Post on 27-Sep-2020
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
ANNUAL AND FIVE YEAR REPORT
FISCAL YEAR 2015/16
_______________________________
Coachella Valley Association of Governments
Transportation Department
COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
Transportation Uniform
Mitigation Fee
Fiscal Year 2015/16
Annual Report
CVAG
Transportation Department
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
FY 2015/16 ANNUAL REPORT
TABLE of CONTENTS
I. INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 II. FY 2015/16 TUMF COLLECTIONS REPORT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 III. TUMF COLLECTIONS by LAND USE CATEGORY . . . . . . . . . . . . 17 IV. UNITS of MEASURE . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 V. TUMF COLLECTIONS by JURISDICTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 29 Cathedral City Coachella County of Riverside Desert Hot Springs Indian Wells Indio La Quinta La Quinta-In LIEU Palm Desert Palm Springs Rancho Mirage VI. COMPARISON BETWEEN TUMF COLLECTED and
LOCAL MEASURE A RECEIVED . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39 VII. CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM La Quinta . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51 VIII. ACCOMPLISHMENTS THROUGH REGIONAL MEASURE A FUNDS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
FY 2015/16
ANNUAL REPORT
SECTION I
INTRODUCTION
1
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE FY 2015/16 ANNUAL AND FIVE YEAR REPORT
INTRODUCTION
In November 1988, Riverside County voters approved Measure A; a one-half cent increase in sales tax over a twenty-year period to be used for transportation purposes. A major factor contributing to the support of Measure “A” was the “return to source” concept which requires the additional sales tax revenue generated in a specific geographic area be used to finance projects within that same area, and that Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fees (TUMF) be adopted valley wide on all new development. The program has been so successful, in November 2002, Riverside County voters approved a 30-year extension of Measure A (2009 - 2039). Despite its success, Measure “A” funds will only contribute a portion of the transportation improvements necessary to prevent a potential breakdown of the regional transportation system. The TUMF program was developed to generate additional funds required for necessary improvements to the regional transportation system. Local jurisdictions may choose not to collect TUMF, however, jurisdictions not collecting TUMF forfeit their share of Local Measure A funds to the regional arterial program. TUMF is a development impact assessment which provides funding for transportation improvements required to support new development. The assessment is based on the number of vehicle trips new development or site improvement will generate. The number of vehicle trips utilized is based on studies within the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual which, in most cases, is the foundation of the TUMF Daily Trip Generation Rates. The 8th edition ITE Trip Generation Manual was in use during FY 15/16.
TUMF is uniformly applied across all participating jurisdictions within the Coachella Valley; it is collected by the local jurisdictions and then transferred to CVAG for allocation to the Regional Arterial Program. The fee for each land use category is detailed in the TUMF Handbook, incorporated by reference, is available at CVAG offices or online at: https://www.cvag.org/library/pdf_files/trans/TUMF_Handbook_07_01_2012.pdf
2
The TUMF Nexus Study Report presents the evaluation of population and employment growth, future transportation needs and the availability of traditional transportation funding to establish TUMF fee levels and program revenue collection targets. The TUMF Nexus Study Report identifies all sources and amounts of funding anticipated to complete financing of eligible transportation improvements. The TUMF Nexus Study Report, incorporated by reference, is available at CVAG offices. And online at: https://www.cvag.org/library/pdf_files/trans/TUMF_Nexus_Report_2005.pdf
The Transportation Project Prioritization Study (TPPS) serves as an unbiased, methodological way to provide CVAG direction in determining funding for regional arterials by prioritizing the eligible study segments. The TPPS is available at CVAG offices or online at: https://www.cvag.org/library/pdf_files/trans/TPPS%20with%20Graphics.pdf. TUMF works in conjunction with CVAG’s allocation of Measure A to fund the CVAG share of regional transportation projects. CVAG apportions 55% of the CVAG share of the cost of each regional transportation project identified in the TPPS to TUMF. The balance is paid with Measure A funds. No portion of a project is funded until sufficient funding to complete the project has been committed. TUMF revenues are applied to the TPPS projects in order of priority, such that a new project will only be funded when sufficient revenues for projects underway are assured. Because the project priorities set out in the TPPS control the order of funding, it also controls generally the approximate timeline for the commencement of each listed project. The following information pertains to the TUMF fund for the year ending June 30, 2016.
Fund Balance - June 30, 2015 10,769,167
Balance of fees collected (accrual basis) - June 30, 2016 3,912,419
Interest earnings from Investment Pool 44,813
Repayments 0
Other Miscellaneous revenues/receipts 47,773
Project costs (5,506,028)
Program management expenditures (552,975)
Fund Balance - June 30, 2016 8,715,169
3
There were no interfund transfers or loans from the TUMF Fund. No fees were refunded or re-allocated pursuant to Gov Code Section 66001 for sums that remain unspent after five years and for which a date of commencement of the improvement has not been provided.
Five Year Test
Using First in First Out Method
Revenues Collected 6/30/2016
Revenues Collected from 2012 2,328,130
Revenues Collected from 2013 3,420,304
Revenues Collected from 2014 4,948,910
Revenues Collected from 2015 4,387,682
Revenues Collected from 2016 3,912,419
Total Revenue for Last Five Years 18,997,445 As of June 30, 2016, $112,754,591 has been collected by the assessment of TUMF and an additional $21,951,365 of Measure A In-Lieu funds were collected for a total of $134,705,956 since program inception on July 1, 1989.
