shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.inshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62502/16/16... · / +& ) 0 " &...

BIBLIOGRAPHY

(AUTHOR-WISE)

BIBLIOGRAPHY

AUTHORSAhluwalia IJ and Little IM DAiman-Smith Lynda; Goodrich Nina; Roberts David;Scinta James

Amabile Teresa M

Anderson, Durston and PooleAnthony Robert N and Govidarajan Vijay

Astebro Thomas

Audrey Verhaeghe and Rivka Kfir

Aul Hildreth and Chris Kimble (Editors)

Babcock Daniel L and Morse Lucy C

Bagchi Subroto

Bagchi Subroto

Barber Felix and Strack Rainer

Bennis Warren G and Thomas Robert J

Bernard C. Y. Tan, H. Jeff Smith, Mark Keil, and Ramiro Montealegre

Bhadury Bikash Bhagwati Jagdish

(AUTHOR-WISE)

Year Month

1995

TITLEIndia’s economic reforms and development

2005 March-April Assessing Your Organization's Potential for Value Innovation

PUBLISHEROxford University Press, DelhiResearch-Technology Management, Number 2, pp. 37-42 Industrial Research Institute, Inc

1998 September How to Kill Creativity Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School Press

Thesis and Assignment Writing "£nEastem Unl,erei,y

Management Control Systems Tata McGraw H New De|hi 9 Ed

Key Success Factors for 2004 AUGUST Technological Entrepreneurs'

R&D Projects

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, Vol 51, NO. 3

Managing innovation in a2002 November knowledge intensive technology R&D Management; Oxford

organization (KITO)

2004Knowledge Networks: Innovation through Communities of Practice

Idea Group Publishing http://www.cs.vork.ac.uk/mis/ KNICOP/Chapters/Introduction html

»» rsn4ESTdringand

2000 December Building Employee Commitment Mind Tree

2005 December

2005 June

Lessons in Entrepreneurship from the Indian IT IndustryThe Surprising Economics of ‘People Business’

2001 January Crucibles of Leadership

Mind Tree

Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School PressHarvard Business Review (on Developing Leaders), Harvard Business School Press

2003 February

1989 May 2004

Reporting Bad News About Software Projects: Impact of Organizational Climate and Information Asymmetry in an Individualistic and a Collectivistic Culture What ails Indian Management In Defense of Globalization

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT. VOL.50.NO. 1

Indian Management Oxford New Delhi

309

Bommer Michael and Jalajas David S. 2004 February

Innovation Sources of Large and Small Technology-Based Firms

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, Vol.51, NO. 1

Bordley Robert F. 1998 NovemberR&D Project Selection Versus R&D Project Generation

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERINGMANAGEMENT, Vol. 45, NO. 4

Bowonder B, Kumar BS, and Yadav S

2000 September 5fP fPendin8 Patterns of -October Global firmsResearch Technology Management, Vol 43, Issue 5

Bowonder B 2001

Globalization of R&D: the Indian Experience and implications for developing countries

Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, Vol 26, Issue 3

Bowonder B, Kelkar V, Satish K.G 2003 March R&D in India

Issue paper No.9, ASCI, Hyderabad,

Bowonder, B.; Racherla, J.K.; Mastakar, N.V.; and Krishnan, S.

2005September- R&D Spending Patterns of October Global Firms

ResearctvTechnology Management, Volume 48, Number 5, pp. 51-59 Industrial Research Institute, Inc

Chachich Alan 2004 November Managing the risks of Product Innovation Cutter IT Journal Vol 17 No 11,

Chandra Mohan A 2003The Leadership Styles of Indian Managers (A case Study of Visakha Patnam Port Trust)

Doctoral Thesis, Sri Krishna Devaraya University, Anantapur

Chandra Mohan A and Niak Krishna CN 2005 The Leadership Styles of Indian Indian Publishers’ Distributors,

Managers Delhi

Chao C. Chen, Cameron M. Ford, and George F. Farris

1999 February

Do Rewards Benefit the Organization? The Effects of Reward Types and the Perceptions of Diverse R&D Professionals


Chatterjee Somnath, 2002 November • December

■ Indian Electronics today and future perspective ELCINA Out Look

Chattopadhyay Urmi 2004

Understanding Organization Designs for Patent Productivity through Disparity of ICT Professionals with Varying Patent Experience

Doctoral Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

Choung Jae-Yong 1998 November Patterns of Innovation in Korea and Taiwan

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERINGMANAGEMENT, Vol 45, NO. 4

Chrissis Mary Beth, Konrad Mike, and Shrum Sandy

2004CMMI Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement

Pearson Education

310

Christensen C.M.; Musso C.S.; and Anthony S.D.

2004 JulyMaximizing the Returns from Research

Christensen Clayton M et al, 2003 The Innovator’s Solutions

Christensen Clayton M, et al, 2004 Seeing What's Next

Christensen, Clayton M and Overdorf Michael,

2000 March Meeting the Challenge of Disruptive Change

Christensen, Clayton M 2000 The Innovator’s Dilemma

CMMI Product Team 2002 March

Capability Maturity Model Integration CMMI Ver 1.1 , Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, PA

Venkataraman M.S 2005

Patents (Amendment) Act 2002 And Patents (Amendment) Bill, 2003 Salient Features

Cordero Rene, Farris George F., and DiTomaso Nancy

2004 February

Supervisors in R&D Laboratories: Using Technical, People, and Administrative Skills Effectively

Cross Richard, 2005 Organizational Change: When All Work Is Knowledge Work

Daniels Aubrey C 2003 Bringing out the Best in People

Das Pulak Kumar 1995

Pay, Promotion and Pay Satisfaction of R & D Personnel in Some Indian Manufacturing Organizations

David Dubois 2004 The Role of Innovation in Economics

De Marco Tom and Lister Timothy 1999 Peopleware: Productive

Projects and Teams

De Marco Tom 1997 The Deadline : A About Project Management

Devin Lee and Austin Rob 2004 November

Planning to Get Lucky (Creativity and Innovation on Schedule)

Dhavan Sunil K, Santanu Roy, and Suresh Kumar

2002 MayOrganizational Energy: An empirical study in Indian R&D laboratories

Research*T echnology Management, Volume 47, Number 4, pp. 12-18, Industrial Research Institute, IncHarper Business (Harvard Business School)Harper Business (Harvard Business School)

Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School Press

Harper Business (Harvard Business School)

Controller of Patents & Designs, Patent Office, Chennai


Tata Me Graw Hill


The 2004 Moffatt Prize in Economics Innovation in the 21st CenturyDorset House Publishing Co. NYDorset House Publishing Co. NY

Cutter IT Journal vol 17 No 11

R&D Management

311

Dhawan Sunil K and Santanu Roy 2003 July 7-9,

Diwan Parag 1984

Drucker Peter F 1954

Drucker Peter F 1995 JcanhUary- February

Drucker Peter F 2006 February

Dumbleton John H 1986

Eccles Robert G January- Iaai February

Edelheit L.S. 2004 January

Ernst Holger, Leptien Christopher, andVitt Jan

2000 MAY

Florida Richard and Goodnight Jim

2005 ^Uly' August

Freeman C 1974

Ganguli Prabudha 2003

Ganguli Prabudha 2005

Germeraad P. 2003 November

Gibbs Andy and DeMatteis Bob 2005

GOI 2003

Satisfaction and dissatisfaction with work climate and group processes in R&D Project environments in IndiaProductivity & Technology Management

