Post on 02-Jun-2018
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
1/58
Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road
Page 1 of 5
Form No. Description of the Form
1 Material Source
2 Particle Size Analysis of Fills
3 Chart for Determining Values of 'K' Used in Particle Size Analysis of Fills
4 Atterberg Limits
5 Dry Density vs. Moisture Content Relationship Using 2.5 kg Rammer
6 Dry Density vs. Moisture Content Relationship Using 4.54 kg Rammer
7 Field Density Test of Fill Materials by Sand Replacement Method
8 Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Determination of Unit Weight)
9 Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Penetration Test and Determination of Swelling)
10 Laboratory C.B.R. Test (Soaked CBR Results)
11 Specific Gravity Test on Soils
12 Determination of Moisture Content of Soil by Oven Drying
13 Calibration of Sand and Sand Cone Apparatus
14 Particle Size Analysis of Aggregates for Subbase
15 Particle Size Analysis of Aggregates for Lower Base(Crushed Rock or Boulder or Crushed Over Burnt Bricks)
16 Particle Size Analysis of Crushed Gravel Aggregates for Lower Base17 Particle size Analysis of Aggregates for Upper Base
18 Specific Gravity & Water Absorption of Aggregates
19 Abrasion Test on Small Size Coarse Aggregate by Use of Los Angeles Machine
20 Density Correction Chart for Coarse Particles in the Soil Compaction Test
21 Field Density Test for Subbase and Bases by Sand Replacement Method
22 Determination of Total Moisture Content of Aggregate by Drying
23 Materials Finer Than # 200 Sieve by Washing
24 Sieve Analysis of Filler
25 Particle Size Analysis of Combined Aggregates for Binder Course
26 Particle Size Analysis of Combined Aggregates for Wearing Course
27 Soundness of Aggregates by Use of Sodium Sulphate
28 Sand Equivalent Test
29 Stripping Test by AASHTO Method: T 182
30 Quantities of Bituminous Prime & Tack Coats
31 Crushed Aggregates of (>2) Fractured Faces (+ 4.75mm, visual)
32 Penetration Test on Bituminous Materials
33 Specific Gravity of Semi-Solid Bituminous Materials
34 Bituminous Extraction & Gradation of Hot Mix
35 Field Density Test of Cored Asphalt Concrete
36 Maximum Specdific Gravity of Bituminous Paving Mixtures
37 Asphalt Concrete Hot Mix Design by Marshall Method
38 Determination of the Presence of Organic Impurities in Fine Aggregate
40 Determination of Compressive Strength of Concrete Cubes
41 Sieve Analysis of Fine Aggregate for Cement Concrete
42 Sieve Analysis of 20mm Coarse Aggregate for Cement Concrete
43 Determination of Flakiness Index
44 Aggregate Crushing Value (ACV) of Coarse Aggregate
45 Clay Lumps and Friable Particles
46 Determination of Slump of Fresh Concrete
47 Normal Consistency and Setting Time of Cement
48 Compressive Strength of Hydraulic Cement Mortar
50 Deflection Test by Benkelman Beam Method
51 Concrete Pouring Record
52 Request for Inspection / Survey / Quality Test
53 MDD vs. Location
54 Sample Record Card
List of Test Forms
WORKSHEETS FOR TESTING
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
2/58
Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road
Page 2 of 58
Form No. Description of the Form
List of Test Forms
R1 Test Report of Ordinary Fill Material
R2 Test Report of Selected Fill (Improved Subgrade) MaterialR3 Test Report of Aggregate Subbase Material
R4 Test Report of Aggregate Lower Base Material
R5 Test Report of Aggregate Upper Base Material
R6 Test Report of Fine Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete
R7 Test Report of Coarse Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete
R8 Test Report of Combined Aggregate for Asphalt Concrete Binder & Wearing Courses
R9 Test Report of Asphalt Concrete Binder Course Mixture
R10 Test Report of Asphalt Concrete Wearing Course Mixture
R11 Test Report of Fine Aggregate for Cement Concrete
R12 Test Report of Coarse Aggregate for Cement Concrete
R13 Test Report of Compressive Strength of ConcreteR14 Test Report of Bitumen
R15 Test Report of Portland Cement
C1 One Monthly Balance Scale Value Check
C2 Six Monthly Balance Repeatability Check
C3 Balance Check Departure from Nominal Value
C4 Balance Check For The Effect of Off-Centre Loading
C5 Clibration of Thermometers
C6 Speedy/Oven Dry Moisture Content Comparison
C7 Batch Plant Calibration Departure from Nominal Value
C8 Batch Plant Calibration Repeatability Check
C9 Calibration of Liquid Limit Apparatus
C10 Calibration of Moulds
C11 Calibration of Tamping Rod
C12 Calibration of Compaction Rammer
C13 Calibration of Sieves of Openings > 2mm
C14 Calibration of Dial Gauges
C15 Calibration of Slump Cones
WORKSHEETS FOR CALIBRATION
SHEETS FOR REPORTING TEST RESULTS
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
3/58
Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road
Page 3 of 58
* 1
* 2
* 3
* 4
* 5
* 6
* 7
* 8
* 9
* 10
* 11
7A
* 12
* 13
* 14
* 15
* 16
* 17
* 18
*
* 19
*
*
*
*
* 24
* 25
* 26
* 27
* 28
*
* 29
* 30
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
4/58
Ayni-Panjakent-Uzbekistan Border Road
Page 4 of 58
WS -
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
5/58
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
6/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Location:.......................... Date of Sampling............
