Copyright © 2009 by Pearson Education Canada 2 - 1 Chapter 2 Accounting Under Ideal Conditions.
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.2-1 Chapter 2 Accounting Under Ideal Conditions.
-
Upload
gabriel-brooks -
Category
Documents
-
view
213 -
download
0
Transcript of © 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.2-1 Chapter 2 Accounting Under Ideal Conditions.
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-1
Chapter 2
Accounting Under Ideal Conditions
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-2
Ideal Conditions of Certainty
• Assumptions– Known future cash receipts– Given interest rate
• Basis of Accounting– Present value
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-3
Ideal Conditions of Certainty, Cont’d
• Income Recognition– As changes in present value occur
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-4
Ideal Conditions of Uncertainty
• Assumptions– States of nature
•Known set•Realization publicly observable
– State probabilities •objective •publicly known
– Given interest rate
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-5
Ideal Conditions of Uncertainty, Cont’d
• Basis of Accounting– Expected present value
• Income Recognition– As changes in expected present
value occur
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-6
Ideal Conditions of Uncertainty- Example
• You pay $100 to a bank to buy a 2-year investment which pays in each year $73.02 with prob. = 0.5 and $33.02 with prob. = 0.5. The interest rate in the economy is 4%.
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-7
Example, Cont’d
• PA0 = [.5(73.02) + .5(33.02)]/1.04 + [.5(73.02) + .5(33.02)]/(1.04)2 = (36.51 + 16.51)/1.04 + (36.51 + 16.51)/(1.04)2
= 53.02/1.04 + 53.02/1.0816 = 50.98 + 49.02 = $100.00
• NB: Risk-Neutral Valuation
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-8
Example, Cont’d
• Assume at End of Year 1, you Receive $73.02– PA1 = 73.02 + [.5(73.02)
+ .5(33.02)]/1.04
= 73.02 + 50.98 = $124
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-9
Example, Cont’d
• Net Income for the Year– Sales less amortization format
73.02 - (100 - 50.98) = 73.02 - 49.02 = $24
– Alternative format•100 x .04 + (24 - 4) = 4 + 20 = $24
– Change in balance sheet net assets•124 - 100 = $24
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-10
Lack of Ideal Conditions
• Problems when conditions not ideal– State probabilities are subjective, not
objective– Incomplete markets
• Definition of Incompleteness• Reasons for Incompleteness
– thin markets– information asymmetry
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-11
Implications of Lack of Ideal Conditions
• Need for Estimates (quantities, prices, timing) of states of nature
• Need for Estimates of State Probabilities
• Market Value Need Not Equal Present Value
• True Net Income Does Not Exist
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-12
Implications of Lack of Ideal Conditions,
Cont’d.• Relevance and Reliability
Must be Traded Off (next slide )
• Historical Cost Accounting a Better Tradeoff?– Relevance of historical cost
accounting?– Reliability of historical cost
accounting?
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-13
Relevance v. Reliability Tradeoff
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-14
Fair Value Accounting
• Implementing Accounting Under Ideal Conditions when Ideal Conditions do not Exist
• Meaning of “Fair Value”– Present value approach– Market value approach– Model-based approach
•E.g., option pricing models
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-15
Reserve Recognition Accounting
• An Application of Present Value Accounting When Ideal Conditions do not Exist– Proved reserves– Discounted at mandated rate of
10%– Revenue recognized as reserves
are proved– Major adjustments to previous
estimates
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-16
Reserve Recognition Accounting, Cont’d
• Relevance of RRA information?• Reliability of RRA information?• Management’s Reaction to RRA
– Concern about relevance and reliability
– Concern about legal liability
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-17
Asset Valuation is Equivalent to Income
Recognition • Proved reserves valued at
present value income recognized as reserves are proved
• Proved reserves valued at cost income recognized as reserves are sold
© 2006 Pearson Education Canada Inc.
2-18
The Challenge of Historical Cost
Accounting• Amortization of Capital Assets
– Consider earlier example• Straight-line amortization
Net Income: 73.02 - 100/2 = 73.02 - 50 = $23.02
• Sum of years digits amortizationNet Income: 73.02 - 2/3 x 100 = 73.02 - 67 =
$6.02
Little theoretical basis to choose between different ways of accounting for the same thing. Relevance? Reliability?