The Practice of Management

The Information Executives Truly Need

What Executives ShouldRemember(1909-2005)

Management of High Technology Research & Development

The Performance Measurement Manifesto

Perspective on GE Research & Development

Inventors Are Not Alike: The Distribution of Patenting Output Among Industrial R&D Personnel

Managing for Creativity

The Economics of Industrial InnovationIntellectual Property Vol IIntellectual Property Rights - Unleashing the Knowledge Economy

Measuring R&D in 2003

Essentials of Patents (Patentcafe)

Indian Patent Act & Patent Rules

The R&D Management Conference 2003, Manchester, England

Prentice Hall India, New Delhi

Harper & Row

Harvard Business Review (on Measuring Corporate Performance), Harvard Business School Press

Harvard Business Review Harvard Business School Press

Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Netherlands


ResearcIrT echnology Management, Volume 47, Number 1, pp. 49-55 Industrial Research Institute, Inc



Penguin, England

Pearson Education

Tata Me Graw Hill

Research*Technology Management, Volume 46, Number 6, pp. 47-56 Industrial Research Institute, Inc

Wiley, USA

Universal Law Publishing Co, New Delhi,

312

Goldratt Eliyahu M and Cox Jeff

Goleman Daniel 2000

Goold Michael and Campbell Andrew

Govardhan J 2005

Gray Lewis 1999

Griffin Natalie Shope 2003

Groover Robert III 2002

Hamel Gary 2000

Hamel Gary 2006

Hamm John 2002

Hegde Vishu 2005

Henriksen Anne DePiante andTraynor Ann Jensen

1999

Holzer Bonnie 1994

IBM 2005

Inge C Kerssens-van Drongelen; and Andrew Cook

1997

lya Sandhya 1992

Jagdish R and Verma PromodJain Ashok and Gupta VK 1988

The Goal(a book on Theory of Constraints) 2nd Revised Ed

Productivity Press (India) Pvt Ltd., Madras

March Leadership that gets Results Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School Press

March Do you have a well-designed Organization


November Strategic Quality Targeting in Transient Economies NIQR Souvenir

Biological Limits onProfessional Performance Abelia Corporation

March Personalize your Management Development

Harvard Business Review (on Developing Leaders), Harvard Business School Press

December Maximizing patent productivity Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal; Clifton

July - August Waking up IBM Harvard Business Review

February The Why, What and How of MANAGEMENT INNOVATION Harvard Business Review

December Why Entrepreneurs don’t ScaleHarvard Business Review (on Developing Leaders), Harvard Business School Press

December Intrinsic Quality: Quality in Knowledge Era Mind Tree

MAY A Practical R&D Project- Selection Scoring Tool


June Quality auditing in a public sector service environment Quality Progress

September Contextual Collaborations Network Computing Agile Enterprise Vol 7 Issue 9

October

Design principles for the development of measurement systems for research and development processes

R&D Management; Oxford

Conceptualization and Measurement of the Uncertainty Experienced by R & D Personnel in Relation to Job Involvement, Work Involvement, and Work Motivation


November Wipro’s Quality Journey NIQR Souvenir

November Management of R&D in India - an Over View Indian Management,

313

Jay Paap; Ralph Katz 2004 SeptemberAnticipating Disruptive Innovation

Jharwal SM 2005

Jones Gareth R 2000

Jordan, Gretchen B. 2005 May

Telecom Growth in India Organizational Theory (Text & Cases)

What Matters To R&D Workers

Jothilakshmi 1994

Study of Leadership and Influence Patterns in Defense R&D Organizations: A Qualitative Approach ,

Kaplan Robert S andNorton David P ^ February

The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance

Kaplan Robert S and 1Qp, September Putting the Balanced Scorecard Norton David P - October to Work

Kaplan Robert S and January- Balanced Scorecard as Norton David P 0 February Strategic Management System

The Score Board Must becomeKaplan Robert S 2002 August the CEO’s Management

System

Kappel Thomas A.and 1999 MAYRubenstein Albert H.

Creativity in Design: The Contribution of Information Technology

Is Faster Really Better? AnKessler Eric H. and cehn,.ra Empirical Test of theBierly, III Paul E. ™ Implications of Innovation

Speed

Kostoff Ronald N. and „nf11 M. Y Science and Technology Schaller Robert R. Roadmaps

KPMG 2004 Balanced Business Score Card

Krishnan KS 2005 December Empowerment In Project Management

Research*T echnology Management, Volume 47, Number 5,1, pp. 13-22 , Industrial Research Institute,Inc

Employment News, 4-10 June 2 Ed, Publisher: Addison Wesley (Low Price Ed),

ReseardvT echnology Management, Volume 48, Number 3, pp. 23-32 Industrial Research Institute, Inc





Indian Management




KPMG

Mind Tree

314

Kumar D 2003

Knowledge Management Initiatives and TheirRelationship withOrganizational Innovativeness

M Sc Thesis, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore,

Kylie Sayer 1997 SeptemberThe Empowerment Case study of BPR BPT, Adelaide,

Kyung Ho Chung, Jungwan Hong, Seungwoo Seo, and Kyeongtaek Kim

1998 November

Recommendations from the Commercialization of Government-Sponsored Telecommunications R&D with Multiple Development Cycles in Korea


Lall S 1996 Learning from Asian Tigers Macmillan, Houndmills

Lakshmi YVS 2004The New Initiatives for Effective Exploitation of Intellectual Property at C-DOT

Laslo Zohar and Goldberg Albert 1 2001 MAY

Matrix Structures and Performance: The Search for Optimal Adjustment to Organizational Objectives


Leigh Andrew and Maynard Michael 1999 The Perfect Leader Random House Business

Books, UK

Lieb Eugene B. 1998 February How Many R&D Projects to Develop?

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL.45, NO.1

Loehr Jim and Schwartz Tony 2001 January The making of a Corporate

Athlete


Lyne M.B. 2003 November Aligning R&D with Business Strategy

Research*Technology Management, Volume 46, Number 6, pp. 44-46,Industrial Research Institute, Inc

Lynn Ellys 1997Evaluation of R&D Processes : Effectiveness through Measurements

Artech House, Boston/London,

Maity S.N. 2005Office of the Controller-General Of Patents, Designs &Trade Marks :An Overview

CGPDTM, Gol

Manzoni Jean-Francois and Barsoux 1998 March Jean-Louis

The Set-up-to-fail Syndrome Harvard Business Review, Harvard Business School Press

Mary Mathew 2001Entrepreneurial R&D: an Organization Design for enhanced patent productivity

PICMET, Portland, Oregon

Mashelkar RA 1995 Vision 2000 Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR),

315

New Delhi

McDonough Edward Managing Communication in IEEE TRANSACTIONS ONF. Ill, Kahn Kenneth 1999 November Global Product Development ENGINEERINGB., and Griffin Abbie Teams MANAGEMENT, VOL 46, NO.4

