SPEAKER

Gonzalo Vargas

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION:

A BACKBONE FOR THE

DEVELOPMENT OF CHILE

Chancellor INACAP

President

Council of Accredited Professional Institutes and Technical Education Centers.

December, 2016

AGENDA

WHO ARE

WE?

WHAT DO WE

PROPOSE?

WHO ARE WE?

THE COUNCIL NOWADAYS

18 Vocational Education

Institutions

Cities in

the

country 33 85%

Enrollment

of the

sector

THE COUNCIL NOWADAYS

150,000 New students in 2014,

equivalent to 44% of

higher education

420,000 Total students;

equivalent to 35% of

higher education

in Chile

WHAT DO WE PROPOSE?

Expand access and

formative success

Improve the

appropriateness

and quality of

education

Improve the

articulation of the

educational system

Axis of the

proposal

Development Strategy 2014 -2024

A systemic focus that combines structural and far-reaching

measures with others established for the short-term, which will

allow progress in the challenges faced to strengthen ESTP, in

agreement with the current requirements of society, the

productive sector and the development of people.

QUALITY

ASSURANCE

20 propositions

ARCHITECTURE

OF

THE SYSTEM

FINANCING

INFORMATION

SYSTEMS AND

VALUATION

FOR

ESTP

PROPOSALS

1. Establish a National Qualification Framework

2. Suppress the distinction between academic titles and

degrees

3. Increase flexibility of formation modalities

4. Implement a System of Academic Credits

5. Create an assessment system for the quality of

learning in high schools

6. Foster acknowledgement of previous learning

7. Create sector councils for competences “Skill

Councils”

8. Establish a particular quality assurance framework for

ESTP

9. Ensure objectivity for the processes of accreditation,

their transparency and adequate dissemination

10.Promote the appropriateness of assessing peers for

the accreditation of ESTP institutions

PROPOSALS

11. Coordinate institutional and career accreditation

processes

12. Financing for the students

13. Clear and transparent methodology for the

reference enrollment fee

14. Improve management and administration for

financing mechanisms

15. Equalization of the conditions to enroll and assign

grant funds for all higher education institutions

16. Improve the information system for higher

education

17.Generate performance indicators for ESTP

institutions

18.Create a unique registry for students

19. Implement a vocational and career orientation

system

20.Develop a national program to foster the valuation

and social prestige of ESTP

TREND: TOTAL ENROLLMENT

Source: National Education Council (CNDE)

163,049

148,375 151,042 152,801 156,226 153,815 161,504 165,636

170,748 167,578

95,020 97,222

100,148 105,091 108,474

113,981 118,702 122,353 126,154 128,155 132,029

137,047

59,632 68,601

72,039 79,168

86,814 92,821 96,078

102,562 109,792

114,777 116,952 119,351

124,835

151,877 166,741 167,890

186,787 205,360

231,456 240,853

227,334 227,712 221,739 221,358

124,835

129,570

217,959

252,055

282,545

318,253

347,611

369,689 377,910

71,506 72,887 83,575 92,875

120,984

134,856 132,752 137,121 139,837 141,413

137,978

-

25,000

50,000

75,000

100,000

125,000

150,000

175,000

200,000

225,000

250,000

275,000

300,000

325,000

350,000

375,000

400,000

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

2.5

1.5

0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3

EE.UU.Canadá

ChileCorea

Nueva Zel.Finlandia

Reimo UnidoAustria

SueciaPaíses bajos

EstoniaAustralia

IsraelJapón

PromedioRusia

Rep. ChecaLetoniaTurquíaFranciaBégicaPoloniaMéxicoIrlanda

PortugalHungría

AlemaniaEspaña

EsloveniaIslandia

EslovaquiaItalia

IndonesiaLuxemburgo

3.6

3.5

0 1 2 3 4 5

Nueva Zel.Islandia

PortugalReino Unido

IrlandaIsrael

BélgicaAustralia

MéxicoFinlandia

FranciaPaíses Bajos

EsloveniaSueciaCorea

CanadáChile

EE.UU.Promedio

PoloniaLuxemburgo

EstoniaAlemania

EspañaAustria

ItaliaTurquía

JapónRep. Checa

LetoniaEslovaquia

HungríaIndonesia

Rusia

HIGHER EDUCATION SPENDING (% Of GDP)

