Post on 25-Mar-2022
Work Package 5 – Good practices in the field of health promotion and chronic disease prevention across the life cycle
Thomas Kunkel, MD, M.Sc.
Scientific Officer
Federal Centre for Health
Education (BZgA)
Cologne, Germany
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Work Package 5 – Lead Organisations
Contact:
Dr. Monika Köster (Head of unit) monika.koester@bzga.de, Tel.: +49 221/8992-345 Thomas Kunkel, MD (Scientific Officer) thomas.kunkel@bzga.de, Tel.: +49 221/8992-334 Theresia Rohde (Scientific Officer) theresia.rohde@bzga.de, Tel.: +49 221/8992-296 Katarzyna Mletzko (Project Assistant) katarzyna.mletzko@bzga.de, Tel.: +49 221/8992-538
Co-lead: EuroHealthNet Lead: Federal Centre for Health Promotion and Prevention (BZgA)
Department 2-22: Cooperation with Federal States, Health Insurance Funds, Associations,
Committees Women’s Health, Men’s Health, Healthy and Active Ageing
Contact: Ingrid Stegeman (Health Promotion Europe Manager) i.stegeman@eurohealthnet.eu, Tel : + 32 2 235 0327 Cristina Chiotan, MD (Public Health Coordinator) c.chiotan@eurohealthnet.eu, Tel.: + 32 2 235 03 24 Anna Gallinat (Communications Officer) a.gallinat@eurohealthnet.eu, Tel.: + 32 2 235 03 27
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Associated Partners in Work Package 5
1. Andalusian Regional Ministry of Equality, Health and Social Policies (CISPSJA), Spain
2. Center for Health Education and Disease Prevention (SMLPC), Lithuania
3. Directorate General of Health (DGS), Portugal
4. European Institute of Womens Health (EIWH), Ireland
5. Directorate of Health (DOHI), Iceland
6. Health Service Executive (HSE), Ireland
7. Institute of Health Carlos III (ISCIII), Spain
8. Institute of Public Health in Ireland (IPH), Ireland
9. Ministry of Health (YPE), Greece
10. Ministry of Health (MINSAL), Italy
11. Ministry of Health and Care Services (HOD), Norway
12. National Centre of Public Health and Analysis (NCPHA), Bulgaria
13. National Health Institute Doutor Ricardo Jorge (INSA), Portugal
14. National Institute of Health (ISS), Italy
15. National Institute for Health Development (NIHD), Estonia
16. National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), the Netherlands
17. Progress and Health Foundation (FPS), Spain
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Collaborating Partners in Work Package 5
1. Consejería de Sanidad y Servicios Sociales, Comunidad Autónoma de Cantabria, Spain
2. Consejería de Sanidad y Asuntos Sociales, Comunidad Autónoma de Castilla-La Mancha, Spain
3. Dirección General de Asistencia Sanitaria, Agencia Valenciana de Salud, Spain
4. European Health Futures Forum (EHFF), UK
5. European Wound Management Association, Denmark
6. Ministry of Health, Cyprus
7. National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden
8. Pharmaceutical Group of the EU (PGEU)
9. Platform for Better Oral Health in Europe
10. Servicio Canario de Salud, Comunidad Autónoma de Canarias, Spain
11. University of Coimbra, Portugal
12. WHO Regional Office for Europe, Denmark
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Aim of Work Package 5
• To identify highly promising, cost-effective and evaluated health promotion
and chronic disease prevention practices with a special focus on older people
• To promote the exchange, scaling up, and transfer of effective approaches to
different regions and countries
• To address major risk factors: poor diets, physical inactivity, smoking and alcohol abuse
• To address the wider determinants that influence the development of chronic diseases - particularly diabetes type II and cardiovascular diseases
• To focus on the elimination of health inequalities
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Methods
• Situation analysis and needs assessment through questionnaire
• Identify criteria of Good Practice in partner countries
• Based on these criteria – identification of three good practices per partner
– attention will be given to cost-effective practices and projects that have
proven to improve the health status of target groups
• The identified practices will be analysed and assessed during an expert
conference
• After the conference 2-3 practices will be selected for study visits
• Study visits aim to assess the applicability and transferability of practices into
different settings and countries
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Outcome and Deliverables of WP5
1. Identification of three good practices per participating member state (M18)
2. Recommendations Report on applicability and transferability of practices into
different settings and countries
(JA CHRODIS Grant Agreement, p.56)
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Tasks in Work Package 5
Task 1: Review of existing work, situation and needs
Task-leader: EuroHealthNet, in cooperation with BZgA
Task 2: Defining an approach
Task-leader: BZgA, in cooperation with EuroHealthNet
Task 3: Identification of good practices
Task-leader: YPE (GR), in collaboration with BZgA and EuroHealthNet
Task 4: Conference seminars
Task-Leader: SMLPC (LT), in collaboration with BZgA and EuroHealthNet
Task 5: Peer Reviews/ Study visits
Task-Leader: EuroHealthNet, in collaboration with BZgA
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Activities of Work Package 5 in 2014 (so far … )
• Work Package Meeting held in Cologne on April 28th and 29th 2014
• Development and dissemination of a questionnaire: Good Practice in the Field of Health Promotion and Primary Prevention
• Analysis of the replies and development of country reports
• Recruitment of Delphi Panel Experts
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Questionnaire „Good Practice in the Field of Health Promotion and Primary Prevention”
Questions:
1. Health Promotion and Primary Prevention landscape?
2. Procedures/mechanisms/criteria to identify GP?
3. GP databases and criteria used?
4. Forecasting studies and Cost effectiveness studies?
5. Gaps and Needs? (Needs Assessment Guidance Document)
Approach:
– Reports, MoH, IPH, etc.
