Two Year Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Treatment and Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV) Switch Data in...

Post on 11-Jan-2016

215 views 1 download

Transcript of Two Year Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Treatment and Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV) Switch Data in...

Two Year Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Treatment and Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV)

Switch Data in HBeAg-Negative Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B (Study 102)

1Hopital Beaujon, Clichy, France; 2Hospital Valle Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; 3University Hospital “St Ivan Rilsky”, Sofia, Bulgaria; 4University of Uludag, Bursa, Turkey; 5Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria; 6Royal

Free Hospital, London U.K.; 7University of Calgary, Calgary Alberta, Canada; 8Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto Ontario, Canada; 9Gilead Sciences, Durham NC

Patrick Marcellin1, Maria Buti2, Zahary Krastev3, Selim Gurel4, Rozalina Balabanska5, Geoff Dusheiko6, Robert Myers7, E Jenny Heathcote8, Jeff Sorbel9, Jane Anderson9, Elsa Mondou9 and Franck Rousseau9

59th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver DiseaseOctober 31-November 4, 2008

San Francisco, CAOral Presentation # 146

Acknowledgements Participating Centers

Australia &New Zealand

W.ChengD. CrawfordP. DesmondE. GaneJ. GeorgeP. GowI.KronborgC. MoyesM. NguS. RobertsJ. SasadeuszW. SievertN.StaceS. StrasserF. Weilert

US & CanadaN. AfdahlF. AndersonM. BennettN. BzowejS. ChanA. DiBisceglieP. GaglioN. GitlinS. GordonJ. Heathcote

US & CanadaK. HuI.JacobsonL. JeffersK. KaitaA. LokP. Martin T. MinR. MyersT. NguyenP. PockrosN.RavendhranR. RubinV.RustgiM. ShermanM. ShiffmanM. TongH. TrinhN. TsaiC. WangZ. Younossi

Bulgaria, Czech Republic & PolandR. BalabanskaM. Beniowski R. FlisiakA.GladyszW. HalotaA. HorbanP. HusaI. KotzevZ.KrastevW. KryczkaT. MachJ. SperlK. TchernevP. UrbanekM. Volfova

Spain, Germany & FranceK. BarangeY. BenhamouT. BergJ. BronowickiW. BoecherP. BuggischM. ButiJ. Calleja

Spain, Germany & France T. CasanovasJ. EnriquezG. GerkenF. HabersetzerT. HeintgesC. HezodeH. HinrichsenD. HuppeS. KaiserM. MannsP. MathurinS. MaussB. MollerJ. PetersonM. PrietoG. TeuberC. TrepoR. ZachovalJ. ZarskiS. Zeuzem

UK & NetherlandsR. DeManG. DusheikoD. MutimerR. Williams

Greece, Turkey & ItalyU. AkarkaP. AndreoneG. DalekosG. GermanidisS. GurelS. HadziyannisG. KitisO. KurdasS. OzenirlerM. RizzettoH. SenturkO. Ozdogan

Gilead SciencesJ. DinsdaleA. FosterE. Montgomery

ICONQuintiles

Patrick Marcellin, MD Hospital Beaujon, University of Paris

I have financial relationships within the last 12 months relevant to my presentation with:

Hoffman La Roche, Schering Plough, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb and Idenix-Novartis,Vertex, Human

Genome Sciences, Cytheris, Intermune, Pharmasset and Tibotec.

AND

My presentation does include discussion of off-label use of

emtricitabine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Background

• Tenofovir DF (TDF) is a nucleotide analog and obligate chain terminator

• Approved for HIV-1 in 2001: ~ 2 million patient-years of experience

• Approved for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in 2008

• Week 48 Phase 3 data showed TDF superior to ADV: – 93% of HBeAg-negative TDF-treated patients had HBV DNA <400 copies/mL

Aim

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of:

• 2 years of TDF therapy

• Switch from ADV to TDF

RA

ND

OM

IZA

TIO

N

2:1

Tenofovir 300 mg

Adefovir 10 mg

Open-label

Week 48

Liver BiopsyPre-treatment Liver Biopsy

Double Blind

Week 96

Tenofovir 300 mg

Tenofovir 300 mg

HBeAg Negative Study 102 Design

*Week 72 HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL option to add emtricitabine (FTC) to TDF in a fixed dose tablet

