© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

71
© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit- Maximization

Transcript of © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

Page 1: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc.

19 Profit-Maximization

Page 2: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 2

Economic Profit A firm uses inputs j = 1…,m to make

products i = 1,…n. Output levels are y1,…,yn.

Input levels are x1,…,xm.

Product prices are p1,…,pn.

Input prices are w1,…,wm.

Page 3: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 3

The Competitive Firm

The competitive firm takes all output prices p1,…,pn and all input prices w1,…,wm as given constants.

Page 4: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 4

Economic Profit

The economic profit generated by the production plan (x1,…,xm,y1,…,yn) is

p y p y w x w xn n m m1 1 1 1 .

Page 5: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 5

Economic Profit Output and input levels are typically

flows. E.g. x1 might be the number of labor

units used per hour. And y3 might be the number of cars

produced per hour. Consequently, profit is typically a

flow also; e.g. the number of dollars of profit earned per hour.

Page 6: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 6

Economic Profit How do we value a firm? Suppose the firm’s stream of

periodic economic profits is … and r is the rate of interest.

Then the present-value of the firm’s economic profit stream isPV

r r

01 2

21 1( )

Page 7: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 7

Economic Profit

A competitive firm seeks to maximize its present-value.

How?

Page 8: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 8

Economic Profit Suppose the firm is in a short-run

circumstance in which Its short-run production function is

y f x x ( , ~ ).1 2

x x2 2~ .

Page 9: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 9

Economic Profit Suppose the firm is in a short-run

circumstance in which Its short-run production function is

The firm’s fixed cost isand its profit function is

y f x x ( , ~ ).1 2

py w x w x1 1 2 2~ .

x x2 2~ .

FC w x 2 2~

Page 10: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 10

Short-Run Iso-Profit Lines

A $ iso-profit line contains all the production plans that provide a profit level $.

A $ iso-profit line’s equation is py w x w x1 1 2 2

~ .

Page 11: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 11

Short-Run Iso-Profit Lines

A $ iso-profit line contains all the production plans that yield a profit level of $.

The equation of a $ iso-profit line is

I.e.

py w x w x1 1 2 2~ .

ywp

xw xp

11

2 2 ~.

Page 12: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 12

Short-Run Iso-Profit Linesy

wp

xw xp

11

2 2 ~

has a slope of

wp1

and a vertical intercept of

w xp2 2~.

Page 13: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 13

Short-Run Iso-Profit Lines

Increasing

profit

y

x1

Slopeswp

1

Page 14: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 14

Short-Run Profit-Maximization

The firm’s problem is to locate the production plan that attains the highest possible iso-profit line, given the firm’s constraint on choices of production plans.

Q: What is this constraint?

Page 15: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 15

Short-Run Profit-Maximization

The firm’s problem is to locate the production plan that attains the highest possible iso-profit line, given the firm’s constraint on choices of production plans.

Q: What is this constraint? A: The production function.

Page 16: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 16

Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

Technicallyinefficientplans

y The short-run production function andtechnology set for x x2 2~ .

y f x x ( , ~ )1 2

Page 17: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 17

Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

Increasing

profit

Slopeswp

1

y

y f x x ( , ~ )1 2

Page 18: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 18

Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

y

Slopeswp

1

x1*

y*

Page 19: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19

Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

y

Slopeswp

1

Given p, w1 and the short-runprofit-maximizing plan is

x1*

y*

x x2 2~ ,( , ~ , ).* *x x y1 2

Page 20: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 20

Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

y

Slopeswp

1

Given p, w1 and the short-runprofit-maximizing plan is And the maximumpossible profitis

x x2 2~ ,( , ~ , ).* *x x y1 2

.

x1*

y*

Page 21: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 21

Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

y

Slopeswp

1

At the short-run profit-maximizing plan, the slopes of the short-run production function and the maximaliso-profit line areequal.

x1*

y*

Page 22: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 22

Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

y

Slopeswp

1

At the short-run profit-maximizing plan, the slopes of the short-run production function and the maximaliso-profit line areequal.