Meemamsi GB 1995 The CDOT Story New Delhi

Harvard Business Review

Meyer Christopher 1994 January-February

How the right measures help teams excel

(on Measuring Corporate Performance), Harvard Business School Press

Rethinking PerformanceMeyer Marshal W 2002 Measurement: Beyond

Balanced Score CardCambridge University Press,

Michelson Grant and Suchitra Mouly V. 2002

‘You Didn’t Hear it From Us But...’: Towards an Understanding of Rumour and Gossip in Organisations

Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 27, Special Issue 2002

Mitter, Lakshmi 2005

Technological Innovation and Economic Performance in M Sc Thesis, Indian Institute ofSmall-Scaie Precision Science, Bangaloreengineering Industry

Research*T echnologyMoitra D. and Krishnamoorthy M.B 2004 July Global Innovation Exchange Management, Volume 47,

Number 4, pp. 32-38lndustrialResearch Institute, Inc

Murugesan San and Unhelkar Bhuvan 2004 November

A roadmap for successful ICT Innovation: Turning great ideas Cutter IT Journal vol 17 No 11into successful implementations

Productivity of ScientificNagpaul P S 1988 November Teamwork - Management and

Policy IssuesIndian Management

Nagpaul P S, PruthiS, Jain a andWahid A

1988 November Image of Indian Science - an Inside View Indian Management

Nagpaul PS and Santanu Roy 2003

Constructing a multi-objective measure of research performance

Scientometrics, Vol 56, No 3

Organizational Factors

Nair, Prabha 1991Influencing Success or Failure of Creative Performance of R & D Scientists: A Comparative Methodology for Identification


316

Naveh Eitan and Marcus Alfred A.

NCAER

Neilson Gary L, Pasternack Bruce A, Karen E, and Van Nuys

Ness Joseph A and Cucuzza Thomas G

NithyanandanRadhakrishnan

'kr/.S/* Sill

Osborn RN et a!..

Pandey Subrata

Pandya Pradeep,Paradi Joseph C., Smith Sandra (Rehm), and Schaffnit-Chatterjee Claire

Patd-Cornell M. Elisabeth and Dillon Robin L.

Peggy Holman and Tom Devane

Prasad Lakshmanan and Rubenstein Albert H

Prasad Lakshmanan

When Does the ISO 9000Quality Assurance Standard IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON

2004 AUGUST Lead to Performance ENGINEERINGImprovement? Assimilation and MANAGEMENT, VOL.51, NO.3 Going Beyond

1994 January Socio-Economic Impact ofRural Telecom Services NCAER Report, New Delhi,

2005 October The Passive - Aggressive Organization


1995 Jcanhuar>'- February

Tapping the full potential ofABC


2004

Building Successful Software Companies in Developing Countries - The Case of India and Infosys

Infosys

Research and development 'S'* -?''A

A case study

Management Accounting Research, Orlando,

Organizational Theory John Wiley (New York)

1986

2002 August

Study of Organizational and Individual Characteristics inR & D OrganizationsKeeping Score on Strategy


Indian Management^ "

2002 February

Knowledge Worker Performance Analysis Using DEA: An Application to Engineering Design Teams at Bell Canada

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL 49, NO.1

2001 February

Success Factors and FutureChallenges in the Management IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON of Faster-Better-Cheaper ENGINEERINGProjects: Lessons Learned from MANAGEMENT, VOL.48, NO 1 NASA

1997 The Change Handbook: Group Methods for Shaping the Future Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc,

1986 MayFactors influencing project success at the R&D - Production Interface

TIMS/ORSA Los Angeles

2004

The work they do in R&D : Implications for the Management of Knowledge workers

Presentation Material onWeb site, HMB

317

Project Management Institute

2000A guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBoK Guide)

Project Management Institute, USA

Qingrui Xu,, Jin Chen, and Bin Guo 1998 November

Perspective of Technological Innovation and Technology Management in China

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERINGMANAGEMENT, VOL.45, NO 4

Qureshi M A

Rahman A, Bhargava RN, Qureshi MA and Pruthi S

1988 November

1973

Commercialization of Indigenous Technology

Science and Technology in India

Indian Management

Indian Council of Cultural Relations, New Delhi

Rao AS 1994Management of Technology Change

Global Business press, Delhi

RaoHS 1988 NovemberManagement of Technology Transfer - from Laboratory to Industry

Indian Management,

Ravichandran T 1993

Study of Organizational Innovativeness: Analysis of Some Correlates and Causal Factors


Rawat Anil andRao AS 1995 Management of Corporate R&D

and InnovationGlobal Business press, Delhi

Reinertsen, Donald; Shaeffer, Leland 2005 July-August Making R&D Lean

Research*T echnology Management, Volume 48, Number 4, Industrial Research Institute, Inc, pp. 51-57

Robert Kegan and Lisa Laskow Lahey 2003 The Real Reason People won't

Change

Harvard Business Review (on Culture and Change) Harvard Business School Press

Roger Whitley, Trueman Parish; Ronald Dressier; Geoffrey Nicholson

1998 Sept/Oct Evaluating R&D performance using the new sales ratio

Research Technology Management; Washington

Rusinko Cathy A. 1999 February

Exploring the Use of Design-Manufacturing Integration (DMI) IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON to Facilitate Product ENGINEERINGDevelopment: A Test of Some MANAGEMENT, VOL.46, NO.1 Practices

Saha Biswatosh 2004 August

State Support for Industrial Rand D in Developing Economies Economic and Political weekly,: Telecom Equipment Industry vol XXXIX No 35 in India and China

Saha R, 2005 S!Pte™ber - October

Management of Intellectual Property Rights in Information Technology

IETE Technical Review vol 22, No 5

318

Santanu Roy and Sunil K Dhawan 2002 February

Preliminary Pointers towards improving the work environment in CSIR Laboratories: Remarks from an empirical study

Current Science, Vol 82, No.3,

Santanu Roy, PS Nagpaul, and Pratap 2003 KJ Mohapatra

Developing a model to measure Inti Jl of Operations and the effectiveness of Research Production Management, Vol Units 23, No 12

Sattler Linda, and Sohoni Vinay

Scott Allen

1999 November

Participative Management:An Empirical Study of the Semiconductor Manufacturing Industry


2004 What To Do When Your Great Idea Becomes Mainstream Your Guide to Entrepreneurs

Scott Susan ne G. and Bruce Reginald A. 1998 February

Following the Leader in R&D:The Joint Effect of Subordinate IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON Problem-Solving Style and ENGINEERINGLeader-Member Relations on MANAGEMENT, VOL.45, NO 1Innovative Behavior

Sharad Dick 1989 May Should Project Management be a way of Life Indian Management,

Shenhar Aaron J.From Theory to Practice:

1998 February Toward a Typology of Project Management Styles

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL.45,NO. 1

Shim Duksup and Lee Mushin 2001 November Upward Influence Styles of

R&D Project Leaders


Simons Robert and igga January- How high is your return onDavila Antonio 0 February Management


Skyrme David J. 2004Knowledge Networking, Creating the Collaborative Enterprise

http://www.skyrme.com/knet/index.htm

Indian Electronics today andSomnath Chattergee 2002 Nov-Dec future perspectives ELCINA

Electronics OutlookSony IM 2004 September The Mediocrity Octopus Alive

Soo-Hoon Lee, Poh-Kam Wong, and 2005 FebruaryChee-Leong Chong

Human and Social Capital Explanations for R&D Outcomes

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL.52.NO. 1

Sorcher Melvin and Are you picking the RightBrant James, zuuz heDruary Leaders


319

Sosa Manuel E.,Eppinger Steven D.,Pich Michael, Me 2002 February Kendrick David G., and Stout Suzanne K.

Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: An Empirical Study in theTelecommunications Industry

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL 49, NO.1

Spolsky Joel

Sreenath Settur

2005 July Hitting the High Notes

2002 December6&7

A Model To Effectively Meet The Challenges Of Managing Indigenous Research And Development In The Current Times

Joel on Software

CSIR R&D Management Conference 2002, New Delhi

Sreenath Settur and A.K.Manoj Kumar

The CDOT Vendor1994 September Development Programme :

Past, Present and Future

DOT-CVATELECOMPONENTS 94, Bangalore

Sreenath Settur, A.K.Manoj Kumar and YVS Lakshmi

1998 September

Evolution of Component Qualification Methods for Local Component Manufacturers for Telecom

Productivity Improvement inSreenath Settur 2003 May 2-3 R & D : A study case of

Organization Re-design

Special Issue of the IEEE Transactions on Reliability (commemorating the 50th Anniversary of IEEE Reliability Society)National workshop on Applications of Information Technologies, Bangalore

Sreenath Settur, SN Raju, P Sadhasivam, 2003 and Dr. YVS Lakshmi

December.6&7

A simple model for managing knowledge markets by employing innovation oriented product centric approach


Sreenath Settur and CN Krishna Naik 2004 October A Preliminary Ethnographic

Study of an R&D Organization

Sreenath Settur and CN Krishna Naik

A Preliminary Study on Performance Measurement as

2004 November a Means for ImprovingOrganizational Effectiveness of R&D Institutions


A Preliminary Study on the Impact of Conducive

2004 November Environment on Productivity Improvement in an R&D Organization

A simple integrated model forSreenath Settur and 2qo4 December improved organizational SN Raju 6&7 effectiveness employing

knowledge networks

CSIR R&D Management Conference 2004,New Delhi

320


Sreenath Settur and Krishna Naik CN


Stuck Bart and Weingarten Michael

Suchitra Mouly V.

Suchitra Mouly V. Post-Doctoral Fellow, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore Suchitra Mouly V and Jayaram K Sankaran

Suchitra Mouly V

Suchitra Mouly V and Jayaram K Sankaran

Suchitra Mouly V, and Jayaram K.Sankaran,

Suleiman K.Kassicieh, Steven T. Walsh, John C. Cummings, Paul J. McWhorter,Alton D. Romig, and W. David Williams,

Sull Donald Normann

Suit Donald Normann

TNS

A Preliminary Study on the Effects of Integration (or de-

2005 January compartmentalization) onPerformance Improvement in an R&D Organization

2005 MarchR&D Organization For Improved Productivity

2006 May

2005 April

1990

1990

1994

1994

1995

1999

An Integrated Approach for Organizational Effectiveness in R&D Institutions

How Venture Capital Thwarts InnovationA Study of an R&D Team in an Indian Research Organization: An Ethnographic Approach

A Study of an R&D Team in an Indian Research Organization: An Ethnographic Approach

Organizational Effectiveness: An Ethnographic Perspective Organizational Ethnography: A critical Literature ReviewOrganizational Ethnography - illustrative application in the study of Indian R&D Settings

Barriers To The Cohesiveness and Effectiveness of Indian R&D Project Groups: Insights From Four Federal R&D Organizations

Factors Differentiating the 2002 November Commercialization of Disruptive

and Sustaining Technologies

2003 Why Good Companies Go Bad

2005

2006 July

How good companies go bad and how great managers remake them

UPS Asia Business Monitor: Executive Summary II

Science Tech Entrepreneur, pp 51-57

IEEE Spectrum


ASCI, Hyderabad Publication

ASCI Journal of Management Vol 23ASCI Journal of Management Vol 23

Sage Publications, New Delhi

Advances in Qualitative Organization Research

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERINGMANAGEMENT, VOL.49, NO.4

Harvard Business Review (on Culture and Change) Harvard Business School Press,

HBR On PointHarvard Business School Press

Survey Report by TNS conducted for UPS ABM

321

Venkataraman M.SPatents (Amendment) Act 2002 And Patents (Amendment) Bill, 2003 Salient Features

Verkasalo Matti and Lappalainen Pentti 1998 November

A Method of Measuring the Efficiency of the Knowledge Utilization Process

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL45.NO. 4

Violino Bob 2006 April Offshore R&D Takes Off Voice & Data

Von Meier Alexandra 1999 FebruaryOccupational Cultures as a Challenge to Technological Innovation


Waldroop James and Butler Timothy 2000 September Managing Away Bad Habits


Wheeler David A 2005 May The Most Important Software Innovations

Wilkinson TS and Bhandarkar PL 2004 Methodology and Techniques

for social research , 16th Ed Himalaya Publishing House,

Wille G. and BK Chandrasekhar 2002 December

6&7 GE’s R&D experiences in India CSIR R&D Management Conference 2002, New Delhi

Wright Vicky and Brading Liz 1992 October A balanced Performance Total Quality Management

Yew Kee Ho, Hean Tat Keh, and Jin Mei Ong

2005 February

The Effects of R&D and Advertising on Firm Value: An Examination of Manufacturing and Non-manufacturing Firms

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL 52,NO. 1

Young Pauline V and Schmid Calvin F 1984 Scientific social surveys and

researchPrentice Hall of India, NewDelhi

Zangwill Williard 1994 June Ten Mistakes CEOs make about Quality Quality Progress

322

WEBSITES;

http://india.gov.inyhttp://www.mit.gov.in/http://www.dot.gov.in/http://www.bsnl.co.inhttp://www.cdot.comhttp://www.trai.gov.inhttp://www.itiltd-india.com/http://www.dsir.gov.in/http://www.csir.res.in/http://www.nrdcindia.com/http://dst.gov.in/http://mst.nic.in/dst/http://www.cdac.in/http://www.iisc.emet.in/http://www.cag.gov.in/http://www.asci.org.in/http://india.gov.in/sectors/communicationO.phphttp://coai.in/http://www.upsinasia.com/abm

http://calculators.stat.ucla.edu/correlation.php http://www.changbioscience.com/math/math.html http://www.changbioscience.com/stat/corr.html http://www.changbioscience.com/stat/chi2.html http://facultv.vassar.edu/lowrv/corr rank.html http://facultv.vassar.edu/lowrv/webtext.html http ://www, survevsvstem .com/ http://www.survevsvstem.com/correlation.htm

BIBLIOGRAPHY

(CATEGORY-WISE)

BIBLIOGRAPHY(CATEGORY-WISE)

