Transcript of Zurab Sajaia DECPI The World Bank Poverty measures: Properties and Robustness.
- Slide 1
- Zurab Sajaia DECPI The World Bank Poverty measures: Properties
and Robustness
- Slide 2
- AB D E F C 2
- Slide 3
- Properties and Robustness How do we measure welfare? Individual
measures of well-being When do we say someone is "poor"? Poverty
lines How do we aggregate data on welfare into measures of poverty?
How robust are these measures? 3
- Slide 4
- Three components of poverty analysis Welfare Indicators Poverty
Lines Poverty Analysis 4
- Slide 5
- Headcount Adding up poverty: Headcount 5 where q - number of
people deemed poor N - population size Advantages: easily
understood Disadvantages: insensitive to distribution below the
poverty line e.g., if poor person becomes poorer, nothing happens
to H Example: A: (1, 2, 3, 4) B: (2, 2, 2, 4) C: (1,1,1,4) Let z =
3.0 H A = 0.75 = H B =H C ; Table 2.1(P0)
- Slide 6
- Adding up poverty: Sharp poverty Low Elasticity of poverty head
count with respect to the changes in poverty line Poverty line 1
q2q2 0 Ranked Households n Income q1q1 Poverty line 2 6
- Slide 7
- Poverty line 1 q2q2 0 Ranked Households n Income q1q1 Poverty
line 2 7 Adding up poverty: Shallow poverty High Elasticity of
poverty head count with respect to the changes in poverty line
- Slide 8
- Changes in poverty when the average consumption increases 8
Income Poverty line 0 Ranked Households n q1q2
- Slide 9
- Changes in poverty when the consumption distribution changes 9
Income Poverty line 0 Ranked Households n q
- Slide 10
- Headcount Adding up poverty: Headcount 10 Income Poverty line 0
Ranked Households n q
- Slide 11
- Poverty Gap Ratio Adding up poverty: Poverty Gap Ratio 11
Advantages of PG: reflects depth of poverty Disadvantages:
insensitive to severity of poverty Example: A: (1, 2, 3, 4) B: (2,
2, 2, 4) Let z = 3.0 HA = 0.75 = HB; PGA = 0.25 = PGB Table
2.1(P1)
- Slide 12
- Poverty Gap Adding up poverty: Poverty Gap 12 Income Poverty
line 0 Ranked Households n q
- Slide 13
- Poverty Gap Adding up poverty: Poverty Gap The minimum cost of
eliminating poverty: (Z - z )*q -- Perfect targeting The maximum
cost of eliminating poverty: (Z*n) -- No targeting Ratio of the
minimum cost of eliminating poverty to the maximum cost with no
targeting: Poverty gap - potential saving to the poverty
alleviation budget from targeting 13
- Slide 14
- Squared Poverty Gap Adding up poverty: Squared Poverty Gap Week
Transfer Principal: A transfer of income from any person below the
poverty line to anyone less poor, while keeping the set of poor
unchanged, must raise poverty Advantages of SPG: sensitive to
differences in both depth and severity of poverty hits the point of
poverty line smoothly Disadvantages: difficult to interpret
Example: A = (1, 2, 3, 4) B = (2, 2, 2, 4) z = 3 SPG A = 0.14; SPG
B = 0.08 H A =H B, PG A =PG B but SPG A >SPG B 14
- Slide 15
- FGT-measures Adding up poverty: FGT-measures Additivity: the
aggregate poverty is equal to population- weighted sum of poverty
level in the various sub-groups of society. 15
- Slide 16
- FGT-measures Adding up poverty: FGT-measures Derivatives 0
Consumption or income z 1 P0P0 P1P1 P2P2 16
- Slide 17
- Range of FGT Measures: Rawlss welfare function: maximize the
welfare of society's worse-off member Social and economic
inequalities are to be arranged... to the greatest benefit of the
least advantaged... (Theory of Justice, pages 302-302).