Year 2Year 1

Week 72*

TDF TDF-TDF: N= 250 235 225 TDF FTC/TDF: N= (2)* ADV ADV-TDF: N= 125 112 110

Patients (on study drug)

Week 384

Year 8

• HBeAg- patients• Age 18-69 years • Compensated liver disease• Lamivudine experienced or naive• HBV DNA > 105 copies/mL • ALT > ULN and <10 x ULN• Knodell necroinflammatory score ≥ 3• HIV-1, HDV, HCV seronegative

Key Eligibility Criteria

Methods

• HBV DNA and laboratory analyses every 8 weeks

• HBsAg every 16 weeks

• Resistance surveillance: patients with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL (69 IU/mL)

Assessments During Year 2 (after week 48 through week 96)

Baseline Disease andDemographic Characteristics

 CHARACTERISTICTDF

(N=250)ADV

(N=125)

Mean Age (years) 44 43

Race Caucasian Asian

64%25%

65%24%

Male 77% 78%

Prior lamivudine experience 17% 18%

Mean HBV DNA (log10 copies/mL) 6.86 6.98

Mean ALT (U/L) 128 164

Mean Knodell necroinflammatory score Mean Knodell fibrosis score

7.82.3

7.82.4

Knodell fibrosis score = 4 (cirrhosis) 19% 20%

Viral Genotype A B C D

12%9%

12%64%

11%14%10%63%

% Patients with HBV DNA <400 copies/mL (95% CI) (ITT)

Pe

rce

nta

ge

(%

)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Weeks on Study

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96

89%

91% P=0.672

Randomized Double Blind Open Label

18% LAM Exp: 93%

96%

250TDF-TDF N= 250250 245245245 243243243 248248248 247247247 242242242 243243243 234234234

125ADV-TDF N= 125125 125125125 124124124 120120120 123123123 123123123 122122122 122122122

% Patients with HBV DNA <400 copies/mL (95% CI)(On-Treatment Analysis)

Pe

rce

nta

ge

(%

)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

100

Weeks on Study

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96

250TDF-TDF N= 250250 242242242 239239239 242242242 241241241 226226226 224224224 214214214125ADV-TDF N= 125125 123123123 121121121 117117117 117117117 110110110 109109109 109109109

99%100%

P=0.166

~ 89% Retention

Randomized Double Blind Open LabelRandomized Double Blind

18% LAM Exp: 97% 100%

Mean HBV DNA (log10copies/mL) (95% CI)

P=0.181

Randomized Double Blind Open Label

P<0.001

Mea

n (9

5% C

I) H

BV

DN

A (

Log 1

0 C

opie

s/m

L)

0

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

Weeks on Study

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96

250TDF-TDF N=250250 242242242 239239239 242242242 241241241 226226226 224224224 214214214125ADV-TDF N=125125 123123123 121121121 117117117 117117117 110110110 109109109 109109109

LLOQ

ADV Switch Patients

• Viral suppression on ADV is maintained after switching to TDF – 100% of patients (76/76) were responders at Week 96

• Viral suppression of viremic patients on ADV is rapidly obtained with TDF – At week 64: 94% – At week 96: 100%

HBV DNA response (below 400 copies/mL) at Week 96 for ADV patients who switched to TDF at Week 48:

Mean ALT (U/L) (95% CI)M

ean

(95%

CI)

ALT

(U

/L)

0

25

50

75

100

125

150

175

200

Weeks on Study

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96

250TDF-TDF N= 250250 244244244 238238238 242242242 240240240 223223223 223223223 215215215125ADV-TDF N= 125 123123 122122 118118 117117 107107 108108 108108

P=0.82735 U/L34 U/L

Randomized Double Blind Open Label

ULN for females=34 U/LULN for males=43 U/L

Patients with Virologic Breakthrough During Year 2

Definition of Virologic Breakthrough:

• confirmed ≥400 copies/mL after being <400 copies/mL OR

• confirmed 1 log increase from nadir

Patients with Virologic Breakthrough

Pt 7957

HB

V D

NA

(Log

10 C

opie

s/m

L)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Weeks on Study

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96

LLOQ

TDF TDF

FTC+TDF

Non-adherent (TDF levels BQL)

