Post on 19-Jan-2015
description
Vision for UDOTVision for UDOT’’s Futures FutureInfrastructure and General Government Appropriations Subcommittee | September 12, 2013Infrastructure and General Government Appropriations Subcommittee | September 12, 2013
Final Four Strategic Goals
Preserve Infrastructure
OptimizeMobility
ZeroFatalities
Strengthen the economy
Integrated TransportationEmphasis AreaEmphasis Area
CollaborationEmphasis AreaEmphasis Area
EducationEmphasis AreaEmphasis Area
TransparencyEmphasis AreaEmphasis Area
QualityEmphasis AreaEmphasis Area
Operational ExcellenceEmphasis AreaEmphasis Area
UDOT’s Core Values
• Innovation• Dedication• Integrity• Public Responsiveness• Passion• Fiscal Responsibility
Administrative Efficiency ReportingAdministrative Efficiency Reporting
Media Stories
“A new national study says Utah’s urban highway conditions are among the nation’s best, but the state is among the worst for cost-effective road spending — including paying nearly four times the national per-mile average for administration.”
“Utah ranks 26th nationally for overall highway performance and efficiency — falling from 22nd and 16th best in the two previous annual reports by the Reason Foundation.
“The study says the Utah’s administrative costs per mile of highway went from $12,938 in 2007 to $42,390 in 2009, a 228 percent increase. It said that 2009 number was four times higher than the national average, and ranked Utah 45th among the states.”
Reason Foundation
Federal Highway Administration
Highway Statistics
Federal Highway Administration
Reason Foundation’s Calculation
Federal Highway Administration
Federal Highway Administration
“The Classification of administration and miscellaneous expenditures is not uniform for all states because of
indeterminate amounts charged to construction and maintenance projects.”
Miscellaneous Expenditures
Corridor Preservation Funds $200,000 Express Lanes $337,000 County of the 1st Class $27,000,000 Equipment $35,000,000 Maintenance $136,000,000
Administrative Expenditures
Appropriated vs. Actual Expenditures
*State dollars
Reason Foundation’s Calculation
Calculation with the Correct Dollar Amount for Administrative Costs
Preserving InfrastructurePreserving InfrastructureHighway Maintenance OutlookHighway Maintenance Outlook
State Highway Assets
95,000 roadside signs 2,700 large overhead signs 375,000 delineators 67,500 culverts 2,500 miles of fence 39 rest areas 100,000 acres of roadside vegetation 600 miles of guardrail 2,000 miles of ditches
Good Roads Cost Less
Preservation Rehabilitation Reconstruction$1 $4 $25
Utah Road Utah Road ConditionsConditions
Pavement Conditions
Bridge Conditions
Age Distribution of UDOT Bridges
2
Bridges1910s
400
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
Num
ber o
f Brid
ges
Proposed ReplacementNumber of Existing
1920s 1930s 1940s 1950s 1960s 1970s 1980s 1990s 2000s 2010s 2020s
6
4525
157
349355
314
183
278162
296
151
Annual Pavement and Bridge Needs
BridgesLevel 2
$50
$38
$25
$13
$0
Mill
ions
of D
olla
rs
Unfunded NeedsAvailable
$40 Million $27 Million
$10 Million
$21 Million
Prioritization ProcessPrioritization Process
Model Recommendations
AssetManageme
nt System
Prioritization Process
Utah TransportationCommission
Projects
Long Range Plans
Unified Transportation Plan
Public Input
Utah Transportation Commission - Role
• Prioritize Projects and Funding Levels
• Hold Public Hearings
• Provide for Public Input
CommissionersCommissioners
Wayne K. BarlowRegion 1
Meghan Z. HolbrookRegion 2
J. Kent Millington
Co-Chair, Region 3
Naghi ZeenatiRegion 4
Jeffrey D. HoltChairman, At-Large
Dannie R. McConkie
At-Large
Eddie L. CoxAt-Large
Project Selection Process
State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
Preserve Infrastructure
Optimize Mobility
Strengthen Economy
Long Range Plan and Data
Zero Fatalities
Projects
Project Selection Process
State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
Preserve Infrastructure
Optimize Mobility
Strengthen Economy
Long Range Plan and Data
Zero Fatalities
Rehabilitation and Preservation Projects
Model Recommendations
AssetManageme
nt System
Preserve Infrastructure
Commission
Projects
Pvmt. & Bridge Condition
Pvmt. Deterioration Curves
Available Funding
Ranking Factors:Overall Road Condition Bridge ConditionVehicle and Truck TrafficSafety
Project Selection Process
State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
Preserve Infrastructure
Optimize Mobility
Strengthen Economy
Long Range Plan and Data
Zero Fatalities
Passing Lanes, Guard Rail, etc.
Model Recommendations
SafetyManageme
nt System
Zero Fatalities
Commission
Projects
Number of Crashes
Severity of Crash
Fatalities
Ranking Factors:Greatest ability to reduce crashesBenefit-to-cost ratioProject Complexity Coordination with other projects
Project Selection Process
State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
Preserve Infrastructure
Optimize Mobility
Strengthen Economy
Long Range Plan and Data
Zero Fatalities
ITS, Capacity, Access, etc.
Model Recommendations
Prioritization
Process
Optimize Mobility
Commission
Projects
Vehicle and Truck Traffic
Congestion
Crash Rates
Ranking Factors:Average Daily Traffic: Vehicles & TrucksLevel of CongestionBenefit/Cost RatioSafety
Project Selection Process
State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP)
Preserve Infrastructure
Optimize Mobility
Strengthen Economy
Long Range Plan and Data
Zero Fatalities
Projects
BridgesLevel 2
$50
$38
$25
$13
$0
Mill
ions
of D
olla
rs
Unfunded NeedsAvailable
$40 Million$27 Million
$10 Million
$21 Million
Vision for UDOTVision for UDOT’’s Futures FutureInfrastructure and General Government Appropriations Subcommittee | September 12, 2013Infrastructure and General Government Appropriations Subcommittee | September 12, 2013