PALM SPRINGS
INDIO
LA QUINTA
COACHELLA
PALM DESERTRANCHO MIRAGE
DESERT HOT SPRINGS
INDIAN WELLS
CATHEDRAL CITY
Coachella Valley Association of Governments TUMF/In-Lieu Collections
FY 2015/16
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
²
0 5 10 15 202.5Miles
Cathedral City TUMF -$352,526
Coachella TUMF -$49,189
County of Riverside TUMF - $279,005
Desert Hot Springs TUMF - $246,305
Indian Wells TUMF - $51,448
Indio TUMF - $440,986
La Quinta TUMF - $472,396; In Lieu - $712,804
Palm Desert TUMF - $705,743
Palm Springs TUMF - $534,212
Rancho Mirage TUMF - $67,805
·}74
·}86
·}62
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
FY 2015/16
ANNUAL REPORT
SECTION II
FY 2015/16 TUMF COLLECTIONS REPORT
3
Cathedral City, 9.0% Coachella, 1.3%
Desert Hot Springs, 6.3%
Indian Wells, 1.3%
Indio, 11.3%
Palm Desert, 18.0%
Palm Springs, 13.7%
Rancho Mirage, 1.7%
County of Riverside , 7.1%
La Quinta (In-Lieu), 18.2%
La Quinta, 12.1%
TUMF Collections/In-Lieu Contributions Percentage by Jurisdiction
FY 2015/16
4
TUMF 15/16 % of FY Total Inception (7/1/1989) to 6/30/2016 % of Total
$352,526.43 9.01% $10,342,310.88 7.68%
$49,189.01 1.26% $5,222,164.45 3.88%
$246,304.92 6.30% $4,800,630.20 3.56%
$51,448.32 1.32% $2,737,559.26 2.03%
$440,985.60 11.27% $27,452,989.22 20.38%
$472,396.02 12.07% $2,150,146.20 1.60%
$705,742.90 18.04% $20,767,560.09 15.42%
$534,211.83 13.65% $13,886,569.48 10.31%
$67,804.79 1.73% $9,055,107.78 6.72%
$279,005.10 7.13% $16,332,051.81 12.12%
$0.00 0.00% $1,927,787.44 1.43%
$0.00 0.00% $1,070,889.25 0.80%
$712,803.66 18.22% $18,952,687.62 14.07%
$3,912,418.57 100.00% $134,698,453.67 100.00%
Regional
Arterials 18,651,336.60 $292,817,501.83
TOTAL TUMF and
Measure A 22,563,755.17 $427,102,952.87
IN LIEU - COACHELLA
LA QUINTA
PALM DESERT
ALL JURISDICTIONS
TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
DESERT HOT SPRINGS
INDIAN WELLS
INDIO
IN LIEU - LA QUINTA
TOTAL
RANCHO MIRAGE
RIVERSIDE COUNTY
IN LIEU - DHS
PALM SPRINGS
CATHEDRAL CITY
COACHELLA
5
CITY OF CATHEDRAL CITY
TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
Collected Refunds Interest TOTAL
July $145,308.95 $0.00 $0.00 $145,308.95
August $5,512.32 $0.00 $0.00 $5,512.32
September $16,729.36 $0.00 $0.00 $16,729.36
1st Quarter $167,550.63 $0.00 $0.00 $167,550.63
October $90,593.85 $0.00 $0.00 $90,593.85
November $40,441.80 $0.00 $0.00 $40,441.80
December $3,674.88 $0.00 $0.00 $3,674.88
2nd Quarter $134,710.53 $0.00 $0.00 $134,710.53
January $9,187.20 $0.00 $0.00 $9,187.20
February $9,187.20 $0.00 $0.00 $9,187.20
March $8,004.15 $0.00 $0.00 $8,004.15
3rd Quarter $26,378.55 $0.00 $0.00 $26,378.55
April $5,512.32 $0.00 $0.00 $5,512.32
May $5,512.32 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
June $12,862.08 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
4th Quarter $23,886.72 $0.00 $0.00 $23,886.72
Accruals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $352,526.43 $0.00 $0.00 $352,526.43
6
CITY OF COACHELLA
TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
Collected Refunds Interest TOTAL
July $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
August $34,598.52 $0.00 $0.00 $34,598.52
September $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
1st Quarter $34,598.52 $0.00 $0.00 $34,598.52
October $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
November $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
December $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
2nd Quarter $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
January $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
February $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
March $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
3rd Quarter $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
April $14,590.49 $0.00 $0.00 $14,590.49
May $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
June $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
4th Quarter $14,590.49 $0.00 $0.00 $14,590.49
Accruals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $49,189.01 $0.00 $0.00 $49,189.01
7
COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE
TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
Collected Refunds Interest TOTAL
July $7,537.83 $0.00 $0.00 $7,537.83
August $11,024.64 $0.00 $0.00 $11,024.64
September $7,191.36 $0.00 $0.00 $7,191.36
1st Quarter $25,753.83 $0.00 $0.00 $25,753.83
October $115,840.83 $0.00 $0.00 $115,840.83
November $32,011.93 $0.00 $0.00 $32,011.93
December $15,736.32 $0.00 $0.00 $15,736.32
2nd Quarter $163,589.08 $0.00 $0.00 $163,589.08
January $13,098.24 $0.00 $0.00 $13,098.24
February $9,187.20 $0.00 $0.00 $9,187.20
March $28,706.24 $0.00 $0.00 $28,706.24
3rd Quarter $50,991.68 $0.00 $0.00 $50,991.68
April $15,020.73 $0.00 $0.00 $15,020.73
May $15,978.81 $0.00 $0.00 $15,978.81
June $7,670.97 $0.00 $0.00 $7,670.97
4th Quarter $38,670.51 $0.00 $0.00 $38,670.51
Accruals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $279,005.10 $0.00 $0.00 $279,005.10
8
CITY OF DESERT HOT SPRINGS
TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
Collected Refunds Interest TOTAL
July $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
August $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
September $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
1st Quarter $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
October $10,923.43 $0.00 $0.00 $10,923.43
November $1,837.44 $0.00 $0.00 $1,837.44
December $20,211.84 $0.00 $0.00 $20,211.84
2nd Quarter $32,972.71 $0.00 $0.00 $32,972.71
January $3,674.88 $0.00 $0.00 $3,674.88
February $207,679.33 $0.00 $0.00 $207,679.33
March $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
3rd Quarter $211,354.21 $0.00 $0.00 $211,354.21
April $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
May $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
June $1,978.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,978.00
4th Quarter $1,978.00 $0.00 $0.00 $1,978.00
Accruals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $246,304.92 $0.00 $0.00 $246,304.92
9
CITY OF INDIAN WELLS
TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
Collected Refunds Interest TOTAL
July $7,349.76 $0.00 $0.00 $7,349.76
August $1,837.44 $0.00 $0.00 $1,837.44
September $1,837.44 $0.00 $0.00 $1,837.44
1st Quarter $11,024.64 $0.00 $0.00 $11,024.64
October $5,512.32 $0.00 $0.00 $5,512.32
November $1,837.44 $0.00 $0.00 $1,837.44
December $9,187.20 $0.00 $0.00 $9,187.20
2nd Quarter $16,536.96 $0.00 $0.00 $16,536.96
January $1,837.44 $0.00 $0.00 $1,837.44
February $7,349.76 $0.00 $0.00 $7,349.76
March $9,187.20 $0.00 $0.00 $9,187.20
3rd Quarter $18,374.40 $0.00 $0.00 $18,374.40
April $1,837.44 $0.00 $0.00 $1,837.44
May $3,674.88 $0.00 $0.00 $3,674.88
June $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
4th Quarter $5,512.32 $0.00 $0.00 $5,512.32
Accruals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $51,448.32 $0.00 $0.00 $51,448.32
10
CITY OF INDIO
TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
Collected Refunds Interest TOTAL