Material Type: .. Date of Testing:
Determination Number
Container Number
Number of Blows
Wt. of Can & Wet Soil (gm)
Wt. of Can & Dry Soil (gm)
Wt. of Water (1-2 = 3) (gm)
Wt. of Can (gm)
Wt. of Dry Soil (2-4=5) (gm)
Moisture Content (3/5)x100%
Results:
Remarks:
Tested By: Witnessed by:Contractor Consultant
Plasticity Index %Liquid Limit % Plastic Limit %
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
ATTERBERG LIMITS
6
2
3
4
5
LIQUID LIMIT PLASTIC LIMIT
1
WS - 1
Form No. WS 1 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
7/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Description of Material: Date of Testing:
Blows / Layer: ________ No. of Layers: _______ Wt. of Rammer: ... kg. Drop ht.: . mm
Mould Dia: __________ mm Mould Height: ___________ mm Vol. of Mould: _______ x 10-6
m3
Density Determination
Initial weight g
Initial moisture content %
Water added g
Target moisture content %
Weight of mould + wet mat'l g
Weight of mould g
Weight of wet mat'l g
Bulk density
Dry density
Determination of Moisture ContentMoisture container No.
Container + wet mat'l g
Container + dry mat'l g
Water g
Container g
Dry mat'l g
Moisture content %
Optimum MC = %
Oversize fraction (+19mm= %
Moisture content, %
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
Drydensity,
t/m
3
g/cm3
g/cm3
4 5 6
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
DRY DENSITY vs. MOISTURE CONTENT RELATIONSHIP USING 4.54 KG RAMMER
Max. dry density = g/cm3
Dry density / moisture content relationship curve
Determination No. 1 2 3
WS - 2
Form No. WS 2 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
8/58
TEST INFORMATION :
Chainage: Lab Ref. No.:
Elevation: Date Requested:
Layer Thickness: Request No.:
Width: Date of Testing:
PREVIOUS LAYER INFORMATION : Lab Ref. No.:
Elevation:
Location of Test Done:
RESULTS:
Test Hole Location: Chainage
Offset
Weight of wet sample from hole, mw g
Depth of test hole g
Weight of sand + cylinder before test, m1 g
Weight of sand + cylinder after test, m4 g
Weight of sand in hole + cone, m1- m4 g
Weight of sand in cone, m2 g
Weight of sand in hole, mb = (m1- m4- m2) g
Bulk density of sand, ga g/cm3
Ratio, R = mw / mb
Bulk density of sample, gb= R x ga g/cm3
Dry density, gd =100gb / (100 + W) g/cm3
Can No.
Weight of can + wet sample, P g
Weight of can + dry sample, Q g
Weight of water, R = P - Q g
Weight of can, C g
Weight of dry sample, Md = Q - C g
Water content, W = 100 R / Md %
Maximum dry density (MDD) g/cm3
OMC (lab value) %
MDD Test Reference (Lab Ref. No.)% Compaction, 100 gd / MDD %
Specified compaction %
Results
Remarks :
Tested by : Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
DETERMINATION OF DEGREE OF COMPACTION
MOISTURE CONTENT DETERMINATION
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
FIELD DENSITY TEST OF FILL MATERIALS BY SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD
FIELD DENSITY DETERMINATION
WS - 3
Form No. WS 3 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
9/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Location:
Description of Material: Date of Testing:
MDD: OMC:
Data for Unit Weight (before soaking) :
(g)
(g)
(g)
ml
g/cm3
t/m3
Compaction Achieved %
Data for Moisture content
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(g)
(%)
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
Container No.
Wt. of Dry Soil
Moisture Content
Wt. of Container + Wet Soil
Wt. of Container + Dry Soil
Wt. of Moisture
Wt. of Container
Wt. of Mould
Wt. of Wet Soil
Volume of Mould
Wet Unit Weight
Dry Unit Weight
Mould No.
Mould No.
No. of layers
No. of blows per layer
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST (DETERMINATION OF UNIT WEIGHT)
Wt. of Wet soil + Mould
WS - 4
Form No. WS 4
Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
10/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Description of Material: Date of Testing:
SWELL DATA :
0
1
2
3
4
SOAKING DATA
Wt. of dry soil in mould
MOISTURE CONTENT (AFTER SOAKING)
Can No
PENETRATION TEST DATA Ring No. __________
Proving Ring Factor :
Tested by : Witnessed by:
(Contractor)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST (PENETRATION TEST AND DETERMINATION OF SWELLING)
Mould No.
Specimen location T M B
Mould No.
BB T M
0.500 in (12.70mm)
0.300 in (7.62mm)
0.400 in (10.16mm)
0.200 in (5.08mm)
0.150 in (3.81mm)
0.100 in (2.54mm)
0.075 in (1.91mm)
0.050 in (1.27mm)
Load, kN Load Dial Div. Load, kN Load Dial Div. Load, kN
0.025 in (0.64mm)
Av. Moisture Content %
PenetrationMould No. Mould No. Mould No.
Load Dial Div.
