The impact of anemia in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

Post on 14-Dec-2016

212 views 0 download

Transcript of The impact of anemia in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

ORIGINAL ARTICLE

The impact of anemia in moderate to severe traumatic braininjury

O. Okoye • K. Inaba • M. Kennedy •

A. Salim • P. Talving • D. Plurad • L. Lam •

D. Demetriades

Received: 31 January 2013 / Accepted: 1 June 2013

� Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Abstract

Purpose The impact of anemia and restrictive transfusion

strategies in traumatic brain injury (TBI) is unclear. The

purpose of this study was to examine the outcome of

varying degrees of anemia in patients who have sustained a

TBI.

Methods We performed a retrospective study of all adult

patients with isolated blunt TBI admitted between January

2003 and June 2010. The impact of increasing severity of

anemia (Hb B8, B9, or B10 g/dl measured on three con-

secutive draws within the first 7 days of admission) and

transfusions on complications, length of stay, and mortality

was examined using univariate and multivariate analysis.

Results Of the 31,648 patients with blunt trauma admitted

to the trauma service during the study period, 812 had an

isolated TBI, among which 196 (24.1 %) met at least one

of the anemia thresholds within the first 7 days [78 %

male, mean age 47 ± 23 years, Injury Severity Score

16 ± 8, and head Abbreviated Injury Scale 3.3 ± 1.0].

Using a logistic regression model, anemia even as low as

8 g/dl was not associated with an increase in mortality

[AOR8 = 0.8 (0.2, 3.2), p = 0.771; AOR9 = 0.8 (0.4,

1.6), p = 0.531; AOR10 = 0.6 (0.3, 1.3), p = 0.233] or

complications. However, for all patients, the transfusion of

packed red blood cells was associated with a significant

increase in septic complications [AOR = 3.2 (1.5, 13.7),

p = 0.030].

Conclusion The presence of anemia in patients with TBI

as low as 8 g/dl was not associated with increased mor-

tality or complications, while the transfusion of red blood

cells was associated with a significant increase in septic

complications. Prospective evaluation of an optimal

transfusion trigger in head-injured patients is warranted.

Keywords Traumatic brain injury � Surgery �Outcome measures � Guidelines

Introduction

Transfusion practices in the intensive care unit (ICU) have

undergone considerable changes over the last decade.

There is an increasing body of evidence supporting more

restrictive transfusion strategies across a wide range of

critically ill patient populations, including those who have

sustained traumatic injury [1–3].

Less clear, however, is the benefit of a restrictive

transfusion threshold for patients with traumatic brain

injury (TBI). The management of TBI patients focuses

on avoiding secondary neurologic insult from reduced

oxygen delivery as a result of hypoperfusion, hypox-

emia, and anemia. In theory, the transfusion of red blood

cells to correct anemia in TBI patients would seem

appropriate in order to optimize oxygen-carrying

capacity, and this has been demonstrated in a few small

studies [4, 5]. Practically, however, large studies have

failed to show a clear benefit of a more liberal transfu-

sion strategy [6, 7]. The available literature on anemia

and TBI is limited by inconsistent definitions of anemia

and by mixed results, with some studies showing worse

outcomes with anemia [8, 9] and others showing no

detrimental effect [10, 11].

O. Okoye � K. Inaba (&) � M. Kennedy � A. Salim � P. Talving �D. Plurad � L. Lam � D. Demetriades

Division of Trauma Surgery and Surgical Critical Care (Acute

Care Surgery), University of Southern California, 2051 Marengo

Street, Room C5L100, Los Angeles, CA 90033-4525, USA

e-mail: kenji.inaba@med.usc.edu; kinaba@surgery.usc.edu

123

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg

DOI 10.1007/s00068-013-0307-1

Given our increasing understanding that the transfusion

of blood products is not without consequences and that

these infectious and inflammatory risks are not negligible

[2, 12, 13], the current study examines the outcomes

associated with varying degrees of anemia, as well as the

impact of red blood cell transfusion, in patients who have

sustained a TBI. Having previously established that anemia

as low as 9 g/dl is safely tolerated in TBI [12], in this

analysis, a threshold of 8 g/dl was specifically examined.

Methods

After institutional review board (IRB) approval, all patients

sustaining a blunt TBI admitted to the Los Angeles

County ? University of Southern California Medical

Center Surgical Intensive Care Unit (SICU) between Jan-

uary 1, 2003 and June 30, 2010 were identified through the

institutional trauma registry. Included patients had a history

of head trauma and an intracranial abnormality on initial

head computed tomography (CT). Patients who died within

48 h of hospital admission, had an Abbreviated Injury

Scale (AIS) C3 in other body regions, or sustained non-

survivable head injuries (head AIS = 6) were excluded.

