© 2009 IBM Corporation The Future of Software Radio: Wireless Network Cloud Parul Gupta, Smruti...
-
Upload
deirdre-hill -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
1
Transcript of © 2009 IBM Corporation The Future of Software Radio: Wireless Network Cloud Parul Gupta, Smruti...
© 2009 IBM Corporation
The Future of Software Radio: Wireless Network Cloud
Parul Gupta, Smruti Sarangi, Shivkumar Kalyanaraman [IBM Research – India]
Zhen Bo Zhu, Lin Chen, Yong Hua Lin, Ling Shao [IBM Research – China]
© 2009 IBM Corporation2 Version 0.1
Outline
Cellular wireless systems and convergence trends (esp in emerging markets)
Today’s 2G/3G architectures and the trend towards 4G (all-IP and OFDMA for PHY/MAC layers)
Increasing computational costs, low utilization with future generations of technology, upgrade cycles, growing maintenance / OPEX costs.
SDR evolution: – Firmware OTA upgrades on vendor platforms, – From DSP/FPGA platforms to Hybrid IT platforms, – Multi-technology / multi-operator support– Virtualization & cloud given fiber-to-tower availability
© 2009 IBM Corporation3 Version 0.1
Wireless: short technical summary
1. Scarce bandwidth (10-100 MHz/operator)
2. Spectral Efficiency: MHz -> Mbps (signal to noise ratio is key!)
Rate
Mobility
2G
3G
4G802.11b WLAN
2G Cellular
Other Tradeoffs: Rate vs. Coverage Rate vs. Delay Rate vs. Cost Rate vs. Energy
3. Tradeoffs: Rate vs X(no free lunch!)
Today With femto cells & MIMO antennas
Wireless IT convergence
Wireless networks are designed to maximize spectral efficiency, support mobility, coverage, and Quality-of-Service under severe spectrum/bandwidth constraints
Wireless networks are designed to maximize spectral efficiency, support mobility, coverage, and Quality-of-Service under severe spectrum/bandwidth constraints
In emerging markets the dependence on wireless is high and growing. ARPU pressures are severe: $2 incremental ARPU today. Operators aggressively outsource their (wireless/wired) networks and IT.
© 2009 IBM Corporation4 Version 0.1
Wireless Convergence: Closed Vertically Integrated to Horizontal Open
TDMA/CDMA
Circuit Voice;
Data overlay
2G/3G wireless
Integrated MAC,
network functions
Radio layer: OFDMA/MIMO
Network layer: IP
Middleware: IMS, SDP
Apps: Unified Comms (multimedia),
Smarter Planet, mobile VAS, Internet apps, Spoken Web/SMS platforms…
4G wireless
System: IT and wireless systems are approaching similar system architectures
Network Services: Convergence of enterprise wireless and operator wireless services
Application/Solutions: Seamless integration and interaction of wireless infrastructure and mobile applications
Convergence at
Systems Level
Convergence at
Network Services Level
Convergence at
Application/Solutions Level
There is another interesting twist in this wireless / IT convergence at the systems level
© 2009 IBM Corporation5 Version 0.1
BS
BS
BS
BS
Radio network controller
Radio network controller
Mobile switch center
Service support node Gateway
PSTNPSTN
Access Network Core Network
2G-3G wireless network architecture
Service Network
SMS/MMS
WAP GW
4G Wireless Network over Wireless Network Cloud
InternetInternet
SMS/MMS
IMS
Content Service
Web Service
GS
M
GS
MW
iMA
XT
D-S
CD
MA
BS cluster
LTE
WiM
AX
WiM
AX
LTE
BS cluster
Cloud of Wireless Access Network + Core Network
Edge gatewayManagementServer
BillingEdgegateway
© 2009 IBM Corporation6 Version 0.1
Service support node
PSTNPSTN
Service Network
2G/3G/4G Wireless over Wireless Network Cloud
InternetInternet
SMS/MMS
IMS
Content Service
Web Service
GS
M
GS
MW
iMA
XT
D-S
CD
MA
BS cluster
LTE
WiM
AX
WiM
AX
LTE
BS cluster
Edge gatewayManagementServer
BillingEdgegateway
Service on Edge
Cloud of Wireless Access Network + Core Network
© 2009 IBM Corporation7 Version 0.1
Mobile Infrastructure Network Hierarchy
Core Network Radio Access Network
Challenges: The radio access network is a costly and continuous investment ($100B+). With reducing ARPUs and need for broader nationwide coverage, there are more initiatives for sharing infrastructure
© 2009 IBM Corporation8 Version 0.1
Various Forms of Infrastructure Sharing in Wireless Networks
Network Sharing (eg: rural) Base Station Sharing (leads to cloud)
Antenna Sharing Tower Sharing (very popular)
BSC BTS
Owner #1 Retail
Owner #2 Retail
MSC
BSC BTS
Owner #1 Network
Owner #2 Network
BSC BTS
O
BSC BTS
Owner #1 Network
Owner #2 Network
BSC BTS
Base Band UnitBSC
Owner #1 Network
Owner #2 Network
BSCSDR
BTS
RRU
© 2009 IBM Corporation10
Version 0.1
Passive Sharing and Tower Companies
Eg: Indus Towers (JV controls towers of Bharti, Vodafone, Idea) has 100K towers. Tata Teleservices, Aircel have signed deals with BSNL for sharing 60K+ towers.
