Post on 20-Apr-2018
AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK GROUP
ZAMBIA
GEF CLIMATE RESILIENT LIVESTOCK MANAGEMENT PROJECT
(CRLMP)
RDGS/AHAI/PGCL DEPARTMENTS
September 2017
P
ub
lic
Dis
clo
sure
Au
tho
rize
d
Pu
bli
c D
iscl
osu
re A
uth
ori
zed
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Currency Equivalents, Fiscal Year, Weights and Measures, Acronyms i
Grant Information ii
Project Summary iii
Results Based Logical Framework (Project Matrix) v
Project Time Frame/Implementation Schedule vii
I. STRATEGIC THRUST AND RATIONALE 1
1.1 Project Linkages with Country Strategy and Objectives 1
1.2 Rationale for Bank’s Involvement 1
1.3 Donors Coordination 3
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4
2.1 LISP and CRLMP Objectives and Components 4
2.2 Project Type 7
2.3 CRLMP Cost and Financing Arrangements 7
2.4 CRLMP Target Area and Population 9
2.5 Participatory Process for Project Identification, Design and Implementation 9
2.6 Bank Group Experience and Lessons Reflected in Project Design 10
2.7 Project Performance Indicators 10
III. PROJECT FEASIBILITY 10
3.1 Economic and Financial Performance 10
3.2 Environmental and Social Impacts 11
IV. IMPLEMENTATION 13
4.1 Implementation Arrangements 13
4.2 Monitoring 15
4.3 Governance 15
4.4 Sustainability 16
4.5 Risk Management 16
4.6 Knowledge Building 17
V. LEGAL INSTRUMENTS AND AUTHORITY 17
5.1 Legal Instruments 17
5.2 Conditions Associated with Bank’s Intervention 17
5.3 Compliance with Bank Policies 18
VI. RECOMMENDATION 18
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix 1
: GEF CEO Endorsement Letter for GEF-LDCF Resources
Appendix 2 : Zambia - Comparative Socio-economic Indicators
Appendix 3 : Zambia Portfolio (as at 30th April 2017)
Appendix 4a
Appendix 4b
: Description of On-going LISP Component (Baseline Project)
: Results-Based Logical Framework for the On-going Zambia LISP
(Anchor Project)
Appendix 5 : Map of the Project Area
i
Currency Equivalents
(May 2017)
1 USD = 9.5753 ZMW
1 UA = 1.3710 USD
1 UA = 13.1279 ZMW
Fiscal Year
1st July – 30th June
Weights and Measures
1 metric tonne (t) = 2,204 pounds (lbs)
1 metre (m) = 3.28 feet (ft)
1 millimetre (mm) = 0.03937 inch
1 kilometre (km) = 0.62 mile
1 hectare (ha) = 2.471 acres
Acronyms and Abbreviations
ADB African Development Bank LTDP Lake Tanganyika Development Project ADF African Development Fund LSC Livestock Service Centre
MLF Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock
APMEP Agriculture Productivity and Market Enhancement Project M&E Monitoring and Evaluation ASIP Agriculture Sector Investments Programme MTEF Medium Term Expenditure Framework
CEO Chief Executive Officer MTR Mid-Term Review
COZM Zambia Country Office NALEIC Livestock and Epidemiological Information Centre CPPR Country Portfolio Performance Review NAPA National Adaptation Programme of Action
NCB National Competitive Bidding
CRLMP Climate Resilient Livestock Management Project NEMA National Environmental Management Authority NGO Non-Governmental Organization
CQS Selection Based on Consultants Qualifications OAG Office of the Auditor General
CVRI Central Veterinary Research Institute ORQR Quality Assurance and Results Department DDCC District Development Coordinating Committee NPV Net Present Value
DFZ Disease Free Zone PCR Project Completion Report
ESMP Environment and Social Management Plan PDCC Provincial Development Coordinating Committee EIRR Economic Internal Rate of Return PIF Project Identification Form
EU European Union PPCR Pilot Programme on Climate Resilience
ESAP Environmental and Social Assessment Procedure PPE Personal Protective Equipment FAO Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations RBCSP Results Based Country Strategy Paper
FFMP Lake Tanganyika Framework Fisheries Management Plan SAP Strategic Action Program
FIRR Financial Internal Rate of Return SCRIKA Strengthening Climate Resilience in Kafue Sub-Basin
GAP Good Agricultural Practices SIP Small Scale Irrigation Project
GEF Global Environment Facility SESA Strategic Environmental and Social Assessment GHG Green House Gas SLIP Smallholder Livestock Investment Project
GRZ Government of the Republic of Zambia SMS Subject Matter Specialist
IBLI Index-based livestock insurance SNDP Sixth National Development Plan
IFAD International Fund for Agriculture Development TSU Technical Support Unit
ILUA Integrated Land Use Systems UNDP United Nations Development me
IQPR Bank Interim Quarterly Progress Report UNFCCC Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change
LCS Least Cost Selection USAID United States Agency for International
Development LDCF Least Developed Countries Fund VFM Value for Money
LEWIS Livestock Early Warning Information System WB World Bank Group
LIMS Livestock Information Management System ZEMA Zambia Environment Management Authority LISP Livestock Infrastructure Support Project
ii
Grant Information
Client’s information
RECIPIENT: Republic of Zambia
EXECUTING AGENCY: Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock
P.O. Box 50197, Lusaka, Zambia
Tel: +260 211 253933
Fax: +260 211 250305
IMPLEMENTING AGENCY: Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock
Financing plan
Source Amount Instrument
GEF-LDCF USD 6.21 million Grant (was already endorsed by
GEF CEO in January 2016)
ADF (LISP) UA 12.00 million
Loan (Anchor Project – was
already approved by the AfDB
Board in June 2013)
GoZ/Beneficiaries (LISP) UA 1.71 million N/A
Important Financial Information (GEF/LDCF Grant)
Loan Currency USD
Interest Type N/A
Interest Rate Spread N/A
Commitment Fee N/A
Service Charge N/A
Tenor N/A
Grace Period N/A
FIRR, NPV (base case) 22%, NPV (12%): USD 4.38 million
Timeframe - Main Milestones (expected)
GEF/PIF Approval
24th September 2013
Project Endorsement by GEF CEO 14th January 2016
GEF CRLMP AfDB Board Approval September 2017
Effectiveness October, 2017
Completion 31st October, 2020
Last Date of Disbursement 30th June, 2021
Last Repayment N/A
iii
PROJECT SUMMARY
1.1 Project Overview: Zambia has benefitted from additional funds from the Global
Environment Facility (GEF) Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF)1 Grant amounting to
USD 6.21 million which will be used to finance the Climate Resilient Livestock Management
Project (CRLMP) which has been designed based on the on-going Bank ADF-funded (UA
12.00 million) Livestock Infrastructure Support Project (LISP). The LISP, as an anchor project,
has 3 objectives namely (i) to improve smallholder livestock production and productivity, (ii)
to create market linkages, and (iii) increase household income. The LISP was approved by the
Board on 19th June 2013 and the Loan Agreement was signed on 19th December 2013, and is
still under implementation. As at 30th April 2017, the LISP physical implementation rate was
about 35%, with ADF disbursement ratio of 38.01%. The GEF-LDCF financed CRLMP will
have similar objectives with the aim of strengthening the adaptive capacity of Zambian
livestock farmers to the impacts of climate change and to help increase the resilience of the
natural environment. The CRLMP will incorporate climate change-related aspects into the
initial activities and ensure preservation of ecosystems.
1.2 The CRLMP seeks to address stakeholder concerns that the livestock activities under
LISP might negatively affect the environment and contribute to climate change since it will
introduce additional livestock in Northern and Muchinga Provinces through restocking and
pass-on-scheme. These activities will over time increase the amount of solid manure dropped
and add to greenhouse gas (GHG) emission. The CRLMP recognized the need to promote
climate resilient investments and is primarily about adaptation by livestock farmers, to climate
change impact, and how their farming practices and installed facilities could affect the
environment and subsequently climate change. Based on this, CRLMP will be implemented
within the anchor project Provinces over a period of 3 years. The Executing Agency is also the
same (Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock/MoFL) and day-to-day activities will be carried out
by the LISP Coordination Unit (PIU) which will be beefed-up with a Climate Change Expert.
After closure of LISP, CRLMP will provide the required operational funds for the PIU to cover
the remaining period. It should be noted that CRLMP’s Project Information Form (PIF) was
already approved and endorsed by the GEF CEO on 14th January 2016, and is being submitted
to the Board for approval of its physical implementaton.
1.3 Needs Assessment: In line with its strategy of economic diversification, the
Government launched a nationwide programme to scale-up the development of the livestock
sub-sector and enhance its contribution to the national economy. The livestock sub-sector is an
important source of economic growth and job creation to foster poverty reduction. The
Government requested the Bank’s financial support for the implementation of LISP which is
the anchor project for CRLMP. The additional outputs and their associated activities are
proposed through the CRLMP to facilitate both climate change adaptation and mitigation
outlook to the on-going LISP-supported activities. Both projects will assist the Government to
foster economic diversification through catalytic projects for private sector development,
focusing on agriculture, particularly livestock value chain, and natural resources management
and climate change initiatives.
1 The Least Developed Countries Fund (LDCF) was established on directives to the Conference of the Parties to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) at its seventh session to address the needs of least developed countries (LDCs) under
the Convention on Climate Change. Absolute priority is accorded to adaptation and particularly the financing of the preparation and
implementation of National Climate Change Adaptation Programs of Action (NAPAs). The Fund’s objective is to finance projects that address the urgent and immediate climate change adaptation needs of LDCs by seeking to reduce the vulnerability of sectors and resources which are
essential to social progress and national development such as water, agriculture and food security, health, the management and prevention
of catastrophic risks, and infrastructure, as have been identified and prioritized in NAPAs.
iv
1.4 Bank’s Added Value: During the design of LISP in 2013, at that time the Bank’s
Agricultural Sector Strategy (2010-2014) Pillar I focussed on agricultural infrastructure. The
Bank, as a result of its long term involvement in the livestock sub-sector, developed sound
experience in satisfactory development of rural infrastructures. Lessons learned include the
need to involve intended beneficiaries in infrastructure selection, siting, construction and
management inorder to enhance ownership and sustainability which were mainstreamed in the
project design. Based on this anchor project, the CRLMP design was aligned to the same Bank
strategies and policies, and also the High-5 Feed Africa Strategy for Agriculture
Transformation in Africa (2016-2025).
1.5 Knowledge Management: Knowledge gained through implementation of previous
projects has been used in designing the CRLMP. Knowledge that will be generated through
implementation of CRLMP will be helpful during design and management of future projects.
Lessons learned will be documented through quarterly and annual progress reports, mid-term
review report, beneficiary impact assessment report, and project completion report.
v
GEF/LCDF CRLMP Results-Based Logical Framework (LogFrame/Project Matrix)
(Note: These LogFrame indicators including associated costs were already approved by GEF in January 2016)
Country and Project Name: Zambia – Climate Resilient Livestock Management Project (CRLMP)
Purpose of the Project: To Improve Smallholder Livestock Production, Productivity, Market Linkages and Household Income.
Results Chain Performance Indicators
Means of Verification Risks/ Mitigation
Measures Indicators Baseline Target
IMP
AC
T
Strengthen the adaptive capacity of Zambian livestock farmers
to the impacts of Climate Change (i) % food-secure households Year 2013
(i) 45
Year 2023
(i) 80
Household survey
Assumptions:
Continued Government
support to livestock
industry.
Favourable
macroeconomic
conditions.
Favourable livestock and
livestock products market
prices.
Risk #1: Alternating El Nino
and La Nina episodes.
Mitigation #1: Improved
capacity for weather
forecasting through weather
stations and educating
farmers about the weather
patterns.
(ii) No of jobs created (ii) Total (0); Men (0) & Women (0)
(ii) Total (800);
Men (400) &
Women (400)
(iii) Mean household per capita livestock income (USD) (iii) 115 (iii) 365
(iv) % household income derived from livestock (iv) 33 (iv) 50
OU
TC
OM
ES
Component 1: Livestock infrastructure development and increasing adaptive capacity of livestock farmers
Outcome 1.1: Livestock farmers able to cope with climate
change through adoption of improved practices that enhance
livelihoods
(i) % households with year-round access to adequate water for
livestock watering
Year 2013
(i) 48
Year 2021
(i) 98
Household Survey
Scorecards to measure
climate information
generation, analysis and
communication
Household survey and
survey of managers of emergency response
agencies with data
disaggregated by sex.
