Post on 06-Oct-2020
Water Scarcity in Massachusetts:Emerging Legal Issues
Harvard Law SchoolWater Law Study Group
December 3, 2015
H. David Golddavid.gold@wilmerhale.com
WilmerHale
Agenda
■ Hydrology■ Water Scarcity■ Legal Framework■ Recent Disputes■ Emerging Issues
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
The Hydrologic Cycle
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Water Scarcity in the U.S.
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Massachusetts
Average rainfall: 45.12 inches per year
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Water Shortages in Boston
■ Wells contaminated by privies■ Cisterns contaminated by soot
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Water Shortages Today
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Water Shortages Today
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Water Shortages – 2011
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Water Shortages
WilmerHale
Stressed Basins in Massachusetts (2001)
High StressMedium StressLow StressNo DataGauging StationBasin Boundary
WilmerHale
Water Shortages
WilmerHale
Desalination Plant
… in Dighton, Massachusetts
WilmerHale
Massachusetts Water Demand
Thermoelectric power (saline): 2,340
Public supply: 793
Irrigation: 145
Industrial: 112
Thermoelectric power (fresh): 107
Domestic: 40.5
Aquaculture: 44.4
Mining: 10.7
Livestock: 1.86
WilmerHale
Total water withdrawals by use (MGD)
Thermoelectric power (saline)
Public supply
Irrigation
Industrial
Thermoelectric power (fresh)
WilmerHale
Massachusetts Water Demand
WilmerHale
Metro area water demand projected to increase by 47 MGD by 2030
Source: ELM, State of the Environment (2006)
WilmerHale
Water Scarcity Factors
WilmerHale
Aging Infrastructure
WilmerHale
Water Scarcity Factors
WilmerHale
Development
Source: Federal Interagency Stream Restoration Working Group, Stream Corridor Restoration: Principles, Processes, and Practices (1998).
Impervious Surface Levels
Source: USGS, Preliminary Assessment of Factors Influencing Riverine Fish Communities in Massachusetts (2010), http://www.mass.gov/eea/docs/eea/wrc/wrc‐update‐re‐sust‐water‐mgmt‐18nov2010.pdf.
WilmerHale
Water Scarcity Factors
WilmerHale
Lack of Conservation Measures
MAGoal:65 gpcd
MAActualUse:82 gpcd
WilmerHaleWilmerHale
Saline Intrusion
Well
Well
Well
Salt water
Salt water
Salt water
Salt water
Fresh water
Fresh water
Fresh water
Fresh water
Water Scarcity Factors
Groundwater pumping
Sea level rise
WilmerHale
Water Scarcity Factors
WilmerHale
Pollution
WellWell at risk
Pollution source Unusable well
PlumeGroundwater
WilmerHale
Water Scarcity Factors
WilmerHale
Irrigation
2005■ 6.90 acre-feet per acre■ Highest application rate
in USA!
2010■ 3.87 acre-feet per acre■ 5th highest (after AZ,
MT, WY, and ID)
WilmerHaleWilmerHale
Water Scarcity Factors
Drought
WilmerHale
Massachusetts Water Rights
■ Stratton v. Mt. Hermon Boys’ School, 216 Mass. 83 (1913):“[P]roprietor may make any reasonable use of the water of the stream in connection with his riparian estate and for lawful purposes within the watershed, provided he leave the current diminished by no more than is reasonable, having regard for the like right to enjoy the common property by other riparian owners.”
WilmerHale
Surface Water – reasonable use
WilmerHale
Massachusetts Water Rights
■ Greenleaf v. Francis, 35 Mass. 117 (1836):“[T]he owner of the soil may lawfully occupy the space … below the surface, to any extent which he pleases, unless he has made some grant or agreement or there has been some statute or police regulation to the contrary.”
■ *Prince v. Stockdell, 397 Mass. 843 (1986): “In another case, we might be inclined to reexamine the doctrine which gives the owner of the overlying land absolute control over subsurface water on such land.”
