Post on 05-Apr-2018
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
1/24
Threads of Innovation: the European Union
Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
Firas A.ID i********Pigeonhole ***E-Mail: ********Date: 18/07/2010Graduation Dossier IIVersion: final draft
Supervisors:Dr. W. L****
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
2/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
2
Contents
1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................... 32. The Lack of Innovation in the EU: Analyzing Cause and Effect ................................. 43. A Concise Overview of the EUs Textile and Clothing Industry................................. 7
3.1 SWOT Analysis of the European Textile Industry................................................. 94. Innovation and a Traditional EU Textile Industry: Do They Mix? ........................ 11
4.1
The Role of Novel Technologies in the EU Textile Industry.......................... 12
4.2 The Importance of New Production Technologies.......................................... 124.3 Intelligent Textiles as an Opportunity for Europe .......................................... 13
5. The International Economic Dimension........................................................................ 135.1 Analyzing the Effects of Trade Agreements on Intl. Trade Relations.......... 14
6. The EU Policy Dimension: Analyzing Challenges and Responses ......................... 166.1 Technological and Scientific Research Development Framework.............. 176.2 Policy Challenges and Responses to the Textile and Clothing Sector ......... 19
7. Conclusion ................................................................................................................................ 21Bibliography .................................................................................................................................... 23
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
3/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
3
1. IntroductionThe difficulty lies not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones, which ramify, for
those brought up as most of us have been, into every corner of our minds.
British economist John Maynard Keynes, 11th of June 1935
Over the period of the last decade, the European clothing and textiles industry has
experienced fundamental restructuring. Not only has production shifted towards high-quality
articles, but also the productivity has increased considerably. This is closely linked to the
ongoing and intensive modernization of the industry, which has been shifting greater focus on
innovation. Together with this process of modernization and the restructuring of the industry
came the reduction of more than one-third of the European workforce employed in this sector.
Further factors which are predicted to significantly affect and alter the industry over the
coming decade are the European Union (EU) enlargement, increased competition as a direct
result of research, innovation, quality, and skills, and, above all, the recent abolition of quotas
together with its opportunities as well as challenges which pose themselves on a globalized
and international commercial landscape (Fahnemann, 2005).
This paper mainly revolves around the relationship between the EU innovation gap
and the textile and clothing industry. The following research question is therefore central to
this paper: What is the effect of the EU innovation gap on the textile industry? However,
this paper also deals with the following questions: What are the policies employed to
stimulate innovation and aid the troubled textile and clothing industry? How effective are
they? Thispaper examines the hypothesis stating that innovation is the savior of the textile
and clothing industry. In other words: innovation is essential for the survival of the EUs
textile and clothing industry on a globalized, increasingly competitive market economy.
In order to shed light onto these and other issues this paper begins by analyzing the
cause and effect of the lack of innovation within the EU. This is followed by a concise
overview of the EUs textile and clothing industry, serving to establish a common basis for
further discussion on the topic of innovation in the industry. As part of this a SWOT analysis
on the EU textile and clothing industry is conducted, allowing the reader to gain an improved
understanding of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities as well as threats associated with
the industry. Subsequently the interplay between innovation and the traditional EU textile and
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
4/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
4
clothing industry is examined, covering the role of new (production) technologies and
intelligent textiles as an opportunity for the EU. This chapter is followed by an analysis of the
internal economic dimension of the EU textile and clothing industry which also includes the
effects of EU trade agreements on international trade relations. Finally, the EU policy
dimension is addressed, analyzing challenges and responses to the innovation gap and the
troubled textile and clothing industry, thereby covering the technological and scientific
research development framework programme. A comprehensive conclusion summarizes the
main findings of this paper and addresses its limitations, suggesting further venues of
research.
2.
The Lack of Innovation in the EU: Analyzing Cause and Effect
The word innovation is a central key-word in this paper. For sake of establishing a clear
framework the word innovation is defined below. Additionally, innovation gap is another
concept which is fundamental to his paper and is further elaborated on later in this chapter,
illustrated by means of cause and effect as well as statistics to support claims made regarding
the innovation gap. It is important to mention that there are several, even opposing, definitions
of innovation. However, the ongoing debate on the definition on the aforementioned term is
beyond the focus of this paper. Instead the definition of innovation as established by the
American Chamber of Commerce to the European Union (AmCham) is found to be
appropriate in this particular context.
AmChamdefines innovation in its publicationRecommendations for Closing Europes
Innovation Gap published in 2006 as the successful commercial exploitation of new ideas
[by means of] incorporating new technologies, design and best practice to enable businesses
to compete effectively in the global environment. AmCham continues by stating that
innovation in the widest sense includes the development of new products and services
(product innovation), new ways of working (process innovation), and new commercial
arrangements, business models and ways of eliciting the best from people and resources
(AmCham, 2006).