(ii) Emerging livestock disease incidences (% of livestock
population) in non-endemic areas
(ii) 15
(ii) 5
(iii) % Change in GHG emissions due to livestock activities (estimated)
(iii) 0 (iii) 95
(iv) % households affected by climate related disasters (iv) No Data (*) (iv) 10%
(v) % households adopting wider variety of livelihood strategies (v) No Data (*) (v) 75
(vi) % farmers with access to markets for livestock products (vi) No Data (*) (vi) 90
Outcome 1.2: Increased resilience of infrastructure to climate
change threats
Percent LISP infrastructure made climate resilient to rapid-onset
events (i.e. floods & storm surges, heat-waves)
0% 100%
Outcome 1.3: Reduced GHG emissions from LISP
infrastructure
Percent of LISP infrastructure with GHG emission reduction
technology
0% 100%
Component 2: Capacity Building on climate change Adaptation for stakeholders
Outcome 2.1: - Increased knowledge and risk preparedness and
adaptive capacity to climate variability at country and targeted community levels
Percent households who are aware of climate change issues
No Data (*) 90%
Outcome 2.2 - Diversification and strengthened livelihoods and
source of incomes for rural population (artisan and livestock farmers)
% households adopting climate change resilient livestock
management and resilient crop husbandry practices
No Data (*)
90%
Component 3:- Knowledge, Monitoring and Evaluation
vi
Country and Project Name: Zambia – Climate Resilient Livestock Management Project (CRLMP)
Purpose of the Project: To Improve Smallholder Livestock Production, Productivity, Market Linkages and Household Income.
Results Chain Performance Indicators
Means of Verification Risks/ Mitigation
Measures Indicators Baseline Target
Outcome 3.1: - M&E management and lessons learnt are captured and appropriately disseminated
Percent actual/budgeted expenditure achieved
0 100%
Project M&E Reports
Risk #2: High dependence
on natural resources and
weak coping mechanism.
Mitigation #2: Improved
human skills and capacity to
diversify livelihoods.
Risk #3: Poor performance
of civil works contractors.
Mitigation #3: Apply
stringent evaluation methods
to enforce quality and also
contract monitoring and
evaluation.
Risk #4: Inadequate MoFL
Technical Staff at
Provincial and District
levels.
Mitigation #4: The
Government is currently
recruiting and training field
staff. The Project will recruit
additional national experts to
be part of the PCT and also
short-term consultants.
Risk #5: Weak institutional
arrangements and capacity
for climate proofing.
Mitigation #5: The Climate
Adaptation Expert will be
recruited by the Project and
will be full-time PCT staff.
OU
TP
UT
S
1.1.1 Livestock farmers acquire breeds resilient to climate change
Number of climate resilient livestock units procured and distributed
Year 2013
0
Year 2020
3,450
1.1.2 Livestock farmers set up sustainable livestock pastures,
fodder banks, rangeland and water harvesting systems
(i) Number of village land use plans established
(ii) Ha under pastures, fodder banks, and rangeland
(iii) Km of fire breaks constructed around rangelands
(iv) Number of livestock water sources developed
(i) 0
(ii) 0
(iii) 0
(iv) 0
(i) 270
(ii) 2,250
(iii) 600
(iv) 292
1.1.3 Effective practices developed for the community to manage
indigenous livestock
Number of best practices identified and documented for the community to
manage indigenous livestock
0 10
1.1.4 Operational livestock index-based insurance scheme Operational livestock index-based insurance scheme in place 0 1
1.1.5 Operational Livestock Early Warning Info System Operational Livestock Early Warning Information System 0 1
1.2.1 Restoration of degraded pasture and increased vegetation
cover with different drought tolerant perennials
Rangeland area (ha) under improved interventions (e.g. drought tolerant
annual and perennial species)
0 4,500
1.3.1 Climate resilient infrastructure designs in place No of infrastructure designs improved to be climate resilience 0 11
1.3.2 Climate resilient infrastructure constructed Number of climate resilient infrastructure constructed 0 217
1.4.1 LISP structure designs for reduced GHG emissions No. of LISP structure designs improved to reduce GHG emissions 0 11
1.4.2 - LISP infrastructure fitted or constructed with GHG emissions reduction technologies
Number of LISP infrastructure designs constructed with GHG emissions reduction technologies
0 11
2.1.1 National technical staff trained in climate risk assessment and
adaptation skills for livestock farmers
Number of staff trained on climate risk assessment and adaptation skills
for livestock farmers
0 160
2.1.2 Community level artisans in manufacturing livestock-related
material as a source of income diversification
Number of beneficiary cooperative members trained on manufacturing
livestock-related material
0 80
2.2.1 Livestock farmers (30% F) equipped with skills for livestock
feed conservation for dry season
Number of livestock farmers equipped with skills of feed conservation for
dry season
0 180
2.2.2 Strengthened adaptive capacity for sustainable land use management
Number of village committee members with capacity developed for sustainable land use management
0 180
2.2.3 Technical and business capacity developed for construction of
biogas plants for livestock farmers
Number of farmers trained on the technical and business capacity for
construction of biogas plants
0 180
3.1 Compile Knowledge adaptation products Number/sets of knowledge adaptation products compiled (e.g. videos, fact
sheets, projects reports, training materials, books, ...)
0 5
3.2 Participate in adaptation practitioners events Number of adaptation practitioners events attended 0 30
3.3 Produce Monitoring and Evaluation reports No. of AWPB, Progress and Audit Reports submitted by PCT 0 29
KE
Y
AC
IVIT
IES
CRLMP Components Inputs
Component 1: Livestock infrastructure development and increasing adaptive capacity of livestock farmers (USD 4,665,000 about 75.1%)
Component 2: Capacity Building on climate change Adaptation for stakeholders (USD 1,000,000 about 16.1%)
Component 3: Knowledge, Monitoring and Evaluation (USD 545,000 about 8.8%)
Total: USD 6,210,000
CRLMP Total Cost USD 6.21 million
GEF LDCF Grant: USD 6.21 million (100%).
Government: USD 0 million (0%).
Beneficiaries: USD 0 million (0%).
vii
CRLMP Time-Frame/Implementation Schedule2
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
0.0 Preparatory Activities,Grant Signature/Effectiveness Govt
1.0Component 1: Promoting Climate Resilient Livestock investments and increasing climate change
adaptive capacity of livestock farmers
1.1Livestock farmers able to cope with climate change through adoption of improved practices that enhance
livelihoods
1.1.1 Livestock farmers acquire breeds resilient to climate change
1.1.2 Livestock farmers set up sustainable livestock pastures, fodder banks, rangeland and water
harvesting systems
1.1.3 Effective practises developed for the community to manage indigenous livestock
1.2 Resilience of natural resources to climate change enhanced
1.2.1 Restoration of degraded pasture and increased vegetation cover with different drought tolerant
perennials
1.3 Increased resilience of infrastructure to climate change threats
1.3.1 Climate resilient infrastructure designs in place
1.4 Reduced GHG emissions from LISP infrastructure
1.4.1 LISP infrastructure designs for reduced GHG emissions in place
1.4.2 LISP infrastructure fitted with GHG emissions reduction technologies
2.0 Component 2: Capacity Building on Climate Change Adaptation for Stakeholders
2.1Increased knowledge and risk preparedness and adaptive capacity to climate variability at country and
targeted community levels
2.1.1 Government staff trained in climate risk assessment and adaptation skills for livestock farmers
2.1.2 Community level: Training artisans in manufacturing livestock-related material as a source of
income diversification
2.2 Diversification and strengthened livelihoods and source of incomes for rural populations
2.2.1 Livestock farmers equipped with skills of feed conservation for dry season and for other adaptation
measures autonomously implemented
2.2.2 Strengthened adaptive capacity for sustainable land use management
2.2.3 Technical and business capacity developed for construction of biogas plants for livestock farmers
3.0 Component 3: Knowledge, Monitoring and Evaluation
3.1 Compile Knowledge Adaptation Products
3.1.1 Knowledge adaptation products compiled
3.2 Participation in Adaptation Practitioners Events
3.2.1 Participation in adaptation practitioners’ events by project team
3.3 Monitoring and Evaluation
3.3.1 Progress Review Meetings (Provincial and Districts)
3.3.2 Supervision Missions (AfDB)
3.3.3 Various Progress Reports produced
3.3.4 Annual Financial Audit
3.3.5 Mid-Term Review (MTR)
3.3.6 Beneficiary Impact Assessment (BIA) and Project Completion Report (PCR)
Note: Q1 = First Quarter (January, February, March); Q2 = Second Quarter (April, May, June); Q3 = Third Quarter (July, August, September) and Q4 = Forth Quarter (October, November, December)
202120202017No Description of Activities
2018 2019
2 This is a summarised general implementation schedule whose activity details are indicated in Technical Annex A.1. Consequently, the detailed annual work schedule will be developed by the Project Coordination
Team (PCT) before the beginning of each fiscal year.
1
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF THE MANAGEMENT TO THE BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS ON THE PROPOSED ADDITIONAL FUNDING FROM GEF-LDCF
GRANT TO FINANCE THE ZAMBIA CLIMATE RESILIENT LIVESTOCK
MANAGEMENT PROJECT
Management submits the following Report and Recommendation for implementation of the GEF-
LCDF Grant of USD 6.21 million, as additional funds, to finance the Zambia Climate Resilient
Livestock Management Project (CRLMP) in order to build climate resilience in the on-going ADF
funded (UA 12.00 million) Zambia Livestock Infrastructure Support Project (LISP).
I. STRATEGIC THRUST & RATIONALE
1.1. Project Linkages with Country Strategy and Objectives
1.1.1. The Government development agenda is articulated in the National Vision 2030 which
reflects the aspirations and determination to be a prosperous middle-income country by year 2030.
In 2013, during the design of Zambia Livestock Infrastructure Support Project (LISP), the
prevailing main documents the Sixth National Development Plan (SNDP: 2011-2015) and also
the Medium Term Expenditure Framework (MTEF: 2013-2015, which operationalize the
National Vision 2030) prioritised agriculture among the key growth sectors of the economy. With
regard to the livestock sub-sector, the main thrust was to improve livestock production and
productivity mainly through infrastructure development, creation of Disease Free Zone (DFZ),
and processing of livestock products. During LISP appraisal, in 2013, the prevailing Bank’s
Results-Based Country Strategy Paper (CSP: 2011-2015) focussed on (i) support to economic
diversification through infrastructure development (Pillar 1) and (ii) support to economic and
financial governance (Pillar 2). The Project aimed at development of various livestock
infrastructures, mainly for disease control.
1.1.2. Based on the approval of LISP, which is the baseline/anchor project, the Climate Resilient
Livestock Management Project (CRLMP) Identification Form was submitted to GEF Secretariat.
The Project Identification Form was endorsed by the GEF National Focal Point Person and
LDCF/SCCF Secretariat on 8th April 2013, for an indicative GEF LDCF Grant of USD 6,210,000
which is meant to climate proof the ongoing Zambia LISP. The GEF CEO Endorsement for the
GEF LDCF resources was granted on 14th January 2016, as indicated in Appendix 1. The CRLMP
is fully based on LISP and is consequently in line with the associated country strategies and
objectives.
1.2. Rationale for Bank’s Involvement
1.2.1. The Agriculture Sector is liberalised. Government sector policy has focused on reforms to
the maize production and market subsidies that consume more than 8% of the national budget.
Major stakeholders have been urging the Government to rationalize food reserve management and
reform the way the input subsidy is managed to encourage Private Sector participation. In the
livestock sub-sector, the Government’s presence is mainly in the control of diseases of national
economic importance. Livestock sub-sector has potential to stimulate the Zambian economic
growth and create jobs. However, inadequate livestock infrastructures, high disease incidence and
poor livestock service delivery have been identified as main bottlenecks for sustainable growth of
the sub-sector. Consequently, the Bank’s strategy is to support the Government’s drive to enhance
the contribution of the livestock sub-sector to the national economy and poverty reduction.
