Post on 27-Mar-2021
STATISTICS BRIEF
1
INTRODUCTION
In March 2018 automated metros reached the 1,000km milestone with the opening of the Pu-jiang Line in Shanghai. As of December 2018, nearly a quarter of the world’s metro systems have at least one fully automated line in operation. In total, there are 64 fully automated metro lines in 42 cities, operating 1,026km, a 27.7% increase in km over the 2016 World Report figures. The next
years will however overshadow this achievement: if confirmed projects advance to plan, by 2023 the number of automated metro km in the world is set to triple, with most of the growth taking place in China. This Statistics Brief offers a general over-view of the world metro automation landscape to-day and its expected future evolution.
WORLD REPORT ON METRO AUTOMATION
2018
Figure 1: Cities with fully automated metro lines in operation, as of 31 December 2018
LilleRennes
ToulouseUijeongbu
YonginIncheonGuangzhou
NagoyaYokohama
Tokyo
OsakaKobe
Taipei
TurinMilan
BresciaBudapest
Istanbul
NurembergCopenhagen
Lyon
Miami
São Paulo
Barcelona
ParisLausanne
SeoulBeijing
Hong Kong
Kuala LumpurSingapore
Rome
Vancouver
BusanShanghai
Daegu
Dubai
Queens (NY)
Detroit
JacksonvilleLas Vegas
Santiago de Chile
High capacity lines: more than 700 passengers per train Medium capacity lines: 300 to 700 passengers per train Low capacity lines: under 300 passengers per train
2
The 64 fully automated metro lines in operation in De-cember 2018 provide public transport service to over 1,026km and 1,026 metro stations in 42 cities across the world. Asia has consolidated its status as the leading world re-gion in metro automation (see Figure 2) with 50% of the km of fully automated metro lines in operation, thanks in particular to the opening of five new lines (in Korea, Ma-laysia and China) in the last two years. Europe remains second at 30%, with North America and Middle East following at 11% and 8% respectively. Last in the chart, Latin America has however experienced one of the high-est relative growth rates, with the opening of Line 6 in Santiago.
At city level, Singapore remains the largest automated metro network, with 126km of automated lines (see Fig-ure 5). After Dubai, Singapore has implemented one of the largest network expansions in the last decade (see Figure 6). With the exception of Lille and Paris, today’s largest networks have also experienced the highest rates of growth in the last 10 years.
Four countries concentrate half of the world’s km of fully automated metro lines: South Korea, France, Singapore and Malaysia (see Figure 3). The same three Asian coun-tries, together with the United Arab Emirates, also lead in growth in the last decade (see Figure 4).
INFRASTRUCTURE
Asia-Pacific
Europe
NorthAmerica
MENALatin America
50%
30%
11%
8% 1%
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Sout
h Ko
rea
Fran
ce
Sing
apor
e
Mala
ysia
UAE
Can
ada
Japa
n
Italy
U.S
.A.
Chin
a
Spain
Chi
nese
Taip
ei
Ger
man
y
Den
mar
k
Turk
ey
Chil
e
Braz
ilH
unga
ry
Switz
erlan
d
13 27
6747
18 2911 7
161
80 7768
4934 32 30 25 18
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
Sout
h Ko
rea
UAE
Sing
apor
e
Mala
ysia
Italy
Spain
Chi
na
Can
ada
Chi
nese
Taip
ei
Turk
ey
Extension New Line
29333436
4247
7980
97126
0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140Incheon
ParisBarcelona
BusanSeoul
LilleVancouver
DubaiKuala Lumpur
Singapore
27
67
47
1329
11
80 77
68
4236 34
30 2925 24
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Dub
ai
Sing
apor
e
Kuala
Lum
pur
Seou
l
Busa
n
Barc
elona
Vanc
ouve
r
Inch
eon
Taipe
i
Dae
gu
Extension New Line
Figure 2 : Automated metros per world region, measured as a % of km in operation
Figure 3 : Fully automated metros per country/territory, measured in km
Figure 4: Top 10 countries/territories in building fully automated metros in the last 10 years, measured in km
Figure 5: Top 10 cities with fully automated metros in operation, measured in km
Figure 6: Top 10 Automated metro networks with largest growth in the last 10 years, measured in km
3
CAPACITYInitially deployed in low capacity lines, currently 75% of the world’s automated metro infrastructure operate me-dium and high capacity trains, a trend that continues to accelerate (see Figure 7). Using train capacity as an in-dicator, most high capacity systems are deployed in Asia and Europe, and it is significant to note that this is the only typology present in Latin America (see Figure 8).