According to research conducted by the Community Research and Development
Information Service (CORDIS) in 2005 the European Union invests about a third less in
research than the United States while at the same time emerging countries like China and
India are fast becoming world-class centers of research and innovation (CORDIS, 2005).
http://cordis.europa.eu/home_en.htmlhttp://cordis.europa.eu/home_en.htmlhttp://cordis.europa.eu/home_en.htmlhttp://cordis.europa.eu/home_en.htmlhttp://cordis.europa.eu/home_en.html8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
5/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
5
This can be illustrated by the statistics collected by the Organization for Economic Co-
Operation and Development (OECD) in 2005, as seen in figure 1 below:
Figure 1 Figure 2
Figure 2 above clearly shows that Japan and the United States are still ahead of the European
Union in terms of innovation. With a composite index gap value of 0.04 in 2003 and 2004 and
an even lower value in 2005 the EU is far behind the US and Japan. While the US is stable
around 0.14, Japans composite index gap value has been steadily increasing over the years,
reaching 0.18 in 2005 thereby defining the highest value yet. According to the 2006
CORDIS report 70 percent of the EU25 innovation gap can be attributed to EUs
underperformance in the following areas: information and communication technology
investment (ICT), USPTO patents and population with tertiary education.
The European Union does not lack cutting edge technological capabilities, an educated
work force or renowned research institutes and universities. In fact it has been found to have a
strong capacity for innovation (AmCham, 2006). Thus, despite the aforementionedfavorable elements, the EU is finding it difficult to accelerate competitiveness and economic
growth to a level similar to that of Japan and the US, as illustrated in figure 2 above. In the
light of the challenges faced by the EU in this context, the former Finish Prime Minister Esko
Aho chaired an independent expert group which operated under the framework of the
Commission. The expert group concluded that if Europe cannot offer an innovation-friendly
market for the creative outputs of its business, then those businesses will fail to thrive or will
go elsewhere (European Commission, 2006).
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
6/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
6
For a large number of sectors the EU cannot be said to be functioning in an innovation-
promoting manner when compared to third countries. There are plenty of examples to support
this claim. One example is the absence of common standards for energy-efficient
technologies, which has the effect of impeding the use as well as success of such
technologies. Another example is given by considering how oftentimes companies are
discouraged from innovating and developing new products due to laws dictating
disproportionate product liability. Furthermore, the level playing-field which is needed for
companies in order to innovate effectively is commonly distorted due to state aid regulations
being based on geographic location, country of possession of a corporation and size instead of
specific market failures (Keenan, Saritas, & Kroener, 2004). The result of these and other
similar factors can be observed in figure
3, where the EU as a location of the
worlds high-tech manufacturing output
has been steadily declining since the year
1990. This chart has been prepared by the
United Nations Industrial Development
Organization (UNIDO), illustrating how
the US represents the leading location of
the worlds high-tech manufacturing
output, with China quickly catching up
with the European Union and Japan.
The EU is aware of the above mentioned weaknesses and has therefore made it, over the
period of the last decade, to one of its main priorities to reach its objective of becoming the
most competitive global knowledge economy in the world. This endeavor has received
support by European leaders and has been subsequently supported by a wide range of
assessments, strategies and funding programmes. Despite all this, the EU has not been able to
achieve the aforementioned objective yet (this topic is discussed in section 5 of this paper in
more depth). Reasons for this have been identified to be the failure to invest efficiently or
suitably in the creative environments, competences, and infrastructure and, generally, the
businesses needed for successful innovation in the 21st century.
The Business Panel on the Future of EU Innovation Policy has criticized the EU for
the fact that public support for innovation is primarily provided through complex, slow and
uncoordinated programmes while noting that private finance mainly backs the same low
Figure 3
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
7/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
7
risk investments (Innovation Unlimited, 2009). As a consequence companies, entrepreneurs
and individuals are often left with a large number of barriers while finding only limited
support in order to realize their creative, ambitious and innovative ideas. The aforementioned
business panel also notes the alarming trend of public services and broader public policy only
taking little advantage of the power of innovation to transform society. Therefore the
innovative potential of the majority of the enlarged Union remains untapped. This holds true
despite the difficult economic situation and societal transformations such as increasing
globalization and an aging population which are only intensifying the aforementioned
weaknesses, leaving the call for radical change louder than ever.
3.A Concise Overview of the EUs Textile and Clothing Industry
This chapter provides an overview of the European Union textile industry, serving to establish
a common basis for further discussion on the topic of innovation in the textile industry. As
part of this chapter, the economic, social and political aspects of the EU textile industry are
touched upon in order to convey an overall picture of the state of the European textile
industry, and the most apparent trends emerging in the aforementioned sector. Developments
which are taking place beyond the EUs borders are also incorporated in order to complete the
overview.
The annual turnover of the EU15 textile and clothing industry roughly accounts to 200
billion, while employing more than 2 million people distributed amongst 177,000 companies.
Recently the number of people employed in the textile industry rose to 2.7 million due to the
EU enlargement. Over the period of four decades trade in clothing and textiles rose from $6
billion in 1963 to $343 billion in 2001, which means an increase of over 60 times compared to
the initial level. As a consequence 5.7 percent of world exports can be attributed to the textile
and clothing sector. It should be noted that a large part (56 percent) of world trade in the
textile and clothing industry can be associated with clothing alone indicating that the
clothing sector is increasing at a faster pace than the textile sector. The EU has emerged as the
worlds largest exporter of textile products and the second largest exporter in the clothing
sectormaking it stand out as a world leader in the clothing and textile trade (CEC, 2003).