Patient variables abstracted included age, gender,

admission vital signs, Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), Injury

Severity Score (ISS), AIS, blood products transfused, daily

hemoglobin (Hb) levels during the first week of hospital

stay, ICU length of stay (LOS), hospital LOS, complica-

tions [acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), sepsis

and acute renal failure (ARF), as well as mortality. ARDS

was defined as the presence of: (a) PaO2/FiO2 B200,

(b) chest radiograph demonstrating bilateral infiltrates, and

(c) no evidence of cardiac failure on pulmonary artery

catheterization (PaOP B18 mmHg) or by echocardiogra-

phy or clinical examination. Sepsis was defined as the

presence of an infection plus at least two of the following:

(a) heart rate[90 bpm, (b) respiratory rate[20 breaths/min,

(c) temperature \36 �C or [38 �C, (d) white blood cell

count \4,000 cells/mm3 or [12,000 cells/mm3, or [10 %

immature neutrophils.

ARF was defined as: (a) serum creatinine three-fold

higher than the normal limit, or (b) glomerular filtration

rate decrease[75 % from baseline, or (c) serum creatinine

C4 mg/dl with an acute rise [0.5 mg/dl, or (d) urinary

output \0.3 ml/kg/h 9 24 h, or anuria 9 12 h. Coagu-

lopathy was defined as a raised international normalized

ratio (INR) above the normal reference range (C1.5), a

prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT)

[36 s, or a platelet count \100,000.

Per protocol, patients admitted to the ICU have a com-

plete blood count (CBC), chemistry panel, and coagulation

panel drawn at admission and every 6 h until they became

clinically stable. These blood draws were then performed

daily. Additional laboratory investigations are performed

as clinically indicated.

Persistent anemia was defined and analyzed at three

different thresholds (Hb B8, B9, and B10 g/dl). To meet

the definition of anemia, patients had to have met the

threshold on three consecutive days within the first week of

admission. Demographic characteristics, clinical factors,

and outcomes were compared between anemic and non-

anemic patients for each of the anemia thresholds. The

relationship between persistent anemia during the first

week of admission and patient outcomes was evaluated

using univariate and multivariate analyses. Continuous

variables were dichotomized for analysis using clinically

relevant cut-points: age (C55 vs.\55 years), systolic blood

pressure on admission (\90 vs. C90 mmHg), GCS (B8 vs.

[8), ISS (C15 vs. \15), and AIS (C3 vs. \3).

Univariate analysis compared the anemic and non-ane-

mic patients. The two-sample t- or Mann–Whitney U-tests

were used to compare means and the Chi-square or Fisher’s

exact test was used to compare proportions. Variables

differing significantly at p \ 0.05 were entered into a

binomial logistic regression model. Continuous variables

are reported as the mean ± standard deviation (SD).

Logistic regression was used to report on categorical

variables, while linear regression was used for conti-

nuous variables. All statistical analyses were performed

using SPSS for Windows, version 17.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL,

USA).

Results

Over the 7-year study period, 31,648 blunt trauma patients

were admitted to the Los Angeles County ? University of

Southern California Medical Center. Of these, 2,307 (7 %)

sustained a TBI. After the exclusion of 1,495 patients

(65 %) who sustained either non-survivable injuries or

multisystem trauma, 812 patients (35 %) were included in

the study. The mean age of the study patients was

48 ± 23 years and 78 % were male. The mean Hb on

admission was 13.1 ± 2.1 mg/dl, with 73 patients (9 %)

presenting with an Hb B10 g/dl on the initial laboratory

assessment. Admission coagulopathy occurred in 20 % of

patients. The mean head AIS and ISS were 3.3 ± 1.0 and

15.9 ± 8.5, respectively. Within the first week of hospi-

talization, 23 % of the patients received C1 U of packed

red blood cells (pRBC). Table 1 summarizes the cohort’s

demographic and clinical characteristics.