PRIMARY AND SECUNDARY EDUCATION SPENDING (% Of GDP)

6,1% 5,3%

OECD: PUBLIC AND PRIVATE EXPENDITURE

Total expenditure on education, by funding source (Percentage of GDP)

HIGHER EDUCATION COVERAGE

GROSS COVERAGE AT HIGHER EDUCATION LEVEL (2014,%)

COVERAGE EVOLUTION IN CHILE (2014, %)

Ingreso según

ENROLMENT

2015

SELECTION PROCESS: 2015

ADMISSION

UNIVERSITIES

SELECTIVE 29,7%

101.281

NON SELECTIVE:

15,4% 52.650

PI - TSC NON SELECTIVE:

54,9% 187.000

CRITICAL ASPECTS: STUDENT PROFILE IS CRITICAL TO ENSURE ACCESS

About 50% of students of

ESTP work and study

simultaneously.

40% of ESTP students come

from municipal schools and 54%

from private schools funded.

The Common Access System does not take into account the profile of

students of vocational higher technical education, different from that of

university students

70% of students entering PI / TSC are the first in their families to access to the

higher education

CRITICAL ASPECTS: STUDENT PROFILE IS CRITICAL TO ENSURE ACCESS

0%

2%

4%

6%

8%

10%

12%

14%

16%

18%

I II III IV V VI VII VIII IX X

CRUCH/PRIVATE Ues:

Greater number of

students in the highest

quintiles.

PI/TSC:

Greater number of

students in the lowest

quintiles.

CRITICAL ASPECTS: THE TRADITIONAL ACCESS SYSTEM AFFECTS THE ACCESS OF THE MOST VULNERABLE

The positive discrimination of the PT and TSC is evident. The bias of universities towards the highest deciles is greater than 30%.

CRITICAL ASPECTS: STUDENT PROFILE IS CRITICAL TO ENSURE ACCESS

FIRST CHALLENGE…

STUDENTS OF LOWER INCOME

2 out of 10

GET ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION

9 out of 10

GET ACCESS TO HIGHER EDUCATION

Access to higher education is not

equitable: For the poorest it is more difficult

to reach Higher Education

STUDENTS OF HIGHER INCOME

INST. OF HIGHER EDUCATION FIRST YEAR TOTAL

CRUCH (25) 72.639 304.577

PUBLIC (16) 41.740 171.384

G9 (9) 30.899 133.193

U. PRIVADAS (35) 78.015 341.391

ACCREDITED (20) 67.338 295.749

NON ACCREDITED (15) 10.677 45.642

PI+TSC 188.536 519.686

TOTAL 339.190 1.165.654

PI+TSC 56%

G9 20%

Publics 28%

Privates 52%

Universities 44%

PI+TSC

45%

G9

21%Publ ics

26%

Privates

53%

Universities

55%

ALLOCATION OF UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS BY IES

TOTAL ENROLMENT 2015 BY INSTITUTION OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Students: First year Students: Total

SOCIO-ECONOMIC CHARACTERISATION

IES BY SOCIOECONOMIC LEVEL: (Undergraduate Enrolment 2015)

45%

40%

39%

55%

17%

15%

14%

18%

38%

45%

47%

27%

0% 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

U.Estatales

U. del G9

U.Privadas

CFT+IP

Deciles 1-5 Deciles 6-7 Deciles 8-10

ALLOCATION OF ENROLMENT BY DECILES

ALLOCATION OF ENROLLMENT, ACCORDING TO THE TYPE OF SCHOOL EDUCATION

CHARACTERISATION BY INSTITUTIONS OF HIGHER EDUCATION

THANK YOU!!!