SIGNALLING TECHNOLOGYCommunications Based Train Control (CBTC) is the dominant signalling solution for fully automated metro lines: 72% of the world’s km of automated metros are operated under CBTC systems (Figure 9). 87% of the fully automated metro infrastructure inaugurated in the last decade was equipped with CBTC.
Thales remains the market leader for fully automated lines, with close to 330km of automated metro equipped, in its majority, in mid-capacity lines. Siemens follows with over 250km, of which approximately half corresponds to high capacity lines (see Figure 10).
CHARACTERISTICS & TRENDS
326km
433km
267km
+46%
+39%
+15%
250 200 150 100 50 2009
50 100 150 200 250 300 350
Capacity(pax per train)
>700300-700<300
©UITP 2019
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
Asia-Pacific Europe North America Middle East Latin America
Capacity(pax per train)
>700300-700<300
512
293
11680
2526%
35%
39%
33%
32%
35%
69%
+87%
+13%
734km
292km
300 200 100 2009
100 200 300 400 500 600
CBTCNon-CBTC
©UITP 2019
Thales
Siemens
Bombardier
Alstom
AnsaldoSTS
Kobelco
Kyosan
Beijing Tra�c Control Technology Others
32%
25%
13%
8%
7%
6%2%
1% 6%
Figure 7: Automated metros per train capacity, measured in km, and inaugu-rated metros in the last decade, measured as a % of km
Figure 8: Automated metros per world region and per train capacity, measured as a % of km in operation
Figure 9: CBTC vs non-CBTC signalling solutions for fully automated me-tros, measured as km equipped and % of km inaugurated in the last decade
Figure 10: Signalling suppliers of fully automated metro lines, measured as % of km equipped
4
ROLLING STOCK MARKET In 2018, 13 rolling stock suppliers share the market for fully automated metro lines. While Bombardier, Siemens and Alstom trains serve over 50% of the km of automat-ed metro in operation (see Figure 11), the last two years also saw three new suppliers entering the market: CAF, CRRC Qingdao Sifang Co Ltd. and Changchun Railway Vehicles Co., Ltd/Norinco.
CONSTRUCTION MODELUnlike conventional metro systems, where underground alignments remain predominant (67% of all stations), au-tomated metro lines underground and elevated stations are almost equally split (see Figure 12). However, 60% of the stations inaugurated in the last decade correspond to underground alignments. When considering the wheel/rail interface system, a majority of lines opt for steel wheels, as opposed to rubber tyres: in the last decade, close to 75% of new automated metro infrastructure corresponded to steel wheel systems.
PLATFORM TRACK PROTECTION SYSTEMS Platform screen doors (PSD) remain the dominant solu-tion over track intrusion detection systems (see Figure 13) to ensure the safety of the platform/track interface in fully automated metro lines. Currently, 77% of stations in automated metro lines in operation are equipped with platform screen doors (and 87% of the stations built in the last decade).
Bombardier Transportation
Siemens Transportation
Systems
Alstom
Hyundai Rotem
Hitachi
Kinki Sharyo
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries
Others
10%6%
7%
9%
12%14%
18%
24%
+40%
+60%
485 stations
541 stations
300 200 100 2009
100 200 300 400
ElevatedUnderground
©UITP 2019
+87%*
+14%*
790 stations
241 stations
350 250 150 50 50 150 250 350 450 550
PSDNon-PSD
2009
©UITP 2019
Fully automated metro lines represent 7% of the world’s metro infrastructure in operation. This comparatively small figure is the outcome of a relatively short time span of exponential growth, especially when considering the 150 years of conventional metro history. In the 37 years since the implementation of the first automated metro line, their growth rate has accelerated with each passing decade, with 2018 marking a significant inflection point. In the next five years, it is expected that full automation will become the mainstream design for greenfield met-ro lines, increasing from the current share of 10% of km of metro infrastructure in planning and construction, to 48% by 2022.