Moisture Content %
Wt. of dry soil
Wt. of Can
Wt. of Water
Wt. of dry soil + Can
Wt. of wet soil + Can
T M
Water absorbed
% Water absorbed
Wt. of soil + mould + base- plate
(before soaking)Wt. of soil + mould + base- plate
(after soaking)
Gauge
Reading
Swell
(mm)% Swell
Gauge
Reading
Swell
(mm)% Swell
Day &
Month
Time &
Day
Time
Elapsed
(Days)
Mould No.. Ht. mm Mould No.. Ht. mm Mould No.. Ht. mm
Gauge
Reading
Swell
(mm)% Swell
WS - 5
Form No. WS 5 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
11/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Material Type: Date of testing:
Result:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
SoakedCBR%
LABORATORY C.B.R. TEST (SOAKED CBR RESULTS)
Load,kN
Load,kN
10 Blows/Layer 30 Blows/Layer
65 Blows/Layer Dry Density vs. Soaked CBR
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
Penetration, mm Dry Density, g/cm3
Penetration, mm Penetration, mm
Load,kN
WS - 6
Form No. WS 6 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
12/58
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
13/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Location: Date of Sampling:
Description of Material: Date of Testing:
Representative Area: Dry Weight:
Mode of Drying (Oven dry / Fry pan):
Sample ID / Lab Ref. No.
Container No.
Weight of wet aggregate + container g
Weight of dry aggregate + container g
Weight of water in aggregate g
Drying started: h-m
Drying finished: h-m
Period of drying h-m
Weight of container g
Weight of dry aggregate g
Water content %
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
DETERMINATION OF TOTAL MOISTURE CONTENT OF AGGREGATE BY DRYING
WS - 7A
Form No. 7A Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
14/58
Calibration Ref.No.:
Description of Sand: Date of Calibration:
Dimension of Mould(mm): Diam. = Ht. =
Room Temparature: = C Ambient Temp.= C Relative Humidity = %
Volume of Mould
Sand in Cone with Base Plate
Unit Weight of Sand
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
1
2
3 Weight of Water (2-1)
5
6
7
321Determination No.:
Weight of Empty Mould + Glass Plate
Weight of Mould Filled with Water + Glass Plate
4
Temparature Correction
Volume of Mould, cm3
Average Volume of mould, cm3
Temparature of Filling Water, C
7
8
9
10
Weight of Apparatus + Sand before Pouring, g
Weight of Apparatus + Sand after Pouring, g
Weight of Sand in Cone + Base Plate, g
Average Weight of Sand in Cone + Base Plate, g
12 Weight of Apparatus + Sand after Pouring, g
11 Weight of Apparatus + Sand before Pouring, g
14 Weight of Sand in Mould, g
13 Weight of Sand in Cone + Base Plate, g
16 Average Unit Weight of Sand, g/cm3
CALIBRATION OF SAND AND SAND CONE APPARATUS
15 Unit Weight of Sand, g/cm3
WS - 8
Form No. WS 8 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
15/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Location: Date of Sampling:
Description of Material: Date of Testing:
Initial Dry Weight:
Reduction of Test Weights
Stages of subdivision
Material passed through test sieve :
Weight before reduction
Weight after reduction
Correction factor
Sieving Test Data
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
Contractor Consultant
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WORKSHEET FOR PARTICLE SIZE DISTRIBUTION
1 2 3
Mb1= Mb2 =
Ma2 =
C2= C
1.M
b2/ M
a2=
Mb3=
Ma3=
C3=
Pan
Total
Spec.
Limit
Cumul.
Percent
Retained
Weight
Retained, g
Percent
Passing
Corrected
Weight
Retained, g
Cumulative
gm
gm
Sieve Size,
mm
Correction
Factor
Invidual Weight
Retained, g
Ma1 =
C1= M
b1/ M
a1 =
WS - 9
Form No. WS 9 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
16/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Stockpile Location: Date of Sampling:
Description of Material: Date of Test:
Purpose of Use:
Determination No. 1 2
1. Weight of oven dry specimen in air A (g)
2. Weight of saturated surface dry specimen in air B (g)
3. Weight of saturated specimen under water C (g)
4. Water Absorbed B - A (g)
5. Water Absorption 100(B - A) / A %
6. Specific Gravity
a) Oven dry basis (bulk) A / (B - C)
b) Saturated surface dry (SSD) basis B / (B - C)
c) Apparent A / (A - C)
Determination No. 1 2
1. Weight of oven dry specimen A (g)
2. Weight of saturated surface dry specimen S (g)
3. Weight of bottle + water B (g)
4. Weight of bottle + saturated specimen + water C (g)
5. Water Absobed S - A (g)
6. Water Absorption 100(S - A) / A %
7. Specific Gravity
a) Oven-dry basis (bulk) A / (S + A - C)
b) Saturated surface dry (SSD) basis S / (S + B - C)
c) Apparent A / (A + B - C)
Results :
The Average Specific Gravity = (Bulk / On SSD basis / Apparent)
Water Absorption = %
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
FINE (Coarse Sand/Fine Sand/Filler)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
SPECIFIC GRAVITY AND WATER ABSORPTION OF AGGREGATESWS - 10
Form No. WS 10 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
17/58
Lab Ref No.:
Material Source: Date of Sampling:
Description of Material: Date of Testing:
Retained on
1.7mm Sieve
Passing Through
1.7mm Sieve
Total Quantity
Available, g
Remarks : Specified Values :
Max.
Max.
Max.
Max.
Tested By: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
Loss in
Weight, gPercent Wear
Asphaltic Concrete Coarse Agg.