MPwp

at x x y

11

1 2

( , ~ , )* *

x1*

y*

Page 23: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 23

Short-Run Profit-MaximizationMP

wp

p MP w11

1 1

p MP 1 is the marginal revenue product ofinput 1, the rate at which revenue increaseswith the amount used of input 1.If then profit increases with x1.If then profit decreases with x1.

p MP w 1 1

p MP w 1 1

Page 24: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 24

Short-Run Profit-Maximization; A Cobb-Douglas Example

Suppose the short-run productionfunction is y x x 1

1/321/3~ .

The marginal product of the variableinput 1 is MP

yx

x x11

12 3

21/31

3

/ ~ .

The profit-maximizing condition is

MRP p MPp

x x w1 1 12 3

21/3

13 ( ) ~ .* /

Page 25: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 25

Short-Run Profit-Maximization; A Cobb-Douglas Example

px x w

3 12 3

21/3

1( ) ~* / Solving for x1 gives

( )~

.* /xw

px1

2 3 1

21/3

3

Page 26: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 26

Short-Run Profit-Maximization; A Cobb-Douglas Example

px x w

3 12 3

21/3

1( ) ~* / Solving for x1 gives

( )~

.* /xw

px1

2 3 1

21/3

3

That is,( )

~* /x

pxw1

2 3 21/3

13

Page 27: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 27

Short-Run Profit-Maximization; A Cobb-Douglas Example

px x w

3 12 3

21/3

1( ) ~* / Solving for x1 gives

( )~

.* /xw

px1

2 3 1

21/3

3

That is,( )

~* /x

pxw1

2 3 21/3

13

so xpx

wpw

x121/3

1

3 2

1

3 2

21/2

3 3*

/ /~~ .

Page 28: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 28

Short-Run Profit-Maximization; A Cobb-Douglas Example

xpw

x11

3 2

21/2

3*

/~

is the firm’s

short-run demandfor input 1 when the level of input 2 is fixed at units. ~x2

Page 29: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 29

Short-Run Profit-Maximization; A Cobb-Douglas Example

xpw

x11

3 2

21/2

3*

/~

is the firm’s

short-run demandfor input 1 when the level of input 2 is fixed at units. ~x2

The firm’s short-run output level is thus

y x xpw

x* *( ) ~ ~ .

1

1/321/3

1

1/2

21/2

3

Page 30: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 30

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

What happens to the short-run profit-maximizing production plan as the output price p changes?

Page 31: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 31

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

ywp

xw xp

11

2 2 ~The equation of a short-run iso-profit lineis

so an increase in p causes -- a reduction in the slope, and -- a reduction in the vertical intercept.

Page 32: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 32

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

Slopeswp

1

y

y f x x ( , ~ )1 2

x1*

y*

Page 33: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 33

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

Slopeswp

1

y

y f x x ( , ~ )1 2

x1*

y*

Page 34: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 34

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

Slopeswp

1

y

y f x x ( , ~ )1 2

x1*

y*

Page 35: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 35

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

An increase in p, the price of the firm’s output, causes

– an increase in the firm’s output level (the firm’s supply curve slopes upward), and

– an increase in the level of the firm’s variable input (the firm’s demand curve for its variable input shifts outward).

Page 36: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 36

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

xpw

x11

3 2

21/2

3*

/~

The Cobb-Douglas example: When

then the firm’s short-rundemand for its variable input 1 is

y x x 11/3

21/3~

ypw

x* ~ .

3 1

1/2

21/2

and its short-runsupply is

Page 37: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 37

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

The Cobb-Douglas example: When

then the firm’s short-rundemand for its variable input 1 is

y x x 11/3

21/3~

x1* increases as p increases.

and its short-runsupply is

xpw

x11

3 2

21/2

3*

/~

ypw

x* ~ .

3 1

1/2

21/2

Page 38: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 38

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

The Cobb-Douglas example: When

then the firm’s short-rundemand for its variable input 1 is

y x x 11/3

21/3~

y* increases as p increases.

and its short-runsupply is

x1* increases as p increases.

xpw

x11

3 2

21/2

3*

/~

ypw

x* ~ .

3 1

1/2

21/2

Page 39: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 39

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

What happens to the short-run profit-maximizing production plan as the variable input price w1 changes?