© 2009 IBM Corporation11
Version 0.1
Towards Active Sharing: Unbundling Base Stations: RRU + BBU
Distributed base station
– RRU (Remote Radio Unit)
– BBU (Base Band Unit)
Two key standards enable distributed base station development
– CPRI
– OBSAI
Benefits of distributed base station
– Reduce cost of facilitate infrastructure
– Reduce power consumption
– Easy of installation
– Flexible deployment model
Traditional Integrated Macro BS
Distributed BS: RRU + BBU
RRU
BBU
© 2009 IBM Corporation12
Version 0.1
Distributed base station deployment #1: under the tower
70% - 80% power consumption is RRUs
3 RRU: 100 – 150W/RRU
1 BBU: 100W
Requirement & Challenges to BBU
light weight < 10Kg
small size (1U – 2U)
low power consumption (< 100W)
Scenario #1: Unbundle at the tower
BSC
BBU
MSC
BBU
RRU RRU
<100m
RRU-BBU Distance <100m5-10Km
5-10Km
© 2009 IBM Corporation16
Version 0.1
Active Infrastructure Sharing: Field Trial in India (IBM/partner)
© 2009 IBM Corporation17
Version 0.1
IO & GPS module
CPRI/OBSAI/
Ir
SWR Base Station
RRU
GE/E1/T1/STM-1
To RNC/ASN-GW/AGW
RRU adaptor
...
PC
Ie/IB
sw
itch
GE
sw
itch E1/T1/STM-1
GPS module
Base band processing
accelerators
RRU adaptor
Base band processing server(PHY, MAC, C&M)
...
Base band processing server(PHY, MAC, C&M)
General purpose servers
Unbundled SDR BS w/ Open Wireless Interfaces & IT Platforms
© 2009 IBM Corporation18
Version 0.1
Distributed base station #2: distributed RRU + centralized BBU pool
Benefits
– Fit for super urban, urban with high density of traffic
– Highly scalable– Improve utilization by resource sharing– Reduce management cost
Requirements & Challenges to BBU
– High density– Resource sharing with BBU pool– Low power consumption
Key barriers:
– Fiber distance (<10Km)– Increasing IO data throughput >10Gbs
with LTE – Fiber construction cost– Synchronization in long distance
network
Scenario #2: central deployment
BSC
BBU Pool
RRUBBU BBU
BBU BBU
MSC10KM
RRU
Case in China:
World largest TD-SCDMA BBU pool
Max support 72 RRUs
Power: 400W
A city like Bangalore or Delhi could be served from <10-15 pooled sites.
© 2009 IBM Corporation19
Version 0.1
Wireless Network Cloud: Convergence of IT Platforms, SDR & RRH, Cloud Computing Principles & Fiber-to-the-tower
End-to-End IP Infrastructure in 4G
IT & Cloud Computing Techniques
BaseStation Pool
Antenna + Remote Radio Header
Fiber (> 10Km)
Software Radio Technology/
Hybrid IT Systems
Remote Radio Header Technology
GSM RF header
WiMAX RF header
WCDMA RF header
WCDMA RF header
GSM RF header
LTE RF header
Resourcemanager
Server for BS
LTE
WiMAXGSM
WiMAX
WCDMA
WCDMA
WCDMA
GSM
GSM
Server for Access GW
Timing Network over IP/Eth
Server for Access GW
© 2009 IBM Corporation20
Version 0.1
Joint processing
I
I
I
I
I
I
Multiple points collaborate to mitigate ICI or align interference for cancellation.