FGT-measures Adding up poverty: FGT-measures 17
- Slide 18
- Social Welfare function 18 Utilitarian Social Welfare Function
Social states are ranked according to linear sum of individual
utilities: We can assign weight to each individuals utility:
Inclusive and Exclusive Social Welfare Functions
- Slide 19
- Recommendations Adding up poverty: Recommendations Does it
matter in poverty comparisons what measure to use? Depends on
whether the relative inequalities have changed across the
situations being compared. No changes in inequality, no change in
ranking. Recommendations: Always be wary of using only H or PG;
check SPG. A policy conclusion that is only valid for H may be
quite unacceptable. 19
- Slide 20
- Example 1 Adding up poverty: Example 1 Effect of a change in
price of domestically produced goods on welfare Price of rice in
Indonesia: Many poor households are net rice producers Poorest
households are landless laborers and net consumers of rice Policy
A: Decrease in price of rice. Small loss to person at poverty line,
but poorest gains Policy B: Increase in price. Poorest loses, but
small gain to person at poverty line So H A > H B yet SPG A <
SPG B Which policy would you choose? 20
- Slide 21
- Example 2 Adding up poverty: Example 2 Poverty line = 6 Initial
distribution: (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) HC: = 0.50 Poverty gap: (5/6,
4/6, 3/6, 2/6, 1/6, 0) = 0.25 SPG: (25/36,,0) = 0.16 Poverty
Alleviation Budget $6 Case 1:(6,3,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10) HC = 0.40
PG:(0,3/6,3/6,2/6,1/6,0..0) = 0.15 SPG:
(0,9/36,9/36,4/36,1/36,0..0)= 0.07 Case 2: (1,2,6,6,6,6,7,8,9,10)
HC = 0.20 PG:(5/6,4/6,0,,0) = 0.15 SPG:(25/36,16/36,0,,0)= 0.11
21
- Slide 22
- Robustness of poverty comparisons Why should we worry? Errors
in living standard data Uncertainty and arbitrariness of the
poverty line Uncertainty about how precise is the poverty measure
Unknown differences in need for the households with similar
consumption level Different poverty lines that are completely
reasonable and defensible How robust are our poverty comparisons?
Would the results of poverty comparisons change if we make
alternative assumptions? 22
- Slide 23
- Poverty incidence curve Robustness: Poverty incidence curve
Each point represents a headcount for each possible poverty line
Each point gives the % of the population deemed poor if the point
on the horizontal axis is the poverty line. 23
- Slide 24
- Poverty depth curve Robustness: Poverty depth curve Poverty
depth curve = area under poverty incidence curve Each point on this
curve gives aggregate poverty gap the poverty gap index times the
poverty line z. 24
- Slide 25
- Poverty severity curve Robustness: Poverty severity curve
Poverty severity curve = area under poverty depth curve Each point
gives the squared poverty gap. 25
- Slide 26
- First Order Dominance Test Robustness: First Order Dominance
Test If the poverty incidence curve for distribution A is above
that for B for all poverty lines up to z max then there is more
poverty in A than B for all poverty measures and all poverty lines
up to z max 26
- Slide 27
- First Order Dominance Test Robustness: First Order Dominance
Test What if the poverty incidence curves intersect? Ambiguous
poverty ranking What can you do? restrict range of poverty lines
restrict class of poverty measures 27
- Slide 28
- Second Order Dominance Test Robustness: Second Order Dominance
Test If the poverty deficit curve for A is above that for B up to z
max then there is more poverty in A for all poverty measures which
are strictly decreasing and weakly convex in consumptions of the
poor (e.g. PG and SPG; not H). Higher rice prices in Indonesia:
very poor lose, those near the poverty line gain What if poverty
deficit curves intersect? 28
- Slide 29
- Poverty deficit Third Order Dominance Test Robustness: Third
Order Dominance Test If the poverty severity curve for distribution
A is above that for distribution B then there is more poverty in A,
if one restricts attention to distribution sensitive (strictly
convex) measures such as SPG. Formal test for the First Order
Dominance Kolmogorov-Smirnov test 29
- Slide 30
- Recommendations Robustness: Recommendations First construct the
poverty incidence curves up to highest admissible poverty line for
each distribution If they do not intersect, then your comparison is
unambiguous If they cross each other then do poverty deficit curves
and restrict range of measures accordingly If they intersect, then
do poverty severity curves If they intersect then claims about
which has more poverty are contentious 30