1.2.2. The Bank’s focus on livestock infrastructure fills a vital but missing financial gap along
the livestock value chain which is not fully covered by other partners and is urgently required to
support economic diversification. The Project is aligned to one of the Bank’s Ten Year Strategy
2
(TYS: 2013-2022) core operational areas of infrastructure and also areas of special emphasis
namely agriculture, and High-5 Feed Africa Strategy for Agriculture Transformation in Africa
(2016-2025) in that it will enhance sustainable livestock infrastructure development, promote
livestock-by products, increase household income and food security. Consequently, the Project
will improve the quality of lives for rural communities in Zambia’s Northern and Muchinga
Provinces. In addition, the Project will promote climate resilience while ensuring inclusiveness of
rural men, women and youths as direct beneficiaries. The Project will also improve Private Sector
participation along the livestock value chain starting from production, disease control, processing,
and marketing. The Zambia comparative socio-economic indicators are reflected in Appendix 2.
The Bank’s active portfolio is about UA 745 million with an average disbursement rate of 15.0%,
as shown in Appendix 3, which justifies the continued support to the Agriculture Sector. The three
largest Sectors in the Zambia portfolio include Transport, Water Supply and Sanitation, and
Agriculture which are funded from ADF and ADB resources, Africa Working Together Fund,
Nigeria Trust Fund, Strategic Climate Fund, and Global Agriculture and Food Security
Programme (GAFSP) Trust Fund. Most of Bank-funded projects are task managed directly from
the Country Office (COZM) and also Southern Africa Regional Development and Business
Delivery Office (RDGS) which benefits overall portfolio performance, and also improves
relationship and dialogue with the Government and Development Partners (DPs).
1.2.3. The African Development Bank is one of the largest providers of development finance to
Zambia, with current total commitments of more than USD1 billion, distributed across seven
sectors namely transport (32%), water supply and sanitation (22%), agriculture (17%), energy
(12%), finance (7%) social (6%), and environment (4%). As at December 2016, the average age
of the operations was 2.5 years with disbursements at 17%, inclusive of operations approved but
not effective for disbursement. The Zambian portfolio continued to witness significant
improvements in terms of performance. The percentage of loans and grants rated satisfactory
improved from 43% in January to 70% in December 2016. All conditions precedent to first
disbursement for the previously approved loans/grants in the Agriculture Sector were duly
satisfied by the Government. Key portfolio improvement measures implemented during 2016
included technical launch, quarterly portfolio review and field supervisions. The technical launch
is a capacity building program to assist staff of project implementation units familiarize with the
project appraisal report (including relevant technical annexes), loan agreements, procurement
rules and procedures to be applied, disbursement rules and procedures, elaboration of an annual
work plan and budget, monitoring and evaluation as well as a follow up to conditions precedent
to first disbursement. The meeting was with all key implementing partners to understand the
project, implementation mechanisms and their respective roles during planning, implementation
and monitoring. The Bank, the Ministry of Finance and Ministry of National Planning jointly
organized quarterly portfolio review meetings for project staff, especially project coordinators,
monitoring and evaluation officers, procurement officers, project accountants, office of auditor
general and staff from line ministries providing oversight responsibility to project
implementation. The joint quarterly Portfolio Performance Review meeting was viewed by
participants as a good platform for all stakeholders to periodically identify critical issues affecting
implementation and agree on recommended actions.
1.2.4. One of the projects in the current Bank portfolio is the Livestock Infrastructure Support
Project (LISP) which is the anchor/baseline project for the proposed CRLMP. The LISP (P-ZM-
AAE-001) ADF Loan (UA 12.00 million, number 2100150029293) was approved on 19th June
2013 and the Loan Agreement was signed on signed on 19th December 2013. The Loan entered
into force on 30th December 2013. The LISP Executing Agency (EA) is the Ministry of Fisheries
and Livestock (MoFL) and it is implemented by the Department of Livestock Development. The
conditions precedent to effectiveness and first disbursement were met on 25th March 2014. The
first disbursement was made on 8th April 2014 and the ADF loan disbursement ratio was 38.01%
in June 2017.
3
1.2.5. Rationale for GEF LDCF Additional Financing: Natural resources constitute the primary
source of livelihood for the majority of the Zambian population. Management of these natural
resources is therefore important and critical to Zambia’s long-term development. Climate change
is already increasing the frequency and intensity of extreme weather events such as droughts,
floods, landslides and heat waves. The events of the past few years clearly illustrate the magnitude
of the problem. The Government of Zambia has prepared a National Adaptation Plan of Action
(NAPA) and identified priority intervention areas. The Government has also produced a National
Policy on Climate Change (2016). Through the Policy and NAPA, government has identified
priority intervention areas to stimulate interest among key stakeholders and also lead to changes
in planning approaches resulting into integration of climate change issues into development
planning.
1.2.6. The CRLMP will allow for the climate proofing of LISP and is primarily about adaptation
by livestock farmers to climate change impacts, and how their farming practices, their installed
facilities and equipment and processes in the implentation of the LISP could affect the
environment and subsequently climate change. As LISP deals with installation of livestock
infrastructure, there were concerns during its Appraisal phase that the installed facililities and
some of the planned activities might negatively affect the environment and contribute to climate
change. Therefore, the CRLMP PIF recognized the need to promote climate resilient investments
including infrastructure. An Environmental Risk Assessment for LISP activities and infrastructure
was prepared. Furthermore, the CRLMP preparation process included preparation of a Climate
Risk Assessment Report to accompany the CEO Endorsement Form. The justification is based on
the recognition that some processes and infrastructure installed by the LISP are bound to have
negative impacts on the environment.
1.2.7. The GEF-LDCF intervention comes at a time when the sector is also exploring avenues of
agriculture diversification through livestock and fisheries. The additional funding therefore
addresses the desired demands of the sector for sustainability of the livestock and pasture
resources. The Project seeks to build the resilience of vulnerable populations to climate change.
Adaptation measures and activities will be undertaken in the areas of water, agriculture, energy
efficient cooking, and resource management (notably training, information and technology) with
focus on women and youth. Women’s priorities and needs captured through public consultation
will be taken into account and women participation in decision making with respect to
management of facilities will be ensured. Tailor made training will target women groups and
youth for skills in facility construction, operation and maintenance as well as utilisation of labour
and energy saving biogas digesters. The agro-based activities for ecosystem restoration outside
the park and along river banks will be working closely with the families in the affected areas
providing more opportunity for rural women and youth involvement.
1.3. Donors Coordination
The DPs’ contributions are coordinated by the Ministry of Finance. The Agriculture
Cooperating Partner Group (Ag-CP) has been coordinating activities in the sector and engaging
Government in dialogue on key policy developments. The Zambia Country Office (COZM) has
played a pivotal role in donor coordination activities and overall portfolio management. The
National Livestock Development Programme (NLDP) that the Government has embarked on is
coordinated with various DPs which are funding different aspects or specific geographic zones.
The Agriculture Cooperating Partners Group (comprising USAID, EU, Finland, JICA, World
Bank, FAO, WFP, IFAD, Sweden and Norway) has formed a sub-committee on livestock
development to coordinate and dialogue with Government on livestock issues. Although the
Government is funding some projects within the NLDP, using its own resources, the DPs have
already participated as follows: (i) World Bank is covering Southern Central and Eastern
4
provinces; (ii) IFAD is covering livestock disease control throughout the country; (iii) EU is
providing institutional capacity building within the MoFL; (iv) AfDB is covering the northern
part of the country, and (v) the United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) has
implemented three projects related to livestock. The WB and AfDB livestock-related projects are
similar in design, focusing on disease control, though WB’s project has less infrastructure
component. The WB and AfDB are jointly implementing the Special Programme on Climate
Resilience in the Kafue and Zambezi river basins (SPCR) financed by the Climate Investment
Fund (CIF). The AfDB is also co-financing the Lake Tanganyika Development Project (LTDP)
with GEF-LDCF. In addition, the on-going livestock and climate change related activities by
different DPs are indicated in Table 1.1. The DPs’ in Agriculture Sector support is summarised in
Table 1.2
Table 1.1: DPs and Associated Livestock/Climate Change Activities
DPs Activities
UNDP Leading an LDCF project on improved meteorological stations and early warning systems –
as part of a regional initiative
FAO Implementing a large EU-funded project on agricultural adaptation focused on improved
climate smart agriculture and Integrated Land Use Systems (ILUA)
USAID Implementing market development initiatives linked to climate smart agriculture and nutrition
World Bank Implementing irrigation, livestock restocking and climate smart agriculture programmes
IFAD Implementing livestock restocking and climate smart agriculture programmes
Table: 1.2 Donor Support to Agriculture
Sector or subsector* Size
GDP Exports Labour Force
Agriculture (including
fisheries and forestry) 21% 20% 67%
Players - Public Annual Expenditure (average)
Government Donors AfDB 23.4% FAO 0.1% Finland 3.4%
UA m UA 424.0 m UA 104.0 m WB 34.3% JICA 2.4% USAID 7.9%
% 75.5% 24.5% EU 4.7% WFP 3.3% Norway 1.0% DFID 2.1% IFAD 17.4%
Level of Donor Coordination
Existence of Thematic Working Groups (this sector/sub-sector) [Yes]
Existence of SWAps or Integrated Sector Approaches [No]
ADB's Involvement in Donors Coordination [Member but not leader]
II. PROJECT DESCRIPTION
2.1. LISP (Baseline Project) and CRLMP Objectives and Components
2.1.1. LISP Objectives and Components: The on-going Livestock Infrastructure Support Project
(LISP) objectives are to improve smallholder livestock production, productivity, create market
linkages and increase incomes of livestock farmers. The on-going LISP is the anchor/baseline
project for the GEF-LDCF funded CRLMP. The LISP components, activities, and LogFrame are
indicated in Appendix 4. The total LISP cost is UA 13.71 million, at year 2013 price level which
is being financed by (i) ADF Loan: UA 12.00 million (87.6%) covering all major activities, (ii)
Government contribution: UA 1.69 million (12.3%) through value for office space, salaries for
Government staff and utilities such as electricity and water, and (iii) beneficiaries’ contribution:
UA 0.02 million (0.1%) in form of operation and maintenance of the LSC tier 1 and 1+ as per
Government’s policy to ensure sustainability. As at 30th April 2017, the LISP physical
implementation rate was about 35% with ADF disbursement ratio of 38.01%.
5
2.1.2. CRLMP Objectives and Description: The CRLMP objectives as aligned to the LISP
objectives as described in paragraph 2.1.1. The GEF-LDCF CRLMP seeks to build climate
resilience in the on-going LISP and will incorporate climate change-related aspects into the initial
project activities in order to ensure preservation of ecosystems. The CRLMP will mainly address
the stakeholders’ concerns that the livestock activities under LISP might negatively affect the
environment and contribute to climate change. Introduction of additional livestock into the two
provinces through restocking and pass-on-schemes will over time increase the amount of solid
manure dropped and add to greenhouse gas (GHG) emission. The CRLMP recognized the need
to promote climate resilient investments and is primarily about adaptation by livestock farmers to
climate change impact, and how their farming practices including LISP supported facilities could
affect the environment and subsequently climate change. The additional outputs and their
associated activities are proposed through the CRLMP to impart both a climate change adaptation
and mitigation outlook to LISP.
2.1.3. The additional activities to be carried out under CRLMP are packaged into three mutually
re-enforcing components as listed and summarized below under 3 components: (i) Component 1
- Promoting Climate Resilient Livestock investments and increasing climate change adaptive
capacity of livestock farmers; (ii) Component 2 - Capacity Building on climate change Adaptation
for stakeholders; and (iii) Component 3 - Knowledge, Monitoring and Evaluation. The CRLMP
components and activities are indicated in Table 2.1, below. The expected major achievements
from the additional GEF-LDCF (CRLMP) funding include: (i) Livestock farmers able to cope
with climate change through adoption of improved practices that enhance livelihoods; (ii)
Resilience of natural resources to climate change enhanced; (iii) Increased resilience of
infrastructure to climate change threats; (iv) Reduced GHG emissions from LISP infrastructure
and processes; (v) Increased knowledge and risk preparedness and adaptive capacity to climate
variability at country and targeted community levels; (vi) Diversification and strengthened
livelihoods and source of incomes for rural population (artisan and livestock farmers); (vii) M&E
management and lessons learnt are captured and appropriately disseminated; and (viii) the project
will contribute to strengthening awareness and ownership of adaptation and climate risk reduction
processes in rural Zambia.
