Post on 21-Feb-2022
Transforming Transit in California
November 19, 2015 California Transit Association
50th Annual Fall Conference and Exposition Pasadena, California
1
Tony Brasil, Chief Heavy Duty Diesel Implementation Branch
Mobile Source Control Division California Air Resources Board
o Significant reductions needed to meet air quality and climate goals • 90% reduction in NOx by 2031 • 40% reduction in GHGs by 2030 • 80% reduction in GHGs by 2050
o Up to 50% petroleum use reduction by 2030 o Achieving goals will require a
transformational change in all sectors o Stationary, industrial, mobile, other
Driving Change
o All possible methods needed to meet goals • Increased efficiencies • Cleaner combustion • Cleaner fuels • Zero emission vehicles • In-use controls • Other
Requires Reductions Across All Sectors
3
o Coordinating: Connecting statewide efforts between regions and agencies
o Regulations: Coordinated multi-pollutant approaches • Advanced Clean Transit • Other
o Funding: Enhance markets with strategic public incentive and investment programs • Significant funding prioritized for zero emission transit
Implementing an Advanced Technology Framework
4
o Transit bus highly suitable for advanced technologies • Operate in congested areas where
localized pollution can be a problem • Centrally located and fueled • Fixed routes • Government support
o Experiences aid other fleets in deploying advance technologies
Transit Buses Leading the Way
5
o Low NOx on-road heavy duty engines • One CNG engine certified (90% lower NOx) available 2016 • More low NOx engines expected (CNG and diesel)
o Renewable fuels • Displace conventional diesel and natural gas use • Used in multiple sectors
o Zero emission buses • Significant technology improvements over past 5 years • Commercially available • Costs have come down and continue to decline
Role for Zero- and Near-Zero Emission Buses
6
Zero Emission Buses
7
o No tailpipe emissions o Are meeting transit service needs today o Technology and costs continue to improve o Currently 190% to 420% times more efficient than
conventional o Potential for lower fuel and maintenance costs
Why Zero Emission Buses
8
o Several fleets adding to their existing zero emission bus fleet
o Number of zero emission buses operating in California to more than double next year
o Antelope Valley Transit committed to 100% zero emission bus goal as soon as possible
o More zero emission bus models available
Zero Emission Bus Market Growing Rapidly
9
Multiple Fleets Using Zero Emission Buses
10
Bus Fleet Operator Technology Type
Zero Emission Buses Existing Fleet Size1
ZBus Percent of
Fleet In
Service Ordered Total
Antelope Valley Transit Battery 2 29 31 65 48% Stanford University Battery 13 10 23 79 29% Anaheim Resort Transit Fuel Cell 0 9 9 38 24%
SunLine Transit Fuel Cell 5 11 16 104 19% Battery 0 3 3 Santa Barbara Battery 20 0 20 110 18% Porterville Transit Battery 0 2 2 14 14% Foothill Transit Battery 15 15 30 300 10% San Joaquin RTD Battery 2 7 9 113 8% Long Beach Transit Battery 0 10 10 251 4% UC Irvine Fuel Cell 1 0 1 30 3% ZEBA (AC Transit lead) Fuel Cell 13 0 13 571 2% Monterey-Salinas Battery 1 0 1 95 1% Los Angeles MTA Battery 5 0 5 2594 0% Total 77 96 173 4364
1 Source: 2014 ARB Reporting Database
Multiple Zero Emission Buses Available
11
Make Model Bus Type Fueling BYD K7M 30’ Transit Battery BYD K9S 35’ Transit Battery BYD K11M 40’ Transit Battery New Flyer Xcelsior XE40* 40’ Transit Battery or Fuel Cell Proterra BE35 35’ Transit Battery Proterra Catalyst 40’ Transit Battery El Dorado American Fuel Cell Bus* 41’ Transit Fuel Cell BYD C9 40’ Motor Coach Battery BYD C10 45’ Motor Coach Battery BYD K9M 60’ Articulated Battery New Flyer Xcelsior XE60* 60’ Articulated Battery or Fuel Cell
* In development
Note: Additional zero emission buses available that are less than 30’ in length
o Fuel cell bus fueling and range similar to CNG/diesel o Battery electric slow charge (plug-in)