BOOKS

AUTHOR(S) YEAR MONTH TITLE

Ahluwalia I J India’s economicand Little EMD 1995 reforms and

developmentAnderson, Durston and PooleAnthony Robert

1970 Thesis and Assignment writing

N and 1998 Management ControlGovidarajanVijay

Systems

Babcock Daniel ManagingL and Morse 2002 Engineering andLucy C TechnologyBhagwati 2004 In Defense ofJagdish GlobalizationChandra Mohan The LeadershipA and Niak 2005 Styles of IndianKrishna CN ManagersChrissis Mary CMMI Guidelines forBeth, Konrad 2004 Process IntegrationMike, and Shrurn and ProductSandy Improvement,

Christensen 2003 The Innovator’sClayton M et al.. Solutions

Christensen Clayton M, et al.. 2004 Seeing What's Next

Christensen, 2000 The Innovator’sClayton M Dilemma

CMMI Product Team 2002 March

Capability Maturity Model Integration CMMI Ver 1.1

Daniels Aubrey 2003 Bringing out the BestC in PeopleDe Marco Tom Peopleware:and Lister 1999 Productive ProjectsTimothy and Teams

The Deadline: ADe Marco Tom 1997 About Project

ManagementProductivity &

Diwan Parag 1984 TechnologyManagement

PUBLISHER

Oxford University Press, Delhi

Wiley Eastern University Edition

9thEd, Tata McGraw Hill, New Delhi

3rd Ed, Pearson Education

Oxford New Delhi

Indian Publishers’ Distributors, Delhi

Pearson Education




Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, PA

Tata Me Graw Hill

Dorset House Publishing Co. NY

Dorset House Publishing Co. NY

Prentice Hall India, New Delhi

324

Harper & RowDnickcr Peter F. 1954

Dumbleton John H

Freeman C 1974

Gibbs Andy and DeMatteis Bob 2005

Goldratt Eliyahu M and Cox Jeff 1993

Jones Gareth R, 2000

LallS 1996

Leigh Andrew and Maynard Michael

1999

Lynn Ellys 1997

Meemamsi GB 1995

Meyer MarshalW 2002

Osborn RN et al..

Peggy Holman and Tom 1997Devane

ProjectManagement 2000Institute

RaoAS 1994

The Practice of Management

Management of High Technology Research & Development

Elsevier Science Publishers B.V. Netherlands

The Economics ofIndustrial Penguin, EnglandInnovationEssentials ofPatents Wiley, USA(Patentcafe)The Goal(a book on Theory of Productivity Press (India) Constraints) Pvt Ltd., MadrasSecond Revised EdOrganizational Adels™ Wesley(Textl) Cases) 2 Ed (LowPrice Ed)

Learning fromAsian Tigers Macmillan, Houndmills

The Perfect Leader Random House Business Books, UK

Evaluation of R&DProcesses: Artech House,Effectiveness through Boston/London Measurements

The CDOT Story New Delhi

Rethinking Performance Measurement: Beyond Balanced Score Card

Cambridge University Press

OrganizationalTheory

Publisher: John Wiley (New York)

The Change Handbook: Group Methods for Shaping the Future

Berrett-Koehler Publishers Inc

A guide to theProject Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide)

Project Management Institute, USA

Management of Technology Change

Global Business press,Delhi

325

Rawat Anil and Rao AS 1995

Suchitra Mouly Vand Jayaram K Sankaran

1995

Sull Donald Normann 2005

Wilkinson TS and Bhandarkar PL

2004

Young Pauline V and Schmid Calvin F

1984

GanguliPrabudha 2003

GanguliPrabudha 2005

Pandya Pradeep 2002 August

Richard Cross 2005

Management of Corporate R&D and Innovation

Global Business press, Delhi

Organizational Ethnography - illustrative application in the study of Indian R&D Settings

Sage Publications, New Delhi

How good companiesgo bad and how great HBR On Point, Harvard managers remake Business School Press them

Methodology and Techniques for social research

Himalaya Publishing House, 16th Ed

Scientific social Prentice Hall of India, surveys and research New Delhi

Intellectual Property Vol IIntellectual Property Rights - Unleashing the Knowledge Economy Keeping Score on Strategy

Organizational Change: When All Work Is Knowledge Work

Pearson Education

Tata Me Graw Hill

Indian Management

CONFERENCE PAPERS

Office of the Controller-General Of

Maity S.N. 2005 Patents, Designs &Trade Marks :An Overview

Dhawan Sunil K and SantanuRoy

2003 July 7-9

Satisfaction and dissatisfaction with work climate and group processes in R&D Project environments in India

Mary Mathew 2001

Entrepreneurial R&D : an Organization Design for enhanced patent productivity,

CGPDTM, Go I

The R&D Management Conference 2003, Manchester, England

PICMET, Portland, Oregon,

326

NithyanandanRadhakrishnan

Prasad Lakshmanan and Rubenstein Albert H

1986 May

Sreenath Settur 9nn. December and SN Raju ZUU4 6&7

Sreenath Settur,SN Raju, PSadhasivam, 2003 and Dr. WS Lakshmi

December.6&7

Sreenath Settur 2003 May 2-3,

Sreenath Settur 2002 December6&7

Building Successful Software Companies in Developing InfosysCountries - The Case of India and Infosys

Factors influencing project success at the R&D - Production Interface

TIMS/ORSA Los Angeles

A simple integrated model for improved organizational effectiveness employing knowledge networks,


A simple model for managing knowledge markets by employing innovation oriented product centric approach


Productivity Improvement in R & D : A study case of Organ izatio Re-design

National workshop on Applications of Information Technologies, Bangalore

A Model To Effectively Meet TheChallenges Of CSIR R&D ManagementManaging Indigenous Conference 2002, Research And New DelhiDevelopment In The Current Times

Sreenath Setturand A.K.Manoj 1994 September Kumar

The CDOT Vendor Development Programme: Past, Present and Future

DOT-CVATELECOMPONENTS 94, Bangalore

Wille G. and BK ____ December Chandrasekhar 6&7

VenkataramanM.S 2005

GE’s R&D experiences in India


Patents(Amendment) Act2002 And Patents (Amendment) Bill,2003 Salient Features

Controller of Patents & Designs, Patent Office, Chennai, Gol

327

ISSUE PAPERBowonder B, Kelkar V,Satish K.G

2003 March R&D in IndiaIssue paper No.9, ASCI, Hyderabad

JOURNAL PAPERS

Aiman-Smith Lynda; Goodrich Nina; Roberts David; Scinta James,

2005 March-April

Assessing Your Organization's Potential for Value Innovation ,

ReseardvT echnology Management, Number 2, pp. 37-42 Industrial Research Institute, Inc

Amabile Teresa M, 1998 September How to kill Creativity


Astebro Thomas 2004 AUGUST

Key Success Factors for Technological Entrepreneurs’ R&D Projects

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL. 51, NO. 3

Audrey Verhaeghe, Rivka Kfir,

2002 November

Managing innovation in a knowledge intensive technology organization (KITO),


Barber Felix and Strack Rainer 2005 June

The Surprising Harvard Business Review,Economics of ‘People Harvard Business School Business' Press

Bennis WarrenG and Thomas Robert J

2001 September Crucibles of Leadership


Bernard C. Y.Tan, H. JeffSmith, Mark Keil,2003 and RamiroMontealegre

FEBRUARY

Reporting Bad News About Software Projects: Impact of Organizational Climate and Information Asymmetry in an Individualistic and a Collectivistic Culture


Bhadury Bikash 1989 May What ails Indian Management Indian Management

Bommer Michael and JalajasDavid S.