Concrete Aggregates
Mean
%
Subbase
Road Base
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
ABRASION TEST ON SMALL SIZE COARSE AGGREGATE BY USE OF LOS ANGELES MACHINE
Location:
Representative Quantity:
Sample
IdentificationTest No. No. of Charges
No. of
Revolutions
Weight
Before Test, g
Weight in grams after test
WS - 11
Form No. 11 Revision No. 0 Revision Date:
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
18/58
Form No. 11
Revision No. 0
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
19/58
TEST INFORMATION :
Chainage: Lab Ref. No.:
Material: Date Requested:
Layer Thickness: Request No.:
Width: Date of Testing:
SAND CALIBRATION: Lab Ref. No.:
Date of Calibration:
Wt. of sand in cone, g
Bulk density of sand, g/cm3
Test Hole Location: KM
Offset
Weight of wet sample from hole, mw g
Depth of test hole mm
Weight of sand + cylinder before test, m1 g
Weight of sand + cylinder after test, m4 g
Weight of sand in hole + cone, m1- m4 g
Weight of sand in cone, m2 g
Weight of sand in hole, mb = (m1- m4- m2) g
Bulk density of the material, gb g/cm3
Dry density, gd=100gb / (100 + W) g/cm3
Can No.
Weight of can + wet sample, P g
Weight of can + dry sample, Q g
Weight of water, R = P - Q g
Weight of can, C g
Weight of dry sample, Md = Q - C g
Water content, W = 100 R / Md %
Weight of oversized material g
% oversize (dry basis) %
Optimum Moisture Content (lab value) %
Maximum Dry Density (lab value) g/cm3
MDD Test Reference (Lab Ref. No.)
% Compaction, 100 gd / MDD %
Specified compaction %
Results
Remarks
Tested by : Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
OVERSIZE FRACTION & DETERMINATION OF DEGREE OF COMPACTION
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WORKSHEET FOR FIELD DENSITY TEST BY SAND REPLACEMENT METHOD
DETERMINATION OF FIELD DENSITY
DETERMINATION OF MOISTURE CONTENT
WS - 3
Form No. WS 3 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
20/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Stock Pile Location: Date of Sampling:
Material: Date of Testing:
Determination No. / Sample Ref. 1 2 3
Initial Oven Dry Weight of Specimen, W1gm
Final Oven Dry Weight after Washing on # 200 Sieve,
W2gm
Material Passed Through # 200 Sieve (W1 - W2) gm
% Passing = 100(W1 - W2) / W1
Average % Passing
Specification
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WORKSHEET FOR MATERIALS FINER THAN 0.075MM SIEVE BY WASHING
WS - 12
Form No. WS 12 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
21/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Source: Date of Sampling:
Description: Date of Testing:
Original Weight: Oven Dry Weight:
Sieving Test Data
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WORKSHEET FOR SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FILLER
Total
Specification
LimitRetained, g
CumulativePercent Passing
0.600
CumulativeInvidual Weight
Retained, g
0.300
Pan
0.075
0.150
Retained
Sieve Size,
mmPercentWeight
WS - 13
Form No. WS 13 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
22/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Location: Date of Sampling:
Description of Material: Date of Testing:
Initial Oven Dry Weight:
Reduction of Test Weights
Stages of subdivision
Material passed through test sieve :
Weight before reduction
Weight after reduction
Correction factor
Sieving Test Data
Remarks:
Tested by:
1
50.150
0.300
Sieve Size,
mm
Correction
Factor
Corrected
Weight
Retained, g
2.36
28
gm
gm
Cumulative
Weight
20
Invidual Weight
Retained, gRetained, g
Cumul.
Percent
Retained
14
0.075
Pan
Total
10
4.75
1.18
0.600
2
1
80
6
4
3
2
C3=
Mb2 =
Ma2 =
C2 = C1.Mb2/ Ma2=
Percent
Passing
S
1
Ma1 =
C1= Mb1/ Ma1 =
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF COMBINED AGGREGATES FOR BINDER COURSE
Mb1=
2 3
Mb3=
Ma3=
Form No. 25 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
23/58
~ 20
~ 13
~ 34
~ 27
~ 100
~ 80
~ 70
~ 56
~ 6
~ 44
100
pec.
imit
Form No. 25 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
24/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Location: Date of Sampling:
Description of Material: Date of Testing:
Initial Oven Dry Weight:
Reduction of Test Weights
Stages of subdivision
Material passed through test sieve :
Weight before reduction
Weight after reduction
Correction factor
Sieving Test Data
Remarks:
Tested by:
3
Mb1=
Ma2 =
Mb3=
Ma3=
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
PARTICLE SIZE ANALYSIS OF COMBINED AGGREGATES FOR WEARING COURSE
1 2
5
6
4
C3=
Mb2 =
3
2
90
7
Ma1 =
C1= Mb1/ Ma1 = C2 = C1.Mb2/ Ma2=
Percent
Passing
S
Retained
Pan
1.18
Total
10
4.75
0.600
14
0.075
20
2.36
0.300
Invidual Weight
Retained, gRetained, g
Cumul.
PercentSieve Size,
mmRetained, g
gm
gm
Cumulative
WeightCorrection
Factor
Corrected
Weight
8
1
0.150
Form No. 26 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
25/58
100
~ 72
~ 10
~ 62
~ 50
~ 40
~ 100
~ 85
pec.
imit
~ 20
~ 30
Form No. 26 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
26/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Source: Date Sampled:
Description: Date of Testing:
Passing Retained on
150 micron
300 micron 150 micron
600 micron 300 micron 100
1.18mm 600 micron 100
2.36mm 1.18mm 100
4.75mm 2.36mm 100
9.5mm 4.75mm 100
9.5mm 4.75mm 300
19mm 9.5mm 1000
37.5mm 19mm 1500
75mm 37.5mm 3000
9.5 to 19mm consists of 33% of 9.5 ~ 13.2mm and 67% of 13.2 ~ 19mm.