Table 2.1: CRLMP Components and Associated Activities including Costs
(Note: As presented in the approved GEF CRLMP Information Form, endorsed by GEF CEO)
Component Outcomes Outputs Activities
Component 1: Promoting Climate Resilient Livestock investments and increasing climate change adaptive capacity of
livestock farmers (USD 4,745,200 about 76.4%)
1.1 Livestock farmers able to cope with climate change through adoption of improved practices that
enhance livelihoods
1.1.1 Livestock farmers
acquire breeds resilient to
climate change
1.1.1.1 Characterise and multiply existing known
indigenous livestock species and breeds and breeding
systems
1..1.2 Scale up Livestock Pass-on Scheme (using Heifer
International, recruited under on-going LISP)
1.1.1.3 Train extension officers on GIS to assess carrying
capacities
1.1.2 Livestock farmers set
up sustainable livestock
pastures, fodder banks,
rangeland and water
harvesting systems
1.1.2.1 Set-up sustainable livestock pastures, fodder
banks and rangelands
1.1.2.2 Establish land use plans at village level using
participatory GIS
1.1.2.3 Plant fodder & fruit trees around homesteads
and along the riverines;
1.1.2.4 Construct fire breaks around rangelands
1.1.2.5 Sustainable Management of existing water
resources and develop alternative water sources for
livestock (shallow wells, small dams, & boreholes)
1.1.3 Effective practises
developed for the
1.1.3.1 Raise awareness of the value of indigenous
livestock species and breeds
6
Component Outcomes Outputs Activities
community to manage
indigenous livestock
1.1.3.2 Improve Community management of indigenous
livestock breeds (Best practice and development of breed
management manual for farmers and extension workers
in local language, train extension staff and farmers and
conduct exchange visits for farmers).
1.1.4 Operationalise an index-based livestock insurance
(IBLI) scheme
1.1.5 Operationalise a Livestock Early Warning
Information System (LEWIS)
1.2 Resilience of natural resources to climate change enhanced
1.2.1 Restoration of degraded
pasture and increased
vegetation cover with
different drought tolerant
perennials
1.2.1.1. Characterize rangelands
1.2.1.2 Carry out rangeland improvement
interventions/strategies (eg. planting of drought tolerant
annual and perennial species).
1.3 Increased resilience of infrastructure to climate change threats
1.3.1 Climate resilient
infrastructure designs in
place
1.3.1.1 Review and modify LISP infrastructure designs.
1.3.1.2 Number of climate resilient infrastructure
constructed (already tendered LISP LSC Tier 1)
1.3.1.3. Review and realign the locations of LISP
infrastructure;
1.3.1.4 Establish and construct climate resilient
interventions around infrastructure (eg. Contour ridging
and vertiva grass promotion).
1.4 Reduced GHG emissions from LISP infrastructure
1.4.1. LISP infrastructure
designs for reduced GHG
emissions in place
1.4.1.1 Use less emissions-intensive materials in
livestock handling, abattoir and dairy infrastructure
1.4.1.2 Minimise GHG emmision in Road construction
1.4.1.3 Instal renewable energy sources like - solar and
photovoltaic panels to produce renewable electricity
1.4.2 LISP infrastructure
fitted or constructed with
GHG emissions reduction
technologies
1.4.2.1 Construct more demonstration bio-digesters
(using SNV, based on LISP demonstraion bio-digesters).
Component 2: Capacity Building on Climate Change Adaptation for Stakeholders (USD 1,080,600 about 17.4%)
2.1 Increased knowledge and risk preparedness and adaptive capacity to climate variability at
country and targeted community levels
2.1.1 Government staff
trained in climate risk
assessment and adaptation
skills for livestock farmers-
2.1.1.1 Train local stakeholders in CRiSTAL
“Community-based Risk Screening Tool – Adaptation
and Livelihoods”
2.1.1.2 Strengthen capacity to develop and implement the
index-based livestock insurance scheme and LEWIS
2.1.2 Community level:
Training artisans in
manufacturing livestock-
related material as a source of
income diversification
2.1.2.1 Prepare training materials for artisans in
manufacturing livestock-related materials as a source of
income diversification
2.1.2.2 Train artisans in manufacturing livestock-related
materials as a source of income diversification
2.1.2.3 Develop evidence-based sensitization materials
on climate risks
2.1.2.4 Conduct climate change awareness campaigns (
community meetings, radio, TV)
2.1.2.5 Exchange visits to affected communities
2.1.2.6 Create awareness among livestock farmers of
existence of index-based livestock insurance providers
2.1.2.7 Link livestock farmers with index-based livestock
insurance providers
2.1.2.8 Create awareness among livestock farmers of
existence of early warning systems and how to access it.
2.2 Diversification and strengthened livelihoods and source of incomes for rural populations.
2.2.1 - Livestock farmers
equipped with skills of feed
conservation for dry season
and for other adaptation
measures autonomously
implemented
2.2.1.1 Develop Livestock/Mixed Crop-Livestock
Systems
2.2.1.2 Promote Conservation Agriculture/Farming -
fodder production, forage and cover crops, legume
forages
2.2.1.3 Promote Good Agricultural Practices (GAPs) -
manure use, use of crop residues for feeds and soil cover,
animal draft power
7
Component Outcomes Outputs Activities
2.2.1.4 Promote Fodder production and conservation for
dry season feed
2.2.2 – Strengthened
adaptive capacity for
sustainable land use
management
2.2.2.1 Prepare training materials for sustainable
agriculture land use management
2.2.2.2 Conduct community campaigns to sensitize
livestock farmers in sustainable land use management
2.2.2.3. Train farmers on sustainable land use
management
2.2.3 – Technical and
business capacity developed
for construction of biogas
digerts for livestock farmers
(men and women)
2.2.3.1 Train farmers on the construction and
maintenance of bio-gas digesters
2.2.3.2. Create awareness and provide appropriate
training on how to safely utilize bio-gas digesters
Component 3: Knowledge, Monitoring and Evaluation (USD 384,200 about 6.2%)
3.1 Compile Knowledge Adaptation Products
3.1.1. Knowledge adaptation
products compiled
3.1.1. Produce videos, fact sheets, training materials, and
studies
3.2 Participation in Adaptation Practitioners Events
3.2.1 Participation in
adaptation practitioners’
events by project team
3.2.1.1 Participate in adaptation practitioners events by
project team
3.3 Monitoring and Evaluation Reports
3.3.1 Various Progress
Reports produced
3.3.1.1 Produce Quarterly Progress Reports
3.3.1.2 Produce Audit Reports
3.3.1.3 Prodice Annual Workplan and Budget
3.3.1.4 Produce Baseline Survey Report
3.3.1.5 Produce Beneficairy Impact Report
3.3.1.6 Produce Mid-Term Review Report
3.3.1.7 Produce Project Completion Report
Total CRLMP Cost USD 6,210,000
2.2 Project Type
CRLMP is designed in the form of a stand-alone Investment Project largely funded by the
GEF-LDCF Grant resources.
2.3. CRLMP Cost and Financing Arrangements
The total CRLMP cost is USD 6.21 million which will be financed solely by GEF-LDCF
Grant, covering all planned activities improve resilience against climate variability and climate
change. There is no Government and beneficiaries contributions since they are already covered
under the anchor/baseline project (LISP). The cost allocations, as extracted from the GEF CEO
Endorsement Letter are indicated in Tables 2.2 to 2.4. The cost details are presented in Technical
Annex A.1 (Volume II of II).
Table 2.2a: Summary of CRLMP Costs (USD) by Component
Component Name USD
Foreign Local Total
1. Promoting Climate Resilient Livestock investments and
increasing climate change adaptive capacity of livestock farmers 1,866,000 2,799,000 4,665,000
2. Capacity Building on climate change Adaptation for
stakeholders 400,160 600,240 1,000,400
3. Knowledge, Monitoring and Evaluation 121,600 182,400 304,000
Total Baseline Cost 2,387,760 3,581,640 5,969,400
Unallocated Amount 96,240 144,360 240,600
Total Project Cost 2,484,000 3,726,000 6,210,000
8
Table 2.2b: CRLMP Costs by Component (as presented on GEF PIF)
Project Component Grant
Type Expected Outcomes
Trust
Fund
Grant Amount
(USD)
Promoting Climate Resilient
Livestock investments and
increasing climate change
adaptive capacity of livestock
farmers
Inv
1.1 - Livestock farmers able to cope with
climate change through adoption of improved
practices that enhance livelihoods
LDCF 4,195,749
Inv 1.2 - Resilience of natural resources to
climate change enhanced
LDCF 331,396
Inv 1.3 Increased resilience of infrastructure to
climate change threats
LDCF 43,606
Inv 1.4 - Reduced GHG emissions from LISP
infrastructure and processes
LDCF 94,249
Sub-Total 4,745,200
Capacity Building on climate
change Adaptation for
stakeholders TA
2.1 – Increased knowledge and risk
preparedness and adaptive capacity to
climate variability at country and targeted
community levels
LDCF 631,177
TA
2.2 - Diversification and strengthened
livelihoods and source of incomes for rural
population (artisan and livestock farmers)
LDCF 368,823
Sub-Total 1,080,600
3. Knowledge, Monitoring and
Evaluation TA
M&E management and lessons learnt are
captured and appropriately disseminated
LDCF 384,200
Sub-Total 384,200
Project management Cost (PMC) TA LDCF 240,600
Total CRLMP costs 6,210,000
Table 2.3: Sources of Financing, Amount (USD) and Percentage Contribution (%)
Source of Finance Amount (USD) and Percentage Contribution (%)
Foreign % Local % Total %
GEF LDCF Grant 2,484,000 40 3,726,000 60 6,210,000 100
Government - 0 - 0 - 0
Beneficiaries - 0 - 0 - 0
Total Project Cost 2,484,000 40 3,726,000 60 6,210,000 100
Table 2.4a: CRLMP Cost (USD) – Categories of Expenditure
Category of Expenditure GEF LDCF Grant Amount (USD)
Foreign Cost Local Cost Total
A. Goods 912,878 1,369,317 2,282,195
B. Works 1,174,342 1,761,514 2,935,856
C. Services 228,140 342,209 570,349
D. Operating Costs 72,400 108,600 181,000
E. Unallocated 96,240 144,360 240,600
Total Project Cost 2,484,000 3,726,000 6,210,000
9
Table 2.4b: CRLMP Cost (USD) – Categories of Expenditure (as presented on GEF PIF)
Component
Category Budget (USD) Total
Goods Works Services PM&C Unallocated
1. Promoting Climate
Resilient Livestock
investments and increasing
climate change adaptive
capacity of livestock farmers
1,876,396 2,755,856 32,749 0 80,200 4,745,200
2. Capacity Building on
climate change Adaptation
for stakeholders
327,800 180,000 492,600 0 80,200 1,080,600
3. Knowledge, Monitoring
and Evaluation 78,000 0 45,000 181,000 80,200 384,200
Total Project Cost 2,282,196 2,935,856 570,349 181,000 240,600 6,210,000
Table 2.5: Expenditure (USD) Schedule by Component
Component PY1 PY2 PY3 Total
1. Promoting Climate Resilient
Livestock investments and increasing
climate change adaptive capacity of
livestock farmers
1,399,500 2,099,250 1,166,250 4,665,000
2. Capacity Building on climate
change Adaptation for stakeholders 300,120 450,180 250,100 1,000,400
3. Knowledge, Monitoring and
Evaluation 91,200 136,800 76,000 304,000
Total Baseline Cost 1,790,820 2,686,230 1,492,350 5,969,400
4. Unallocated Amount 72,180 108,270 60,150 240,600
Total Project Cost 1,863,000 2,794,500 1,552,500 6,210,000
2.4. CRLMP Target Area and Beneficiaries
The Project will be implemented in the Northern and Muchinga Provinces covering 9
Districts (Appendix 5), which is also the same area as for anchor project (LISP). The human
population within participating Districts is 1,338,456 out of which 51% are women whilst the total
number of households (HH) is 233,300 with 33,600 female headed HH. The additional funding
will directly benefit a total of 100,000 livestock keeping households, including 33,600 female
headed households. These farmers are being mobilized and trained through 248 registered groups
and associations. The Project will strengthen institutional and technical capacity of public sector
staff. About 800,000 people, including 400,000 rural women, will indirectly benefit from increase
in supply of quality livestock products and management skills. In addition, the CRLMP will
benefit about 4 community based organisations and 70 Government staff through technical and
institutional capacity building.