July $45,936.00 $0.00 $0.00 $45,936.00
August $84,522.24 $0.00 $0.00 $84,522.24
September $42,261.12 $0.00 $0.00 $42,261.12
1st Quarter $172,719.36 $0.00 $0.00 $172,719.36
October $20,211.84 $0.00 $0.00 $20,211.84
November $18,374.40 $0.00 $0.00 $18,374.40
December $51,448.32 $0.00 $0.00 $51,448.32
2nd Quarter $90,034.56 $0.00 $0.00 $90,034.56
January $9,187.20 $0.00 $0.00 $9,187.20
February $23,886.72 $0.00 $0.00 $23,886.72
March $7,349.76 $0.00 $0.00 $7,349.76
3rd Quarter $40,423.68 $0.00 $0.00 $40,423.68
April $58,798.08 $0.00 $0.00 $58,798.08
May $42,261.12 $0.00 $0.00 $42,261.12
June $36,748.80 $0.00 $0.00 $36,748.80
4th Quarter $137,808.00 $0.00 $0.00 $137,808.00
Accruals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $440,985.60 $0.00 $0.00 $440,985.60
11
CITY OF LA QUINTA
TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
Collected Refunds Interest TOTAL
July $20,211.84 $0.00 $0.00 $20,211.84
August $18,374.40 $0.00 $0.00 $18,374.40
September $316,213.62 $0.00 $0.00 $316,213.62
1st Quarter $354,799.86 $0.00 $0.00 $354,799.86
October 29,399.04 $0.00 $0.00 $29,399.04
November 5,512.32 $0.00 $0.00 $5,512.32
December 5,512.32 $0.00 $0.00 $5,512.32
2nd Quarter $40,423.68 $0.00 $0.00 $40,423.68
January $12,862.08 $0.00 $0.00 $12,862.08
February $20,211.84 $0.00 $0.00 $20,211.84
March $16,536.96 $0.00 $0.00 $16,536.96
3rd Quarter $49,610.88 $0.00 $0.00 $49,610.88
April $11,024.64 $0.00 $0.00 $11,024.64
May $12,862.08 $0.00 $0.00 $12,862.08
June $3,674.88 $0.00 $0.00 $3,674.88
4th Quarter $27,561.60 $0.00 $0.00 $27,561.60
Accruals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $472,396.02 $0.00 $0.00 $472,396.02
12
CITY OF LA QUINTA
IN LIEU TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
Collected Refunds (to La Quinta) Interest TOTAL
July $93,168.75 $46,584.38 $0.00 $46,584.38
August $93,168.75 $46,584.38 $0.00 $46,584.38
September $125,090.93 $62,545.47 $0.00 $62,545.47
1st Quarter $311,428.43 $155,714.22 $0.00 $155,714.22
October $130,919.28 $65,459.64 $0.00 $65,459.64
November $103,089.86 $51,544.93 $0.00 $51,544.93
December $138,319.11 $69,159.56 $0.00 $69,159.56
2nd Quarter $372,328.25 $186,164.13 $0.00 $186,164.13
January $119,902.43 $59,951.22 $0.00 $59,951.22
February $90,247.05 $45,123.53 $0.00 $45,123.53
March $121,195.06 $60,597.53 $0.00 $60,597.53
3rd Quarter $331,344.54 $165,672.27 $0.00 $165,672.27
April $140,467.27 $70,233.64 $0.00 $70,233.64
May $97,703.71 $48,851.86 $0.00 $48,851.86
June $130,271.90 $65,135.95 $0.00 $65,135.95
4th Quarter $368,442.88 $113,987.81 $0.00 $184,221.44
Accruals $42,063.13 $21,031.57 $0.00 $21,031.57
TOTAL $1,425,607.23 $642,569.98 $0.00 $712,803.62
13
CITY OF PALM DESERT
TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
Collected Refunds Interest TOTAL
July $53,813.76 $0.00 $0.00 $53,813.76
August $132,740.64 $0.00 $0.00 $132,740.64
September $12,768.00 $0.00 $0.00 $12,768.00
1st Quarter $199,322.40 $0.00 $0.00 $199,322.40
October $15,048.98 $0.00 $0.00 $15,048.98
November $1,837.44 $0.00 $0.00 $1,837.44
December $18,374.40 $0.00 $0.00 $18,374.40
2nd Quarter $35,260.82 $0.00 $0.00 $35,260.82
January $3,674.88 $0.00 $0.00 $3,674.88
February $11,024.64 $0.00 $0.00 $11,024.64
March $3,674.88 $0.00 $0.00 $3,674.88
3rd Quarter $18,374.40 $0.00 $0.00 $18,374.40
April $141,853.69 $0.00 $0.00 $141,853.69
May $54,364.80 $0.00 $0.00 $54,364.80
June $256,566.79 $0.00 $0.00 $256,566.79
4th Quarter $452,785.28 $0.00 $0.00 $452,785.28
Accruals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $705,742.90 $0.00 $0.00 $705,742.90
14
PALM SPRINGS
TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
Collected Refunds Interest TOTAL
July $5,512.32 $0.00 $0.00 $5,512.32
August $18,374.40 $0.00 $0.00 $18,374.40
September $14,699.52 $0.00 $0.00 $14,699.52
1st Quarter $38,586.24 $0.00 $0.00 $38,586.24
October $10,113.54 $0.00 $0.00 $10,113.54
November $3,674.88 $0.00 $0.00 $3,674.88
December $20,928.00 $0.00 $0.00 $20,928.00
2nd Quarter $34,716.42 $0.00 $0.00 $34,716.42
January $13,012.90 $0.00 $0.00 $13,012.90
February $1,837.44 $0.00 $0.00 $1,837.44
March $324,176.90 $0.00 $0.00 $324,176.90
3rd Quarter $339,027.24 $0.00 $0.00 $339,027.24
April $36,748.80 $0.00 $0.00 $36,748.80
May $64,911.29 $0.00 $0.00 $64,911.29
June $20,221.84 $0.00 $0.00 $20,221.84
4th Quarter $121,881.93 $0.00 $0.00 $121,881.93
Accruals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $534,211.83 $0.00 $0.00 $534,211.83
15
CITY OF RANCHO MIRAGE
TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
Collected Refunds Interest TOTAL
July $7,349.76 $0.00 $0.00 $7,349.76
August $1,031.56 $0.00 $0.00 $1,031.56
September $5,512.32 $0.00 $0.00 $5,512.32
1st Quarter $13,893.64 $0.00 $0.00 $13,893.64
October $9,187.20 $0.00 $0.00 $9,187.20
November $3,674.88 $0.00 $0.00 $3,674.88
December $5,512.32 $0.00 $0.00 $5,512.32
2nd Quarter $18,374.40 $0.00 $0.00 $18,374.40
January $3,674.88 $0.00 $0.00 $3,674.88
February $9,187.20 $0.00 $0.00 $9,187.20
March $9,187.20 $0.00 $0.00 $9,187.20
3rd Quarter $22,049.28 $0.00 $0.00 $22,049.28
April $3,674.88 $0.00 $0.00 $3,674.88
May $5,512.32 $0.00 $0.00 $5,512.32
June $4,300.27 $0.00 $0.00 $4,300.27
4th Quarter $13,487.47 $0.00 $0.00 $13,487.47
Accruals $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
TOTAL $67,804.79 $0.00 $0.00 $67,804.79
16
ALL JURISDICTIONS
TUMF PROGRAM
FY 15-16
Collected Refunds Interest TOTAL
July $339,604.60 $0.00 $0.00 $339,604.60
August $354,600.54 $0.00 $0.00 $354,600.54
September $479,758.21 $0.00 $0.00 $479,758.21
1st Quarter $1,173,963.34 $0.00 $0.00 $1,173,963.34
October $372,290.67 $0.00 $0.00 $372,290.67
November $160,747.46 $0.00 $0.00 $160,747.46
December $219,745.16 $0.00 $0.00 $219,745.16
2nd Quarter $752,783.29 $0.00 $0.00 $752,783.29
January $130,160.92 $0.00 $0.00 $130,160.92
February $344,674.86 $0.00 $0.00 $344,674.86
March $467,420.82 $0.00 $0.00 $467,420.82
3rd Quarter $942,256.59 $0.00 $0.00 $942,256.59
April $359,294.71 $0.00 $0.00 $359,294.71
May $253,929.48 $0.00 $0.00 $253,929.48
June $409,159.58 $0.00 $0.00 $409,159.58
4th Quarter $1,022,383.76 $0.00 $0.00 $1,022,383.76
Accruals $21,031.57 $0.00 $0.00 $21,031.57
TOTAL $3,912,418.54 $0.00 $0.00 $3,912,418.54
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
FY 2015/16
ANNUAL REPORT
SECTION III
TUMF COLLECTIONS by LAND USE CATEGORY
17
TUMF COLLECTIONS by LAND USE CATEGORY
This section sorts each jurisdiction’s TUMF collections into 11 different land use categories. The bar graphs in this section provide a clear illustration of dollar amounts collected in each category. The total amount of TUMF collected during FY 2015/16 was $3,199,615. This figure excludes Local Measure “A” forfeited by the city of La Quinta, an In-Lieu jurisdiction. Residential development was the biggest generator of TUMF revenue in 2015/16 accounting for 44% of TUMF revenue. Residential development was by far the dominant source of TUMF revenue with the next highest categories being Restaurants at 19% and Lodging at 14%. There were no Terminal developments subject to TUMF during FY 2015/16. .