19 to 37.5mm consists of 33% of 19 ~ 26.5mm and 67% of 26.5 ~ 37.5mm
37.5 to 75mm consists of 50% of 37.5 ~ 50mm and 50% of 50 ~ 75mm
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
(5-CYCLES)
WORKSHEET FOR SOUNDNESS TEST OF AGGREGATES BY USE OF SODIUM SULPHATE
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
(E) Actual
Loss After
Test %
(F)
Corrected
Avg.
Weight
Loss %
FineAggregate
Total
(A)
Grading
Original
Sample %
Retained
(B)
Weight of
Test
Fraction
Before
Test
(gram)
(C)
Weight of
Test
Fraction
After Test
(gram)
(D)
Loss in
Weight
After Test
(gram)
Sieve Size
E = D / B x100
F = A x E/100
CoarseAg
gregate
Total
Notes :D = B - C
WS - 14
Form No. WS 14 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
27/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Location: Date of Sampling:
Description of Material: Date of Testing:
Test Data
Remarks:
Tested by:
Clay Reading
Sand Reading
Sand Equivalent, %
Average Sand Equivalent, %
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
SAND EQUIVALENT TEST
1 2 3Trial Nos.
Form No. 28 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
28/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Location:
Weight of Aggregate: Size:
Weight of Asphalt: Type:
Visual Quality of Mix: Date of Testing:
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
% Area Coated
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WORKSHEET FOR STRIPPING TEST BY AASHTO METHOD: T 182
Below 95 %Above 95 %
Visual estimation after 16 -18 hours of immersion in
water
WS - 15
Form No. WS 15 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
29/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Area (KM): Date of Testing:
Description of Material:
Station Number
Tray Number
Weight of Tray + Bituminous Material (g)
Weight of Tray (g)
Weight of Bituminous Material (g)
Area of Tray (m2)
Quantity of Bituminous Material (g/m2)
Unit weight of Bituminous Material at 0C (g/l)
Spraying Rate (l/m2)
Average Spraying Rate (l/m2)
Temperature at Application 0C
Temperature Correction Factor
Corrected Average Rate of Application (l/m2)
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WORKSHEET FOR QUANTITIES OF BITUMINOUS PRIME & TACK COATS
WS - 16
Form No. WS 16
Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
30/58
Material: Lab Ref. No.:
Source: Date of Sampling:
Stockpile: Date of Testing:
Description:
Test No. 1 2
a)Total Weight of + 4.75 mm Material A g
b) Weight of (2) Fractured Faces Material (g) B g
c) Percentage of (2) Fractured Faces Material 100(B / A) %
d) Average (2) Fractured Faces Material %
e) Specification Limit %
Remarks
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WORKSHEET FOR CRUSHED AGGREGATE OF (>or =2) FRACTURED FACES (+ 4.75MM, VISUAL)
WS - 17
Form No. WS 17 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
31/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Location(KM): Date of Sampling:
Origin: Date of Testing:
Description of Material:
Specimen No. 1
Description of the Test Specimen:
Container No.
Initial Dial Reading
Final Dial ReadingPenetration, mm
Average Penetration
Specimen No. 2
Description of the Test Specimen:
Container No.
Initial Dial Reading
Final Dial Reading
Penetration, mmAverage Penetration
Specimen No. 3
Description of the Test Specimen:
Container No.
Initial Dial Reading
Final Dial Reading
Penetration, mm
Average Penetration
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WORKSHEET FOR PENETRATION TEST ON BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
REMARKS
REMARKS
REMARKS
WS - 18
Form No. WS 18 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
32/58
Lab. Ref:
Location: Date of Sampling:
Description of Material:
Origin: Date of Testing:
Determination No.
Temperature of water during test C
Weight of clean dry pycnometer & stopper (nearest 1 mg) A g
Weight of pycnometer, stopper plus water (nearest 1 mg) B g
Weight of pycnometer, stopper plus sample (nearest 1 mg) C g
Weight of pycnometer, stopper, sample plus water (nearest 1 m D g
Weight of sample C - A g
Volume of pycnometer B - A g
Specific Gravity (C - A) / [(B - A) - (D - C)]
Average Specific Gravity
Temperature correction
Corrected Specific Gravity ( at 25C)
Note
A pycnometer calibrated at one temperature cannot be used at a different temperature without recalibration at that temperature
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
1 2
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WORKSHEET FOR SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF SEMI SOLID BITUMINOUS MATERIALS
3
Form No. Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
33/58
Lab Ref. No:
Sample: Date Sampled:
Chainage: Date of Testing:
Material:
(A) BITUMEN EXTRACTION
VALUE VALUE
1. Weight of pan + Sample 7. Weight of filter paper after test
2. Weight of pan
3. Weight of Mix. + Sample (1 - 2)
4. Weight of pan + Extracted Agg. 10. Weight of bitumen (3 - 9)
5. Weight of extracted Agg. (4 - 2)
6. Wt. of filter paper before test 12. Specified percent of bitumen
(B) GRADATION OF EXTRACTED AGGREGATE
Standard Sieve
size (mm)
Weight Retained
(gram)
Cumulative
Weight Retained
Cumulative
Percentage
Retained
% Passing Specification Limit
2519
12.5
9.5
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.600
0.300
0.150
0.075
Pan
Remarks:
Tested by : Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
11. Percent of bitumen by weight of
Mix. 100(10) / (3)
DESCRIPTIONDESCRIPTION
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WORKSHEET FOR BITUMEN EXTRACTION & GRADATION OF HOT MIX
8. Weight of dust accumulated in
filter paper (7 - 6)
9. Weight of total extracted Agg. (5
+ 8)
WS - 19
Form No. WS 19 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
34/58
Lab Ref. Nos
Material: Date Sampled
Description: Date Tested :
Thickness Wt. in Air Wt. in water Volume Density
mm g g ml g/ml g/ml
Test Performed by:
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
WORKSHEET FOR FIELD DENSITY TEST OF CORED ASPHALT CONCRETE
Specimen
No.