2004 FEBRUARY

Innovation Sources of IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON Large and Small ENGINEERINGTechnology-Based MANAGEMENT, VOL. 51, Firms NO. 1

328

Bordley Robert F. 1998 NOVEMBER

R&D Project Selection Versus R&D Project Generation


Bowonder B,Kumar BS, and 2000 Yadav S

SeptemberOctober

R&D spending patterns of Global firms

Research Technology Management, Vol 43, Issue 5

Bowonder B 2001

Globalization of R&D: the IndianExperience and Interdisciplinary Scienceimplications for Reviews, Vol 26, Issue 3developing countries

Bowonder, B.; Racherla, J.K.; Mastakar, N.V.; Krishnan, S.

2005 September-October

Chachich Alan 2004 November

Chao C. Chen, Cameron M. Ford, and George F. Farris

1999 FEBRUARY

Choung Jae- Vong, 1998 NOVEMBER

Christensen Clayton M., Musso C.S. and Anthony S.D.

2004 July

Christensen, Clayton M and OverdorfMichael

2000 March

Cordero Rene, Farris GeorgeF., and DiTomasoNancy

2004 FEBRUARY

R&D Spending Patterns of Global Firms

ResearcIrTechnology Management, Volume 48, Number 5, pp. 51-59 Industrial Research Institute, Inc

Managing the risks of Cutter IT Journal vol 17 No Product Innovation 11Do Rewards Benefit the Organization? The Effects of Reward Types and the Perceptions of Diverse R&D Professionals


IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON Patterns of Innovation ENGINEERING in Korea and Taiwan , MANAGEMENT, VOL. 45,

NO. 4,

ResearcIrTechnologyMaximizing the Management, Volume 47,Returns from Number 4, pp. 12-18,Research Industrial Research

Institute, Inc

Meeting the Harvard Business Review,Challenge of Harvard Business SchoolDisruptive Change Press

Supervisors in R&D Laboratories: Using Technical, People, and Administrative Skills Effectively


Devin Lee and Austin Rob 2004 November

Planning to Get Lucky(Creativity and Cutter IT Journal vol 17 NoInnovation on 11Schedule)

Dhavan Sunil K, Santanu Roy, and Suresh Kumar

2002 May

Organizational Energy: An empirical study in Indian R&D laboratories

R&D Management 32

Drucker Peter F 1995 January-February

The Information Executives Truly Need


Drucker Peter F 2006 FebruaryWhat Executives Should Remember (1909-2005)

Harvard Business Review Harvard Business School Press

Eccles Robert G 1991 January-February

The PerformanceMeasurementManifesto


Edelheit L.S. 2004 JanuaryPerspective on GE Research & Development

Research^ echnology Management, Volume 47, Number 1, pp. 49-55 Industrial ResearchInstitute, Inc

Ernst Holger, LeptienChristopher, and Vitt Jan

2000 MAY

Inventors Are Not Alike: The Distribution of Patenting Output Among IndustrialR&D Personnel


Florida Richard and Goodnight Jim

2005 July - August Managing for Creativity,


Germeraad P. 2003 November Measuring R&D in 2003

Research'T echnology Management, Volume 46, Number 6, pp. 47-56 Industrial ResearchInstitute, Inc

Goleman Daniel 2000 March Leadership that gets Results


Goold Michael and Campbell Andrew

2002 MarchDo you have a well- designedOrganization


330

Griffin Natalie Shope 2003 March

Personalize yourManagementDevelopment


Grover Robert III 2002 December Maximizing patent productivity

Intellectual Property & Technology Law Journal; Clifton

Hamel Gary 2000 July - August Waking up IBM

The Why, What and


Hamel Gary 2006 February How ofMANAGEMENTINNOVATION


Hamm John 2002 December Why Entrepreneurs don’t Scale


Henriksen Anne DePiante and Traynor Ann Jensen

1999 MAYA Practical R&D Project-Selection Scoring Tool,


Holzer Bonnie 1994 JuneQuality auditing in a public sector service environment

Quality Progress

Inge CKerssens-van Drongelen; Andrew Cook

1997 October

Design principles for the development of measurement systems for research and development processes


Jain Ashok and Gupta VK 1988 November

Management of R&D in India - an Over View

Indian Management

Jay Paap; Ralph Katz 2004 September Anticipating

Disruptive Innovation

Research*T echnology Management, Volume 47, Number 5,1, pp. 13-22 , Industrial ResearchInstitute, Inc

Jordan,Gretchen B. 2005 May What Matters To R&D

Workers

ResearcIvT echnology Management, Volume 48, Number 3, pp. 23-32 Industrial ResearchInstitute, Inc

Kaplan Robert S and NortonDavid P,

1992 January-February

The Balanced Scorecard - Measures that Drive Performance,


331

Kaplan Robert S and NortonDavid P

1993 September - October

Putting the Balanced Scorecard to Work

Kaplan Robert S and NortonDavid P


Balanced Scorecard as Strategic Management System

Kaplan Robert S 2002 August

The Score BoardMust become the CEO’s Management System

Kappel Thomas A. and Rubenstein Albert H„

1999 MAY

Creativity in Design: The Contribution of Information Technology

Kessler Eric H. and Bierly, III Paul E.

2002 FEBRUARY

Is Faster Really Better? An Empirical Test of the Implications of Innovation Speed

Kostoff RonaldN. and Schaller Robert R.

2001 MAYScience andTechnologyRoadmaps

Kylie Sayer 1997 September The Empowerment Case study of BPR

Kyung HoChung, Jungwan Hong,Seungwoo Seo, and Kyeongtaek Kim

1998 NOVEMBER

Recommendations from theCommercialization of Government- Sponsored Telecommunications R&D with Multiple Development Cycles in Korea

Laslo Zohar and Goldberg AlbertI.

2001 MAY

Matrix Structures and Performance: The Search for Optimal Adjustment to Organizational Objectives

Lieb Eugene B. 1998 FEBRUARY How Many R&D Projects to Develop?



Indian Management




BPT, Adelaide




332

Loehr Jim and Schwartz Tony

Lyne M.B.

Manzoni Jean- Francois and Barsoux Jean- LouisMcDonough Edward F. Ill, Kahn Kenneth B., and Griffin Abbie

MeyerChristopher

Michelson Grant andSuchitra Mouly V.

Moitra D.;KrishnamoorthyM.B.