Of the 812 patients with TBI, 325 (40 %) had at least

one Hb measurement B10 g/dl within the first week. 187

patients (23 %) met the B10 anemia threshold with three

consecutive values B10 g/dl, 128 (16 %) met the B9

O. Okoye et al.

123

Ta

ble

1C

har

acte

rist

ics

of

the

stu

dy

po

pu

lati

on

atv

ary

ing

cut-

po

ints

for

anem

ia

An

emia

B8

g/d

l9

3d

ays

(18

)

No

n-a

nem

ic

(79

4)

p-V

alu

eA

nem

ia

B9

g/d

l9

3d

ays

(12

8)

No

n-a

nem

ic

(68

4)

p-V

alu

eA

nem

ia

B1

0g

/dl

93

day

s(1

87

)

No

n-a

nem

ic

(62

5)

p-V

alu

e

Ag

e

Mea

SD

51

.1±

20

.44

7.6

±2

2.7

0.5

23

50

.4±

22

.54

7.2

±2

2.6

0.1

37

48

.7±

22

.84

7.4

±2

2.6

0.4

85

n(%

)C

55

8/1

8(4

4.4

%)

30

7/7

94

(38

.7%

)

0.6

31

56

/12

8(4

3.8

%)

25

9/6

84

(37

.9%

)

0.2

36

78

/18

7(4

1.7

%)

23

7/6

25

(37

.9%

)

0.3

92

Mal

eg

end

er,

n(%

)1

1/1

8(6

1.1

%)

62

0/7

94

(78

.1%

)

0.0

93

88

/12

8(6

8.8

%)

54

3/6

84

(79

.4%

)

0.0

11

13

5/1

87

(72

.2%

)4

96

/62

5

(79

.4%

)

0.0

45

Sy

sto

lic

blo

od

pre

ssu

re

Mea

SD

13

22

14

29

0.0

59

14

30

14

29

0.2

94

14

30

14

28

0.0

97

Hy

po

ten

sio

n(S

BP

B9

0m

mH

g)

1/1

7(5

.9%

)1

3/7

81

(1.7

%)

0.2

62

2/1

26

(1.6

%)

12

/67

2(1

.8%

)1

.00

05

/18

5(2

.7%

)9

/61

3(1

.7%

)0

.33

3

GC

S

n(%

)B

84

/18

(22

.2%

)1

93

/78

4

(24

.6%

)

1.0

00

43

/12

6(3

4.1

%)

15

4/6

76

(22

.8%

)

0.0

09

59

/18

5(3

1.9

%)

13

8/6

17

(22

.8%

)

0.1

71

Mea

nH

bo

nad

mis

sio

n9

.7±

1.5

13

.2±

2.0

\0

.00

11

1.1

±2

.01

3.6

±1

.8\

0.0

01

11

.3±

2.0

13

.7±

1.7

\0

.00

1

Co

agu

lop

ath

yo

n

adm

issi

on

8/1

8(4

4.4

%)

15

8/7

94

(19

.8%

)

0.0

17

51

/12

8(3

9.8

%)

11

5/6

84

(16

.8%

)

\0

.00

17

0/1

87

(37

.4%

)9

6/6

25

(15

.4%

)

\0

.00

1

Hea

dA

IS

n(%

)[

31

0/1

8(5

5.6

%)

35

1/7

94

(44

.2%

)

0.3

49

69

/12

8(5

4%

)2

92

/68

4

(42

.7%

)

0.0

20

99

/18

7(5

3%

)2

62

/62

5

(43

.7%

)

0.0

09

Su

b-a

rach

no

id

hem

ato

ma

7/1

8(3

8.9

%)

27

5/7

94

(34

.6%

)

0.8

03

47

/12

8(3

6.7

%)

23

5/6

84

(34

.4%

)

0.6

14

70

/18

7(3

7.4

%)

21

2/6

25

(33

.9%

)

0.3

82

Su

b-d

ura

lh

emat

om

a1

2/1

8(6

6.7

%)

56

5/7

94

(71

.2%

)

0.7

93

92

/12

8(7

1.9

%)

48

5/6

84

(70

.9%

)

0.8

33

13

1/1

87

(70

.1%

)4

46

/62

5

(71

.4%

)

0.7

83

Ep

idu

ral

hem

ato

ma

2/1

8(1

1.1

%)

41

/79

4(5

.2%

)0

.24

61

2/1

28

(9.4

%)

31

/68

4(4

.5%

)0

.03

21

2/1

87

(6.4

%)

31

/62

5(5

.0%

)0

.45

7

Oth

erin

trac

ran

ial

ble

ed

11

/18

(61

.1%

)5

02

/79

4

(63

.2%

)

1.0

00

80

/12

8(6

2.5

%)

43

3/6

84

(63

.3%

)

0.9

21

11

4/1

87

(61

.0%

)3

99

/62

5

(63

.8%

)

0.4

90

ISS M

ean

±S

D1

7.6

±6

.51

5.8

±8

.50

.37

81

9.2

±8

.91

5.3

±8

.3\

0.0

01

19

.5±

9.9

14

.8±

7.7

\0

.00

1

n(%

)C

15

11

/18

(61

%)