Due to the gradual abolition of World Trade Organization (WTO) 1995 quotas, EU
imports have been gradually increasing. Over the past two decades the geographic distribution
of clothing and textile production has undergone fundamental change. According to the
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
8/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
8
International Labor Organization (ILO) European Union output has dropped by more than 32
percent over the aforementioned period. While the output of the United States has increased
by 97 percent and the output of Asia has increased by 97 percent. Research has shown that the
EUs share of global output has declined from 53 percent in 1980 to less than 30 percent in
the year of 1995. Traditionally, declining production is coupled with declining employment.
Investigating the employment landscape of the textile and clothing industry quickly reveals
that most jobs in this sector are semi-skilled. As a consequence those people occupying semi-
skilled positions within companies usually transfer to other low-wage occupations with only
little chance of landing a higher income job. Research by the ILO has shown that in the period
between 1990 and 1996 employment in the textile and clothing industry declined by 31
percent. The trend continued between 1996 and 1998, where employment fell by another 15
percent. Calculating these numbers reveals a disturbing figure: more than 1 million jobs in
Europe were lost in less than a decade (ILO, 2000).
The EUs textile and clothing industry now stands before the challenge of not just
maintaining but also improving its position in an increasingly globalized market. Rapid
advancements in technology and innovation from abroad are adding to the pressure in Europe.
However, international competition from countries outside the European Union is not just
stemming from advancements in technology and innovation, but also from low labor costs
abroad (especially in developing countries) which has been resulting in an ongoing process of
relocation of production facilities. An increasing number of European-based companies are
choosing to relocate in favor of the low labor costs abroad in order to guarantee their long-
term financial sustainability and competitiveness (Keenan, Saritas, & Kroener, 2004).
Sub-contracting labor-intensive production processes to North Africa, Turkey and
Eastern Europe and other cheaper locations has become common practice. The emphasis on
high-quality secondary products with greater added value has also been increasing over the
past few years. Thus there is no doubt that the industry is undergoing fundamental
restructuring in terms of the location of production facilities, the technological procedures, as
well as the quality of products manufactured (CEC, 2003). It seems that the modernization of
production processes in the European textile and clothing sector, which has already begun
(albeit progressing at comparatively slow pace) has gained even more importance in the light
of these developments.
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
9/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
9
3.1 SWOT Analysis of the European Textile IndustrySWOT stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats. A SWOT analysis is a
commonly used strategic planning method, employed in order to identify the aforementionedfactors, typically in the context of a business endeavor or project. However, the range of
usage is very broad, allowing a SWOT analysis to be conducted on a particular industry
without any difficulty in this case the European Textile industry. As part of a SWOT
analysis internal and external factors are identified. Internal factors are shaped by the industry
itself while external factors are shaped by the environment and other dynamics outside the
influence of the EUs textile industry. Strengths and Weaknesses are internal while
Opportunities and Threats on the other hand are external.
The SWOT analysis below (figure 4) confirms the statements made in the previous
chapter: while Europes textile sector benefits from a large production base and solid
infrastructure, it is suffering from high labor costs coupled with a low research and
development (R&D) commitment bringing about a shortage in innovation. Increased
globalization is amplifying the growth of low-cost imports from developing countries,
especially China. However, as also previously mentioned, the modernization of production
processes in the European textile and clothing sector is underway, steadily increasing
efficiency. Added value production, product diversification and especially technical textiles
represent great opportunities for the troubled textile sector of the EU. Finally, the SWOT
analysis helps gain a better understanding of the industry by examining it from numerous
angles covering Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats, thereby extending the
general overview of the textile and clothing to provide further valuable insights.
Space left blank in order for the table on the following page to display correctly.
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
10/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
10
Table 1SWOT Analysis of the European Textile Industry
Strengths Opportunities
Tradition & expertise in textile &clothing
Quality and design Short delivery times Organizational flexibility World leader in technology usage An effective production network
disguised in industrial sectors &
exchange of information
Enlargement increases EUs authority &influence in trade talks
Strong family firms with professionalmanagement
Market access in certain important exportmarkets
Increasing efficiency Product diversification Investment in people Goodwill Adding value through innovation, design
and branding
Investments in technical textiles
Weaknesses Threats
Low profitability in the clothing sector Fragmentation of sector High labor turnover in clothing
manufacturing
Dependence on a few multiples (i.e. rawmaterials from China)
Growing shortage of qualified humanresources (i.e. textile engineering)
R&D commitment is extremely lowcompared to other industries
Growth of cheap imports fromdeveloping countries and within the EU
Sectoral decline in Western Europe,growth in Eastern Europe
Increased cost of labor, energy, andenvironmental compliance
Piracy or illegal copying of designs andbrands
Source: (Euratex, 2004)
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
11/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
11
4. Innovation and a Traditional EU Textile Industry: Do They Mix?Over the last decade less developed countries have shifted their focus to the production of low
and medium quality sectors. These countries have become highly competitive in the
aforementioned area of production. Reasons for this include: know-how imported from
developed countries, low labor costs and high-quality textile equipment. The unique mix of
these factors has enabled developing and least developed countries to excel in the
aforementioned area of production, which led the EU15 to specialize in innovative and high-
quality textiles as well as clothing products in order to cope with these and similar challenges.
Over the recent years textile production has become more capital-intensive and increasingly
automated. As a result of this development labor wages only account for 40 and 60 percent of
production costs within the textile industry and the clothing industry respectively (Fraiman,
Singh, Arrington, & Paris, 2002).