WilmerHale
Groundwater – absolute ownership*
WilmerHale
Massachusetts Water Law
Wetlands Protection Act (1972)
WilmerHale
Con Coms may regulate proposed activity: Within “wetlands” and surrounding buffer zones Drilling Pumping Access to water withdrawals
Within 200-ft riverfront areas Groundwater use with potential impacts on
stream flows
WilmerHale
Massachusetts Water Law
Interbasin Transfer Act (1984)
WilmerHale
■ WRC may prohibit transfers between watersheds■ “Significant” transfers (1+ MGD) may be denied ■ Evaluation criteria
Potential impacts on in-stream flows Other environmental impacts Proposed conservation efforts
■ Conditions Monitoring Efficiency requirements
WilmerHale
Massachusetts Water Law
■ 100,000-gpd threshold■ Groundwater / surface water■ Registration for grandfathered uses
Based on use between 1981 and 1985Must be filed on or before Jan. 1, 1988 Must be renewed every 10 yearsMust meet metering, reporting, recordkeeping
requirements
■ Permit for new withdrawalsMust be denied if safe yield is exceeded
WilmerHale
Water Management Act (1985)
WilmerHale
Massachusetts Water Law
Watershed Management Act (1992)
WilmerHale
■ Goals Protect and preserve the quality of pure water Assure availability for future generations
■ Prohibitions “Alterations within 200 feet of the bank of a
tributary or surface water” within designated watersheds
Alterations that will hinder purpose of protecting the public water supply
WilmerHale
Massachusetts Water Law
■ State projects ■ Private projects requiring state permits/funding■ Thresholds New withdrawals or expansions
• 0.1 MGD (new water sources requiring construction)• 0.5 MGD (existing systems)• 1.5 MGD (groundwater)• 2.5 MGD (surface water)
New interbasin transfers• 1.0 MGD• “Significant”
WilmerHale
Mandatory EIR
MEPA (1977)
WilmerHale
Massachusetts Water Law
■ Reliable energy supply■ Lowest possible cost■ Minimum impact on the environment■ M.G.L. ch. 164, sec. 69J1/4
(Construction of generating facility) Review project impacts, including water impact Establish performance standards reflecting best
available and most efficient technology to control and reduce water withdrawals
WilmerHale
Energy Facilities Siting Board
WilmerHale
Massachusetts Water Law
Bills
WilmerHale
House No. 834 (2009) – An Act Relative to Sustainable Water Resources House Committee on Environment, Natural
Resources and Agriculture recommended ought NOT to pass, recommended further study (2010)
Senate No. 405 (2015) – An Act to Mitigate Water Resources Impacts / House No. 657 (2015) – An Act Providing for the Establishment of Sustainable Water Resource Funds Hearings held in October 2015
WilmerHale
Massachusetts Water Law
Massachusetts Constitution, Art. XCVII (1972)
WilmerHale
The people shall have the right to clean … water … and the protection of the people in their right to the conservation, development and utilization of the agricultural, mineral, forest, water, air and other natural resources is hereby declared to be a public purpose.
WilmerHale
Framingham
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Framingham – Proposed Birch Road Water Quality Facility
WilmerHale
Framingham – Birch Road Wellfield
WilmerHale
■ Proposal: 4.3 MGD
■ Registered volume under WMA: 3.17 MGD
■ Reduced proposal to 3.17 MGD
WilmerHale
Framingham – Birch Road Wellfield
WilmerHale
■ Opposition Other ratepayers Anti-privatization Environmental community
■ MEPA required Supplemental EIR to study: Reduction of flows in Sudbury River Reduced water levels in Lake Cochituate
■ Recovery Act deadline passed ($5M)■ March 2011: Project scheduled for construction in 2015■ January 2015: New deal with MWRA
WilmerHaleWilmerHale
Ipswich RiverPhoto from Charles River Watershed Association, Water Resource Conservation and
Restoration in Massachusetts (2006)
Ipswich River Watershed
Hamilton74 Mass. App. Ct. 1129 (2009)
WilmerHale
Hamilton
■ Registered volume under WMA: 0.92 MGD■ Additional permitted volume: 0.11 MGD■ 2003 MassDEP summertime water use cap: 0.70 MGD■ Magistrate: Cap OK (still can average 0.92 MGD)■ Superior Court: Cap OK
MassDEP must determine Safe Yield of Ipswich River
■ Appeals Court: Affirmed
WilmerHale
74 Mass. App. Ct. 1129 (2009)
WilmerHaleWilmerHale
Post-Hamilton■ October 2009 – MassDEP defined “Safe Yield” as “the
amount of water that would be present during a drought year” Environmental groups protested Withdrawals will increase in already-stressed basins No protection for in-stream flows or other environmental
considerations■ November 2009 – MassDEP suspended new definition■ October 2010 – Deadline for new definition■ February 2012 – Sustainable Water Management
Initiative Draft Framework■ April 2012 – Written comment period ended
Water suppliers Conservation Commissions Individuals Government agencies
WilmerHale
Sustainable Water Management Initiative –Final Framework
WilmerHale
Safe Yield =55% of Drought
Basin Yield + Reservoir Storage
WilmerHale
Fairhaven
WilmerHale
455 Mass. 740 (2010)
Town of Fairhaven (+ 13 other cities and towns) WMA registrations came up for renewal in 2008
MassDEP sought to impose conservation requirements as conditions of renewal
Fairhaven challenged conditions Can’t impinge on grandfathered rights
MassDEP 85% of all withdrawals authorized under WMA are
registered uses WMA would be “lobotomized” if MassDEP could not
use it to regulate registered uses
WilmerHale
■ Look at WMA: MassDEP “shall adopt such regulations as it deems necessary to carry out the purposes of this chapter”
■ MassDEP must adopt regulations before it can impose conservation measures
■ But … conservation measures may not deny registrants their entitlement to existing withdrawals (for instance, by limiting a registrant’s water use to less than the existing withdrawal)
■ “[U]nder the Act, the department has broad authority under § 3 to issue regulations to carry out the Act’s purpose of water management, including water conservation, provided it does not infringe the registrants’ entitlement to existing withdrawals.”