18
INDUSTRIAL, 1.3%
LODGING, 13.7%
MEDICAL, 0.5%
MISC.RETAIL, 0.1%
OFFICE, 7.9%
RECREATIONAL, 0.6%
RESIDENTIAL, 43.9%
RETAIL/SERVICES, 12.8%
SCHOOLS, 0.7%
STAND ALONE RESTAURANT, 18.5%
Percentage of TUMF Collected by Land Use Category
FY 2015/16
19
$1,032
$35,819
$2,187
$1,032
$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000
Cathedral City
Coachella
County of Riverside
Desert Hot Springs
Indian Wells
Indio
La Quinta
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Racho Mirage
TUMF Collections by Land Use CategoryIndustrial
FY 2015/2016 Total = $40,069(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
Negative values represent change of use.
20
$69,823
$1,837
$122,248
$35,052
$51,448
$440,986
$200,281
$203,510
$217,544
$64,310
$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000 $450,000 $500,000
Cathedral City
Coachella
County of Riverside
Desert Hot Springs
Indian Wells
Indio
La Quinta
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Racho Mirage
TUMF Collections by Land Use CategoryResidential
FY 2015/2016 Total = $1,407,040(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
Negative values represent change of use.
21
$18,901
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 18000 20000
Cathedral City
Coachella
County of Riverside
Desert Hot Springs
Indian Wells
Indio
La Quinta
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Racho Mirage
TUMF Collections by Land Use CategoryRecreation
FY 2015/2016 Total = $18,901(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
Negative values represent change of use.
22
$276,522
$161,394
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000
Cathedral City
Coachella
County of Riverside
Desert Hot Springs
Indian Wells
Indio
La Quinta
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Racho Mirage
TUMF Collections by Land Use CategoryLodging
FY 2015/2016 Total = $437,916(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
Negative values represent change of use.
23
$6,266
$198,709
$19,095
$35,739
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000
Cathedral City
Coachella
County of Riverside
Desert Hot Springs
Indian Wells
Indio
La Quinta
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Racho Mirage
TUMF Collections by Land Use CategoryOffice
FY 2015/2016 Total = $259,808(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
Negative values represent change of use.
24
$43,278
$11,533
$11,720
$12,544
$103,709
$125,922
$93,660
$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000
Cathedral City
Coachella
County of Riverside
Desert Hot Springs
Indian Wells
Indio
La Quinta
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Racho Mirage
TUMF Collections by Land Use CategoryRetail/Services
FY 2015/2016 Total = $402,366(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
Negative values represent change of use.
25
$2,492
$0 $1,000 $2,000 $3,000 $4,000 $5,000 $6,000 $7,000 $8,000 $9,000 $10,000
Cathedral City
Coachella
County of Riverside
Desert Hot Springs
Indian Wells
Indio
La Quinta
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Racho Mirage
TUMF Collections by Land Use CategoryMisc. Retail/Services
FY 2015/2016 Total = $2,492(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
Negative values represent change of use.
26
$235,903
$112,166
$168,406
$67,362
$6,974
$2,463
$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000
Cathedral City
Coachella
County of Riverside
Desert Hot Springs
Indian Wells
Indio
La Quinta
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Racho Mirage
TUMF Collections by Land Use CategoryRestaurant
FY 2015/2016 Total = $593,273(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
Negative values represent change of use.
27
$3,516
$11,146
0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000
Cathedral City
Coachella
County of Riverside
Desert Hot Springs
Indian Wells
Indio
La Quinta
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Racho Mirage
TUMF Collections by Land Use CategoryMedical
FY 2015/2016 Total = $14,662(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
Negative values represent change of use.
28
$23,088
0 5000 10000 15000 20000 25000
Cathedral City
Coachella
County of Riverside
Desert Hot Springs
Indian Wells
Indio
La Quinta
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Racho Mirage
TUMF Collections by Land Use CategorySchools
FY 2015/2016 Total = $23,088(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
Negative values represent change of use.
29
COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS
SUMMARY of LAND USE ACTIVITIES July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016
FEES COLLECTED
Note: These amounts are net TUMF and do not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.
Land Use
Categories
Units of
Measure
Cathedral
City Coachella
Desert Hot
Springs
Indian
Wells Indio La Quinta
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Rancho
Mirage
County of
Riverside
All
Agencies
Terminal Flights Per Day $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
Industrial Square Footage $1,032 $35,819 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,187 $0 $1,032 $0 $40,069
Residential Dwelling Unit $69,823 $1,837 $35,052 $51,448 $440,986 $200,281 $203,510 $217,544 $64,310 $122,248 $1,407,040
Lodging Room $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $276,522 $161,394 $0 $0 $437,916
Recreational Square Footage $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $18,901 $0 $0 $18,901
Medical Square Footage $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $11,146 $0 $0 $3,516 $14,662
Office Square Footage $0 $0 $198,709 $0 $0 $0 $19,095 $35,739 $0 $6,266 $259,808
Retail/Service Square Footage $43,278 $11,533 $12,544 $0 $0 $103,709 $125,922 $93,660 $0 $11,720 $402,366
Schools Square Footage $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $23,088 $23,088
Misc. Retail Square Footage $2,492 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $2,492
Restaurant Square Footage $235,903 $0 $0 $0 $0 $168,406 $67,362 $6,974 $2,463 $112,166 $593,273
Financial Square Footage $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
TOTALS $352,526 $49,189 $246,305 $51,448 $440,986 $472,396 $705,743 $534,212 $67,805 $279,005 $3,199,615
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
FY 2015/16
ANNUAL REPORT
SECTION IV
UNITS of MEASURE
28
COACHELLA VALLEY ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENTS SUMMARY of LAND USE ACTIVITIES July 1, 2015 through June 30, 2016
UNITS of MEASURE
Land Use
Categories
Units of
Measure
Cathedral
City Coachella
Desert Hot
Springs
Indian
Wells Indio La Quinta
Palm
Desert
Palm
Springs
Rancho
Mirage
County of
Riverside
All
Agencies
Terminal Flights Per Day 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Industrial Square Footage 1,000 34,723 0 0 0 0 2,120 0 1,000 0 38,843
Residential Dwelling Unit 42 1 19 28 240 109 121 121 35 87 803
Lodging Room 0 0 0 0 0 0 257 150 0 0 407
Recreational Square Footage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3,393 0 0 3,393
Medical Square Footage 0 0 0 0 0 0 27,000 0 0 1,440 28,440