GROWTH
Figure 11: Automated rolling stock suppliers, measured as % of km equipped
Figure 12: Construction model of automated metro lines (total number of elevated stations vs underground stations, and % of growth in the last decade)
Figure 13: Platform Screen Doors vs. non-PSD (Total stations equipped & % of new stations in the last decade)
In the next 5 years, a further 2,000km will be commissioned, tripling what it took 35 years to achieve so far.
* The percentages add up to more than 100% as five lines on Line 1 in Paris are equipped with both PSD and non-PSD systems.
5
CONVERSION PROJECTS
Following the successful conversion projects of Nuremberg (2009) and Paris L1 (2012), seven Euro-pean cities have confirmed conversion projects in the coming decade:
Brussels, L1&5 Glasgow, G. Subway London, Docklands Lyon, LA & LB Marseille, L1 & L2 Paris, L4 Vienna, U2/U5
These represent 7% of the projected growth, a rel-atively low percentage that can be attributed to the complexity of implementing full automation in an ex-isting line while in operation. This difficulty, however, is not unique to full automation: brownfield re-signalling projects are also highly challenging.
With over 140 metro lines inaugurated in the 70s and 80s reaching critical asset replacement needs, the comparative advantages of full automation (see the Automation benefits section) should weigh increas-ingly in the strategic choices that networks face when considering these modernisation programmes. It is therefore expected that the market for conversions will grow.
Forecasts based on confirmed projects indicate that by 2028 there will be over 3,800km of automated metro lines in operation (figure 14). Most of this growth corre-sponds to the expected opening of 87 new lines, or ex-
tensions of existing lines, with conversion projects rep-resenting only under 7% of the new infrastructure, all of them in Europe (see box).
© RATP
Figure 14: Total growth in Automated metros, measured as km in operation
1,837
4,007
93 206539
1,026
0
1,000
2,000
3,000
4,000
1980 1985 1990 1995 2000 2005 2010 2015 2018 2020 2025 2030
Km in operation
Projected growth
NOV2017
971 KmSantiago
DEC2017
982 KmIstanbul
DEC2017
996 KmBeijing
MARCH2018
+1,000 KmShanghai
6
The largest share of the growth will be located in Asia, which is set to quadruple the number of km in operation in the next decade and represents, on its own, half of the projected growth. This is mostly thanks to the explosive emergence of automated metro projects in China (see China in Focus section).
At a relative distance follow MENA and Europe (see fig-ure 15). In 2028, Asia is expected to represent 53% of the world’s km of automated metro, followed by Europe (21%) and the Middle East (15%).
Figure 15: Current length of automated metro lines and projected growth for the next decade, per world region
© Metro Istanbul
512
303
116 80 15
1,489
611
99
428
170
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Asia-Pacific Europe North America MENA Latin America
Current km in operation
Projected growth in km in operation (2028)
7
CHINA IN FOCUS
Following the inauguration in December 2017 in Bei-jing of China’s first fully automated metro line built with domestic technology, Chinese cities have em-braced full automation for their growing networks. A further 37 metro lines are designed for full automat-ed operation are planned to open in the coming five years.By 2023, it is expected that 19 networks in mainland China will have 40 lines designed for full automation, totalling over 1,200km and 861 stations. In keeping with Asian metro trends, these lines will be relatively long (average of 32.5km, above the Asian metro line average of 26km), with long inter-station distances (1.4km).
This development is supported by a government policy comprising the following elements:
Mandatory CBTC for metro signalling Reservation of exclusive bandwidth 2.4 GHz for metro CBTC applications
Commissioning a consortium of Chinese universi-ties to prepare interoperable CBTC specifications, fostering a competitive domestic market
As of 2018, five Chinese CBTC suppliers have in their portfolio GoA2 systems, however with the open-ing of the Yanfang line in December 2017, they have demonstrated their ability to supply the GoA4 market. The appetite is reflected in the above figures, with only a few projects involving global traditional suppliers.