Murugesan San and Unhelkar Bhuvan

Nagpaul P S, Pruthi S, Jain a and Wahid A

NagpaulP S

Nagpaul PS and Santanu Roy

Harvard Business Review The making of a (on Developing Leaders),

ZUU1 January Corporate Athlete Harvard Business School

Press

2003 NovemberAligning R&D with Business Strategy

Research ̂echnology Management, Volume 46, Number 6, pp. 44- 46,Industrial Research Institute, Inc

1998 MarchThe Set-up-to-fail Syndrome,


1999 NOVEMBER

Managing IEEE TRANSACTIONS ONCommunication in ENGINEERING Global Product MANAGEMENT, VOL. 46,Development Teams NO. 4


2002

2004 July

2004 November

1988 November

1988 November

2003

How the right measures help teams excel


‘You Didn’t Hear it From Us But...’: Towards an Understanding of Rumour and Gossip in Organisations

Australian Journal of Management, Vol. 27, Special Issue 2002,

Global Innovation Exchange

ReseardvT echnology Management, Volume 47, Number 4, pp. 32- 38lndustrial Research Institute, Inc

A roadmap for successful ICTInnovation: Turning Cutter IT Journal vol 17 Nogreat ideas into 11successfulimplementations

Image of IndianScience - an Inside Indian Management View

Productivity of Scientific Teamwork Management and Policy Issues

Indian Management,

Constructing a multiobjective measure of research performance

Scientometrics, Vol 56, No 3

333

When Does the ISO 9000 Quality

Naveh Eitan and Marcus Alfred A. 2004 AUGUST

Assurance Standard Lead to Performance Improvement? Assimilation and Going Beyond

Neilson Gary L, Pasternack Bruce A, Karen E, and Van Nuys

2005 OctoberThe Passive -AggressiveOrganization

Ness Joseph A and Cucuzza Thomas G


Tapping the full potential of ABC,

Research and development

Nixon Bill 1998 September performance measurement: A case study,Knowledge Worker

Paradi Joseph Performance AnalysisC., Smith Using DEA: AnSandra (Rehm), 2002 FEBRUARY Application toand Schaffnit- Engineering DesignChatterjee Claire Teams at Bell

CanadaSuccess Factors and Future Challenges in

Patd-Cornell M. the Management ofElisabeth and 2001 FEBRUARY Faster-Better-Dillon Robin L. Cheaper Projects:

Lessons Learned from NASAPerspective of

Qingrui Xu, , Jin TechnologicalChen, and Bin 1998 NOVEMBER Innovation andGuo Technology

Management in China

Commercialization ofQureshi M A 1988 November Indigenous

Technology

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL 51, NO. 3



Management Accounting Research, Orlando;




Indian Management

Rahman A, BhargavaRN, .q Qureshi MA and Pruthi S

Science and Technology in India

Indian Council of Cultural Relations, New Delhi

334

RaoHS

Management of1988 November Tfrom Laboratory8^ lndian Management,

Industry,

Reinertsen,Donald; 2005 July-August Making R&D LeanShaeffer, Leland

ResearctvTechnology Management, Volume 48, Number 4, Industrial Research Institute, Inc, pp. 51-57

Robert Keganand Lisa Laskow 2003Lahey

Harvard Business Review The Real Reason (on Culture and Change) People won't Change Harvard Business School

Press

Roger Whitley,Trueman Parish;Ronald Dressier; 1998 Sept/OctGeoffreyNicholson

Evaluating R&D performance using the new sales ratio

Research Technology Management; Washington;

Exploring the Use ofDesign-Manufacturing IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON

Rusinko Cathy 1QQQ „RR||.RV Integration (DMI) to ENGINEERING A. iaaa '■ttJKUAKY Facj|jtate Product MANAGEMENT, VOL. 46,

Development: A Test NO. 1 of Some Practices

Saha Biswatosh 2004 August

Tate Support for Industrial R and D inDeveloping Economic and PoliticalEconomies : Telecom weekly, vol XXXIX No 35 Equipment Industry in India and China

Saha R,

Management of2005 September- Intellectual Property IETE Technical Review vol

October Rights in Information 22, no 5 Technology,

Santanu Royand Sunil K 2002 February Dhawan,

Santanu Roy,PS Nagpaul, and Pratap KJ Mohapatra

Preliminary Pointers towards improving thework environment in Current Science, Vol 82, CSIR Laboratories: No.3Remarks from an empirical study,

Developing a model to measure the effectiveness of Research Units

Inti Jl of Operations and Production Management, Vol 23, No 12

335

Sattler Linda,and Sohoni 1999Vinay

Scott Susanne G. and Bruce 1998 Reginald A.

ParticipativeManagement: An IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON

ura/ci/RCP Empirical Study of the ENGINEERING NUVtMtstK Semjconductor MANAGEMENT, VOL. 46,

Manufacturing NO. 4Industry

FEBRUARY

Following the Leader in R&D: The Joint Effect of Subordinate Problem-Solving Style and Leader- Member Relations on


innovative Behavior

Should ProjectSharad Dick 1989 May Management be a Indian Management

way of Life

Shenhar Aaron J. 1998 FEBRUARY

From Theory to Practice: Toward a Typology of Project Management Styles

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL.45,NO. 1

Shim Duksup „nni and Lee Mushin A NOVEMBER

Upward Influence Styles of R&D Project Leaders


Simons Robertand Davila 1998Antonio

January-February

How high is your return on Management


Soo-Hoon Lee, Poh-Kam Wong, 9nn(. and Chee-Leong Chong

FEBRUARYHuman and Social Capital Explanations for R&D Outcomes


Sorcher Melvin and Brant James‘S February

Harvard Business Review Are you picking the (on Developing Leaders), Right Leaders Harvard Business School

Press

Sosa Manuel E., Eppinger Steven D., Pich Michael,Me Kendrick 2002 David G., and Stout Suzanne K.

FEBRUARY

Factors That Influence Technical Communication in Distributed Product Development: An Empirical Study in the NO. 1 Telecommunications Industry

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, VOL. 49,

336

SreenathSettur,A.K.ManojKumar, andY.V.S.Lakshmi

Evolution ofComponentQualification

1998 September Methods for Local Component Manufacturers for Telecom

Special Issue of the IEEE Transactions on Reliability, (commemorating the 50th Anniversary of IEEE Reliability Society)

Sreenath Settur and Krishna 2005 Naik CN

MarchR&D Organization For Improved Productivity

Science Tech Entrepreneur, pp 51-57

Stuck Bart and Weingarten 2005Michael

April How Venture Capital Thwarts Innovation IEEE Spectrum

Suchitra Mouly V and Jayaram i< 1994 Sankaran

Organizational — Effectiveness: An«f0(^rFhic

Persperave

ASCI Journal of Management Vol 23

Suchitra MoulyY’ and u 1999Jayaram K.Sankaran

Barriers To The Cohesiveness and Effectiveness of Indian R&D Project Groups: InsightsFrom Four Federal R&D Organizations

Advances in Qualitative Organization Research,

Suchitra Mouly V1994Organizational Ethnography: A critical Literature

ASCI Journal of Management Vol 23

Review,Suchitra MoulyV. ,Post-Doctoral Fellow, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore Suleiman K. Kassicieh, Steven T.Walsh, John C. Cummings,Paul J.McWhorter,Alton D. Romig, andW. David Williams

Z14 #^Study of an R&D |i an Indian

Research Organization: An Ethnographic Approach

ASCI, Hyderabad publication

NOVEMBER

Factors Differentiating the commercialization of Disruptive and Sustaining Technologies