Specimen
Idn.Station
Bulk
Density
(Lab)
Field Cored Sample
Form No. 35 Revision No. 0
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
35/58
Remarks
Form No. 35 Revision No. 0
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
36/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Sample Location: Date sampled :
Type of Materials: Date tested :
Percentage of Bitumen in the Mixture:
Determination No.
Mass of Dry Sample in Air A g
Mass of Jar + Lid + Water B g
Mass of Jar + Lid + Sample + Water C g
Temparature of Water C
K factor :
Corrected Mass of Jar + Lid + Water to Fill at 25C: D = B.K g
E = C.K g
Maximum Specific Gravity F = A / (A + D - E)
Average Maximum Specific Gravity
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
( Gmm)
Corrected Mass of Jar + Lid + Sample + Water
to Fill at 25C:
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
MAXIMUM SPECIFIC GRAVITY OF BITUMINOUS PAVING MIXTURES
1 2
WS - 29
Form No. WS 29 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
37/58
In Air In Water Asphalt Aggregate Voids V.M.A VFA To
% gm gm mm cc gm/cc gm/cc
bxg (100-b)xg i x100 1
Gasp Gagg 100-j j
a b c d e f g h i j k l m
1
2
3
Av.
1
2
3
Av.
1
23
Av.
Specified Values :
Specific Gravity of Bitumen (Gasp) = Minimum Stability ( kN at 60 C)
Minimum Flow ( mm)
Air Voids in Total Mix (%)
Voids in Mineral Aggregate Filled wit
Marshall Quotient ( kN / mm)
Tested By: Marshall Quotient ( kN / mm)
(Contractor) Filler to Binder Ratio
Witnessed by:(Consultant)
100-i - jc - d
Bulk Specific Gravity of Aggregate ( Gagg) =
Wt. of Specimen
Height ofSample
BulkDensity
BulkVolume
c / fASTM
D -2041
Volume % Total Voids %MaximumTheoritical
Density
AYNI PANJAKENT UZBEKISTAN BORDER
ASPHALT CONCRETE HOT MIX DESIGN BY MARSHALL
Date of sampling :
Specimen No.
AsphaltContentby Wt. of
Mix
Form No.
Revision No. 0
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
38/58
Form No. Revision No. 0
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
39/58
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
DETERMINATION OF THE PRESENCE OF ORGANIC IMPURITIES IN FINE AGGREGATE
Lab. Ref. No.:
Material
Description
Location
Test mass
Date of testing Time of addition of NaOH to sample :
Use SECTION A OR SECTION B
Section A
Prepared liquid colour standard method
Time of preparation of colour standard
Time of comparison of colour
Observat ion
The colour of the supernatant liquid above the test sample was found to be:
lighter than the same as darker than
the standard colour
Section B
Glass colour standard method
Time of comparison of colour
Observat ion
The colour of the supernatant liquid above the test sample was similar to:
Gardner Colour Standard No. 5 8 11 14 16
Inference
The fine aggregate does/does notcontain organic impurities
Remarks:
Form No. 38 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
40/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Pouring No.: Date of Pouring:
Concrete Grade: Structure:
Location: No. of Cylinders:
Age of concrete hr/day
Cylinder No.
Time of testing h-min
Variation in age from the target hr
Specimen condition: moist or dry
Diameter at mid height of the specimen 1) mm
2) mm
Average diameter at mid height mm
Cross sectional area (rounded to 10 mm2) mm
2
Diameter at top mm
Diameter at bottom mm
Height of the specimen mm
Whether the specimen was capped with sulphur compound
Whether the specimen was properly placed on the platen
Pace rate (should be 2.6 ~ 6.2 kN / sec ) kN / sec
Whether attempt was made to keep the pace rate constant at failure
Failure type(cone/ cone and split/ cone and shear/ shear/ columnar)
Maximum load on dial gauge kN
Compressive strength (upto 2nd place of decimal)
Compressive strength (rounded to 0.05 Mpa) MPa
Average compressive strength (test result, rounded to 0.05 MPa) MPa
Remarks:
Tested by:
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CYLINDERS
Form No. 39
Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
41/58
Lab. Ref. No.:
Cube No.