– Expert consultations (expert group)
– (grey) literature search
Outcomes:
• Country Reviews
• Criteria list for Good Practices as input for Delphi Consultation Round
• Overview Report
Title page of the questionnaire
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Selected Examples of Good Practice Criteria
Country
Spain Italy Germany The Netherlands Portugal
Cri
teri
a
• Evaluation
• Sustainability
• Alignment (with national
strategy)
• Quality
• Transferability
• Participative Approach
• Multi-Stakeholder Approach
• Appropriate Budget
• Adequacy (Alignment)
• Relevance (Target group
orientation)
• Evidence based
• Evaluation possible (registry
system in place)
• Sustainability
• Comprehensiveness
• Ethical considerations
• Efficiency
• Equity
• Composition of the Working
group (multidisciplinary, multi-
sectoral, target group included)
• Equity
• Empowerment
• Involvement/Participation
• Setting approach
• Theoretical models of
behaviour change
• Evidence of effectiveness and
good practice examples
• Context analysis
• Determinants analysis
• Resources, time and limits
• Partnerships and alliances
• Objectives
• Process evaluation
• Interventions/activities
description
• Output and outcome evaluation
• Sustainability
• Communication
• Documentation
• Concept and Statement
of Purpose
• Target Group
Orientation
• Innovation and
Sustainability
• Intermediary Concept
• Low Threshold
• Participation
• Empowerment
• Setting Approach
• Integrated Action
Concept and
Networking
• Quality Management
• Documentation and
Evaluation
• Cost-Benefit Ratio
• Inclusion criteria:
• Manual of intervention
available
• Process evaluation
• Material fort he next 2
years available
• Contact person
•
• Two-way assessment:
Description of the
project / ‚well
described‘
Theoretical basis
of the project
• Transferability
(‚Feasability‘)
• Effectiveness
• Ranked by
• Strong indocations
• Good indocations
• First indications
• Project area facing
health strategies and
objectives (Relevance)
• Quality of methods
• Process evaluation
• Sustainability
• Transferability
• Particpation
• Cost-effectiveness
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Delphi Panel in cooperation with WP 4 Additional Input for the Delphi Questionnaire
+ European Quality Instrument for Health Promotion (EQUIHP)
+ Quint-Essenz (CH)
+ Canadian Best Practices
+ other evidence
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Delphi Panel in cooperation with WP 4 Recruitment of Experts
• Delphi experts are nominated through the partner organizations in Work Package 5
• Up to three experts per partner / country
• Partners could nominate themselves as experts in the field
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Example Extract of Overview on Delphi Experts
No. Name(s) of nominee(s) Position
1 Dolors Juvinya Canal Director of Faculty of Health Promotion, University of Girona 2 Lotte Kaba-Schoenstein Professor for social work and health promotion at the University of Applied Sciences, Esslingen 3 Frank Lehmann Head of unit 'Planning and coordination', Federal Centre for Health Education, Cologne 4 Simone Weyers Researcher, Insititute for Medical Sociology, University of Duesseldorf 5 Elena Coffano Head of unit at Local Health Authority, Turin, Italy 6 Guido Iaccarino Associate Professor internal medicine, Dept. of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno 7 Plamen Dimitrov Director of Directorate Health System Performance, Acting Deputy Director
Professor in social medicine and health management 8 Christos Lionis Director of Clinic of Social and Family Medicine, University of Crete 9 Ioannis Tountas Professor of Social Medicine, Scientific Director of Health Services Research Centre, Department
of Hygiene, Epidemiology & Statistical Medicine of Medical School, Athens University 10 Teresa Bennett Senior Health Promotion Officer and Project Manager, in the Health Services Executive (HSE) 11 Siobhan Jennings Specialist/Consultant in Public Health Medicine, HSE
National Population Health lead for Heart Health 12 Michal Molcho (Republic of Ireland) Director of the Health Promotion Research Centre, NUI Galway
13 Olga Cleary (Republic of Ireland) Public Health Development Officer, IPH 14 Elizabeth Mitchell (Northern Ireland) Director of Development and Capacity Building
consultant in Public Health, IPH 15 Margarida Gaspar de Matos
Professor, University of Lisbon Senior Researcher, Institute of Hygiene and Tropical Diseases, New University of Lisbon
… … … 29 Margareta Kristenson Professor at Dept. for Medicine and Health, Linköping University
30 Lars Weinehall Professor of Epidemiology and Family Medicine
Head of Dept. of Public Health, Umea University 31 Richard Watt Head of Research Dept. of Epidemiology and Public Health, UCL
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Delphi Experts on Health Promotion
• Current number: 31 nominees total
• Current Gender ratio 16 Female - 15 Male
• Countries represented 15
• Areas of expertise Clinicians, Research, Policy, Practicioners
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Next steps in Work Package 5
• Start of the Delphi Panel November 2014
• Start of Task 3 „Identification of Good Practice“
Task Leader: YPE (Gr)
• Next Work Package Meeting in February 2015
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
Thank you very much!
Please visit us online:
www.chrodis.eu/our-work/05-health-promotion/
www.eurohealthnet.eu
www.bzga.de
WWW.CHRODIS.EU
The Joint Action on Chronic Diseases and promoting
healthy ageing across the life cycle (JA CHRODIS)*
* THIS PRESENTATION ARISES FROM THE JOINT ACTION ON CHRONIC DISEASES AND PROMOTING HEALTHY AGEING ACROSS THE LIFE CYCLE (CHRODIS-JA) WHICH HAS RECEIVED FUNDING FROM THE EUROPEAN
UNION, IN THE FRAMEWORK OF THE HEALTH PROGRAMME (2008-2013)