WilmerHale
Fairhaven455 Mass. 740 (2010)
Supreme Judicial Court
WilmerHale
Concord Bottled Water Ban
WilmerHale
■ April 2010 – Residents voted to ban bottled water sales “To determine whether the Town will vote to ban the sale of water in
plastic bottles in Concord starting January 1, 2011, or take any other action relative thereto.”
■ July 2010 – Attorney General declined to review ban Not a valid bylaw Not enforceable
■ April 2011 – Ban failed by 7 votes (272 to 265) Resolution passed to “discourage” the sale or use of disposable single-
serving bottled water■ April 2012 – Residents voted to ban single-serving PET
bottles (403 to 364)■ September 2012 – Attorney General approved■ January 2013 – Ban took effect
WilmerHaleWilmerHale
Concord Bottled Water Ban
■ Equal Protection Clause
■ Commerce Clause
■ Takings■ Preemption
WilmerHale
Brockton
WilmerHale
EFSB 07-7A/D.P.U. 07-58/59 (2011)
Brockton
Brockton Reservoir
Silver Lake
Plympton
KingstonHalifax
HansonWhitman
E. Bridgewater
Monponsett Pond
Furnace PondPembroke
WilmerHale
350-MW natural-gas-fired power plantWater required for cooling: 1.1 to 2.1 MGD Approved in 2009
Cooling water from wastewater reclamation facility
Project Change Filing in 2010Cooling water from Brockton municipal water supply
Brockton Municipal Water SupplyTraditional sources (Silver Lake + Brockton Reservoir)Dighton Desalination Plant
WilmerHale
BrocktonEFSB 07-7A/D.P.U. 07-58/59 (2011)
WilmerHale
Brockton Power Co.Municipal supply requires less treatment, and less
volumeWater will come from Desal Plant, not traditional
sources EFSB
City has long history of water supply problemsCity has never had customer this big beforeBrockton Power can’t say where water will come from Brockton Power didn’t show project would have
minimum impact on the environmentProject Change DENIED
WilmerHale
BrocktonEFSB 07-7A/D.P.U. 07-58/59 (2011)
WilmerHale
Brockton appealed EFSB decision to SJC
SJC affirmed EFSB decision in all respects
WilmerHale
Brockton469 Mass. 215 (2014)
WilmerHale
Emerging Issues
WilmerHale
■ Framingham – groundwater■ Hamilton – summertime cap, safe yield■ Fairhaven – conditions on renewals■ Concord – bottled water ban■ Brockton – power plant water supply
Recap of Cases
WilmerHale
Emerging Issues
You need water to produce energy You need energy to produce waterWater for new power plants?
Renewables use much less waterDesalination?
Lack of symmetry: EFSB vs. WMA
WilmerHale
Energy-Water Nexus
WilmerHale
Emerging Issues
Privatization
WilmerHale
WilmerHale
Emerging Issues
■ Erosion of Absolute Ownership■ Constitutional Issues■ Definition of “Reasonable”■ Application of “Safe Yield”■ Disputes between Private Parties■ New Legislation
WilmerHale
WilmerHaleWilmerHale
How water disputes are settled in Arizona