Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

Post on 18-Jan-2015

1.167 views 2 download

Tags:

description

This is a presentation I did at eLearn 2013. It presents evidence about the relative role of Moocs, Online Learning, and Traditional Face-to-Face education modes. Essentially, I'm trying to show that just decreasing the cost of education is not enough to get everyone equal access.

Transcript of Why the lower cost of Moocs will not lead to improved access

MOOCs: Why Low-Cost Will Not Create Equal Access

Nathan GarrettYesica Allaya

eLearn 2013, Las Vegas, NVWednesday, October 23rd, 1:30-2:00pm

http://profgarrett.com

Moocs are…

• “the biggest revolution in education since the printing press…”

Quality

Retention: How many students

complete successfully?

Pedagogy: What teaching techniques are

used?

Cost: What does the overall educational experience cost?

Access: What type of students are

recruited?

Iron Triangle

Cost

Access QualityPedagogyRetention

Traditional Higher Ed

• 5,599 colleges & universities• 21m students• 70% public• >50% over 23• 40% part-time

How many students graduate?

Private Not-For-Profit Four-Year Public Four-Year Private For-Profit Four-Year

67%

57%

26%

45%

39%

16%

60%

46%

28%

75%

65%

36%

White, Non- Hispanic Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander

We have unequal success between ethnic groups

92-93 97-98 02-03 03-04 04-05 05-06 06-07 07-08 08-09 09-10 10-11 11-12

-$4,000

-$2,000

$0

$2,000

$4,000

$6,000

$8,000

$10,000

$12,000

$14,000

$16,000

Public 2-year Public 4-year Private 4-year

What students pay in tuition hasn’t significantly changed

What does it cost?

U.S. Census Bureau, Current Population Survey and decennial census: Percentage of the Population 25 Years and Over Who Have Completed High School or College: Selected Year 1940-2009

But, we educate more of the population

Iron Triangle for Traditional Higher Education

Cost

Access QualityPedagogyRetention

Online Learning

• 32% of college students have taken at least one course

• 9% yearly growth rate

Access

• Requires – Prepared & motivated students

• Minorities have lower levels of computer preparation & skills

• Non-traditional also do worse

– Heavy feedback• Perceived as harder

– by all students

Cost

Outcomes

• Perceptions v. reality– Perceptions? Employers rank lower– Reality? Outcomes similar

Iron Triangle for Online Learning

Cost

Access QualityPedagogyRetention

Mooc

• xMooc v. cMooc– Dave Cormier, Bryan Alexander, George Siemens,

and Stephen Downes

Retention

• Range: 25%, 12%, 5%...

• Are these really serious completers?

• Coursera: – Overall: 7-9%– Intend to complete: 23%– Complete first assignment: 40%– Signature Track: 70%

http://mfeldstein.com/validation-mooc-student-patterns-graphic/

Cost per Completion

• Free v. “Free”• Cost

– Edinburgh, $46k– U Penn: $50k

Access

• Who finishes a Mooc?– 70% has BA/BS, half graduate degree– Majority outside US– 60% of Coursera income <50k

• San Jose– Developmental classes in Pilot

• 29-51%, 20% lower than traditional

Iron Triangle for Moocs

Cost

Access QualityPedagogyRetention

MoocOnlineFace-to-face

Cost

Access Quality