337


Sull Donald N 2003 Why Good Companies Go Bad

(on Culture and Change) Harvard Business School Press

Verkasalo Mattiand Lappalainen 1998Pentti

NOVEMBER

A Method of Measuring the Efficiency of the Knowledge Utilization Process


Violino Bob 2006 April Offshore R&D Takes Off Voice & Data

Von Meier Alexandra 1999 FEBRUARY

OccupationalCultures as a Challenge to Technological Innovation


Waldroop James and Butler Timothy

2000 September Managing Away Bad Habits,


Wright Vicky and Brading Liz 1992 October A balanced

Performance Total Quality Management

Yew Kee Ho, Hean Tat Keh, and Jin Mei Ong

2005 FEBRUARY

The Effects of R&D and Advertising on Firm Value: An Examination of Manufacturing and Non-manufacturing Firms,


Zangwill Williard 1994 June Ten Mistakes CEOs make about Quality Quality Progress

NEWS LETTER

Scott Allen 2004What To Do When Your Great Idea Becomes Mainstream

Your Guide to Entrepreneurs.

PAPERS

David Dubois 2004The Role ofInnovation in Economics

The 2004 Moffatt Prize in Economics Innovation in the 21st Century

338

Govardhan J

IBM

Jagdish R and Verma Promod

Jharwal SM

KPMG

SomnathChattergee

Sony I M

Strategic Quality2005 November Targeting in Transient NIQR Souvenir

Economies

2005 September Contextual Network Computing AgileCollaborations Enterprise Vol 7 Issue 9

2005 November Wipro’s Quality Journey NIQR Souvenir

2005 4-10 June Telecom Growth in India Employment News

2004 Balanced Business Score Card Inputs on web site of KPMG

2002 Nov-DecIndian Electronics today and future perspectives

ELCINA Electronics Outlook

2004 September The Mediocrity Octopus Alive

PAPERS ON WEB SITE

Bagchi Subroto 2000 December

Bagchi Subroto 2005 December

Hegde Vishu 2005 December

Krishnan KS 2005 December

Building Employee Commitment Lessons in Entrepreneurship from the Indian IT Industry Intrinsic Quality:Quality in Knowledge Mind Tree Era

Mind Tree

Mind Tree

Empowerment In Project Management Mind Tree

AulHildreth and Chris Kimble 2004 (Editors)

Knowledge Networks: Idea Group Publishing Innovation through http://www.cs.york.ac.uk/miCommunities of s/KNICOP/Chapters/IntroduPractice ction.html

Skyrme David J. 2004KnowledgeNetworking, Creating http://www.skyrme.com/knethe Collaborative t/index.htmEnterprise

Spolsky Joel 2005 July

Wheeler David A 2005 May

Hitting the High Notes Joel on Software

The Most Important Software Innovations

PRESENTATION MATERIAL

Biological Limits onGray Lewis 1999 Professional Abelia Corporation

Performance

339

REPORTS

ChatterjeeSomnath 2002 November -

December

Indian Electronics today and future perspective

ELCINA Out Look

GOI 2003 Indian Patent Act & Patent Rules

Universal Law Publishing Co, New Delhi

Council of Scientific andMashelkar RA 1995 Vision 2000 Industrial Research

(CSER), New Delhi

NCAER 1994 JanuarySocio-Economic Impact of Rural Telecom Services

NCAER Report, New Delhi

TNS 2006 JulyUPS Asia Business Monitor: Executive Summary II

Survey Report by TNS conducted for UPS ABM

THESIS REPORTS

Chandra Mohan A 2003

ChattopadhyayUrmi

Das Pulak Kumar 1995

lya Sandhya 1992

The LeadershipStyles of Indian Doctoral Thesis, SriManagers - A case Krishna Devaraya Study of Visakha University, AnantapurPatnam Port Trust)Understanding Organization Designsfor Patent Productivity Doctoral Thesis, Indianthrough Disparity of ICT Professionals with Varying Patent ExperiencePay, Promotion and Pay Satisfaction of R & D Personnel in Some Indian Manufacturing Organizations, Conceptualization and Measurement of the Uncertainty Experienced by R & D Personnel in Relation to Job Involvement, Work Involvement, and Work Motivation

Institute of Science, Bangalore



340

Jothilakshmi

Kumar D

Mitter, Lakshmi

Nair, Prabha

Pandey Subrata

Ravichandran T

Suchitra Mouly V.

1994

2003

2005

1991

1986

1993

1990

Study of Leadership and Influence Patterns in Defense R & D Organizations: A Qualitative Approach Knowledge Management Initiatives and Their Relationship with Organizational Innovativeness

Technological Innovation and Economic Performance in Small-Scale Precision engineering Industry,

Organizational Factors Influencing Success or Failure of Creative Performance of R & D Scientists: A Comparative Methodology for Identification

Study ofOrganizational and IndividualCharacteristics in R & D Organizations

Study of Organizational Innovativeness: Analysis of Some Correlates and Causal Factors

A Study of an R&D Team in an Indian Research Organization: An Ethnographic Approach








UNPUBLISHED PAPERS

Lakshmi YVS 2004

Sreenath Setturand CN Krishna 2004 October Naik

Sreenath Setturand CN Krishna 2004 November Naik

The New Initiatives for Effective Exploitation of Intellectual Property at C-DOT A Preliminary Ethnographic Study of an R&D Organization

A Preliminary Study on Performance Measurement as a Means for Improving Organizational Effectiveness of R&D Institutions

Sreenath Setturand CN Krishna 2004 October Naik

Sreenath Setturand CN Krishna 2005 January Naik

A Preliminary Study of an R&D Organization For Improved Productivity

A Preliminary Study on the Effects of Integration (or de- compartmentalization ) on Performance Improvement in an R&D Organization

Sreenath Setturand CN Krishna 2006 MayNaik

An Integrated Approach for Organizational Effectiveness in R&D Institutions

WEBSITES:

http://india.gov.in/http://www.mit.gov.in/http://www.dot.gov.in/http://www.bsnl.co.inhttp://www.cdot.comhttp://www.trai.gov.inhttp://www.itiltd-india.com/http://www.dsir.gov.in/http://www.csir.res.in/http://www.nrdcindia.com/http://dst.gov.in/http://mst.nic.in/dst/http://www.cdac.in/http://www.iisc.emet.in/http://www.cag.gov.inhttp://www.asci.org.in/http://india.gov.in/sectors/communicationO.phphttp://coai.iny'http://www.upsinasia.com/abm

http://calculators.stat.ucla.edu/correlation.phphttp://www.changbioscience.com/math/math.htmlhttp://www.changbioscience.com/stat/corr.htmlhttp://www.changbioscience.com/stat/chi2.htmlhttp://facultv.vassar.edu/lowrv/corr rank.htmlhttp://facultv.vassar.edu/lowry/webtext.htmlhttp://www.survevsvstem.com/http://www.survevsvstem.com/correlation.htm

shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.inshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62502/16/16... · / +& ) 0 " &...

Documents

Transcript of shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.inshodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/62502/16/16... · / +& ) 0 " &...