Page 40: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 40

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

ywp

xw xp

11

2 2 ~The equation of a short-run iso-profit lineis

so an increase in w1 causes -- an increase in the slope, and -- no change to the vertical intercept.

Page 41: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 41

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

Slopeswp

1

y

y f x x ( , ~ )1 2

x1*

y*

Page 42: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 42

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x

1

Slopeswp

1

y

y f x x ( , ~ )1 2

x1*

y*

Page 43: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 43

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

x

1

Slopeswp

1

y

y f x x ( , ~ )1 2

x1*

y*

Page 44: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 44

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

An increase in w1, the price of the firm’s variable input, causes

– a decrease in the firm’s output level (the firm’s supply curve shifts inward), and

– a decrease in the level of the firm’s variable input (the firm’s demand curve for its variable input slopes downward).

Page 45: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 45

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

xpw

x11

3 2

21/2

3*

/~

The Cobb-Douglas example: When

then the firm’s short-rundemand for its variable input 1 isy x x 1

1/321/3~

ypw

x* ~ .

3 1

1/2

21/2

and its short-runsupply is

Page 46: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 46

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

xpw

x11

3 2

21/2

3*

/~

The Cobb-Douglas example: When

then the firm’s short-rundemand for its variable input 1 isy x x 1

1/321/3~

x1* decreases as w1 increases.

ypw

x* ~ .

3 1

1/2

21/2

and its short-runsupply is

Page 47: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 47

Comparative Statics of Short-Run Profit-Maximization

xpw

x11

3 2

21/2

3*

/~

The Cobb-Douglas example: When

then the firm’s short-rundemand for its variable input 1 isy x x 1

1/321/3~

x1* decreases as w1 increases.

y* decreases as w1 increases.

ypw

x* ~ .

3 1

1/2

21/2

and its short-runsupply is

Page 48: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 48

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

Now allow the firm to vary both input levels.

Since no input level is fixed, there are no fixed costs.

Page 49: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 49

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

Both x1 and x2 are variable. Think of the firm as choosing the

production plan that maximizes profits for a given value of x2, and then varying x2 to find the largest possible profit level.

Page 50: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 50

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

ywp

xw xp

11

2 2The equation of a long-run iso-profit lineis

so an increase in x2 causes -- no change to the slope, and -- an increase in the vertical intercept.

Page 51: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 51

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

y

y f x x ( , )1 2

Page 52: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 52

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

y

y f x x ( , )1 22

y f x x ( , )1 2

y f x x ( , )1 23

Larger levels of input 2 increase theproductivity of input 1.

Page 53: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 53

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

y

y f x x ( , )1 22

y f x x ( , )1 2

y f x x ( , )1 23

Larger levels of input 2 increase theproductivity of input 1.

The marginal productof input 2 isdiminishing.

Page 54: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 54

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

y

y f x x ( , )1 22

y f x x ( , )1 2

y f x x ( , )1 23

Larger levels of input 2 increase theproductivity of input 1.

The marginal productof input 2 isdiminishing.

Page 55: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 55

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

y

y f x x ( , )1 22

y f x x ( , )1 2

y f x x ( , )1 23

y x*( )2

x x1 2*( )

x x1 22*( )

x x1 23*( )

y x*( )2 2

y x*( )3 2

p MP w 1 1 0 for each short-runproduction plan.

Page 56: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 56

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

y

y f x x ( , )1 22

y f x x ( , )1 2

y f x x ( , )1 23

The marginal productof input 2 isdiminishing so ...

y x*( )2

x x1 2*( )

x x1 22*( )

x x1 23*( )

y x*( )2 2

y x*( )3 2

for each short-runproduction plan.p MP w 1 1 0

Page 57: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 57

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

x1

y

y f x x ( , )1 22

y f x x ( , )1 2

y f x x ( , )1 23

the marginal profitof input 2 isdiminishing.

y*( x 2)

x x1 2*( )

x x1 22*( )

x x1 23*( )

y*(2 x 2)

y*(3 x 2)

for each short-runproduction plan.p MP w 1 1 0

Page 58: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 58

Long-Run Profit-Maximization Profit will increase as x2 increases so

long as the marginal profit of input 2

The profit-maximizing level of input 2 therefore satisfies

p MP w 2 2 0.

p MP w 2 2 0.