Today a wide range of raw materials is utilized in the textile industry, both synthetic
and natural. The complexity of the fabrics is increasing, as new innovations are widening the
application spectrum of textile in general (e.g. smart textiles). This area of the textile
industry has a relatively higher rate of R&D, as customer requirements are changing at a fast
pace and manufacturers generally base their actions on customer requirements. In this
environment the EU15 has been able to assert itself in the field of technical textiles, aided bytechnology, capital and extensive know-how. According to the European Apparel and Textile
Organization (Euratex) the field of technical textiles (further elaborated on later in this
chapter) is one of the EUs most attractive markets both in terms of returns on investment
(ROI) and general profitability (Euratex, 2004).
An increasing number of companies which were active in the production of traditional
textiles are turning their focus towards technical textile, where they are assuming a pioneering
role. A recent survey conduct by CORDIS found that more than 75 percent of textile
production in the Northern Europe is focused on technical textiles; while in Germany 50
percent of current production is focused around technical textiles (CORDIS, 2005). Thus, as a
preliminary answer to the title of this chapter it can be said innovation and the EU textile
industry do mixand they must if the EU textile industry seeks to survive! The remainder of
this chapter is dedicated to the examination and analysis of how modern production and
management methods are used in the aforementioned industry, closing with stimulating
assumption and predictions on this particular topic.
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
12/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
12
4.1 The Role of Novel Technologies in the EU Textile IndustryAs previously established, the European textile industry has undergone major restructuring.
Part of this is reflected in the customers demands for more product diversity, smaller orders
and shorter lead times. Such developments have made it even more important for existing
companies to make use of modern technologies in order to be able to cope with their
customers demands. As is illustrated later in this chapter this is indeed the case, as an
increasing number of companies are realizing that simply drawing on economies of scale
(which used to be the recipe for success) does not necessarily yield positive economic profit.
Demonstrated by statistics in the previous chapter, a large part of European producers are
focusing their production around technical textiles and enjoy large market shares in this
sector. Non-wovens play a major role in this respect. Examples of non-wovens include
sophisticated products for the automotive industry, geotextiles, hygiene products, military
grade protective textiles and industrial filters (Abernathy, Dunlop, Hammond, & Weil, 1999).
Thus it is apparent that in order for European companies to preserve and extend their
competitive advantage in this sector they must successfully embrace advances in production
technologies. Examples of such production technologies include process automation
facilitators, ICT as well as new raw materials, including multifunctional textiles.
4.2 The Importance of New Production TechnologiesIn the light of the increasing trend of mass-customization and quickly changing consumer
preferences new production technologies have gained further importance. They enable
computer-based and automated production, increasing overall efficiency of the production
process and providing more flexibility. In the past production technologies were mainly
improved in order to speed up production processes and increase quality (CEC, 2003).
However, today Europe has to compete on a different level, which explains the shift of focus
extending priorities from quality and speed to flexibility and individuality. Mass-produced
clothing is widely produced in less developed countries; however, the EU must realize new
production technologies as an enabler to saturate the growing need for tailor-made products
which are then produced in a cost-effective manner within mass-production systems. This
should emerge as a distinctively European competitive advantage over mass-produced
clothing.
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
13/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
13
With new production technologies comes the unique opportunity of processing traditional
materials in a new, innovative manner. Having analyzed numerous publications on the future
of this sector quickly reveals a surprisingly large number in scientific breakthroughs in the
field of textiles. Developments in nanotechnologies, laser, biochemistry, biotechnology and
plasma will allow for new ways of yarn laminating, forming or coating processes. The fusion
of such scientific advances with the European textile industry would bring about a high
degree of desirability in terms of the final product characteristics (important for the consumer)
as well as the successive processability (important for the producer).
4.3 Intelligent Textiles as an Opportunity for EuropeSmart or intelligent textiles represent a rapidly growing market. It is a new sector wherehigh-tech innovation meets traditional European industrial design skills and engineering.
Improving the characteristics on the micro-fiber level does not only change the way such
materials are processed in the factory, but it also opens up a whole new range of usage-
scenarios. Smart textiles may find use in the context of protective clothing, military gear as
well as work, leisure and sportswearto name but a few. In such usage scenarios the reaction
to external conditions could prove extremely advantageous, serving to entertain, inform, alert
or relax the owner of such wearable technologies. Textiles reacting to fire, chemicals,
temperature changes, humidity, light, electric discharge, mechanic use or even bacteria have
already been developed and tested successfully. Another area of research concerns textiles
with light or electricity conducing properties, information storage chips as well as energy
accumulation technology. Thus returning to the statement made at the beginning of this sub-
chapter: the fusion of such technologies with the long-established know-how of the European
textile industry in the areas of industrial design and engineering may prove to be the recipe for
success allowing the EUs textile industry to both maintain and enhance their competitive
advance on a global scale (Fraiman, Singh, Arrington, & Paris, 2002).
5. The International Economic DimensionIn section 3 of this paper A Concise Overview of the EUs Textile and Clothing Industry it
was already briefly conveyed that the textile and clothing industry is undergoing a
fundamental transformation. This transformation is both triggered and spurred by increasingly
open and globalized markets and the connected financial networks of the 21st
century. In order
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
14/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
14
to understand the developments taking place in the European textile and clothing industry a
holistic approach, going beyond the borders of the EU, is necessary. As a result this chapter is
dedicated to analyzing the international economic dimension of the European textile and
clothing industry.
