Post on 24-May-2015
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Types of Decided and Undecided Students
George Steelegsteele@oln.org
University of Southern MaineWorkshop
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Overview• Review types as identified by Virginia
Gordon
• Categorize students from case studies into typology
• Review areas identified in selected article for discussion
Steele, G. (2003), A research-based approach to working with undecided students: A case study, NACADA Journal, 23 (1 & 2) 10- 26.
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
What types describe your students?
• Case Study 1: Parent Interfering
• Case Study 2: Impulsive Decision Maker
• Case Study 3: Competitive Program – Lack of Skills
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Types of decided/undecided
• Very Decided• Somewhat Decided• Unstable Decided
• Tentatively Undecided
• Developmentally Undecided
• Seriously Undecided• Chronically IndecisiveVirginia N. Gordon, (1998)
Career Decidedness Types: A Literature Review, Career Development Quarterly, 46,4, 386-403.
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Background to Gordon’s Types• Synthesis of 15 studies on decided/ undecided
students from 1977 to 1996.• One advantage of identifying general sub-types
of students who exhibit some common characteristics is that possible interventions can be designed to focus on the patterns of needs and concerns …. when they are making educational and career related decision. (p. 391)
• Sub-types based on decision status
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Very decided
• Feel good about themselves - believe they have personal control over their lives and can make good decisions - consider their future career important to them
• Describe themselves as implementing a choice or making plans
• Satisfied with choice
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Somewhat decided• Lack appropriate occupational or self-information• May be thwarted by institutional barriers or may
be unrealistically influenced by positive job market prospects
• Higher levels of state and trait anxiety compared to very decided
• Doubt about “correctness” of decisions• May become “Major-changers”• Need help re-tracing reasons for decisions
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Unstable decided• Clear about future career but unclear about their
goals or values• Lack self-efficacy – have high level of anxiety
and lack confidence in there ability to perform – do not seek help because they are “decided”
• Can be described as decided – indecisive • May experience ambivalence about their choice• May need counseling for their lack of confidence
in their ability to perform adequately and may have high goal instability
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Tentatively undecided• Happy and playful, though undecided, close to a
decision • Feel comfortable with self and situation• Intuitive decision makers – considering several
academic/career alternatives• While they might have the fewest career
decision-making difficulties; they may need help in organizing their decision making process
• May have fear of commitment
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Developmentally undecided
• Student dealing with normal developmental tasks; may resolve indecision through maturation
• Happy and work oriented – may have identified several tentative career choices
• Building competencies to perform developmental tasks required to make a commitment to choice
• Confident but uninformed - need to gather more information about the world of work and self and work on decision-making skills
• May need help in narrowing choices
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Seriously undecided• Low levels of vocational identity and self-esteem• Perceive external barriers and rely on others to
make decisions• Moderate levels of state and trait anxiety • Students may not be far from a decision, but
something is blocking their path (frustrated) or looking for perfect choice (perfectionist)
• May need counseling - personal concerns must be addressed before traditional career exploration activities can take place
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Chronically indecisive• Distressed, unclear about career options – excessive
anxiety – may have fear of commitment or motivated by socially prescribed perfectionism
• High levels of state and trait anxiety• Lack strong motivation to become clear about their
values and goals• Fear of commitment and perfectionism may be part of
the indecisive personality• These students need probably long-term counseling to
address personal issues before academic/vocational issues can be addressed
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
What types describe your students?
• Case Study 1: Parent Interfering
• Case Study 2: Impulsive Decision Maker
• Case Study 3: Competitive Program – Lack of Skills
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Sub-types of decided and undecided students?
• What are the implications for development of services at a campus level?– For configuration of services?– For training?– For availability of resources?
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Area in article for further discussion• Advising Interview• Indecisive vs. undecided• Models for decision making • Sub-types of decided and undecided students • Characteristics of undecided students• Major changing students• Organizational models• Training: Conceptual, Informational, and
Relationship
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
The advising interview • Opening Interview
• Identifying the problem
• Identifying possible solutions
• Taking action on solution
• Summarizing the transaction
Virginia N. Gordon (1992). Handbook of Academic Advising, Greenwood Publishing, Inc. Westport CT, p.53
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Undecided students
“Students who were unwilling, unable or unready to make educational or vocational decisions.”
Virginia N. Gordon (1995). The undecided college student: An academic and career advising challenge, 2nd edition, Charles Thomas, Publishers. p.X
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Indecisive students…
• Have difficulty making any decision
• Tend to have higher levels of anxiety
• Difficulty making a commitment to a particular course of action
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Characteristics of undecided students
• Much of the research is contradictory and confusing - Lewallen (1993)
• Generally not different for the rest of the student population – some might have more anxiety about the choice.
• Variables/ideas useful: self-efficacy, anxiety and occupational choice, ego-identity status, identity and vocational maturity, persistence and academic success, etc….
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Models of decision making• Gordon (1992) conceptual grouping: self-
assessment, educational, occupational and decision making knowledge
• Schein and Laff (1997) start with dialogue - an academic major is an artificial construct
• Beck (1999) used chaos theory as a metaphor• Bertrum (1996) used a continuum of five types of
information: data, information, knowledge, understanding, and wisdom – need to move beyond information.
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Major-changing students/Over subscribed majors
• Who are these students at UMS?
• What are the majors that are oversubscribed?
• What resources/services do they have?
Workshop May, 2009 George Steele gsteele@oln.org
Organizational models
• Faculty only• Supplementary• Split• Dual• Total intake• Satellite• Self-contained
Habley, Wes (1983) Organizational structures for academic advising: Models and implications, Journal of College Student Personnel, 24(6) 535-540.