• About 120 to 190 miles per charge
o Battery electric fast charge (conductive) • Charge on route for about 3 to 10 minutes • Unlimited range
o Battery electric combination • Slow charge plug-in, and • Inductive charging at strategic locations
Multiple Fueling Strategies
12
Transit Bus Fleet Characteristics by Mode
13
Mode Average Weekday
Miles
Average Speed MPH
Commuter Buses (CB) 177 29
Transit Bus (MB) 150 14
Demand Response (DR) 99 14
Source: National Transit Database 2013
Funding Opportunities
14
o Zero Emission Bus Pilot Commercial Deployment Projects • Up to $65 million available (FY14/15) and (FY 15/16)
o Hybrid and Zero Emission Voucher Incentive Project (HVIP) • $110,000 per vehicle
o Low Carbon Transit Operations Program • 5% continuous appropriation of annual Greenhouse Gas
Reduction Fund (GGRF) proceeds
o Transit and Intercity Rail Capital Program • 10% continuous appropriation of annual GGRF proceeds
o Low Carbon Fuel Standard credits
California Supporting Transition to Advanced Technologies
15
o Zero emission bus deployments around strategic “hubs” • Shared location and fueling infrastructure • Workforce training and development • Benefits to disadvantaged communities
o Up to $65M allocated* from FY 14/15 and 15/16 funds • Competitive solicitation released October 2015 • Match funding encouraged
ARB Zero Emission Bus Commercial Pilot Deployments
16 * Portion of funds are pending authorization by the Legislature
http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/aqip/solicitations.htm
o Provides vouchers for California fleets on a first-come, first-served basis • BYD • New Flyer • Proterra • Conversions to zero-emission
o Up to $110,000 for eligible zero emission buses • Visit http://californiahvip.org
ARB HVIP Funding
17
o Low Carbon Transit Operations Program (Caltrans) • Provide operating and capital assistance to transit
agencies • Awarded $25 million for close to 100 projects
o Low Carbon Transit and Intercity Rail Program (CalSTA) • Funding for rail and bus capital projects and operational
improvements • Awarded $244 million for 14 projects
State Transportation Agency
18
http://calsta.ca.gov/res/docs/pdfs/2015/Agency/TIRCPAwardSummary06302015.pdf
o Reduces GHG emissions associated with lifecycle of transportation fuels
o Earn credits to be sold on open market • CNG, RNG, electricity, hydrogen
o Transit fleets can benefit several ways • If three or more vehicles using electricity or • If producing fuel or • Through contract with fuel producer
Low Carbon Fuel Standard Can Lower Costs for Buses
19 Credit trading reports www.arb.ca.gov/fuels/lcfs/lrtmonthlycreditreports.htm
Advanced Clean Transit Regulation
20
o Mix of cleaner combustion & zero-emission buses • Low NOx technologies • Use of renewable fuels • Phased-in adoption of zero-emission technologies
o Natural fleet replacement rate (not accelerated) o Continue to provide effective, efficient, and
affordable regional transit services across California
Advanced Clean Transit Concept
21
o Flexibility for fleets to pool requirements o Flexibility for regional collaboration between
metropolitan planning organizations and transit fleets o Opportunity to recognize greater efficiencies and
zero-emission modes of transporting passengers o Recognize early zero emission bus purchases o Recognize uniqueness of small and rural operations
Advanced Clean Transit Flexibility Options
22
o Continued engagement with stakeholders • Transit workgroup • Technology and regulatory proposal workshops • Economics and business case, funding and incentives
o Update Board early 2016 o Draft regulation proposal in spring 2016 o Board consideration late 2016
Next Steps
23
o Successful transition of heavy-duty sources to zero and near-zero technologies begins with buses
o Partner with transit agencies to meet goals o Continue to improve mobility and efficiency o Will use a combination of incentives and regulatory
approaches
Conclusion
24