2.5. Participatory Process for Project Identification, Design and Implementation
The CRLMP design processes have had extensive consultations with various stakeholders
in the Government and non-government sectors both at national and local levels within the two
effected provinces. Local leaders and beneficiary communities in the targeted districts were
consulted during the preparation phase. The Executing Agency has been involved in the course
of designing and in validation meetings. Consultations with the key stakeholders were also done
during CRLMP design when defining key project activities, implementation and sustainability
arrangements. The CRLMP is a communitybased project, which means that beneficiaries are part
10
of project design, implementation, and monitoring and evaluation. There was large participation
of livestock farmers, civil societies and Government staff during the Inception Workshop and
Validation Workshop. The Project design has in-built mechanisms for continued participation of
beneficiaries and other key stakeholders. Zambia Environment Management Authority (ZEMA)
was also engaged to ensure that all the infrastructure development under the CRLMP are
sustainable and environmental friendly. This participatory approach will continue to be enhanced
during the implementation phase. The CRLMP design also benefitted from the on-going climate
related projects being implemented by different DPs.
2.6. Bank Group Experience and Lessons Reflected in Project Design
In Zambia, the Bank has gained infrastructure development experience during design and
implementation of completed and on-going investment projects, namely, SIP, ASIP, PRODAP,
LISP, PPCR, and APMEP. The lessons learnt and actions taken during CRLMP design are
tabulated below:
No Lessons Learnt Actions incorporated in the Project design
1. Role played by Project Implementation Unit
in expediting project execution after start-up
delay when management was entrusted in
Government Department.
MoFL’s Project implementation capacity has been enhanced
through recruitment of national Experts in the PIU. In addition,
the Climate Adaptation Expert will be recruited to take care of
CRLMP activities.
2. Inadequate consultation with stakeholders in
selection of sites results in poor siting of the
infrastructure.
Adequate consultations with key stakeholders, including
smallholder livestock farmers were undertaken during Project
preparation and appraisal phases.
3. Weak M&E system results in poor
assessment of implementation progress
Participatory M&E activities with adequate financial
allocation have been included in Project design.
4. Lack of infrastructure management entities
compromises sustainability.
Establishment of management entities has been included in
Project design.
2.7. Project Performance Indicators
The CRLMP impact, outcome and output indicators are indicated in the logical framework
(LogFrame) which will be measured using the existing Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) system
which was developed under LISP. The impact indicator, against which the Project development
objective will be measured, is to strengthen the adaptive capacity of Zambian livestock farmers
to the impacts of climate change.
III. PROJECT FEASIBILITY
3.1. Economic and Financial Performance
3.1.1. The economics and financial analyses have been carried out on the assumption that, for
any business to flourish, it requires incentives and conducive environment which will be provided
by LISP and CRLMP. In this regard (i) facilities such dip tanks, spray races, crush pens for
vaccination and other veterinary services, feeding and watering infrastructure will enable farmers
to raise healthy animals, (ii) breeding centres will aid in the stocking programme resulting in
increase in livestock numbers, (iii) marketing structures, slaughter facilities, milk collection
centres and connecting feeder roads will give farmers incentive to keep livestock and feed them
appropriately for high prices, while accessibility will encourage private traders for both inputs and
livestock products to operate in the area, (iv) infrastructure facilities will also attract private
operators such as health inspectors and veterinary officers to invest in livestock development in
the area, (v) the animal pass-on scheme for youth and women will hasten livestock multiplication,
(vi) capacity building will train farmers to raise healthy fattened animals. The Project will, through
infrastructure for disease control, reduce livestock mortality resulting in higher livestock numbers.
Improved animal growth rate through better feeding practices and breed improvement for growth
11
and milk production will improve carcass weight and also milk yields. All these aspects will, in
the final analysis increase livestock production and productivity.
3.1.2. The implementation of the CRLMP, alongside the anchor/baseline project (LISP), is
expected to increase the percentage of households owning livestock in the target area, as the “pass
on scheme” will be scaled up for livestock restocking. This will increase the average livestock
farmers’ incomes. Improvement in availability of feed resources from pastures, rangelands, and
supplementary feeding from improved quality crop residues, and from improved veterinary care
and services will raise productivity outcomes such as calving rates, milk yields and livestock body
weight gains. Improved access to livestock markets, to be constructed by the project, is expected
to reduce marketing costs of livestock and livestock products, and hence increase profit margins
of livestock farmers. With the implementation of adaptation activities, the Project’s economic
benefits will increase, as well as its positive impacts on living conditions and infrastructure
sustainability.
3.1.3. The project is also expected to generate a number of indirect economic benefits. They
include (i) enhanced food security with overall increase in the supply of good livestock products,
(ii) increased demands for livestock related services accruing to service providers, fostering the
development of animal related business and job, and (iii) empowerment of livestock farmer
organizations to provide adequate services to their members. Other social benefits will include
improvement of (i) living conditions of livestock communities, through increased livestock
production and household income, (ii) linkages between disaster risk management and climate
change, (iii) contribution of the livestock sector to climate resilient economy, (iv) social inclusion
and economic growth to reintegrate the most vulnerable groups into the local economy, and (v)
mainstreaming gender issues into livestock development activities. The main assumptions
underlying the calculations of EIRR and FIRR are: (i) cattle, goat and chickens’ average annual
population will increase from 6.3% to 10%, 12% to 15%, and 15% to 22% respectively; (ii)
livestock off-take will increase from the current 12% to 16% for cattle and 31% to 38% for goat
by year 6; (iii) average weight will increase from the current 126 kg to 168 kg for cattle and from
25 kg to 33 kg for goats; and (v) milk production from 1,500 to 2,500 litres per year (cow). The
EIRR and FIRR computations are summarized below:
FIRR, NPV (base case) 20%, NPV (12%): USD 4.02 million
EIRR (base case) 22%, NPV (12%): USD 4.38 million
NB: detailed calculations are available in Appendix 5 and also Technical Annex B.6 of LISP AR
3.2. Environmental and Social impacts
3.2.1. Environment: The anchor/baseline project (LISP) was classified as Environment Category
2 according to the Bank’s Environmental and Social Assessment Procedures (ESAP) which was
validated by the Quality Assurance and Results Department on 8th May 2012. The infrastructure
investments supported by the Project will generate site-specific and short-term negative
environmental impacts which will mainly occur during the construction phase. During the
operational phase the likely impacts would include solid waste and effluent from slaughter houses,
milk collection centers, livestock service centres, markets and also bio-medical waste from
veterinary activities. MoFL has facilitated the preparation of Strategic Environmental and Social
Assessment (SESA) report, for the on-going LISP, which describes measures to mitigate the
negative impacts which include re-vegetating cleared land, restoration of borrow-pits, appropriate
drainage systems to control erosion, installation of systems for solid waste and effluent
management and providing Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) to the workforce.
3.2.2. Climate Change: The CRLMP, by design and name, is a pro-climate resilience and will,
consequently, promote climate change adaptation and foster livelihoods diversification which will
12
ultimately enhance the climate change adaptive capacity of the pastoralists and the livestock
production systems. The Project will support (i) sustainable management of rangeland and
pasture, and (ii) adoption of biogas digesters that will promote use of livestock dung for generation
of energy for lighting and cooking. In building capacity of the livestock farmers and the livestock
production systems, the CRLMP will support breeds that are resilient to climate change and
develop models for community management of endemic livestock and habitat, strengthen
adaptive capacity of communities through training and mounting of demonstration sites for feed
conservation during the dry seasons, restoration of degraded pasture and increased vegetation
cover with different drought tolerant plants.
3.2.3. Gender: Zambian women comprise 51% of the population. In the Project area, cattle are
predominantly owned by men whilst women own small livestock (goats, sheep and chickens).
The Project will address gender balance challenges through interventions targeted at women
including access to livestock services, information and training in modern livestock management.
Immediate benefits to women will be increased livestock production and improved productivity
which will lead to increased household incomes. The Project will also promote the role of women
in climate adaptation and also climate smart agricultural practices, through tailor made training
since their participation will enhance effectiveness and sustainability of the project. The CRLMP
will promote labour saving technologies like biogas digesters and also draught power which have
the benefit of reducing workload for women and youth. Considering that the biogas digesters
provide an excellent linkage with clean cooking solutions, the Project will mobilise and train rural
women and youth on the use and maintenance of biogas units, since there is often resistance in
rural communities to use biogas although it is a cheap and efficient energy source. The CRLMP
will support youth and women empowerment schemes aimed at training them in value addition
skills (such as skins/hides processing) and skills training to run Income Generating Activities
(IGAs). This will have significant potential in reducing poverty among women and youth by
increasing their access to new employment opportunities and developing women as contributors
to economic growth. Women will comprise at least 50% of beneficiaries. Women and youth
participation in livestock development will also be enhanced through scaling up the small stock
pass-on scheme.
3.2.4. Social: The social impact of the CRLMP is expected to be positive since it will provide
more income and better livelihoods to participating communities. The preparation of this CRLMP
which focuses on community/local beneficiaries was guided by a comprehensive and extensive
participatory process. The Project will help participating communities to diversify agricultural
output in a sustainable manner. Other positive effects will include an improvement in nutritional
and food safety status of the direct beneficiaries and other communities through consumption of
wholesome meat and milk products rich in proteins and also supply of draught power for crop
production. Livestock dung will also be used, as compost manure, to enhance crop production and
also used to generate energy through biogas digesters. Rehabilitation of feeder roads will facilitate
sale of livestock and related agro-products which will generally improve trade. The increased
economic activities will significantly boost local development. Value addition training will
improve skills and provide employment to women and youth. The anticipated economic well-
being resulting from higher family incomes will generate positive multiplier effects on social
stability which will help curb rural exodus by retaining local population especially youth within
the participating Districts. The Project will mitigate the risk posed by HIV/AIDS, malaria and
malnutrition through awareness campaigns.
3.2.5. Inclusive Growth: In the context of broad-based and pro-poor growth, the Project will
promote inclusive growth with equitable allocation of resources to activities which will benefit
all levels of the participating communities. The Project will assist poor rural men, women and
youth to own livestock enterprise diversification, job creation, and income generation. The
livestock value chain activities will also give opportunity to rural men, women and youth
13
including Private Sector to participate in off-farm activities including livestock disease control,
processing and marketing.
3.2.6. Transition to Green Growth: The Project is designed to contribute to green growth through
pasture production which will provide soil cover, stabilise the soil, ensure environmental
conservation, and increase livestock production.
3.2.7. Value Addition: The CRLMP will fill in the gaps along the livestock value chain in order
to improve smallholder livestock production, productivity, and market linkages in a sustainable
manner.
3.2.8. Involuntary Resettlement: There will be no involuntary resettlement or land acquisition
envisioned during implementation of the CRLMP activities. The CRLMP activities will be carried
out within the existing LISP areas, in Northern and Muchinga Provinces, which were already
demarcated by the Government and local communities with no known land disputes.
IV: IMPLEMENTATION
4.1. Implementation Arrangements
4.1.1. The Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock (MoFL) will be the Executing Agency (EA) for
the CRLMP which will be implemented through the Director of Livestock Development, over a
period of 3 years. The CRLMP will use the existing Project Coordination Team (PCT) which was
set up by the Government, under LISP, for day to day effective implementation of the Project
activities. Based on Bank’s Rules and Procedures, the Project will competitively recruit from the
open market a Climate Adaptation Expert, to spearhead CRLMP activities, and will be part of the
core PCT. The existing PCT will be fully accountable for the performance of CRLMP
implementation and the use of funds. After planned closure of the LISP (31st December 2018),
the CRLMP resources will support a lean PCT comprising Project Coordinator, Accountant,
Climate Adaptation Expert, and M&E Specialist who will continue working with seconded
Provincial and District Government staff. The MoFL Chief Accountant will facilitate the CRLMP
implementation. A Project Steering Committee3 (PSC) which was already set-up by Government,
for LISP, will also have oversight responsibility and oversee CRLMP compliance with sub-sector
National Policies and Strategies. The PC will continue to be the Secretary of PSC. Through the
PSC, the Government, the Bank and GEF will review and approve the CRLMP’s annual work
plan and budget, at least 3 months before the beginning of the fiscal year. Although the CRLMP’s
annual work plan will be produced separately for ease of monitoring, it will be synchronized with
the LISP’s annual work plan. At the Provincial level, the responsibility for delivery rests with the
existing institutional structures of MoFL under coordination of the Provincial Livestock
Production Officer. During implementation, the CRLMP will support the Provincial and District
Offices’ Technical Officers to take care of planned activities, and include them in their work plans
for sustainability. The Bank’s COZM and RDGS staff will support CRLMP implementation
through regular supervision missions, informal meetings, and processing of all fiduciary
documents.