Office Square Footage 0 0 38,306 0 0 0 3,681 6,889 0 1,208 50,084
Retail/Service Square Footage 7,614 2,029 2,207 0 0 18,246 30,268 16,478 0 2,182 79,024
Schools Student 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 104 104
Misc. Retail Square Footage 1010 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,010
Restaurant Square Footage 5,260 0 0 0 0 3,755 10,120 1,048 370 2,501 23,054
Financial Square Footage 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
FY 2015/16
ANNUAL REPORT
SECTION V
TUMF COLLECTIONS by JURISDICTION
29
$1,032
$2,492
$69,823
$235,903
$43,278
$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000
INDUSTRIAL
LODGING
MEDICAL
MISC.RETAIL
OFFICE
RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL
RESTAURANT
RETAIL/SERVICES
TUMF Collections by JurisdictionCity of Cathedral City
FY 2015/2016 Total = $352,526 (This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
30
$35,819
$1,837
$11,533
$0 $5,000 $10,000 $15,000 $20,000 $25,000 $30,000 $35,000 $40,000
INDUSTRIAL
LODGING
MEDICAL
MISC.RETAIL
OFFICE
RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL
RESTAURANT
RETAIL/SERVICES
TUMF Collections by JurisdictionCity of Coachella
FY 2015/2016 Total = $49,189(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
31
$3,516
$6,266
$122,248
$112,166
$11,720
$23,088
0 20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000
FINANCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
LODGING
MEDICAL
MISC.RETAIL
OFFICE
RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL
RESTAURANT
RETAIL/SERVICES
SCHOOLS
TUMF Collections by JurisdictionCounty of Riverside
FY 2015/2016 Total = $279,005(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
32
$198,709
$35,052
$12,544
$0 $20,000 $40,000 $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 $180,000 $200,000 $220,000
FINANCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
LODGING
MEDICAL
MISC.RETAIL
OFFICE
RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL
RESTAURANT
RETAIL/SERVICES
TERMINAL
TUMF Collections by JurisdictionCity of Desert Hot Springs
FY2015/2016 Total = $246,305(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
33
$51,448
$0 $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000
FINANCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
LODGING
MEDICAL
MISC.RETAIL
OFFICE
RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL
RESTAURANT
RETAIL/SERVICES
TERMINAL
TUMF Collections by JurisdictionCity of Indian Wells
FY 2015/2016 Total = $51,448(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
34
$440,986
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000 300000 350000 400000 450000 500000
FINANCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
LODGING
MEDICAL
MISC.RETAIL
OFFICE
RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL
RESTAURANT
RETAIL/SERVICES
TERMINAL
TUMF Collections by JurisdictionCity of Indio
FY 2015/2016 Total = $440,986(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
35
$200,281
$168,406
$103,709
0 50000 100000 150000 200000 250000
FINANCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
LODGING
MEDICAL
MISC.RETAIL
OFFICE
RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL
RESTAURANT
RETAIL/SERVICES
TERMINAL
TUMF Collections by JurisdictionCity of La Quinta
FY 2015/2016 Total = $472,396(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
36
$2,187
$276,522
$11,146
$19,095
$203,510
$67,362
$125,922
$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000
FINANCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
LODGING
MEDICAL
MISC.RETAIL
OFFICE
RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL
RESTAURANT
RETAIL/SERVICES
TERMINAL
TUMF Collections by JurisdictionCity of Palm Desert
FY 2015/2016 Total = $705,743(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
37
$161,394
$35,739
$18,901
$217,544
$6,974
$93,660
$0 $50,000 $100,000 $150,000 $200,000 $250,000 $300,000 $350,000 $400,000
FINANCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
LODGING
MEDICAL
MISC.RETAIL
OFFICE
RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL
RESTAURANT
RETAIL/SERVICES
TERMINAL
TUMF Collections by JurisdictionCity of Palm Springs
FY 2015/2016 Total = $534,212(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
38
$1,032
$64,310
$2,463
$- $10,000 $20,000 $30,000 $40,000 $50,000 $60,000 $70,000
FINANCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
LODGING
MEDICAL
MISC.RETAIL
OFFICE
RECREATION
RESIDENTIAL
RESTAURANT
RETAIL/SERVICES
TERMINAL
TUMF Collections by JurisdictionCity of Rancho Mirage
FY 2015/2016 Total = $67,805(This figure is net TUMF collected and does not include collection or reimbursement of any related interest.)
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
FY 2015/16
ANNUAL REPORT
SECTION VI
COMPARISON BETWEEN TUMF COLLECTED and
LOCAL MEASURE “A” RECEIVED
39
COMPARISON BETWEEN
TUMF COLLECTED and LOCAL MEASURE “A” RECEIVED July 1, 1989 through June 30, 2016
Jurisdictions participating in the collection of TUMF receive 100% of their Local Measure “A” for street and road projects. The formula for Local Measure “A” distribution involves two variables in equal proportions; 1) dwelling units, and 2) taxable sales. These variables are updated on an annual basis for use beginning July 1st of each fiscal year. As of June 30, 2016, the cumulative amount of Local Measure “A” received, $211,294,850 has exceeded the amount of TUMF collected, $112,754,590. In all jurisdictions except Indio, the cumulative Local Measure “A” received has exceeded the cumulative TUMF collected. The graphs on the following pages illustrate the comparison on an all-jurisdiction cumulative basis as well as individual jurisdictions by fiscal year.
40
$10,342,311
$5,222,164
$16,332,052
$4,802,608
$2,743,072
$27,452,989
$2,150,146
$20,767,560
$13,886,579
$9,055,108
$28,792,276
$7,396,016
$31,633,182
$6,283,532
$4,628,865
$27,219,589
$2,268,332
$48,630,375
$37,822,362
$16,620,320
$0 $10,000,000 $20,000,000 $30,000,000 $40,000,000 $50,000,000 $60,000,000
Cathedral City
Coachella
County of Riverside
Desert Hot Springs
Indian Wells
Indio
La Quinta
Palm Desert
Palm Springs
Racho Mirage
TUMF Collected/Local Measure "A" ReceivedAll Jurisdictions
07-01-89 to 06-30-16
Cumulative TUMF $112,754,590 Cumulative Local Measure "A" $211,294,850
41
$723 $689$630
$425
$209
$326
$173 $153
$327
$492
$634
$738
$549 $544 $539
$392 $396 $401
$616
$69
$222
$20 $33
$152
$388
$152
$353
$481
$615$592
$626 $608$653 $683 $710
$748$830
$1,007
$1,140$1,180
$1,244
$1,460
$1,630
$1,775
$1,660
$1,440
$1,113
$1,023$1,076
$1,154
$1,296$1,311
$1,369$1,367
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
$2,000
Tho
usa
nd
sCity of Cathedral City
TUMF Collected/Local Measure "A" Received
07-01-89 to 06-30-16
Cumulative TUMF $10,342,311 Cumulative Measure "A" $28,792,276
42
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $12$50
$199
$535
$1,121
$1,047
$477
$654
$195
$363
$110$87
$140$91 $91
$49
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$156
$269$304
$370
$431
$515$545 $535
$454 $461 $463
$520
$588 $588 $601 $594
