The Wonderful World of Wikis

Post on 06-May-2015

2.850 views 2 download

Tags:

description

01/2008 version of the handouts for Michael's wikis workshop.

Transcript of The Wonderful World of Wikis

Michael SauersTechnology Innovation Librarian, NLC

NameLibraryJobDo you or your library use wikis?Why are you attending this workshop?

2

Overview of WikisThe user experienceThe content provider experience

3

4

http://w

ww.flickr.com/photos/cogdog/19490596/

A Wiki or wiki (pronounced [wIki], [wiki] or [viki]) is a website that allows users to add content, as on an Internet forum, but also allows anyone to edit the content. "Wiki" also refers to the collaborative software used to create such a website. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki

5

Easily updated by anyone(X)HTML knowledge not requiredPage History/Change trackingReversionInstant hyperlinkingSearchable

How? Non-linear storageRelational database

6

7http://www.flickr.com/photos/kubina/326629513/

“god only knows.On the disk somewheres”

Brion Vibber, Chief Technical Officer, WikipediaIn answer to the question:

where is the text of the elephant article actually stored?Everything is Miscellaneous, Weinberger, 2007, p99

Anyone can editMinimal markup knowledge neededAutomatic hyperlinkingAutomatic change tracking

8

Can be too openCan be too unstructured

9

Resource CollectionsGood resources to answer reference questions

FAQsProject ManagementDiscussionsProcedures

Leaning more toward “informal” procedures that are more likely to change

10

htt

p:/

/ww

w.fl

ickr

.com

/ph

oto

s/io

err

or/

13

40

17

94

5/

"Wikipedia works in practice

but not in

theory.”

12

“I still marvel at how Wiki communities, which seem at first glance to be so fragile, are actually very resilient. They work because everyone can do their part.One lesson, then, is deceptively simple. When you remove barriers to changing things, you also remove the barriers to fixing what’s broken.–Dan Gillmor, We The Media, 2004

13

Sociologist Elinor Ostrom “found that some system to monitor and sanction members’ actions was a common feature of every successful community. Monitoring and sanctioning is important not simply as a way of punishing rule-breakers but also as a way of assuring people that others are doing their part. Many people are contingent cooperators, willing to cooperate as long as most others do.”– Howard Rheingold, Smart Mobs, 2002

The power of the many vs. the power of the few.

“A common defense against persistent vandals is simply to let them deface as many pages as they wish, knowing that they can easily be tracked and reverted after the vandal has left.”http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wiki#Vandalism

14

“The New York Times apparently copied an erroneous Wikipedia entry into its news pages today. From the NYT’s article on the Marburg Hemorrhagic Fever outbreak in Angola.”http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2005/04/09/note-to-the-new-york-times-dont-use-wikipedia-as-an-authoritative-source/

“Lucian George, 12, from north London, found five errors on two of his favourite subjects - central Europe and wildlife - and wrote to complain.”http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/education/4209575.stm

15

“The John Seigenthaler Sr. Wikipedia biography controversy occurred after an anonymous editor posted a hoax in the Wikipedia entry for John Seigenthaler Sr. in May 2005. In September… an old friend of Seigenthaler's, discovered the entry, which suggested that Seigenthaler may have had a role in the assassinations of both John F. Kennedy and Robert F. Kennedy. Demonstrably false statements in the article included claims that Seigenthaler lived in the Soviet Union from 1971 to 1984, and that he was the founder of a public relations firm.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Seigenthaler_Sr._Wikipedia_biography_controversy

16

“…an expert-led investigation carried out by Nature — the first to use peer review to compare Wikipedia and Britannica's coverage of science — suggests that such high-profile examples are the exception rather than the rule.The exercise revealed numerous errors in both encyclopaedias, but among 42 entries tested, the difference in accuracy was not particularly great: the average science entry in Wikipedia contained around four inaccuracies; Britannica, about three.”http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v438/n7070/full/438900a.html

17

18

Unofficial Internal DocumentationCommonly asked reference questionsTime to clean the fridge

Recommended ResourcesOnline reference sourcesLocal resources (restaurants, clubs)

Book ReviewsStaffPublic

TeensGame cheat codes“Where to go, what to do”

19

20

21

22

23

24

25

26

27

28

29

Views

Rendered OutputWiki SyntaxHTMLHistory

Special

Search Results(3 types)

TalkWatchlistUserSandbox

30

31

32

33

34

35

36

37

38

Learn the WikiSyntaxPreview before you saveInclude your “signature” on talk pages

39

To revert to a previous version, open the previous version in the sandbox and save it.

Any changes made since the reverted version will be lost.

40

MediaWiki The top of the line. It runs Wikipedia. Opensource. Web server, PHP, & a SQL server

QwikiWiki Requires no significant installation work PHP & Cookies, no database required

PeanutButter Wiki “Make a free, password protected wiki as easily as a

peanut butter sandwich.” Free Web service

TiddlyWiki Small enough to fit on a 32mb flash drive Like a blog but without publishing

Comparison of Wiki Software article on Wikipedia41

42

43

44

45

46

47

48

49

50

51

52

53

54

Michael Sauersmsauers@nlc.state.ne.us

http://travelinlibrarian.info/

http://del.icio.us/travelinlibrarian/class-wikis

55