© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)
-
Upload
camilla-sutton -
Category
Documents
-
view
220 -
download
0
Transcript of © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)
![Page 1: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 1
Lecture 7a
Modelling Logic Requirements
(Textbook Chapter 8)
![Page 2: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 2
Learning Objectives
Use Structured English as a tool for representing steps in logical processes in data flow diagrams.
Use decision tables to represent the logic of choice in conditional statements.
Select among Structured English and decision tables for representing processing logic.
![Page 3: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 3
Logic Modelling
Data flow diagrams do not show the logic inside the processes or the contents of data flows.
Logic modelling involves representing internal structure and functionality of processes depicted on a DFD.
Logic modelling can also be used to show when processes on a DFD occur.
Data modelling is used to represent the contents and structure of the DFD data flows & data stores. Data Modelling is covered in 2002ICT.
![Page 4: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 4
Modelling a System’s Logic
![Page 5: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 5
Deliverables and Outcomes
Structured English representation of process logic.
Decision Tables representation. Sequence diagram (mainly OO approach). Activity diagram (mainly OO approach).
![Page 6: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 6
Modelling Logic with Structured English
Structured English: modified form of English language used to specify the logic of information system processes.
No single standard. Typically relies on action verbs and noun
phrases and contains no adjectives or No specific standards.
![Page 7: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 7
Recall the DFDs previously presented...
The Hoosier Burger Example
![Page 8: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 8
… and the resulting Level-0 Diagram
![Page 9: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 9
Modelling Logic with Structured English
The Hoosier Burger Inventory Control System
![Page 10: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 10
Modelling Logic with Structured English (cont.)
![Page 11: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 11
Modelling Logic with Structured English (cont.)
![Page 12: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 12
Repetition can also be modelled using DO-WHILE:
Modelling Logic with Structured English
READ Inventory recordsWHILE NOT End-of-File DO
BEGIN IFIF Quantity-in-Stock is less Minimum-order-
quantityTHEN GENERATE new orderELSE DO nothing // optional
END IFEND DO
What is the difference to DO-UNTIL ??
![Page 13: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 13
Cascading IF-THEN tests or a case statement can be combined to cover other possibilities. E.g. imagine modelling an emergency reorder:
Modelling Logic with Structured English
READ Quantity-in-StockSELECT CASE
CASE 1 (Quantity-in-Stock greater then Minimum-order-quantity)DO nothing
CASE 2 (Quantity-in-Stock equals Minimum-order-quantity)DO nothing
CASE 3 (Quantity-in-Stock is less than Minimum-order-quantity)GENERATE new order
CASE 4 (Stock Out)INITIATE emergency reorder routine
END CASE
![Page 14: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 14
Modelling Logic with Decision Tables
Research (Yourdon, 1989) has shown people become confused when trying to interpret more than three nested IF-THENs.
Thus, diagrams are more appropriate for complicated decision logic.
A Decision table is a matrix representation of the logic of a decision which specifies the possible conditions for the decision and the resulting actions.
![Page 15: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 15
Modelling Logic with Decision Tables (cont.)
![Page 16: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 16
Modelling Logic with Decision Tables (cont.)
Condition stubs: that part of a decision table that lists the conditions relevant to the decision.
Action stubs: that part of a decision table that lists the actions that result for a given set of conditions.
![Page 17: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 17
Modelling Logic with Decision Tables (cont.)
Rules: that part of a decision table that specifies which actions are to be followed for a given set of condition.
Indifferent condition: in a decision table, a condition whose value does not affect which actions are taken for two or more rules.
![Page 18: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 18
Modelling Logic with Decision Tables (cont.)
Procedure for Creating Decision TablesName the condition and the values that each
condition can assume.Name all possible actions that can occur.List all possible rules.Define the actions for each rule.Simplify the table.
![Page 19: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 19
Modelling Logic with Decision Tables (cont.)
“IF”
“THEN”
“IF-THEN”
![Page 20: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 20
Modelling Logic with Decision Tables (cont.)
Simplified Decision Table – Staff is paid base salary, regardless
![Page 21: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 21
Modelling Logic with Decision Tables
Hoosier Burger complete Decision Table
![Page 22: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 22
Modelling Logic with Decision Tables (cont.)
Hoosier Burger simplified Decision Table
![Page 23: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 23
Structured English or Decision Tables?
Criteria Structured English
Decision Tables
Determining Conditions and Actions
Ok Average
Transforming Conditions and Actions into Sequence
Best Average
Checking Consistency and Completeness
Average Best
![Page 24: © 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu Noran Lecture 7a 1 Modelling Logic Requirements (Textbook Chapter 8)](https://reader036.fdocuments.in/reader036/viewer/2022062309/56649e405503460f94b31a59/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
© 2008 Prentice Hall, Ovidiu NoranLecture 7a 24
Summary
In this chapter you learned how to:Use Structured English as a tool for
representing steps in logical processes in data flow diagrams.
Use decision tables to represent the logic of choice in conditional statements.
Select Structured English or decision tables for representing processing logic.