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Tho
usa
nd
sCity of Coachella
TUMF Collected/Local Measure "A" Received
07-01-89 to 06-30-16
Cumulative TUMF $5,222,164 Cumulative Measure "A" $7,396,016
43
$215$199
$26 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $28$51 $41 $29
$84
$279
$823 $818$779
$753
$92
$9 $4
$82
$6
$148
$18
$71
$246
$113$144
$34$0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$60 $51
$209$227 $229 $241
$278
$334
$404 $419$384
$310$308$319
$378
$445$463 $477
$458
$0
$100
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
Tho
usa
nd
sCity of Desert Hot Springs
TUMF Collected/Local Measure "A" Received
07-01-89 to 06-30-16
Cumulative TUMF $4,802,608 Cumulative Measure "A" $6,283,532
44
$59
$109
$77
$19 $17$24
$205
$40
$163$175
$247
$104
$165
$31
$162
$131
$219
$279
$162
$44
$19 $24
$41
$66$55 $55 $51
$80
$102$96
$113 $107 $109$115 $116
$122$135
$159 $164$173 $178
$190
$217
$243$252
$229
$184 $182$193
$202
$236$228
$242
$259
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
$250
$300
Tho
usa
nd
sCity of Indian Wells
TUMF Collected/Local Measure "A" Received
07-01-89 to 06-30-16
Cumulative TUMF $2,743,072 Cumulative Measure "A" $4,628,865
45
$309 $306 $367$288 $275
$155$298
$665
$420 $463$356
$639 $923
$1,437
$2,079
$2,408
$2,940
$3,225
$3,025
$891$750
$909
$284
$787
$2,001
$811
$441$490$626 $580 $615 $562 $577 $589 $551 $603
$670$756
$833$937
$1,019
$1,193
$1,371
$1,696$1,675$1,544
$1,244$1,199$1,250$1,360
$1,542
$932$1,050
$1,755
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
Tho
usa
nd
sCity of Indio
TUMF Collected/Local Measure "A" Received
07-01-89 to 06-30-16
Cumulative TUMF $27,452,989 Cumulative Measure "A" $27,219,589
46
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $22,049
$601,146
$1,054,555
$472,396
$0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0 $0
$130,810
$705,989
$718,730
$712,804
$0
$200,000
$400,000
$600,000
$800,000
$1,000,000
$1,200,000
Tho
usa
nd
sCity of La Quinta
TUMF Collected/Local Measure "A" Received
07-01-89 to 06-30-16
Cumulative TUMF $2,150,146 Cumulative Measure "A" $1,555,528
47
$468$358
$685
$324
$668
$908
$631
$859$865 $878
$1,126
$817
$1,274
$551 $576
$1,458
$1,292
$2,779
$698
$945
$143$252
$169
$416$542
$378
$706$613
$783 $806$869 $840 $890
$1,016
$1,183
$1,314
$1,490
$1,741
$1,950$1,995$2,027
$2,261
$2,516
$2,801$2,649
$2,408
$1,993$1,960$2,062
$2,236
$2,522 $2,543 $2,577$2,586
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
Tho
usa
nd
sCity of Palm Desert
TUMF Collected/Local Measure "A" Received
07-01-89 to 06-30-16
Cumulative TUMF $20,767,560 Cumulative Measure "A" $48,630,375
48
$375
$256
$391$291
$109$221
$507
$125$172
$283
$553
$250$176
$452
$1,004$1,014
$842
$1,218
$2,008
$711
$334 $358$410
$297$373
$624$534
$839
$1,072
$905 $1,001$912$1,000
$944 $957$1,030
$1,136
$1,295$1,373$1,413 $1,422
$1,585
$1,711
$1,987
$1,856
$1,707
$1,355$1,412
$1,525
$1,686
$1,886$1,916$1,952$1,946
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
Tho
usa
nd
sCity of Palm Springs
TUMF Collected/Local Measure "A" Received
07-01-89 to 06-30-16
Cumulative TUMF $13,886,579 Cumulative Measure "A" $37,822,362
49
$424
$139
$393$355
$26$50 $72
$142
$277
$550
$377
$840
$650
$861 $881
$487
$417
$962
$428
$294
$68
$9 $20
$83 $78$103
$68
$274
$350
$303$340
$317$350
$384 $394$422
$485$523
$604 $618 $614
$746
$891
$953 $974
$889
$705$694 $713$751
$828 $819 $835
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
Tho
usa
nd
sCity of Rancho Mirage
TUMF Collected/Local Measure "A" Received
07-01-89 to 06-30-16
Cumulative TUMF $9,055,108 Cumulative Measure "A" $16,620,320
50
$854
$559
$693$748
$565
$438
$325
$534 $534
$1,075
$900 $920$990
$1,108
$886
$1,061
$896
$1,047$1,080
$121$41
$209
$16 $29$96
$329$279
$393$494
$697$633
$579 $600 $638 $640$720
$809
$968$1,074
$1,163$1,211
$1,433
$1,614
$1,902 $1,918
$1,679
$1,313$1,275$1,260$1,300
$1,633
$1,878$1,987
$1,823
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
Tho
usa
nd
sCounty of Riverside
TUMF Collected/Local Measure "A" Received
07-01-89 to 06-30-16
Cumulative TUMF $16,332,052 Cumulative Measure "A" $29,810,235
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
FY 2015/16
ANNUAL REPORT
SECTION VII
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM LA QUINTA
51
CONGESTION MANAGEMENT PROGRAM
The Congestion Management Program (CMP) is an effort to link land use, transportation, and air quality, to promote reasonable growth management programs that will effectively utilize new transportation funds, alleviate traffic congestion and related impacts, and improve air quality. The CMP states: "Any jurisdiction that adopts a multi-jurisdictional Transportation Uniform Mitigation Fee (TUMF) which complements the objectives of the CMP, will be found in compliance with the CMP requirements." All jurisdictions, regardless of whether or not they participate in the TUMF Program, must comply with other required elements of the CMP, such as development of deficiency plans if the actual LOS falls below the minimum CMP requirement standard of "E", Transportation Demand Management (TDM), and the Conformance and Monitoring Process. Measure A funds are distributed to local jurisdictions for local street and road projects. These funds are distributed by the Riverside County Transportation Commission (RCTC), based on a Coachella Valley formula that applies a 50% weight to the proportionate share of dwelling units and a 50% weight to taxable sales generated. The CMP requires, as of January 1, 1992, that all new development be tracked in non-TUMF jurisdictions, and calculations performed annually, to demonstrate an equitable share of Measure A funds towards the Regional Arterial Program. CVAG MONITORING PROCESS To meet requirements of the CMP, In-Lieu jurisdictions forward copies of their approved Building Activity Report (or its equivalent) to CVAG on a monthly basis. CVAG staff reviews the report and requests copies of building permits issued for all development subject to TUMF. Data is then extracted from the building permits and entered into the jurisdiction’s database as if the jurisdiction was participating in the TUMF program. Estimation is obtained when fees are calculated on development subject to TUMF. The city of La Quinta began participation in the TUMF Program in April 2013. Prior to its participation in the collection of TUMF, La Quinta forfeited its Local Measure A to the Regional Arterial Program on a monthly basis. The amount of Local Measure A was tracked and compared with estimated revenue that would have been generated if TUMF had been collected. To date, La Quinta’s estimated TUMF exceeds Local Measure A forfeited and is considered to be a “TUMF shortfall”. La Quinta will repay this shortfall through continuing to forfeit half of its Local Measure A until all funds are recovered. The following page provides a comparison between estimated TUMF that would have been collected if La Quinta had been participating in the TUMF program, and the amount of Local Measure A the city forfeited to the Regional Arterial Program beginning July 1, 1989 through June 30, 2016.