144
0 50 100 150 200GuangzhouHong Kong
MacauNanningWuhanFuzhouTaiyuan
HefeiNanjingHohhot
JinanZhengzhou
ChangchunWuhu
LuoyangChengduShenzen
BeijingShanghai
HarbinSuzhou
THE CASE FOR AUTOMATION
At the forefront of innovation, automation must howev-er be understood not as a purely technological project, but as a company project. In the wake of the digitalisation wave and the new smart mobility scenario, automation provides companies with a lever to attain strategic goals linked to a more human, customer orientated and flexible service.
According to the analysis of the experienced networks of the UITP Observatory of Automated Metros, full au-tomated operation (FAO) supports these goals facili-tating improved performances in five key areas that are essential to any metro network: improve the mobility of-fer, enhance safety, contribute to the economic balance of the system, reduce its ecological imprint and provide improved customer service while enhancing staff satis-faction.
Figure 16: Expected automated metro lines in operation in mainland China by 2023, measured in km
Rue Sainte-Marie 6, B-1080 Brussels, Belgium | Tel +32 (0)2 673 61 00 | Fax +32 (0)2 660 10 72 | info@uitp.org | www.uitp.org
This is an official Statistics Brief of UITP, the International Association of Public Transport. UITP has more than 1,600 member companies in 99 countries throughout the world and represents the interests of key players in this sector. Its membership includes transport authorities, operators, both private and public, in all modes of collective passenger transport, and the industry. UITP addresses the economic, technical, organisation and management aspects of passenger transport, as well as the development of policy for mobility and public transport worldwide.
DIGITAL VERSION AVAIL ABLE ON
© UITP - All rights reserved - Responsible Publisher: Mohamed Mezghani, Rue Sainte Marie 6, B-1080 Brussels, Belgium - Legal deposit: D/2019/0105/08
This Statistics Brief was prepared by the Observatory of Automated Metros. Data is valid as of 31 December 2018.
APRIL | 2019
cluded in the above statistics run with trains with a total capacity of at least 100 passengers per train. Systems based on monorail or Maglev technology are included if they meet all other criteria.Infrastructure growth predictions are based on published information for confirmed projects. The data in this Statistics Brief is sourced from the database of automated metro lines of the UITP Observatory of Automated Metros. The figures presented are constantly reviewed in light of addi-tional information and as such, some of the histor-ical data presented in this publication may slightly differ from previously published ones. The Obser-vatory gathers the world’s leading operators with experience in full automated metro operation. It exchanges best practices in key issues affecting au-tomated metro operation and monitors the global evolution and trends on this field.
For more information on the Observatory work, and fur-ther content on metro automation, consult the Observatory website: www.metroautomation.org
DEFINITION AND METHODOLOGY
This Statistics Brief exclusively covers fully auto-mated metro lines, defined as those metro lines de-signed for operation without staff on board of the trains - a defining characteristic is the absence of a driver’s cabin on the train. This type of opera-tion is also known as Unattended Train Operation, or Grade of Automation 4 in standard IEC 62267 (see table below). Moreover, only lines in public transport service have been considered.Metros are high capacity urban rail systems, run-ning on an exclusive right-of-way. Metro lines in-
Grade of Automation
Type of train
operation
Setting train
in motion
Stopping train
Door closure
Operation in event of disruption
GoA1 ATP* with driver Driver Driver Driver Driver
GoA2 ATP and
ATO* with driver
Automatic Automatic Driver Driver
GoA3 Driverless Automatic Automatic Train attendant
Train attendant
GoA4 UTO Automatic Automatic Automatic Automatic
*ATP - Automatic Train Protection; ATO - Automatic Train Operation
FLEXIBILITY
CUSTOMERORIENTED
JOB POSITIONS
ENERGYEFFICIENCY CAPEX
PASSENGER PROTECTION
OPEX
HUMAN ERROR
CAPACITYAVAILABILITY
MOBILITY
HUM
ANIT
Y
ECOLOGY AFFORDABILITY
SAFETY
Figure 17: The five key benefits of fully automated operation declined in 10 areas, as identified by the experts of the Observatory of Automated Metros*
BENEFITS OF FULLY AUTOMATED METRO OPERATION
* For a more detailed analysis, refer to the Metro automation benefits Knowledge Brief (planned for release by June 2019).