Date of casting
Date of testing
Age day
Time of testing h-m
Variation in age from the target
Received specimen immersed in laboratory for 5 min. before testing
Whether the specimen was wet during testing
Whether "go / no go" gauge was used for checking dimensions
Whether the test gauge fitted with the specimen
Height of specimen: top face : 1) mm
2) mm
Height of specimen: bottom face 1) mm
2) mm
Average height of specimen mm
Width of specimen: top face : 1) mm
2) mm
Width of specimen: bottom face 1) mm
2) mm
Average width of specimen mm
Area of specimen (rounded to 10mm2) mm 2
Machine platens were cleaned before crushing specimen
Whether surfaces of the cube were cleaned before crushing
Whether centering of the cube was made before application of load
Pace rate (should be 4.5 to 9.0 kN / sec.) kN / sec
Whether attempt was made to keep the pace rate constant at failure
Maximum load on dial gauge kN
Compressive strength (upto 2nd place of decimal) N / mm2
Cube strength (rounded to 0.5 N/mm2) N / mm
2
Normal or abnormal failure
Test result N / mm2
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
DETERMINATION OF COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF CONCRETE CUBES
WS - 24
Form No. WS 24 Revision No.: Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
42/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Stock Pile Location:
Date Requested: Oven Dry Weight:
Date of sampling: Date of Testing :
Sieving Test Data Dry Sieving / Wet sieving
Sieve Size, mmWeight
Retained
Cumulative
Weight Retained
Cumulative %
Retained% Passing Spec. Limit
9.5 100
4.75
2.36
1.18
0.600
0.300
0.150
0.075
Pan
Remarks :
Tested By :
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
SIEVE ANALYSIS OF FINE AGGREGATE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE
Form No. 41 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
43/58
Form No. 41 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
44/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Stock Pile Location:
Date Requested: Oven Dry Weight:
Date of sampling: Date of Testing :
Sieving Test Data Dry Sieving / Wet sieving
Sieve Size,
mm
Weight
Retained
Cumulative
WeightRetained
Cumulative
% Retained % Passing
AASHTO Limits
(Size No.67)
AASHTO Limits
(Size No.68)
25 100 100
19 90 ~ 100 90 ~ 100
9.5 20 ~ 55 30 ~ 65
4.75 0 ~ 10 5 ~ 25
2.36 0 ~ 5 0 ~ 10
1.18 - 0 ~ 5
0.075 - -
Pan
Remarks :
Tested By :
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
SIEVE ANALYSIS OF 20 MM COARSE AGGREGATE FOR CEMENT CONCRETE
Form No. 42 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
45/58
Lab Ref. No:
Stock Pile Location: Date Requested:
Representative Quantity: Date of Sampling:
Type of Material: Date of Testing:
Wt.Retained Test Weight Passing Flaky Particles Specified Max.
Passing Retained g Weight, g (Gauge), g % Flakiness Index
63 50
50 37.5
37.5 28
28 20
20 14
14 10
10 6.3
Total
Note 1. It retained % of any fraction is equal to or less than 5, then the fraction is not considered for test.
Note 2.If any fraction does not satisfy the test quantity then achieve the required quantity and calculate the flakiness index based on
weighted average of the material retained
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
DETERMINATION OF FLAKINESS INDEX
Flakiness Index =
Sieve Size, mm% Retained
TEST ON FLAKINESSINFORMATION ON SIEVE ANALYSIS
WS - 25
Form No. WS 25 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
46/58
Lab Ref. No.:
Location: Date of Sampling:
Description of Material: Date of Testing:
Representative Area: Dry Weight:
Preparation of Test Specimen
Size fraction mm-mm
Quantity of sample kg
Test sieves used for separating test portion mm
Quantity of test portion kg
Period of drying the sample h-m
Specimen compacted in the cylinder Y/NNo. of layers
No. of strokes/layer
Drop height for compaction mm
Test Data
Determination No.
Initial mass of compacted specimen M g
Loading started h-m-s
Loading finished h-m-s
Period of application of force m-s
Maximum force applied kN
Mass of crushed specimen M1 g
Sieve used for separating fines mm
Mass retained on the separating sieve M3 g
Mass passed through the separating sieve M2 g
Sum* M2+ M3 g
Fines, 100(M2/ M1) %
ACV**
* if the sum differs from M1by more than 10g, discard the result and test other specimens
** The ACV value to be reported is the mean of two results unless any single result differs by more than 0.07 times the mean
in which case the test shall be repeated on two further specimens.
Test Result: %
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
AGGREGATE CRUSHING VALUE (ACV) OF COARSE AGGREGATE
1 2 3 4
Form No. 44 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
47/58
Lab Ref No.
Type of Material : Purpose of Use: Date of Sam
Representative Quantity : Location: Date of Test
Fraction Passing Retained
1) 37.5 19 3000 4.75
2) 19 9.5 2000 4.75
3) 9.5 4.75 1000 2.36
4) 4.75 1.18 25 0.850
Total
Note.
Include fraction 4) for a material which is a mixture of fine and coarse aggregates otherwise ignore
Tested by : Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
CLAY LUMPS AND FRIABLE PARTICLES
(For Coarse Aggregate / A Mixture of Fine and Coarse Aggregates)
Mass of Test
Fraction before
Wash, g, W
Sieve Size, mmDesignated
Fractional Sieve Size,
mm
Grading of
Original
Sample, %, G
Weight
Los
(P x G) Wt, g (min) after Wash, g, R
%
Passing, P
Mass Retained on
Designated Sieve
Designated
Form No.
Revision No. 0
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
48/58
Lab. Ref. No.:
Pouring No.: Method of sampling: Standard/Alternate Date and Time of sampling:
Batch identification Nos. of specimens taken
Place of sampling Place of test
Concrete type Source of concrete
Time elapsed from sampling to commencement of test
Period from the start of filling to removal of cone
Time to lift the slump cone
Graphical Representation
Slump = mm
Form : true / shear / collapse
Thermometer No.:
Thermometer Type:
Temperature = C
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
DETERMINATION OF SLUMP OF FRESH CONCRETEWS - 26
Form No. WS 26 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
49/58
Date of Sampling: Lab Ref. No.:
Storage Location: Sample Idn.: Date of Testing:
Date of Consignment: Description of Sample:
Test for Normal Cosistency
Observed:
Temparature: = C
Relative Humidity = %
Test for Initial Setting Time
. en. mm
20 45
50 42
80 35
130 28
290 18
Test for Final Setting Time
Test Results: Initial Setting Time:
Final Setting Time:
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
Wt.of
CementWt.of Water % Water
Observed Pen.,
mmRequired Penetration, mmTest No.