4.1.2. Procurement Arrangements (GEF-LDCF Resources): Procurement of goods (including
non-consultancy services), works and the acquisition of consulting services, financed by the Bank
for the project, will be carried out in accordance with the “Procurement Policy and Methodology
3 The existing PSC consists of (i) Representative of Secretary to Treasury (Ministry of Finance) - Chairperson, (ii)
Permanent Secretary (PS) - MAL, (iii) PS - Northern Province, (iv) PS - Muchinga Province, (v) PS - Ministry of
Works, (vi) representative from Zambia Environment Management Authority (ZEMA), (vii) 2 livestock farmers’
representatives from Muchinga and Northern Provinces, and (viii) 2 representatives from the Private Sector (beef
and dairy industries).
14
for Bank Group Funded Operations” (BPM), dated October 2015 and following the provisions
stated in the Financing Agreement. Specifically, Procurement would be carried out as follows:
Borrower Procurement System (BPS): Specific Procurement Methods and Procedures
(PMPs) under BPS comprising its Laws and Regulations as per the Public Procurement
Act of 2008 and the Public Procurement Regulations of 2011, using the national Standard
Solicitation Documents (SSDs) shall apply under the project for specified transactions
Bank Procurement Policy and Methodology (BPM): Bank standard PMPs, using the
relevant Bank Standard Solicitation Documents (SSDs), for contracts where the BPS shall
not apply for specific transactions or group of transactions where the BPM have been
found to be the best fit for purpose.
4.1.3. Procurement Risks and Capacity Assessment (PRCA): the assessment of procurement
risks at the Country, Sector, and Project levels and procurement capacity at the Executing Agency
(EA), were undertaken for the project and the results have informed the decisions on the
procurement arrangements being used for transactions under the Project.
4.1.4. Financial Management: As part of preparation for this additional financing, the Bank
updated the Financial Management (FM) assessment of MoFL, as the Executing Agency (EA)
which was carried out during the appraisal of the ongoing anchor project (LISP), in accordance
with the Bank’s Guidelines for Financial Management and concluded MFL’s financial
management capacity satisfy the Bank’s minimum requirements. The EA has addressed the initial
FM capacity challenges which occurred at the inception of the ongoing project and FM
performance has been generally satisfactory; and the project received an unqualified (clean) audit
opinion for its latest (2015) audited financial statement which was accepted by the Bank. In that
regard, the project FM will be handled within the EA’s existing FM system for managing the on-
going LISP.
4.1.5. Financial Reporting and External Audit: The overall financial reporting responsibility
rests with the Chief Accountant (MoFL), as the head of the Ministry’s Finance Department. The
existing Project Accountant, under LISP, will handle all project FM activities under the CRLMP
financing as part of the day to day responsibilities, with the Provincial and District Accountants
providing the necessary backstopping at the local levels as has been the case. In accordance with
the Bank’s financial reporting requirements, separate Interim Quarterly Progress Report (IQPR)
will be prepared by the EA for the CRLMP funds, and submitted to the Bank no later than 45 days
after the end of each calendar quarter. Similarly, the EA shall be required to prepare separate
annual financial statements for the CRLMP to be audited by the Office of the Auditor General
(OAG) as per their mandate, or an externally appointed independent auditor with the involvement
of the OAG. The annual audited financial statements together with the audit management letter
shall be submitted to the Bank not later than six (6) months after the end of each fiscal year.
4.1.6. Disbursement Arrangement: The CRLMP will use the Bank’s disbursement methods
including (i) Direct Payment, (ii) Special Account (SA) and (iii) Reimbursement Methods in
accordance with rules and procedures as stipulated in the Disbursement Handbook. A separate
foreign currency denominated Special Account in the Bank of Zambia (BoZ) and a local currency
account (ZMW) in the BoZ will be opened for the CRLMP to be operated by MoFL and used for
financing eligible operating and other recurring costs under the Project. To facilitate payment of
eligible operating costs, a separate CRLMP sub-account in local currency to be managed by MoFL
as per the existing financial rules and regulations will be opened at a local commercial bank,
acceptable to the AfDB, in Kasama District in the Northern Province. The operating of the bank
accounts including payment for eligible expenditures, preparation of withdrawal applications for
funds into the SA, and documentation for all direct payments shall be in accordance with existing
procedures within the EA, and under the overall responsibility of the Chief Accountant (MoFL).
15
The Bank will issue a Disbursement Letter of which the content will be discussed and agreed
during negotiations.
4.2. Monitoring
4.2.1. Monitoring and Evaluation (M&E) will enable the PCT, MoFL and key stakeholders to
track CRLMP implementation using indicators and targets as presented in the Result Based
Logical Framework (LogFrame) at community (beneficiary), District and Provincial levels. The
Project M&E Specialist will be responsible for the establishment of an M&E system using a
participatory approach in data collection, analysis and dissemination that will provide intermittent
methodological backstopping at the design, implementation and completion phases. The M&E
system will monitor physical and financial implementation progress while providing insights on
Project impact on beneficiaries. The Government has set up, within the National Livestock and
Epidemiological Information Centre (NALEIC), the Livestock Information Management System
(LIMS) in animal health, animal production, livestock and livestock products marketing and trade
which serve as an effective tool for monitoring progress towards the livestock policy objectives.
The M&E system will be linked to LIMS. The CRLMP will also establish and operationalise the
Livestock Early Warning Information System (LEWIS) which will also be linked to LIMS.
4.2.2. The Project will provide financial resources to facilitate the required M&E training, proper
data gathering and processing. The Project will provide funds for Mid-Term Review (MTR),
Project Completion Report (PCR), and annual audits, as indicated in the table below. The PCT
will submit to the Bank Quarterly Progress Reports (QPR) and annual work plans and budgets
using Bank’s format. The Bank will supervise the implementation of the CRLMP through regular
supervision missions, at least twice a year.
Time-Frame Milestones Monitoring Process (Feedback Loop)
Years 1 to 3 Quarterly Progress Reports and Annual
Financial Audit Reports PCT and External Audit Firm (Annually).
Year 2 (Q1) Mid-Term Review Communities, Districts, Provinces, PCT, NALEIC,
and Consultant.
Year 3 (Q1) Beneficiary Impact Assessment Beneficiaries, PCT, NALEIC and Consultant.
Year 3 (Q3) Project Completion Review Communities, Districts, Provinces, PCT, NALEIC,
and Consultant.
4.3. Governance
Zambia has made significant progress in the area of accountability and transparency and
has relatively improved on key indicators of governance including control of corruption, rule of
law, regulatory quality and Government effectiveness. However, weaknesses remain in ensuring
budget credibility, non-fully compliance with internal control regulations, timely follow-up and
implementation of both internal and external audit recommendations. Mitigation measures to
address these issues include: (i) production of tailor-made financial management procedures
manual that will provide guidance to staff; (ii) using MoFL Internal Audit to undertake pre-audit
of Project transactions; and (iii) procurement of off-the-shelf accounting software to record and
process transactions and interface it with IFMIS to facilitate timely project financial reporting
given the operational challenges with IFMIS, and (iv) enforcing a system of timely submission of
interim quarterly progress report (IQPR).
4.4. Sustainability
4.4.1. The CRLMP intends to mainstream climate change-related activities into livestock
development planning by involving rural communities, public and private sectors. The proposed
training to be funded by the Project will provide the tools and approaches for continuous
16
commitment and sustainability after closure of the project. Implementation of the additional
CRLMP activities will involve all stakeholders, including the beneficiary communities to ensure
a sense of ownership and commitment as well as sustainability of the improved infrastructure for
livestock management, The CRLMP will enhance the sustainability principles which focus on
participatory approach in preparation of the Project. This is an important step towards ensuring the
relevance of the investments made and laying of institutional capacity at the community level for
the sustainability of the planned activities. Project sustainability will be ensured through
strengthened and sustainable institutional framework based on the use of existing country systems.
CRLMP will also fully use the decentralized structure of MoFL during implementation since it
will be community-driven and Government facilitated. The use of the Provincial and District
decentralized implementation system will ensure full community participation guided by District
authorities, which will continue after the CRLMP has phased out. For sustainability, the rural
community infrastructures will be constructed or rehabilitated by the community, either using their
own workforce (cooperatives) or recruiting an artisan, with full support from the Project. The
Project will demonstrate that the livestock infrastructures can be ably managed by the community
if given the necessary support including start-up capital for the livestock pass-on scheme which
will revolve with time. The process of community engagement and participation will be a learning
pilot intervention point for the sustainability and also useful database for other potential
development projects being planned by the Government.
4.4.2. The Project will put much emphasis on developing the capacity of beneficiaries and
strengthening their institutions like interest groups, associations or cooperatives. The beneficiaries
will be mobilised, organised into viable self-reliant entities, trained and empowered to view their
activities as business rather than subsistence activity. Gender sensitisation and mainstreaming
training at the community and local administration levels will ensure that women and youth
continue to participate and benefit equally from all rural livestock development activities. Project
sustainability will also be ensured by the proactive involvement of the beneficiaries,
District/Provincial staff in participatory M&E. Through the anchor/baseline Project, the
beneficiaries will contribute towards the cost of acquiring livestock through the pass-on scheme
which will show their commitment and cultivate sense of ownership.
4.5 Risk Management
Risk Risk Mitigation Measure
Alternating El Niño and La Niña
episodes
Improved capacity for weather forecasting through
weather stations and educating farmers about the
weather patterns
High dependence on natural
resources, weak coping mechanism
Improved human skills and capacity to diversify
livelihoods
Weak farmer organizations Capacity building and training on livestock
production, community mobilization and formal
registration
Poor performance of civil works
contractors
Apply stringent evaluation methods to enforce quality
and also contract monitoring and evaluation
Inadequate MoFL technical staff Government is currently recruiting and training field
personnel within the civil service.
Weak institutional arrangements and
capacity for climate proofing
The Climate Adaptation Expert will be recruited as a
full time member of the PCT
17
4.6 Knowledge Building
The CRLMP is expected to generate considerable knowledge which will add value to the
overall design and management of similar future interventions. Lessons and experiences will be
shared within the Bank and other institutions interested in implementing similar projects through
CRLMP quarterly progress reports, audit reports, mid-term review report, and Project completion
report which will be produced and distributed, by the PCT, as these will form part of the
knowledge transfer and dissemination tools. The Project will promote the community
participation and management of the livestock infrastructures. The Project will work closely with
gender related organisations and key stakeholders for purposes of sharing information and
learning materials on women and youth empowerment in relation to livestock development. The
CRLMP will also focus on capacity building for key staff and livestock farmers (beneficiaries)
who will be fully involved in the planned activities based on the training needs assessment.
Discussion with the Project beneficiaries will also be valuable source of knowledge to be captured
and shared. Such activities will be conducted throughout the Project implementation period and
are aimed at enhancing the knowledge transfer. The CRLMP will develop guidelines, technical
messages, leaflets and training manuals on sustainable livestock management for both
Government staff and livestock farmers (men, women and youth) and also facilitate tours and
exchange visits amongst livestock-farming communities in order to share best practices in
resilient livestock development, integrating local knowledge as well as the technologies for
adaptation to climate change. The Project will also work with local NGOs and CBOs in order to
increase their capacity and knowledge so that they can ably continue implementing sustainable
livestock development activities.
V. LEGAL INSTRUMENTS AND AUTHORITY
5.1. Legal Instruments
5.1.1 The legal instrument is the GEF LDCF Grant awarded to the Republic of Zambia, as
additional funding for climate proofing of the on-going baseline project (LISP).
5.2. Conditions Associated with Bank’s Intervention
5.2.1 Conditions Precedent to Entry into Force of the GEF LDCF Grant: The LDCF Grant
Protocol Agreement shall enter into force on the date of its signature.
5.2.2 Conditions Precedent to First Disbursement: In addition to the entry into force of the
Grant, the disbursement of the first tranche of the LDCF Grant resources shall be subject to
fulfilment of the following condition:
a. Opening of a USD denominated Special Account and a local currency denominated Mirror
Account in the Bank of Zambia (§4.1.6).
5.2.3 Other Conditions: The Borrower shall:
a. within six (6) months of the signing of the Grant Agreement, provide evidence, in form
and substance satisfactory to the Bank, of opening of one (1) sub-account to be managed
by MoFL in accordance with the Bank’s financial rules and regulations at one (1) local
commercial bank in Kasama District, that is acceptable to the Bank (§4.1.6).
b. within six (6) months of the signing of the Grant Agreement, provide evidence, in form
and substance satisfactory to the Bank, of the recruitment of Climate Adaptation Expert,
with skills and qualifications acceptable to the Bank (§4.1.1).