52
$882
$321
$544$526
$729
$430$441
$576
$923
$1,132$1,214
$1,011
$1,295
$1,447
$1,935
$1,575
$2,546
$1,693
$1,394
$1,184
$118 $125$68
$132$0 $0 $0
$117 $147 $174$180 $187 $235
$292$298$324
$394$523
$621$686
$891 $906
$1,064
$1,297$1,323$1,281
$1,085$1,101
$1,148$1,263 $1,281
$706 $719 $713
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
Tho
usa
nd
sCity of La Quinta
Estimated TUMF Collected/Local Measure "A" Forfeited
07-01-89 to 06-30-16
Estimated TUMF $22,241,236 In-Lieu Contributions $18,952,688
*Since the City of La Quinta became a participate of TUMF at a later time they forfeited their share of Measure "A" for that time period. In order to be a participate La Quinta was being charged half of the estimated TUMF that would have been collected from the programs Inception.
TRANSPORTATION UNIFORM MITIGATION FEE
FY 2015/16
ANNUAL REPORT
SECTION VIII
ACCOMPLISHMENTS THROUGH REGIONAL MEASURE “A” FUNDS
Approved Actual Actual Actual Actual ActualLead Project CVAG Expenditures Expeditures Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Expenditures Total Expenditures
Project Description Agency1 Cost Share Prior to FY 08/09 FY 08/09 FY 09/10 FY 10/11 FY 11/12 FY 12/13 FY 13/14 FY 14/15 FY 15/16 To-Date
Interchanges (IC)Interchange Preparation Fund Various 10,449,238.75$ 10,449,238.75$ 1,786,873.73$ 976,034.82$ 469,822.04$ 1,146,014.00$ 123,584.44$ 13,986.90$ 2,982.60$ -$ 4,519,298.53$ Indian Ave./I-10 IC PS 26,476,137.00$ 3,142,835.00$ 1,339,361.06$ 413,579.66$ 151,778.96$ 253,902.24$ 255,205.32$ (11,859.38)$ 7,825.50$ 188,417.12$ -$ 2,598,210.48$ Palm Dr./Gene Autry Tr./I-10 IC COR 38,603,000.00$ 25,931,000.00$ 1,628,763.52$ 2,489,048.37$ 1,135,323.29$ 2,055,818.31$ 2,767,663.39$ 1,073,473.06$ -$ (4,926,048.83)$ -$ 6,224,041.11$ Date Palm Dr./I-10 IC incl. RR bridge Various 31,721,000.00$ 17,181,000.00$ 3,002,000.00$ 4,433,410.42$ 1,332,046.17$ 166,317.04$ 4,612.33$ 1,820.10$ 2,252.46$ -$ 8,942,458.52$ Monterey Ave./I-10 Ramp Improvements PD 8,100,000.00$ 5,150,000.00$ 1,788,111.37$ 31,310.66$ 459,635.09$ 16,987.49$ 7,384.38$ 211,665.23$ 1,233,589.18$ -$ -$ 3,748,683.40$ Portola Ave./I-10 IC Various 72,100,000.00$ 54,075,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Jefferson St./I-10 IC Indio/COR 77,886,000.00$ 42,160,000.00$ 768,857.24$ 316,430.71$ 1,766,008.70$ 416,668.50$ 1,066,519.73$ 2,074,998.72$ 5,017,174.06$ 1,818,443.88$ 5,398,757.96$ 18,643,859.50$ Ave. 50/I-10 IC COA 2,800,000.00$ 1,875,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Ave. 66/SR 86 IC CT 46,934,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Subtotal Interchanges 315,069,875.75$ 159,964,073.75$ 10,313,966.92$ 4,226,404.22$ 8,415,978.50$ 5,221,436.71$ 4,386,674.30$ 3,366,876.86$ 6,263,391.44$ (2,916,935.37)$ 5,398,757.96$ 44,676,551.54$
BridgesIndian Canyon Ave. (from Garnet to and incl. RR crossing)PS 21,500,000.00$ 4,642,150.00$ 145,137.85$ 20,823.79$ 39,054.47$ 21,658.37$ 330,381.98$ 431,287.14$ 16,398.26$ 3,548.08$ -$ 1,008,289.94$ Gene Autry Tr. (fr. 1-10 to Vista Chino incl. WWR & RR bridge)PS 10,500,000.00$ 9,304,937.93$ 5,295,427.30$ 762,411.45$ 19,143.23$ 1,050,249.25$ 905,124.06$ 10,467.61$ 2,427.97$ 251.11$ -$ 8,045,501.98$ Indian Canyon Ave. (across WWR) PS 3,324,000.00$ 2,301,000.00$ 156,348.61$ 433.44$ 219,559.99$ 88,653.04$ 1,232,145.88$ 390,684.77$ (9,089.37)$ -$ -$ 1,914,122.40$ Adams Street Bridge LQ 12,451,780.00$ 2,414,035.00$ -$ -$ 141,590.21$ 383,720.03$ 385,572.38$ 407,310.90$ 584,503.57$ 11,425.31$ -$ 1,914,122.40$ Cathedral Canyon Bridge CC 22,038,000.00$ 1,895,820.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 86,007.95$ 23,653.93$ 28,265.67$ 20,141.96$ -$ 158,069.51$ Date Palm Bridge (across WWR) CC 18,703,000.00$ 1,608,925.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 38,036.50$ 26,882.61$ 36,032.70$ 27,602.72$ 128,554.53$ Ave. 56 Grade Separation COR 22,218,043.00$ 14,884,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 992,399.77$ 242,701.88$ 568,344.65$ 2,486,404.34$ 4,089,490.36$ 3,065,301.69$ 11,444,642.69$ Ave. 66 Grade Separation COR $23,490,000 12,597,417.00$ - - - 146,337.17$ 98,320.43$ 76,755.14$ 143,252.02$ 385,093.89$ 1,076,649.21$ 1,926,407.86$ Ave. 52 Grade Separation COA $22,200,000 6,215,625.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 2,090,625.00$ 4,125,000.00$ -$ -$ 6,215,625.00$ Ramon Bridge Widening PS 35,998,000.00$ 8,146,500.00$ -$ -$ 75,000.00$ -$ 11,589.27$ 127,482.63$ 53,064.08$ 177,710.31$ -$ 444,846.29$ Frank Sinatra Bridge over WWR RM 35,290,000.00$ 3,035,822.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 20,814.41$ 30,184.99$ 33,676.98$ 27,051.65$ 111,728.03$ Vista Chino Bridge over WWR PS 114,700.00$ 8,172,375.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 56,750.14$ 33,191.79$ 13,811.88$ 103,753.81$ Dune Palms Bridge over WWR LQ 17,510,000.00$ 1,506,750.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 37,478.98$ 17,494.01$ 54,972.99$ South Palm Canyon Bridge PS 101,968.00$ 76,476.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 10,207.14$ -$ 10,207.14$ East Palm Canyon Bridge PS 102,083.00$ 76,563.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 11,752.91$ -$ 11,752.91$ Ave. 50 Bridge Coa 4,696,500.00$ 1,108,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Avenue 44 Bridge (across WWR) Indio 19,230,000.00$ 1,654,260.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Subtotal Bridges 269,468,074.00$ 77,986,895.93$ 5,596,913.76$ 783,668.68$ 494,347.90$ 2,683,017.63$ 3,291,843.83$ 4,185,462.68$ 7,544,044.28$ 4,850,001.52$ 4,227,911.16$ 33,657,211.44$