Over the past decade the EU15 textile and clothing sector has been experiencing a
rapid decline in employment and production. Between 2001 and 2002 the production dropped
by almost 9 percent, while employment declined by more than 8 percent. According to a
European Commission report in 2005 the overall trade deficit in this sector amounted to 26
billion in the year 2002 (European Commission, 2005). Analysis in previous chapters has
shown that the general decline in employment and production can be associated with a
combination of factors, amongst them the abolition of quantitative restrictions, lower labor
costs abroad and increasingly fierce competition from less developed countries equipped with
expertise from industrialized nations.
The fact that the EU15 only has restricted access to third countries further contributes
to the existing trade deficit. Brussels based Euratex has been working toward achieving a less
restricted world market access for a number of years, stating that freer markets would most
certainly boost European textile and clothing exports. With a growing middle class worldwide
and especially in less developed countries an increasing number of individuals are able to
afford European high-quality and added-value products, previously only obtainable by the
affluent in the West. This exact phenomenon was observed in the 1990s as Mexico, South
Korea and Brazil opened up their markets in the framework of EU trade agreements (Euratex,
2004). WTO trade agreements on the other hand lack the characteristic of symmetric
reciprocal obligations. This means that EU countries may be removing trade barriers, granting
third countries unrestricted access, however third countries are not obliged to do the same for
the EU countries. Despite the European Commissions considerable influence on trade talks
the process of symmetric market liberation is moving forward only very slowly (CEC, 2003).
This topic is further elaborated on in section 6.2 of this paper.
5.1 Analyzing the Effects of Trade Agreements on Intl. Trade RelationsFor the last four decades the international trade relations in textiles and clothing have been
largely dominated by the so called Multi-Fiber Arrangement, or short MFA. The MFA has
played an important role in protecting producers located in the United States and Europe.
However, together with the Uruguay Round of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
15/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
15
(GATT) in 1995 a phasing out process of the MFA began. The plan was to phase out the
MFA in three stages, over a ten year period, starting from 1995. The process was completed
on the 1st of January 2005. From this date the textile trade fell under the jurisdiction of the
WTO. As a result of the dismantling of the quotas, which were in place under the MFA,
textile and clothing exports from China to the West increased by more than 100 percent
(GATT, 2005). A number of experts predicted this would happen long before the MFA was
phased out, bringing about extensive repercussions for domestic manufacturers. In 2002
quotas were removed for a limited number of products. Almost immediately Chinas exports
to the European Union increased by more than 180 percent in the respective categories. Other
countries on the other hand only increased exports to the EU by 10 percent in the same
product categories. This was seen as an indicator of what should be expected from China in
2005 with the removal of the rest of the quotas (Dicken, 2003).
This drastic increase in imports from the Chinese had been anticipated by the
European Union and the United States. Therefore, as part of Chinas entry agreement to the
WTO, a special safeguard was negotiated which specifically focused on textiles. In short, this
special clause enables any WTO member to re-impose a proportional quota on the Chinese
clothing and textile sector for a maximum period of three years (2005 2008). The main
condition for this clause to be allowed was if Chinese exports significantly disrupted domestic
markets with the consequence of harming home producers. The US did not hesitate and made
direct use of the clause, limiting growth to 7.5 percent while the EU, only after massive
pressure from interest groups, limited growth to 10 percent. Such developments left an
increasing number of people doubting the possibility of full trade liberalization in the textile
and clothing sector. In the absence of new quantitative export restrictions, some industry
spokespersons argue, China will seize more than half of the global textile and clothing exports
before the year 2011. Such quantitative export restrictions are also suggested to benefit China
itself, as it would have to deal with less anti-dumping cases (Dicken, 2003).
Many see China rising to the worlds largest exporter in this sector as unfair
considering the circumstances which enable such dominance in the first place: workers for
example earn less than US$120 per month, the currency is undervalued by 40 percent, state
owned companies are financially invulnerable while enjoying economies of scale on the
national market and an increasing number of companies are gaining access to capital
manufactured in Italy, Germany and Japan, together with large parts of the know-how
(Keenan, Saritas, & Kroener, 2004). However, voices are getting louder stating that the
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
16/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
16
solution to such a crisis cannot be sought by leveling the playing field of free trade. In fact,
the idea of putting a policy of affirmative action in place is gaining more popularity. This
option would grant poorer countries tariff and quota advantages over competitors from
developed countries. In this context the European Union has already been utilizing the
General Scheme of Preferences, permitting less developed countries to export garments at
significantly lower prices. Along with this the EU has granted quota-free market access to
poorer countries (European Commission, 2005).
6. The EU Policy Dimension: Analyzing Challenges and ResponsesThis chapter can be said to be one of the most central parts to this paper. In the first part of
this chapter the approach of the EU institutions towards innovation policy is examined. This is
followed by an insight into the technological development and scientific research framework
programmes. Finally policy challenges and responses are evaluated, after shortly elaborating
on specific key-policy fields such as research and innovation policy as well as trade policy.
However, it is by no means the objective of this chapter to represent an exhaustive list of
studies conducted on the main regulatory and policy challenges in the areas of trade policies
and recent managerial and technological developments in the textile and clothing industry.