18
5.3. Compliance with Bank Policies
This Project complies with all applicable Bank policies as well as the policies of
the GEF’s LDCF.
Non-standard conditions (if applicable): N/A
VI. RECOMMENDATION
Management recommends that the Boards of Directors approve the implementation of additional
activities financed through the GEF LDCF Grant of USD 6.21 million, to the Government of
Zambia, for the purpose of implementing the Climate Resilient Livestock Management Project
(CRLMP) and subject to the conditions stipulated in this report.
I
Appendix 1: GEF CEO Endorsement Letter for GEF-LDCF Resources
II
Appendix 2: Zambia - Comparative Socio-economic Indicators
Year Zambia AfricaDeveloping
Countries
Developed
Countries
Basic Indicators
Area ( '000 Km²) 2016 753 30,067 94,638 36,907Total Population (millions) 2016 16.7 1,214.4 3,010.9 1,407.8Urban Population (% of Total) 2016 39.7 40.1 41.6 80.6Population Density (per Km²) 2016 22.5 41.3 67.7 25.6GNI per Capita (US $) 2015 1 500 2 153 4 508 41 925Labor Force Participation *- Total (%) 2016 75.3 65.6 63.9 60.3Labor Force Participation **- Female (%) 2016 69.9 55.6 49.9 52.1Gender -Related Development Index Value 2007-2013 0.913 0.801 0.506 0.792Human Develop. Index (Rank among 187 countries) 2014 139 ... ... ...Popul. Living Below $ 1.90 a Day (% of Population) 2008-2013 64.4 42.7 14.9 ...
Demographic Indicators
Population Growth Rate - Total (%) 2016 3.1 2.5 1.9 0.4Population Growth Rate - Urban (%) 2016 4.5 3.6 2.9 0.8Population < 15 years (%) 2016 45.7 40.9 28.0 17.2Population >= 65 years (%) 2016 2.9 3.5 6.6 16.6Dependency Ratio (%) 2016 94.6 79.9 52.9 51.2Sex Ratio (per 100 female) 2016 99.7 100.2 103.0 97.6Female Population 15-49 years (% of total population) 2016 23.2 24.0 25.7 22.8Life Expectancy at Birth - Total (years) 2016 61.5 61.5 66.2 79.4Life Expectancy at Birth - Female (years) 2016 63.6 63.0 68.0 82.4Crude Birth Rate (per 1,000) 2016 39.3 34.4 27.0 11.6Crude Death Rate (per 1,000) 2016 8.4 9.1 7.9 9.1Infant Mortality Rate (per 1,000) 2015 43.3 52.2 35.2 5.8Child Mortality Rate (per 1,000) 2015 64.0 75.5 47.3 6.8Total Fertility Rate (per woman) 2016 5.2 4.5 3.5 1.8Maternal Mortality Rate (per 100,000) 2015 224.0 495.0 238.0 10.0Women Using Contraception (%) 2016 52.1 31.0 ... ...
Health & Nutrition Indicators
Physicians (per 100,000 people) 2004-2013 17.3 47.9 123.8 292.3Nurses and midwives (per 100,000 people) 2004-2013 78.4 135.4 220.0 859.8Births attended by Trained Health Personnel (%) 2010-2015 64.2 53.2 68.5 ...Access to Safe Water (% of Population) 2015 65.4 71.6 89.3 99.5Healthy life expectancy at birth (years) 2013 53.7 54.0 57 68.0Access to Sanitation (% of Population) 2015 43.9 39.4 61.2 99.4Percent. of Adults (aged 15-49) Living with HIV/AIDS 2014 12.4 3.8 ... ...Incidence of Tuberculosis (per 100,000) 2014 406.0 245.9 160.0 21.0Child Immunization Against Tuberculosis (%) 2014 95.0 84.1 90.0 ...Child Immunization Against Measles (%) 2014 85.0 76.0 83.5 93.7Underweight Children (% of children under 5 years) 2010-2014 14.8 18.1 16.2 1.1Daily Calorie Supply per Capita 2011 1 930 2 621 2 335 3 503Public Expenditure on Health (as % of GDP) 2013 2.8 2.6 3.0 7.7
Education Indicators
Gross Enrolment Ratio (%)
Primary School - Total 2010-2015 103.7 100.5 104.7 102.4 Primary School - Female 2010-2015 104.0 97.1 102.9 102.2 Secondary School - Total 2010-2015 ... 50.9 57.8 105.3 Secondary School - Female 2010-2015 ... 48.5 55.7 105.3Primary School Female Teaching Staff (% of Total) 2010-2015 53.1 47.6 50.6 82.2Adult literacy Rate - Total (%) 2010-2015 85.1 66.8 70.5 98.6Adult literacy Rate - Male (%) 2010-2015 89.7 74.3 77.3 98.9Adult literacy Rate - Female (%) 2010-2015 80.6 59.4 64.0 98.4Percentage of GDP Spent on Education 2010-2014 1.1 5.0 4.2 4.8
Environmental Indicators
Land Use (Arable Land as % of Total Land Area) 2013 5.0 8.6 11.9 9.4Agricultural Land (as % of land area) 2013 31.9 43.2 43.4 30.0Forest (As % of Land Area) 2013 65.9 23.3 28.0 34.5Per Capita CO2 Emissions (metric tons) 2012 0.2 1.1 3.0 11.6
Sources : AfDB Statistics Department Databases; World Bank: World Development Indicators; last update :
UNAIDS; UNSD; WHO, UNICEF, UNDP; Country Reports.
Note : n.a. : Not Applicable ; … : Data Not Available. * Labor force participation rate, total (% of total population ages 15+)
** Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15+)
January 2017
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
20
00
20
05
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
Infant Mortality Rate
( Per 1000 )
Zambia Africa
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
20
00
20
05
20
08
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
GNI Per Capita US $
Zambia Africa
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
200
0
200
5
200
9
201
0
201
1
201
2
201
3
201
4
201
5
Population Growth Rate (%)
Zambia Africa
01020304050607080
20
00
20
05
20
09
20
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
Life Expectancy at Birth (years)
Zambia Africa
III
Appendix 3: Zambia Portfolio, as at 30th April 2017
Long name Status Sector Name Fin.project Loan Number Window Company Name Approval Date Signature Effective ComplDate Crcy Amount Disbursed Disb.Ratio TSK MANAGER NAME
GAFSP-AGRICULTURE PRODUCTIVITY AND MARKET ENHANCEMENT PROJEC OnGo Agriculture P-ZM-AA0-019 5570155000501 [OTHERS] GAFSP Trust Fund 26-Mar-14 10-Jun-14 10-Jun-14 30-Jun-20 UAC 22,769,343.33 3,187,147.88 14.00 COOMPSON Joseph
LAKE TANGANYIKA DEVELOPMENT PROJ OnGo Agriculture P-ZM-AA0-021 2000130012932 [ ADB ] African Development Bank 18-Dec-14 10-Aug-15 4-Nov-15 30-Jun-20 UAC 16,452,899.21 3,073,835.89 18.68 MOHAMEDAHMED Siham
LAKE TANGANYIKA DEVELOPMENT PROJ OnGo Agriculture P-ZM-AA0-021 5550155000501 [OTHERS] Global Environmental Faci 18-Dec-14 10-Aug-15 10-Aug-15 30-Jun-20 UAC 5,121,638.92 733,733.31 14.33 MOHAMEDAHMED Siham
CASHEW INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT PROJECT (CIDP) OnGo Agriculture P-ZM-AA0-024 2000130014431 [ ADB ] African Development Bank 4-Nov-15 29-Mar-16 29-Jun-16 31-Dec-21 UAC 32,924,821.66 583,550.84 1.77 BANGWE Lewis Mupeta
MIC TAF GRANT LUSWISHI FARM BLOCK APVD Agriculture P-ZM-AA0-025 5500155010151 [ ADB ] Middle Inc Countries Fund 22-Mar-16 6-Jul-16 6-Jul-16 31-May-18 UAC 720,000.00 62,367.93 8.66 SILUNGWE Yappy Gregory
MIC TAF GRANT YOUTH IN AGRIBUSINESS AND AGRICULTURE COMMODIT APVD Agriculture P-ZM-AA0-026 5500155010401 [ ADB ] Middle Inc Countries Fund 26-Apr-16 10-Aug-16 10-Aug-16 31-Dec-17 UAC 790,000.00 60,046.07 7.60 SILUNGWE Yappy Gregory
FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR UPSCALING SMALLHOLDER IRRIGATION SYSTE APVD Agriculture P-ZM-AAC-007 5600155004601 [OTHERS] AfricaWater Facility Fund 20-Jun-16 15-Dec-16 15-Dec-16 15-Apr-19 UAC 1,115,289.02 0.00 0.00 NTEGE-WASSWA Maureen
LIVESTOCK INFRASTRUCTURE SUPPORT PROJECT (LISP) OnGo Agriculture P-ZM-AAE-001 2100150029293 [ ADF ] African Development Fund 19-Jun-13 8-Aug-13 30-Dec-13 31-Dec-18 UAC 12,000,000.00 4,560,722.66 38.01 BOULANOUAR Bouchaib
AQUACULTURE ENTERPRISE DEV. PROJECT APVD Agriculture P-ZM-AAF-002 2000200000602 [ ADB ] African Development Bank 18-Nov-16 17-Feb-17 15-Dec-20 UAC 33,214,172.31 0.00 0.00 OLADAPO Olagoke
STRENGTHENING CLIMATE RESILIENCE IN THE KAFUE BASIN OnGo Environment P-ZM-CZ0-001 5565130000151 [OTHERS] Strategic Climate Fund 18-Oct-13 18-Dec-13 18-Dec-13 30-Jun-19 UAC 12,804,097.31 356,876.93 2.79 DIOP Ahmadou Bamba
STRENGTHENING CLIMATE RESILIENCE IN THE KAFUE BASIN OnGo Environment P-ZM-CZ0-001 5565155000501 [OTHERS] Strategic Climate Fund 18-Oct-13 18-Dec-13 18-Dec-13 30-Jun-19 UAC 14,999,085.42 2,033,771.99 13.56 DIOP Ahmadou Bamba
LINE OF CREDIT TO DEVELOPMENT BANK OF ZAMBIA APVD Finance P-ZM-HAA-001 2000130017036 [ ADB ] African Development Bank 21-Sep-16 18-Sep-24 UAC 18,931,816.97 0.00 0.00 SEKIOUA Sofiane Hicham
LINE OF CREDIT TO DEVELOPMENT BANK OF ZAMBIA APVD Finance P-ZM-HAA-001 2000200000351 [ ADB ] African Development Bank 21-Sep-16 18-Sep-24 UAC 18,291,567.59 0.00 0.00 SEKIOUA Sofiane Hicham
LINE OF CREDIT TO FRB SUBSIDIARY, FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ZAM OnGo Finance P-ZM-HAB-022 2000130012980 [ ADB ] African Development Bank 12-Dec-12 26-Mar-15 2-Jun-15 21-May-22 UAC 32,169,745.75 32,169,745.75 100.00 ANSAH Dennis
ITEZHI-TEZHI HYDROPOWER PROJECT OnGo Power P-ZM-FAB-004 2000130008981 [ ADB ] African Development Bank 13-Jun-12 14-Apr-14 14-Apr-14 31-Dec-18 UAC 25,608,194.62 25,313,140.28 98.85 SAKALA Mdaniso Ernest
KARIBA DAM REHABILITATION OnGo Power P-Z1-FA0-075 2100150032548 [ ADF ] African Development Fund 15-Dec-14 20-Feb-15 7-Sep-15 30-Jun-26 UAC 25,200,000.00 0.00 0.00 MUGUTI Elizabeth
POWER TRANSMISSION PROJECT OnGo Power P-ZM-FA0-003 2100150027396 [ ADF ] African Development Fund 13-Jun-12 19-Dec-12 24-Sep-13 31-Dec-18 UAC 30,000,000.00 21,144,219.47 70.48 MUGUTI Elizabeth
POWER TRANSMISSION PROJECT OnGo Power P-ZM-FA0-003 2200160000989 [ NTF ] Nigerian Trust Fund 13-Jun-12 19-Dec-12 26-Jun-15 31-Dec-18 UAC 6,400,000.00 4,295,126.53 67.11 MUGUTI Elizabeth
EDUCATION FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT IN AFRICA (ESDA-NMRM) APVD Social P-ZM-IAD-002 2100150036560 [ ADF ] African Development Fund 14-Dec-16 16-Mar-17 30-Jun-21 UAC 1,220,000.00 0.00 0.00 TAKEI Keiko
SUPPORT FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION PROJECT (SSTEP/ OnGo Social P-ZM-IA0-005 2100150030194 [ ADF ] African Development Fund 20-Nov-13 2-Jun-14 7-Jan-15 31-Dec-19 UAC 22,220,000.00 4,555,098.44 20.50 MOCHACHE Jason Mosomi