Page 59: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 59

Long-Run Profit-Maximization Profit will increase as x2 increases so

long as the marginal profit of input 2

The profit-maximizing level of input 2 therefore satisfies

And is satisfied in any short-run, so ...

p MP w 1 1 0

p MP w 2 2 0.

p MP w 2 2 0.

Page 60: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 60

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

The input levels of the long-run profit-maximizing plan satisfy

That is, marginal revenue equals marginal cost for all inputs.

p MP w 2 2 0.p MP w 1 1 0 and

Page 61: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 61

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

xpw

x11

3 2

21/2

3*

/~

The Cobb-Douglas example: When

then the firm’s short-rundemand for its variable input 1 is

y x x 11/3

21/3~

ypw

x* ~ .

3 1

1/2

21/2

and its short-runsupply is

Short-run profit is therefore …

Page 62: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 62

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

py w x w x

ppw

x wpw

x w x

* *

/

~

~ ~ ~

1 1 2 2

1

1/2

21/2

11

3 2

21/2

2 23 3

Page 63: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 63

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

py w x w x

ppw

x wpw

x w x

ppw

x wpw

pw

w x

* *

/

~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

1 1 2 2

1

1/2

21/2

11

3 2

21/2

2 2

1

1/2

21/2

11 1

1/2

2 2

3 3

3 3 3

Page 64: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 64

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

py w x w x

ppw

x wpw

x w x

ppw

x wpw

pw

w x

p pw

x w x

* *

/

~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

1 1 2 2

1

1/2

21/2

11

3 2

21/2

2 2

1

1/2

21/2

11 1

1/2

2 2

1

1/2

21/2

2 2

3 3

3 3 3

23 3

Page 65: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 65

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

py w x w x

ppw

x wpw

x w x

ppw

x wpw

pw

w x

p pw

x w x

pw

x

* *

/

~

~ ~ ~

~ ~

~ ~

~

1 1 2 2

1

1/2

21/2

11

3 2

21/2

2 2

1

1/2

21/2

11 1

1/2

2 2

1

1/2

21/2

2 2

3

1

1/2

2

3 3

3 3 3

23 3

427

1/22 2 w x~ .

Page 66: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 66

Long-Run Profit-Maximization

4

27

3

1

1/2

21/2

2 2pw

x w x~ ~ .

What is the long-run profit-maximizinglevel of input 2? Solve

0124272

3

1

1/2

21/2

2

~

~x

pw

x w

to get ~ .*x xp

w w2 2

3

1 2227

Page 67: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 67

Long-Run Profit-MaximizationWhat is the long-run profit-maximizinginput 1 level? Substitute

xpw

x11

3 2

21/2

3*

/~

xp

w w2

3

1 2227

* into

to get

Page 68: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 68

Long-Run Profit-MaximizationWhat is the long-run profit-maximizinginput 1 level? Substitute

xpw

x11

3 2

21/2

3*

/~

xp

w w2

3

1 2227

* into

to get

xpw

p

w w

p

w w1

1

3 2 3

1 22

1/2 3

1223 27 27

*/

.

Page 69: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 69

Long-Run Profit-MaximizationWhat is the long-run profit-maximizingoutput level? Substitute

xp

w w2

3

1 2227

* into

to get

ypw

x* ~

3 1

1/2

21/2

Page 70: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 70

Long-Run Profit-MaximizationWhat is the long-run profit-maximizingoutput level? Substitute

xp

w w2

3

1 2227

* into

to get

ypw

p

w w

pw w

* .

3 27 91

1/2 3

1 22

1/2 2

1 2

ypw

x* ~

3 1

1/2

21/2

Page 71: © 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 19 Profit-Maximization.

© 2010 W. W. Norton & Company, Inc. 71

Long-Run Profit-MaximizationSo given the prices p, w1 and w2, andthe production function y x x 1

1/321/3

the long-run profit-maximizing productionplan is

( , , ) , , .* * *x x yp

w w

p

w w

pw w1 2

3

122

3

1 22

2

1 227 27 9