Post on 13-Dec-2015
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 1
Preparing for the V0 TDR(Lyon-Mexico project)
The V0 detector in 3 chapters 1 - Tests and simulations of detection elements• V0L and V0R design after tests in next August 2 - Photodetectors and Front End Electronics• first plans and prototypes 3 - Simulations of the V0 responses (PPR
contribution)• efficiencies for minimum bias triggers: p-p et Pb-
Pb• multiplicity indicator• luminosity control• background filter for central detector and
dimuon Conclusion
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 2
Chapter 1 - The V0 detector
V0 in both sides of the vertex
V0L at –3.5 meters• -5.1 < η < -2.75 • 4.3 < R < 44.5 cm V0R at 0.9 meter • on the front absorber • 1.7 < η < 3.8 • 4.0 < R < 33.6 cm
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 3
RingV0L V0R
ηmax/ηmin max/min ηmax/ηmin max/min
1 -5.1/-4.6 -0.7/-1.2 3.8/3.4 2.6/3.8
2 -4.6/4.2 -1.2/-1.7 3.4/2.9 3.8/6.3
3 -4.2/-3.7 -1.7/-2.8 2.9/2.5 6.3/9.4
4 -3.7/-3.2 -2.8/-4.7 2.5/2.1 9.4/14.0
5 -3.2/-2.8 -4.7/-7.0 2.1/1.7 14.0/20.7
V0 segmentation
Arrays with 72 detectors according to 5 rings/12 sectors
• in the FMD acceptance, in the dimuon arm acceptance
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 4
V0 scintillator element
Elementary channel (ring i element)• plastic scintillator (SC)• wave length shifting fibers in grooves
(WLS)• clear optical fibers for light transport (CL)• photomultiplier (PMT)• electronics (FE) for:…. triggering (V0, V1, V2)…. charge and time numerizations (Q, T)
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 5
Setup A
Coupling of WLS fibers on one of the front flat edges of scintillating elements
• 1 cm thick scintillator• from 8 to 2 WLS fibers• 40 cm long
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 6
Setup B
Coupling of WLS fibers on the latteral flat edges of scintillating elements
• 1 cm thick scintillator• 8 WLS fibers on each side• 40 cm long
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 7
Tests in T10 and with cosmics
From the MIP through several V0 elements Fast scintillator from BICRON (BC408)• 425 nm maximum emission, 2.1 ns decay constant Shifting fibers (Y11 from Kuraray) directly on PM XP2020• 430 nm maximum absorption, 476 nm maximum emission Light yield as a function of:• glue or no glue for fixing the fibers (BC600) (-35% difference)• Al/Teflon envelope on scintillator (factor 2 gain compared to
TiO2 paint)• no reflector on fiber ends (-30% loss compared to Al or Teflon) Time resolution with threshold discriminator:• as a function of elements• as a function of the collected light
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 8
Light yield from setup Adirect proportion
No fix ratio between the collected light and the number of fibers
• saturation when increasing fibers Light yield dependence on element and number of WLS
fibers• more results from very close setup by Gerardo next talk
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 9
Light / time from setup A
p1/N + p2
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 10
Light / time from setups A and B
Much more light with setup B better time resolution
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 11
Simulations
Simulation based on the LITRANI code (C++/ROOT program)
• generation and propagation of the optical photons from their emission point to detecting devices
Geometry and optical parameters of the V0 elements • absorption, diffusion, scattering lengths• reflection, diffusion coefficients Light yield • within the fiber acceptance • in the direction of the PMT
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 12
Light yield from setup A
Data normalized on ring 4 element with 4 fibers Good relative agreement between measures and
calculations
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 13
Light map from setup A
Large inhomogeneity in the light production• depends on the WLS fiber positions • zones of inefficiency in the corners
fiber positions
inefficiency zones
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 14
Light map from setup B
Better uniformity with setup B• extreme MIP light dispersion of a factor 2.5
minimum contribution
maximum contribution
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 15
Light yield from setups A and B
Ring
Setup A (10 mm)
Setup B(10 mm)
Setup B(15 mm)
1 26 49 65
2 23 49 65
3 18 48 65
4 14 49 65
5 16 52 69
Setup A (8 fibers): light depends on the geometry (~factor 2)
Setup B: light yield independent of the geometry• goes like the SC thickness