This chapter is intended to provide a well-balanced overview and analysis of the challenges
and responses faced by the EU on a policy-making level.
Starting in the 1990s innovation policies as such started to appear in the public
documents of the community institutions. The Green Paper on Innovation in 1995 marked the
first step toward innovation policy. One year later, in 1996, the First Action Plan for
Innovation in Europe was published, bringing forward policy suggestions (though sparing in
number) which later defined the direction of development. Generally, the suggested actions
were organized in three categories depending on their intended purpose, which was either tofoster an innovation culture, better articulate research and innovation, or to establish a
framework encouraging innovation (CEC, 2000). Such steps were taken in order to foster
innovation in a knowledge-driven economy, where a paradox exists which is namely that
satisfactory research performance is not successfully matched by adequate innovation
performance. This paradox has been identified and acknowledged in numerous publications
by a wide range of European institutions. For examples see COM (2000)567 or COM
(95)688. In such publication the European innovation performance was benchmarked again
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
17/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
17
Japans or the United States performance, leading to the identification of serious deficits on
the European side.
An important milestone in Europes approach to innovation policy was achieved in
2000 with the Lisbon European Council. The conclusions of the Presidency set ambitious
goals to be fulfilled by the EU over the period of the coming 10 years. Amongst those
objectives, voiced within the framework of the Lisbon strategy, was the desire to become the
most competitive and dynamic knowledge-based economy in the world, capable of
sustainable economic growth with more and better jobs and greater social cohesion (CEC,
2000). Together with the Lisbon strategy, innovation became a priority within the EU policy
framework, accepting the reality that competitiveness on a global economy largely depends
on the introduction of new, innovative, products and services. This holds particularly true for
the textile and clothing industry, as discussed in chapter 4 of this paper, where the importance
of innovation in the aforementioned industry is paramount in order to compete successfully on
a global level.
In a wider context innovation policies began to be regarded as a vital component of
industrial and enterprise policy strategies. This represented a shift in theoretical perspective
and an end to the previously employed method of framing innovation policy within the
context of research policy. According to Mytelkaand, professorial fellow at Maastricht
Economic and Social Research and Training Center on Innovation and Technology the last
decades have been marked by European institutions being influenced by a number of
unorthodox approaches, including national systems of innovations and economics of
complexity leading to a paradigm shift in the analysis of technological change and
innovation. This stands in contrast with the past where heterodox economic theories played a
decisive role, shaping European policymakers intellect within institutions such as the
Commission. Thus numerous evolutionary developments have been taking place within
European institutions, placing innovation in a more relevant position. (Mytelka & Smith,
2002).
6.1 Technological and Scientific Research Development FrameworkSince the early 90s innovation and research activities of the European Union are placed under
one main platform: the Frame Programme (FP). So-called research framework programmes
represent the EUs key legal and financial instruments utilized to implement the European
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
18/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
18
Research Area, or short ERA. In March 2002, during the Barcelona Summit, the objective of
increasing investment to 3 percent of the Unions overall GDP by the end of 2010 was set.
ERA plays a major role in achieving this objective as it is a key element to the
aforementioned strategy, which at the same time represents a political and legal obligation
stemming from the Treaty of Amsterdam. Generally, Framework Programmes last for a
period of four years and are composed by the Commission. The Council and Parliament on
the other hand has the obligation to adopt the frameworks.
Currently the 7th Framework Programme (FP7), which is the natural successor of the
6th Framework Programme (FP6), is in place. The main priorities of the FP7 have been
outlined by the European Commission in their Communication Science and technology, the
key to Europe's future - Guidelines for future European Union policy to support research.
FP7 is highly focused on achieving the Lisbon objectives, which have been addressed earlier
in this chapter. As part of this the management tools, organization, content and
implementation modes of FP7 are designed as a key contribution to the relaunched Lisbon
strategy (EurActiv, 2006). According to Science and Research Commissioner Potonik FP7
will not be just another Framework Programme. In the past, Framework Programmes have
been central to European as well as international multidisciplinary cooperation and research
activities. The 7th Framework Programme aims to continue this task, however differs from
other Framework Programmes as it is
larger (see budget comparison, figure 4)
and more comprehensive (European
Commission, 2007). Commissioner
Potonik further states that FP7 is
centered on innovation and knowledge
for growth, it will continue the drive
towards the European research area
(ERA) - thus aiming at building
the internal market of knowledge
(EurActiv, 2006). FP7 is the product of
years of consultation with European
policy making and research institutions,
the scientific community, as well as
other interested parties. Figure 4Source: (European Commission, 2007)
http://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/pdf/com-2004-353_en.pdfhttp://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/pdf/com-2004-353_en.pdfhttp://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/pdf/com-2004-353_en.pdfhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/era/index_en.htmlhttp://ec.europa.eu/research/era/index_en.htmlhttp://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/pdf/com-2004-353_en.pdfhttp://europa.eu.int/comm/research/future/pdf/com-2004-353_en.pdf8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
19/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
19
6.2 Policy Challenges and Responses to the Textile and Clothing SectorThis sub-section is intended to relate the general policy responses outlined above to the
textiles and clothing sector and more specifically to one of the research question of this paper:
What are the policies employed to help the troubled textile industry and how do they
perform? One of the Commissions communications lay out the objectives from a
perspective of the textile and clothing industry particularly well: If it is the primary
responsibility of enterprises to meet the challenges [facing the sector], the role of public
authorities is and will remain the establishment of favorable framework conditions in which
textiles and clothing, like other sectors, can develop and enjoy the opportunity to compete,
domestically and internationally, on the basis of equity (CEC, 2003).