Arterial LinksFred Waring (Adams St. to Porta Maria) COR 11,409,000.00$ 5,370,000.00$ -$ -$ 525,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ 2,578,481.42$ 1,221,037.15$ -$ 4,324,518.57$ Monroe St. (from Ave. 52 to I-10) Indio 22,600,000.00$ 11,925,025.00$ 3,979,874.77$ 1,279,301.01$ 253,237.08$ 7,643.54$ 777,973.48$ 4,156,153.08$ 93,450.34$ -$ -$ 10,547,633.30$ Madison St. (from Ave. 52 to Indio Blvd.) Indio 46,250,000.00$ 18,677,500.00$ 1,101,034.01$ 1,474,826.80$ 1,341,525.48$ 102,566.80$ 197,603.93$ 979,835.41$ 95,313.62$ 60,630.61$ -$ 5,353,336.66$ Hwy. 111 (thru Indian Wells) IW 16,000,000.00$ 12,730,336.50$ -$ -$ 4,460,918.99$ 494,239.19$ 2,775,849.17$ -$ 1,701,787.39$ -$ -$ 9,432,794.74$ Portola Ave. (north of Geral Ford Dr.) PD 2,139,739.00$ 534,934.83$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Jefferson St./Varner Road north of I-10 Indio 6,000,000.00$ 4,500,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 330,498.22$ 417,580.47$ 18,444.76$ -$ 766,523.45$ Hwy. 111 in Indio Indio 11,400,000.00$ 5,070,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 38,940.44$ 444,101.31$ 144,595.62$ 291,655.09$ 919,292.46$ Ave. 48 between Jackson and Van Buren Coa 3,622,000.00$ 991,500.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 45,514.26$ -$ 45,514.26$ Date Palm Drive North of I-10 CC 3,116,000.00$ 2,337,000.00$ -$ -$ 119,100.45$ -$ 119,100.45$ Jackson Street Signal Improvements Indio 3,000,000.00$ 2,655,900.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Avenue 50 (fr. Calhoun St. to Harrison St.) Coa 4,500,000.00$ 3,375,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Traffic Signals Project Coa 1,950,000.00$ 1,725,000.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 12,925.38$ 12,925.38$ Monterey Ave. (from Dinah Shore to Gerald Ford RM 1,877,072.00$ 770,034.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Frank Sinatra at Hwy 111 RM 1,794,282.00$ 670,712.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Subtotal Arterial Links 135,658,093.00$ 71,332,942.33$ 5,080,908.78$ 2,754,127.81$ 6,580,681.55$ 604,449.53$ 3,751,426.58$ 5,505,427.15$ 5,330,714.55$ 1,609,322.85$ 304,580.47$ 31,521,639.27$ Total 720,196,042.75$ 309,283,912.01$ 20,991,789.46$ 7,764,200.71$ 15,491,007.95$ 8,508,903.87$ 11,429,944.71$ 13,057,766.69$ 19,138,150.27$ 3,542,389.00$ 9,931,249.59$ 109,855,402.25$
Potential Future ObligationsJefferson St./I-10 IC Indio 58,000,000.00$ Total 58,000,000.00$ 1Lead Agency - RM - Rancho Mirage, COR - County of Riverside, IW - Indian Wells, LQ - La Quinta, PS - Palm Springs, PD - Palm Desert, COA - Coachella, CC - Cathedral City, RCTC - Riverside County Transportation CommissionClosed ProjectsPortola Ave. Bridge (over WWR) PD 15,000,000.00$ 7,450,000.00$ 6,606,729.55$ 26,776.34$ -$ -$ 6,633,505.89$ Jackson St. (from I-10 to Ave. 42) Indio 3,100,000.00$ 1,650,000.00$ 56,922.92$ 865,816.16$ 3,669.50$ -$ 926,408.58$ Jefferson St. (from Hwy. 111 to Indio Blvd.) COR 31,397,642.00$ 31,397,642.00$ 29,033,207.32$ 61,186.88$ -$ -$ 29,094,394.20$ Fred Waring Dr. (thru Palm Desert and Indian Wells) IW 38,245,250.66$ 28,683,938.00$ 26,709,409.28$ 868,898.38$ -$ -$ 27,578,307.66$ Fred Waring Dr. (from Washington to Adams) LQ 1,430,789.00$ 1,345,847.44$ -$ 1,195,633.25$ 149,792.93$ -$ 1,345,426.18$ Ramon Rd. (from Da Vall to Bob Hope) Multi 6,250,000.00$ 3,125,000.00$ 2,976,947.10$ 4,818.24$ -$ -$ 2,981,765.34$ Monterey Ave. (from I-10 to Ramon Rd.) COR 2,270,000.00$ 1,135,000.00$ -$ 1,135,000.00$ -$ 1,135,000.00$ Monterey Ave. Corridor (from Country Club to Dinah Shore)RM 5,000,000.00$ 2,500,000.00$ -$ 161,955.00$ 1,442,698.43$ 502,939.93$ 2,107,593.36$ Golf Center Parkway Indio 4,900,000.00$ 2,450,000.00$ -$ -$ 886,965.67$ 28,918.84$ 915,884.51$ Ave. 50 (from Jefferson to Jackson) Indio 11,000,000.00$ 550,000.00$ -$ 521,010.41$ -$ -$ 521,010.41$ Ave. 42 (from Golf Ctr. Pkwy. To Caspian St.) Indio 10,000,000.00$ 5,000,000.00$ 1,491,352.45$ 1,674,675.55$ 327,084.36$ 269,963.25$ 3,763,075.61$ Miles Ave. (from WWR to Clinton) COR 22,000,000.00$ 22,425,000.00$ 4,237,183.24$ 11,743,634.95$ 2,360,632.03$ 3,712,371.25$ 245,832.54$ -$ 22,299,654.01$ Interim Palm Dr. & Date Palm I-10 Projects COR 1,550,000.00$ 1,162,500.00$ 547,769.34$ 5,019.67$ 20,002.14$ -$ -$ -$ 572,791.15$ Dillon Rd. Grade Separation Various 3,841,138.00$ 2,880,854.00$ -$ -$ 519,786.84$ -$ -$ 633,795.04$ 1,153,581.88$ Ramon Rd.-Bob Hope Dr./I-10 IC CT 51,800,132.00$ 5,215,000.00$ -$ -$ 216,000.00$ -$ -$ 747,854.54$ -$ 963,854.54$ Cook Street Widening (from Fred Waring to Frank Sinatra) PD 6,000,000.00$ 3,000,000.00$ 273,955.65$ 16,872.78$ 99,484.40$ 119,104.86$ 1,185,523.98$ 115,585.75$ -$ -$ 1,810,527.42$ Varner Rd. (from Adams to Jefferson) Indio 14,418,470.00$ 7,209,235.00$ 4,271,875.53$ 95,575.91$ 566,925.63$ 317,688.86$ 13,304.41$ -$ -$ -$ 5,265,370.34$ Indian Ave. between 20th and Dillon DHS 11,396,750.00$ 8,547,562.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ Date Palm Dr. and Vista Chino Drive CC 746,750.00$ 560,062.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 442,013.35$ 31,706.33$ 473,719.68$ Hwy. 111/Washington Street Intersection LQ 776,644.00$ 582,483.00$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ -$ 481,493.43$ -$ 481,493.43$ Total 241,123,565.66$ 136,870,123.44$ 76,205,352.38$ 17,241,873.52$ 7,728,041.93$ 4,950,986.99$ 1,444,660.93$ 1,939,248.68$ 513,199.76$ 110,023,364.19$
*PDF Available upon Request