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 16
Plan
Test of quadrants in August 2003• in a real configuration (SC/WLS fibers/connector/CL fibers/PMT)…. in independent elements (setup B with 1 and 1.5 cm in
thickness)…. and from one unique SC plate (similar to setup A) next talk• with (x, y) measurement of tracks Last options chosen for a final design• included in the TDR in September 2003 Mechanical construction starting in 2004
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 17
V0R with setup B
optical fibers
absorberV0R
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 18
CERN Maquette 1:1
Si outerabsorber Si inner
T0R V0R
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 19
Chapter2 - PMT and FEE PMT signal dynamics: 1 - 1000• for a dynamics of 1- 300 MIP’s (expected in Pb-Pb)• and a 1 MIP efficiency > 97% (required for pp) Signal picked up from anode and last dynode (A/D = 6)• fast rise and decay times (pulses within 20 ns))• good linearity (minimum signal distorsion)• low dark noise (minimum V0 auto-triggering) Good candidates exist Fast electronics providing 3 levels of trigger to the CTP • one MB in pp and Pb-Pb: V0 trigger and TRD wake-up • one central and one semi-central in Pb-Pb: V1 and V2
triggers Signal dynamics numerization• 1 to 1000 in charge (relatively to minimum threshold)• 0 to 256 ns in time (relatively to the bunch clock)
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 20
PMT noise measurement
Threshold: 5 p.e.
• V0 self-triggering
• XP2020: 20 c/s• XP2972,
R7400P: … 0.003 c/s
5
1
from NA49
400
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 21
Ele
ctro
nic
s dia
gra
m
CTP
digitization
MB trigger
scin
till a
tor
centrality triggers
CTP
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 22
Integration in ALICE
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 23
Chapter 3 - Simulations
PYTHIA for pp extrapolated to proton beams of 7 TeV• MB cross-section: tot = el + inel = 101 mb el = 22 mb and inel = 79 mb• each term will be measured by TOTEM at LHC energies Limited covering of V0 at small angles (max = -5.1 / 3.8)• no detection of charged particles from elastic process Luminosity: L = (Ninel/effinel)/inel
• if PYTHIA is correctly calibrated (inel ), we should be able to evaluate the term effinel from simulations (within few %)
• … and counting Ninel should allow to measure the luminosity Two components for inel = SD + NSD :• SD: p + p > p + X (14 mb)• NSD: p + p > X + Y (65 mb)
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 24
Triggering efficiency
pp multiplicity distribution in 4• white: Pythia without transport Events with at least 1 MIP • light grey: Pythia in vacuum• light and dark grey: Pythia in
AliRoot Production of secondaries improves
the triggering efficiency effinel = 84% from V0L*V0R
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 25
Efficiency function
Triggering efficiency as a function of the minimum number of left/right cells required for the coincidence V0L*V0R
If Ncell cut = 1 for L and R
• effinel from Pythia + AliRoot:
(0.53 x 14 + 0.93 x 65) / 79 = 0.86 Threshold could be necessary to
kill residual p-gas background in the trigger rate
Simulations to evaluate the p-gas contribution are in progress
SD
NSD
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 26
Efficiency values
effinel
Ncut on Left cells
1 2 3 4 5 6
Ncut on Right cells
1 0.86 0.80 0.76 0.70 0.66 0.60
2 0.82 0.78 0.74 0.69 0.65 0.59
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 27
Multiplicity in pp
Multiplicity from Pythia + AliRoot
• 1000 events• Signal in clear• Signal + background in dark Many secondaries due to the
setup• big effects in rings 1 left/right
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 28
Multiplicity in Pb-Pb
Multiplicity from Hijing + AliRoot
• 30 events with b = 0-11.2 fm Line = pure signal Points = signal + background • circle: V0L• square: V0R Many secondaries due to the
setup• big effects in rings 1 left/right
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 29
Background from AliRoot
S/B as a function of (ring)
• B > 2S
Background in V0R
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 30
Vertex distribution
Reconstructed tracks• 1000 pp events Important in V0R• from ITS support, bellows
and flange
Background in V0R
V0, jyg, ALICE week, March 2003 31
Conclusion
Three chapters for the V0 in the TDR:• detector (design and performances in September 2003)• front end electronics (design and first tests by August)• simulations (present and close future results)