The European Commission, being responsible for trade policy in the EU, has made it
clear from an early stage that it is not willing to take actions which are aimed at privileging
the European textile and clothing industry by means of subsidies, or the replacement of quotas
of 2005 by other trade barriers (Rossi, 2005). Judging from the Doha Development Agenda
negations the European Commission seems much more interested in the introduction of a
level playing field instead of introducing such new restrictions. Ultimately the Commission
wants to see improved conditions of market access to third countries, which are comparable
across the globe and fair at the same time. The least developed countries however are exempt
from such demands. Thus in order to improve domestic conditions for textile and clothing
producers the EU has called upon all WTO members to eliminate non-tariff barriers while at
the same time cutting customs duties to the lowest possible level. Such a call can be
understood considering that, as mentioned in chapter 5 The International Economic
Dimension of this paper, WTO trade agreements lack the characteristic of symmetric
reciprocal obligations. This means that EU countries may be removing trade barriers, granting
third countries unrestricted access, however third countries are not obliged to do the same for
the EU countries.
As part of the EUs Barcelona Process the extension of the Pan-European arrangement
of diagonal cumulation of origin to the Mediterranean countries should be fiercely pursued.
This is necessary in order to maintain and improve the complete chain of production close to
the EU market. This chain of production is the most effective way of combining the economic
advantages of geographic proximity, quality as well as production costs. Today the
cumulation of origin includes the CEECs, EFTA, Turkey and of course the EU (CEC, 2003).
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
20/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
20
Such endeavors are conducted under the framework of the Barcelona Process which has the
objective of putting in place a free trade area (FTA) encompassing the European Union and
Mediterranean countries. Such an FTA will enable manufacturers to draw from intermediate
products located around the entire area without having to deal with economic barriers, while
allowing for the successful exploitation of the competitive economic advantages of different
regions. The final result of such efforts is hoped to decrease the negative effects of the
abolition of import quotas which used to protect European markets under the Multi-Fiber
Arrangement (MFA), which is discussed in chapter 5.1 of this paper. However, the fact that
numerous countries in the Mediterranean region still do not have properly arranged FTAs
with one another represents a considerable hindrance to the smooth functioning of a diagonal
cumulation of origin.
The 7th Framework Programme, discussed in section 6.1, also contains numerous
funding possibilities which are potentially highly valuable for the textile and clothing sector.
Such funding possibilities for the textile and clothing industry can be found in the second,
third and sixth priority areas of the FP7 for Research and Development. Priority two for
example focuses on information society and technologies, while priority area three focuses on
nanotechnologies, new production processes and devices as well as knowledge-based multi-
functional materials (discussed in section 4). Priority six on the other hand focuses on
sustainable development (EurActiv, 2006). Those are all areas which are related to the
innovative textile and clothing industry of 21st century Europe. In fact, the aforementioned
priority areas already include research activates directed toward the textile and clothing
sector. This is expected to aid the EU industry to remain competitive while modernizing at the
same time.
It should be noted however that a larger number of publicly funded research and
development in the European Union is financed by its Member States (MS) therefore a
comparatively greater responsibility to let the textile and clothing sector benefit from such
work lies in the hands of the individual MS. Policies in support of human resources underlie
very similar regulations. The EUs Leonardo da Vinci II Programme for example provides
support for newly established training programmes and skills, which have benefitted the
aforementioned sector. In this case, again, it is up to the MS to improve skills in this sector as
most of the MS have their own programmes of skills development and specialized training. In
the light of such fragmented and inconsistent operations the Commission realized the
opportunity of erecting a Europe-wide approach to skills development and training (which it
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
21/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
21
is currently encouraging amongst the MS). Such a common program would be focused on
identifying best practices in the industry while coordinating future progression in order to
avoid the duplication of efforts (Rossi, 2005).
As pointed out in the SWOT analyses conducted in section 3.1, the EUs clothing and
textile industry has its strengths in fashion, design, branding and to some extent innovation.
Having said this, one may wonder about how such intellectual property rights (IPR) are
protected abroad. The importance of IPR policy is uncontested, as the lack of thereof would
severely limit the motivation for innovation and novel designs in the industry due to declining
profitability. The European Commission has recognized this and made the improvement of
IPR enforcement and protection in third countries a priority. This includes monitoring the
compliance with the WTO Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property
Rights (TRIPs). In addition to informing EU rights-holders about registration requirements
(proper registration of e.g. trademarks) necessary to be eligible for protection under TRIPs,
the Commission also engages in political discourse with trading partners, stressing the
significance of TRIPs compliance (Keenan, Saritas, & Kroener, 2004).
7. ConclusionComing back to the main research question of this paper (stated in the introduction) What is
the effect of the EU innovation gap on the textile industry? it can be safely concluded that it
is a significant one. Analysis in this paper has shown that innovation, or the lack thereof, will
largely determine the fate of the EU clothing and textile industry. This confirms the
hypothesis presented in the introduction of this paper: innovation is essential for the survival
of the EUs textile and clothing industry on a globalized, increasingly competitive market
economy. The EU has to fuse the already available excellent expertise, quality, design and
technological affinity of its traditional textile and clothing industry with innovation in order to
unlock its full potential effectively turning threats to the industry into strengths and
weaknesses into opportunities (speaking in terms of the SWOT analysis conducted in chapter
3.1).