SKILLS DEVELOPMENT AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP PROJECT - SUPPORTIN OnGo Social P-ZM-IE0-002 2000130014280 [ ADB ] African Development Bank 14-Oct-15 29-Mar-16 29-Jun-16 31-Dec-20 UAC 21,949,881.10 88,196.81 0.40 BESONG Raymond Eyoh
BOTSWANA/ZAMBIA-KAZUNGULA BRIDGE PROJECT OnGo Transport P-Z1-DB0-031 2100150025694 [ ADF ] African Development Fund 7-Dec-11 10-Feb-12 3-Sep-12 31-Dec-19 UAC 51,000,000.00 3,176,795.99 6.23 MALINGA Richard
CHINSALI - NAKONDE ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECT (NORTH-SOUTH OnGo Transport P-ZM-DB0-003 2000130013830 [ ADB ] African Development Bank 10-Jul-15 28-Jan-16 29-Jun-16 31-Dec-20 UAC 141,210,901.77 24,414.95 0.02 MALINGA Richard
CHINSALI - NAKONDE ROAD REHABILITATION PROJECT (NORTH-SOUTH OnGo Transport P-ZM-DB0-003 5050130000051 [OTHERS] AfricaGrowingTogetherFund 10-Jul-15 28-Jan-16 4-Oct-16 31-Dec-20 UAC 36,583,135.17 0.00 0.00 MALINGA Richard
LUSAKA SANITATION PROGRAM OnGo Water Sup/Sanit P-ZM-E00-010 2000130013680 [ ADB ] African Development Bank 24-Jun-15 29-Mar-16 7-Jul-16 31-Dec-20 UAC 36,583,135.17 752,838.98 2.06 CHINOKORO Herbert
INTEGRATED SMALL TOWNS WATER AND SANITATION PROJECT APVD Water Sup/Sanit P-ZM-E00-011 2000200000603 [ ADB ] African Development Bank 18-Nov-16 17-Feb-17 31-Dec-21 UAC 79,687,580.03 0.00 0.00 CHINOKORO Herbert
INTEGRATED SMALL TOWNS WATER AND SANITATION PROJECT APVD Water Sup/Sanit P-ZM-E00-011 2100150036393 [ ADF ] African Development Fund 18-Nov-16 17-Feb-17 31-Dec-21 UAC 7,070,000.00 0.00 0.00 CHINOKORO Herbert
INTEGRATED SMALL TOWNS WATER AND SANITATION PROJECT APVD Water Sup/Sanit P-ZM-E00-011 5050200000001 [OTHERS] AfricaGrowingTogetherFund 18-Nov-16 17-Feb-17 31-Dec-21 UAC 10,974,940.55 0.00 0.00 CHINOKORO Herbert
INTEGRATED SMALL TOWNS WATER AND SANITATION PROJECT APVD Water Sup/Sanit P-ZM-E00-011 5500155011201 [ ADB ] Middle Inc Countries Fund 18-Nov-16 26-Dec-16 31-Dec-21 UAC 1,200,000.00 0.00 0.00 CHINOKORO Herbert
TRANSFORMING RURAL LIVELIHOODS IN WESTERN ZAMBIA - NATIONAL OnGo Water Sup/Sanit P-ZM-E00-028 2000130012430 [ ADB ] African Development Bank 10-Sep-14 12-Jun-15 10-Sep-15 31-Dec-19 UAC 11,340,771.90 909,218.19 8.02 CHINOKORO Herbert
TRANSFORMING RURAL LIVELIHOODS IN WESTERN ZAMBIA - NATIONAL OnGo Water Sup/Sanit P-ZM-E00-028 5800155001401 [OTHERS] Rural Water Supply & Sani 10-Sep-14 7-Jan-15 7-Jan-15 31-Dec-19 UAC 2,788,222.55 651,353.49 23.36 CHINOKORO Herbert
TRANSFORMING RURAL LIVELIHOODS IN WESTERN ZAMBIA - NATIONAL OnGo Water Sup/Sanit P-ZM-E00-028 6540654001082 [OTHERS] OPEC-Org of Pet Exp Cntrs 29-Jun-15 29-Jun-15 29-Jun-15 31-Dec-19 UAC 10,243,277.85 0.00 0.00 CHINOKORO Herbert
MULTIPURPOSE SMALL DAMS OnGo Water Sup/Sanit P-ZM-EAZ-002 5600155002951 [OTHERS] AfricaWater Facility Fund 4-Sep-12 28-May-13 28-Aug-13 28-Nov-17 UAC 756,803.26 666,783.51 88.11 CHINOKORO Herbert
744,341,321 108,398,986 15%TOTAL
IV
Appendix 4a: Description of On-going LISP Components (Anchor/Baseline Project)
No Component
Name
Total Cost
(UA million)
Component Description
1 Livestock
Infrastructure
Development
9.31
(67.9%)
Sub-component 1: Rural Community Infrastructure Support
156 demand-driven livestock service centres tier 1 constructed.
16 livestock service centres tier 1+ constructed/rehabilitated.
5 livestock service centres tier 2 constructed.
3 milk collection centres constructed/rehabilitated.
2 livestock market centres constructed.
8 livestock slaughter facilities constructed.
Sub-component 2: Public Infrastructure Support
80 km of feeder road rehabilitated.
2 Regional veterinary laboratories rehabilitated.
7 District veterinary laboratories rehabilitated.
2 veterinary quarantine stations established.
2 livestock service centres tier 3 constructed (within existing
Government livestock ranches/breeding centres).
2 veterinary check points constructed.
3 veterinary check points (with boom gate only) constructed.
Assorted equipment for CVRI’s Public Health Laboratory.
2 Capacity
Building 3.42
(25.0%)
Sub-component 1: Support to Participating Institutions
Consultancies (including NGO services) on pilot livestock-pass on
scheme and biogas digesters, forage production and management
and local training-institutions.
Community mobilisation activities and formation of groups and
cooperatives.
Procurement of office equipment and furniture.
Staff and farmer training on livestock management (at least 50%
women).
Support to Livestock Information Management System (LIMS)
under National Livestock and Epidemiological Information Centre
(NALEIC).
Pilot livestock stocking (cattle and goats).
Livestock management-field demonstration centres.
Pasture and rangeland management (within LSC Tier 3).
Environmental and social management.
Sub-component 2: Women/youth Empowerment
Formation/strengthening of 45 women/youth groups.
Income generating activities (small-stock pass-on scheme) for 27
participating women and youth groups.
Training and empowerment of 18 women and youth groups in skin
and hides processing units (leather and leather products - mini
backyards vegetable tanneries).
Nutrition, HIV/AIDS and malaria awareness (at least 50% women)
Artisan (youth) training for maintenance of LSC tier 1.
3 Project
Management 0.98
(7.1%)
Project management including supervision.
Progress review meetings including MTR and PCR.
Financial management including audit.
Support to PCT - recruitment of professional and support staff.
Participatory monitoring and evaluation (M&E).
Total 13.71
V
Appendix 4b: Results-Based Logical Framework for the On-going Zambia LISP (Anchor Project)
Country and Project Name: Zambia – Livestock Infrastructure Support Project (LISP)
Purpose of the project: To improve smallholder livestock production, productivity, market linkages and household income.
RESULTS CHAIN
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS MEANS OF
VERIFICATION
RISKS /MITIGATION
MEASURES Indicator (including CSI) Baseline Target
IMP
AC
T
1.1 Contribute to poverty
reduction
1.1 Proportion of population living in poverty
Baseline 2012
1.1. 70%
Target 2020
1.1. 65%
Poverty Reduction
Strategy Paper Household surveys
OU
TC
OM
ES
2.1 Decreased prevalence of
the main diseases
2.1. Prevalence rates for CBPP, FMD, ASF and
NCD (%)
Baseline 2012
2.1. CBPP (0.03), FMD (0.35), ASF (0.10) and NCD (0..25)
Target 2019
2.1. CBPP (0.02), FMD (0.30), ASF (0.09) and NCD (0.20)
Periodical
epidemiological
surveys (for prevalence rates).
Project reports.
2.2 Improved livestock
performance.
2.3 Improved income of
livestock farmers including women/youth
2.2.1 Average population increase rate (%) for cattle, goats and chickens
2.2.2 Carcass weight (kg) for cattle and goats
2.2.3 Milk production (litres/year) per cow 2.3 Average annual income of livestock farmers
2.2.1 Cattle (6.3), goats (12) and chickens (15)
2.2.2 Cattle (126) and goats (18)
2.2.3 Milk (1,500) 2.3 USD 364
2.2.1 Cattle (10), goats (15) and chickens (22)
2.2.2 Cattle (168) and goats (23)
2.2.3 Milk (2,500) 2.3 USD 512
OU
TP
UT
S
3. Livestock Infrastructure
Development
3.1 Rural Community
Infrastructures improved
3.2 Public infrastructures improved
4. Capacity building
4.1 Farmers and staff
empowered/trained
5. Project Management
5.1 Project properly managed.
3.1.1 Number of LSCs Tier 1, 1+ & 2
3.1.2 Number of milk collection centre
3.1.3 Number of livestock marketing centres
3.1.4 Number of slaughter facilities
3.2.1 Length (km) of all-weather feeder roads 3.2.2 Number of laboratories
3.2.3 Number of small quarantine stations
3.2.4 Number of LSC Tier 3 3.2.5 Number of veterinary check points
4.1.1 Number of farmers & staff trained.
4.1.2 No of livestock cooperatives formed. 4.1.3 Number of rural households reached.
4.1.4 No. of women/youth livestock groups (pass-on
scheme) formed.
4.1.5 No. of women/youth hides/skins processing
groups formed.
5.1.1 Number of quarterly progress reports 5.1.2 Number of mid-term review reports
5.1.3 Number of audit reports per year
5.1.4 Number of procurement plans per year 5.1.5 Number of work plans per year
5.1.6 Disbursement rate (average per year)
Project Area – Baseline 2013
3.1.1 30
3.1.2 2
3.1.3 0
3.1.4 2 3.2.1 0
3.2.2 2
3.2.3 0 3.2.4 0
3.2.5 1
4.1.1 0
4.1.2 0
4.1.3 0 4.1.4 0
4.1.5 0
5.1.1 0 5.1.2 0
5.1.3 0
5.1.4 0 5.1.5 0
5.1.6 0
Project Area - Target 2018
3.1.1 177
3.1.2 3
3.1.3 2
3.1.4 8 3.2.1 80
3.2.2 9
3.2.3 2 3.2.4 2
3.2.5 5
4.1.1 100,000 farmers & 120 staff (>50% female)
4.1.2 248 by year 5
4.1.3 190,000 HH (33,600 Female HH) 4.1.4 27
4.1.5 18
5.1.1 4 per year 5.1.2 1 (project life)
5.1.3 1
5.1.4 1 5.1.5 1
5.1.6 20%
Project reports
Risk: Incompetent
Contractors
Mitigation: (i) use
stringent evaluation
process, and (ii) follow-up contract execution.
Risk: Low Livestock Population
Mitigation: Continued
GoZ restocking programme.
Risk: PCT base in Lusaka.
Mitigation: The core
PCT staff will be based in the project area
(Kasama District), about
800km from Lusaka for effective project
supervision.
KE
Y
AC
TIV
ITIE
S
Components Inputs
Component 1: Livestock Infrastructure Development (UA 9.31 million, 67.9%) Component 2: Capacity Building (UA 3.42 million, 25.0%)
Component 3: Project Management (UA 0.98 million, 7.1%)
Total: UA 13.71 million
Project Total Cost: UA 13.71 million
ADF loan: UA 12.00 million (87.6%).
Government: UA 1.69 million (12.3%).
Beneficiaries: UA 0.02 million (0.1%).
VI
Appendix 5: Map of the Project Area