of reasoningreasoning

Determine whether the reasoning is an example of deductive or inductive reasoning.All math teachers have a great sense of humor. Patrick is a math teacher. Therefore, Patrick must have a great sense of humor.

SolutionBecause the reasoning goes from general to specific, deductive reasoning was used.

Page 7: 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-7

Example: predict the product of two Example: predict the product of two numbersnumbers

Use the list of equations and inductive reasoning to predict the next multiplication fact in the list:

37 × 3 = 111 37 × 6 = 222

37 × 9 = 333 37 × 12 = 444

Solution37 × 15 = 555

Page 8: 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-8

Example: predicting the next number Example: predicting the next number in a sequencein a sequence

Use inductive reasoning to determine the probable next number in the list below.

2, 9, 16, 23, 30

SolutionEach number in the list is obtained by adding 7 to the previous number.

The probable next number is 30 + 7 = 37.

Page 9: 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-9

Pitfalls of Inductive ReasoningPitfalls of Inductive Reasoning

One can not be sure about a conjecture until a general relationship has been proven.

One counterexample is sufficient to make the conjecture false.

Page 10: 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-10

Example: pitfalls of inductive reasoningExample: pitfalls of inductive reasoning

We concluded that the probable next number in the list 2, 9, 16, 23, 30 is 37.

If the list 2, 9, 16, 23, 30 actually represents the dates of Mondays in June, then the date of the Monday after June 30 is July 7 (see the figure on the next slide). The next number on the list would then be 7, not 37.

Page 11: 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-11

Example: pitfalls of inductive reasoningExample: pitfalls of inductive reasoning

Page 12: 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-1 Chapter 1 The Art of Problem Solving.

2012 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 1-1-12

Example: use deductive reasoningExample: use deductive reasoning

Find the length of the hypotenuse in a right triangle with legs 3 and 4. Use the Pythagorean Theorem: c 2 = a 2 + b 2, where c is the hypotenuse and a and b are legs.

Solutionc 2 = 3 2 + 4 2

c 2 = 9 + 16 = 25

c = 5