10 1 in 30 sec
Scale
Reading, mm
Normal Consistency :
Elapsed
Time, min Clock Hrs.
Scale
Reading, mm
Elapsed
Time, min Clock Hrs.
Final Setting Time:
When the needle does not sink visibly into the cement paste.
When penetration of the needle is 25 mm.
Notes on Observation
Initial Setting Time:
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
NORMAL CONSISTENCY AND SETTING TIME OF CEMENT
Elapsed
Time, minClock Hrs. Observation
10
20
30
40
50
0 50 100 150 200
Penetration,
mm
Elapsed time, min
WS - 27
Form No. WS 27 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
50/58
Structure Location: Date of Sampling: Lab Ref. No.:
Storage Location: Sample Idn.:
Date of Consignment: Description of Sample:
Other Ref.: Date of Adding Water:
Mortar
Cube no.
Testing
DateAge, days
Dimensions,
mm
Area,
mm2
TestLoad,
kN
Comp.Strength,
MPa
AverageComp.
Strength,
MPa
SpecifiedCompressive
Strength, MPa
Remarks
Remarks:
Tested by: Witnessed by:
(Contractor) (Consultant)
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH OF HYDRAULIC CEMENT MORTAR
WS - 28
Form No. WS 28 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
51/58
Lab Ref. No:
Station: Temperature: ... C Date of Testing:
FIELD TEST DATA
Tested by:
4 5
Initial of First
Reading0.5m 2nd 1.0m 3rd
Final
Reading
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
DEFLECTION TEST BY BENKELMAN BEAM METHOD
Rebound
Deflection Remarks
1
Chainage
2 3
Form No. 50 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
52/58
Supplementary Sheet(s): Yes / No
Contract No.: __________ Structure: _______________________ Concrete Class: __________ Pumping Stages(Nos.): _____ Target volume
Trial Mix Ref.: ___________ Slump Range: ___________________ Pouring No. _____________ Batch Plant No.: _______ Weather Cond
Sl. Truck / Batching Discharge Delivery Slump Visual Concrete Cylinders / Cubes
No. Date Batch No. Time Time Time Slip No. Test Value slump Temp, C Mould Ref. Prepared 7 day 28 day
Started Finished mm check 7 day 28 day by Specimen No. Specimen No.
Batch Counted by : 1) __________________
Reviewed by: _____________2) __________________
Concrete Pouring Record
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
Form No. 51
Revision No. 0
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
53/58
.. of
Action
Taken by
Contractor
Form No. 51 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
54/58
TO:
DESCRIPTION OF WORKS:
LOCATION:
Estimated time that the work will be ready .. AM/PM Date: ..
Following Operation:
_______________
Signed Time: ...
For the Contractor Date: ...
Received Time: ...
_______________
For Consultants Date: ...
FIELD OBSERVATIONS:
RE Date: ... Time: ...
Bridge Engineer . Date: ... Time: ...
Survey Engineer Date: ... Time: ...
Materials Engineer Date: ... Time: ...
APPROVAL TO PROCEED
Approval is / is not given to proceed as requested.
Remarks:
______________
Signed: Time: ...
For Consultants Date: ...
inspection as per Clause 37 and 38
of the Condition of Contract
Resident Engineer
JOC-BCL
Consultants
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
Ref. No.Request for checking and / or
REQUEST FOR ISPECTION / SURVEY / QUALITY TEST
Form No. 52 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
55/58
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
56/58
%
Form No. 53 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
57/58
Lab Ref. Nos:
Sampling Location: Km 24 + 500 Date of Sampling: 09 August, 2014
Purpose of Use: Construction of Date of Testing: 11 August, 2014
Masonry Wall Engineer's Test/Joint Test: Engineer's
Specimen No. 1 2 3 4
Marking No No No No
DescriptionStained brown
surface
Stained brown
surfaceDeep grey Gray
Weight after oven drying g 4373 6339 8045 9238
Period of drying hr 24 24 24 24
Weight of SSD specimen g 4402 6354 8061 9269
Period of soaking under water hr 24 24 24 24
Weight of absorbed water g 29 15 16 31
Water Absorption % 0.66 0.24 0.20 0.34
Specimen No. 5 6 7
Marking No. No. No.
DescriptionStained brown
surfaceGrey Grey
Weight after oven drying g 5779 6380 6567
Period of drying hr 24 24 24
Weight of SSD specimen g 5818 6388 6581
Period of soaking under water hr 24 24 24
Weight of absorbed water g 39 8 14
Water Absorption % 0.67 0.13 0.21
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
DETERMINATION OF WATER ABSORPTION OF STONEWS - 30
Form No. WS 30 Revision No. 0 Revision Date: xx/xx/xx
8/10/2019 Worksheet Taj Lab
58/58
CONSULTANTS CONTRACTOR
Sample ID.......................................................... Contract No.:
Location:.............................................. Date: ....................................................
Sampled by: . Material Type: .................................................
Lab Ref.
No. Description of Sample Source Rep. Qty Quantity/No. Tests Required Remarks
AYNI - PANJAKENT - UZBEKISTAN BORDER ROAD
SAMPLE RECORD CARD