HB

V D

NA

(Lo

g 10

Cop

ies/

mL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Weeks on Study

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96

LLOQ

TDFTDF

non-adherent (TDF levels BQL)

Pt 6852

Patients with Virologic Breakthrough

Pt 1674

HBV

DN

A (L

og10

Cop

ies/

mL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Weeks on Study

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96

LLOQ

Pt 1669

Patient off drug between weeks 80 and 96 Patient off drug between weeks 80 and 96

TDF TDF TDF TDF

HB

V D

NA

(Lo

g10

Cop

ies/

mL)

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

10

11

Weeks on Study

0 8 16 24 32 40 48 56 64 72 80 88 96

LLOQ

TDF TDF

Resistance Surveillance

All patients :– at baseline– yearly if ≥ 400 copies/mL (≥ 69 IU/mL– at discontinuation of TDF mono-therapy if ≥ 400 copies/mL

Any patient post-baseline with:– conserved site changes in pol/RT– virologic breakthrough– polymorphic site changes (> 1 patient)

Genotyping(HBV pol / RT)

Phenotyping(HBV pol / RT)

Resistance Surveillance Results

No resistance up to 2 years of TDF mono-therapy

• No HBV pol/RT amino acid substitutions associated with TDF resistance were detected through 96 weeks of TDF monotherapy

Week 96 TDF Resistance Surveillance; A Snow-Lampart et al. Poster # 977

Summary of Safety Data during Open Label TDF Week 96

  TDF-TDF (N=250)

ADV-TDF (N=125)

Study Drug-Related SAE 1 (<1%) 0

Deaths Metastatic liver carcinoma 1 (<1%) 0

G3 or G4 Laboratory 23 (10%) 11 (10%)

Discontinue due to an AE hepatic neoplasm dizziness, fatigue, lack of concentration

2 (1%)11

000

Confirmed ↓ phosphorus < 2mg/dL 2 (<1%) 1 (<1%)

Confirmed 0.5 mg/dL in creatinine 0 0

Confirmed creatinine clearance <50 mL/min 0 0

ConclusionsWeek 96

• TDF demonstrated durable, potent antiviral activity through Week 96: – 99% of patients on therapy had HBV DNA <400 copies/mL

• No resistance to TDF monotherapy detected up to 2 years

• Patients can safely and effectively switch from ADV to TDF treatment:– 100% of patients had HBV DNA <400 copies/mL

• TDF was well tolerated through Week 96

Patient Disposition

N= 375Randomized and Treated

TDFTDFn = 225

Completed Week 96

N = 125Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV)

Entered Open-Label TDF Period TDFTDF = 235 ADVTDF = 112

Discontinued Treatment Prior to Week 48

TDF = 6ADV = 4

N= 250Tenofovir DF (TDF)

ADVTDFn = 110

Completed Week 96

Discontinued Treatment Between Weeks 48 and 96 TDFTDF n = 10ADVTDF n = 2

Permanently Initiated FTC/TDF prior to Week 96TDFTDF n = 2ADVTDF n = 0

Patient Disposition

N= 375Randomized and Treated

TDFTDFN = 225

TDF-TDF – FTC/TDF*N= 2 (of 225)

Completed Week 96

N = 125Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV)

Entered Open-Label TDF Period TDFTDF = 235 ADVTDF = 112

Discontinued Treatment Prior to Week 48

TDF N = 6ADV N = 4

N= 250Tenofovir DF (TDF)

ADVTDFN = 110

ADV-TDF – FTC/TDF*N= 0 (of 110)

Completed Week 96

Discontinued Treatment Between Weeks 48 and 96

TDFTDF N = 10ADVTDF N = 2

Marcellin P, et al., AASLD 2008; Oral #146

~ 89% Retention

*Permanently Initiated FTC/TDF Combination

therapy Week 72TDFTDF N = 2ADVTDF N = 0

egarcia
if you are going to use this dispositions slide I would consider using this re-formatted one. The previous version was very inconsistent in font, size, alignment, labeling (n=), etc.