Multi-cell environment withfrequency reuse factor 1
Optical fiber
Optical fiber Optical fiber
interference
Wireless Network Cloud Potential: Distributed Interference Management. Eg: Collaborative MIMO for Elastic Capacity Allocation
© 2009 IBM Corporation21
Version 0.1
An e2e Demo has been setup in IBM CRL/IRL ([email protected])
Internet
RRH(USRP)
RRH(USRP)
WiMAX BS /Gateway(multi-core server)
MS (laptop simulated)
Multi-core Utilization Analysis Tool Radio Signal Analysis Tool
I-vieW
VoIP Web Browsing
Web Server
Demo Application
VoIP Stream
Web Browsing Edge Gateway
WiMAXBS
WiMAX BS
WiMAX BS
SIP Server
Soft-phone
Collaboration of IBM China and India Labs: Multiple base-stations on common IT platform, USRP & e2e flows
© 2009 IBM Corporation22
Version 0.1
BS SDR System Architecture
MAC: Software Components
RRH adaptor
...
Lo
cal S
wit
ch F
abri
c (P
CIe
Sw
itch
)
To other BS chasisTo ASN gateway or core networkTo internet directly
RRH
RRH
Signal processing server
(PHY) (P7/x86/Cell)
Lo
cal S
wit
ch F
abri
c (G
bE
sw
itch
)
Wireless MAC modules& PHY-MAC adaptors
BS edge router
Control & Manage
...
RRH
RRHRRH adaptor Signal processing
server(PHY) (P7/x86/Cell)
Prism based platform
Control & management
Switch of BS system
BS edge router
MAC instance
MAC instance
MAC instance
Adapter Adapter Adapter
Fast path data processing
Slow path message
processing
MAC and adapter Stacks
Scheduling
Fragment & packing
Packets Encryption
ConcatenationPacket Extract
Defragment & unpacking
Packets Decryption
MA
C M
anag
emen
t
DownlinkUplink
DL AdapterUL Adapter
Msg.
Msg.
Msg.
Key technical challenges being addressed (IRL+CRL)
• How to map the wireless software radio (SWR) stack/workload to massive multicore and hybrid architectures?
• How to meet QoS and real-time requirements for the VoIP application, especially since the wireless software stack (such as PHY and MAC layer) will be implemented in software using a regular OS?
© 2009 IBM Corporation23
Version 0.1
Laundry List of Challenges
Difference from regular computational, storage cloud: “real-time computational cloud”– Focus on very high performance, real-time synchronized behavior. – Cooperative techniques require greater degree of rigor in performance management– Wireless = Critical infrastructure. Availability / reliability equally important as real-time
performance support.
Choice of underlying platforms: hybrid systems, commodity servers and mapping it to VMs (eg: MAC VM may work well on system A, and PHY VM work well on system B).
– Need real-time virtual switches that can tie together such component VMs into a pipeline (Network -> MAC -> PHY)
– Cooperative techniques require redesign of protocols / implementation
Multi-tenancy, elastic provisioning of real-time resources, tracking performance / availability risks (eg: 4-5 nines)
– Providing backup for virtual base-stations from multiple data center sites: “cloud” attribute.
Helping the industry move from an integrated “box” model to a software + outsourced services model.
– Hypothesis: ARPU pressures faced by providers will ultimately drive such a move. Aggressive outsourcing happening in markets like India.
© 2009 IBM Corporation24
Version 0.1
Summary
Software radio is an emerging technology.
The long term potential of software radio involves: – Unbundling base stations into hardware, software, RF components.– Application of IT platforms, open wireless interfaces to SDR; opening up a open-
source community of developers – Allowing flexibility for BS software to be virtualized, and consolidated into pools for
reduced CAPEX/OPEX, higher utilization and change business models– Fiber to towers will allow pooling and application of the Cloud model.
Wireless network cloud can provide new benefits. – Elastic capacity allocation & higher utilization/lower costs– Distributed Interference Management: Collaborative MIMO etc (5th Generation Wireless)– Integration of edge-based services at the cloud site. Eg: caching, content delivery,
unified communications, enterprise app delivery, cloud-based application delivery etc
Perfect storm of “cloud” challenges: – Real-time, synchrony/performance-critical, ultra-high reliability requirements.
© 2009 IBM Corporation25
Version 0.1
Terminology
RAN – Radio Access Network CN – Core Network BTS – Base Station = BBU + RRU BSC – Base Station Controller BBU – Base Band Unit RRU – Remote Radio Unit RNC – Radio Network Controller, BSC in 3G NodeB – BTS in 3G eNB – Base Station Node in LTE LTE – Long Term Evolution (E-UTRAN) AIPN – All IP Network NEP – Network Equipment Provider