Throughout this paper it has become clear that a knowledge society is not enough in
order to successfully compete on an increasingly competitive world market. It is vital for the
European Union to form an innovation society where valuable knowledge is utilized swiftly
and powerfully for the purpose of the development as well as benefit of society. Indeed, this
requires an effective transformation away from closed approaches which are fragmented and
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
22/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
22
only deal with single issues, to a flexible, open and networked approach. While closed
approaches typically favor large incumbents, open approaches favor new ideas and entrants,
which ultimately leads to more innovation. This paper is also intended as a call to all EU
policy makers, including EU institutions, regional as well as national governments, to actively
back this vital transformation. After all (referring to the opening quote of this paper) The
difficulty lies not in the new ideas, but in escaping from the old ones, which ramify, for those
brought up as most of us have been, into every corner of our minds. More than 75 years later,
this quote by British economist John Maynard Keynes still holds true.
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
23/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
23
Bibliography
Abernathy, F., Dunlop, J., Hammond, J., & Weil, D. (1999).A Stitch in Time: Lean Retailingand the Transformation of. New York: Oxford University Press.
AmCham. (2006, November 03).Recommendations for Closing Europe's Innovation Gap.Retrieved May 14, 2010, from Amercian Chamber of Commerce to the EuropeanUnion: http://www.umic.pt/images/stories/Innovation_amcham_eu.pdf
CEC. (2000, September 20).Innovation in a knowledge-driven economy. Retrieved June 02,2010, from EUR-Lex: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2000:0567:FIN:EN:PDF
CEC. (2003, January 16). The future of the textiles and clothing sector in the enlargedEuropean Union. Retrieved March 13, 2010, from Commission of the EuropeanCommunities: http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0649:FIN:EN:PDF
CORDIS. (2005, March 18).Research Results. Retrieved May 19, 2010, from EuropeanCommission - CORDIS: http://cordis.europa.eu/results/home_en.html
Dicken, P. (2003). Global Shift: Transforming the Global Economy. London: Paul ChapmanPublishing.
EurActiv. (2006, November 18). 7th Research Framework Programme (FP7). Retrieved May12, 2010, from EurActiv: http://www.euractiv.com/en/science/7th-research-
framework-programme-fp7/article-117494
Euratex. (2004, December 12).European Technology Platform for the future of textiles andclothing - A vision for 2020. Retrieved May 18, 2010, from Euratex - The Apparel andTextile Confederation: http://www.euratex.org/system/files/attached-files/euratex-broch-technology_platform.pdf
European Commission. (2005, March 01). Textiles and clothing industry. Retrieved May 09,2010, from European Commission Enterprise and Industry:http://ec.europa.eu/enterprise/sectors/textiles/index_en.htm
European Commission. (2006). Creating an Innovative Europe. Luxembourg: Office forOfficial Publications of the European Communities.
European Commission. (2007, March 15). Setting a new standard in European research.Retrieved May 06, 2010, from European Commission:http://ec.europa.eu/research/leaflets/fp7/page_01_en.html
Fahnemann, T. (2005, March 13).A Vision for the Textile Industry in Europe. Retrieved June01, 2010, from Lenzinger Berichte: www.lenzing.com/rd/media/LB-0842005001.pdf
8/2/2019 Threads of Innovation: the European Union Innovation Gap and the Textile Industry
24/24
Firas A. (i********) Bachelor Thesis II 2010
Fraiman, N., Singh, M., Arrington, L., & Paris, C. (2002, July 27).Zara. Retrieved June 06,2010, from Columbia Business School Marketing Cases:http://www.3isite.com/articles/ImagesFashion_Zara_Part_II.pdf
GATT. (2005, December 02).International Textile Trade Arrangements. Retrieved March 12,
2010, from GATT Digital Library:http://gatt.stanford.edu/bin/search/simple/process?offset=0&length=10&query=arrangement+regarding+international+trade+in+textiles&search=Search
ILO. (2000, April 29).Labour practices in the footwear, leather, textiles and clothing.Retrieved June 06, 2010, from International Labor Organization:http://www.ilo.org/public/english/dialogue/sector/techmeet/tmlfi00/tmlfi-r.pdf
Innovation Unlimited. (2009, October 08).Reinventing Europe through innovation. RetrievedApril 09, 2010, from Innovation Unlimited: http://ec.europa.eu/culture/key-documents/doc/forum/innovation_consultation.pdfSN0FA&sig2=DASRO3VpDi4RzB
Sx4HgtxA
Keenan, M., Saritas, O., & Kroener, I. (2004). A dying industry or not? The future of theEuropean textiles and clothing industry. Foresight, 313-322.
Mytelka, L. K., & Smith, K. (2002). Policy Learning and Innovation Theory: An Interactiveand Co-Evolving Process.Research Policy, 1-13.
Rossi, F. (2005, October 29).Innovation policy in the European Union: instruments andobjectives.Retrieved March 29, 2010, from Universita di Modena e Reggio Emilia:http://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/2009/1/MPRA_paper_2009.pdf