43

3/7

94

(54

.5%

)

0.6

39

87

/12

8(6

8.0

%)

35

7/6

84

(52

.2%

)

0.0

01

13

2/1

87

(70

.6%

)3

12

/62

5

(49

.9%

)

\0

.00

1

pR

BC

tran

sfu

sio

n1

0/1

8(5

5.6

%)

17

9/7

94

(22

.5%

)

0.0

03

77

/12

8(6

0.2

%)

11

2/6

84

(16

.4%

)

\0

.00

11

01

/18

7(5

4.0

%)

88

/62

5

(14

.1%

)

\0

.00

1

pR

BC

un

its

(mea

SD

)

8.7

±1

2.3

2.4

±7

.2\

0.0

01

7.2

±1

2.8

1.7

±5

.4\

0.0

01

6.8

±1

2.2

1.3

±4

.4\

0.0

01

FF

Pu

nit

s

(mea

SD

)

4.9

±9

.31

.3±

4.2

\0

.00

13

.5±

7.5

1.0

±3

.4\

0.0

01

3.2

±6

.70

.8±

3.2

\0

.00

1

Pla

tele

tu

nit

s

(mea

SD

)

1.9

±4

.70

.3±

1.4

\0

.00

10

.8±

2.2

0.2

±1

.40

.00

10

.6±

1.9

0.2

±1

.50

.00

6

The impact of anemia in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

123

anemia threshold, and 18 (2 %) of the patients met the B8

anemia threshold with three consecutive values B8 g/dl

within the first week of hospitalization. No patients had an

Hb B7 g/dl. No significant differences in age were found

between the anemic and non-anemic patients at each of the

thresholds of anemia. Anemic patients were significantly

more likely to be coagulopathic on admission (44 vs. 20 %

at Hb B8 g/dl, p = 0.017; 40 vs. 17 % at Hb B9 g/dl,

p \ 0.001; and 37 vs. 15 % at Hb B10 g/dl, p \ 0.001).

Similarly, anemic patients had higher head AIS and ISS

scores. Anemic patients were significantly more likely to

be given a pRBC transfusion in the first week of hospital

admission (56 vs. 23 % at Hb B8 g/dl, p = 0.003; 60 vs.

16 % at Hb B9 g/dl, p \ 0.001; and 54 vs. 14 % at Hb

B10 g/dl, p \ 0.001) (Table 1).

Overall, 5 patients (0.6 %) developed ARF, 10 (1.2 %)

ARDS, and 16 (2 %) developed sepsis during their hospital

stay. Anemia at all three thresholds studied was not asso-

ciated with increased rates of these complications. Trans-

fusion did significantly increase the risk of septic

complications [AOR = 3.2 (1.5, 13.7) p = 0.030)

(Table 2).

The overall mortality for the cohort was 8.9 %. After

adjusting for differences in these populations, no significant

difference could be found at any of the thresholds [Hb8;

AOR = 0.8 (0.2, 3.2) p = 0.771, Hb9; AOR = 0.8 (0. 4,

1.6) p = 0.531, Hb10; AOR = 0.6 (0.3, 1.3) p = 0.233].

Anemia at all three thresholds was associated with longer

ICU and hospital LOS. The effect was more pronounced at

the B9 and B10 thresholds, though this finding did not

persist after multivariate correction (Table 3).

Discussion

The determination of appropriate transfusion triggers has

been an ongoing area of controversy in both the trauma

and the general medical literature. The dogmatic assertion

that all patients must be maintained at a minimum

hematocrit of 30 % [14] has been challenged in well-

designed trials illustrating the tolerability of anemia in a

wide range of patient populations, including critically ill

patients [1], those with a history of cardiac disease [15] or

post-cardiac surgery [16], and those who have sustained

traumatic injuries [3].

The amount of oxygen reaching end organs is depen-

dent on local blood flow and the arterial oxygen content,

which, in turn, is dependent on the concentration of Hb. In

the presence of anemia, numerous cerebrovascular com-

pensatory mechanisms act to improve flow. Worsening

anemia ultimately leads to a collapse of these mechanisms;

however, the threshold when this occurs is yet to be

identified [6]. Studies evaluating the impact of anemia onTa

ble

1co

nti

nu

ed

An

emia

B8

g/d

l9

3d

ays

(18

)

No

n-a

nem

ic

(79

4)

p-V

alu

eA

nem

ia

B9

g/d

l9

3d

ays

(12

8)

No

n-a

nem

ic

(68

4)

p-V

alu

eA

nem

ia

B1

0g

/dl

93

day

s(1

87

)

No

n-a

nem

ic

(62

5)

p-V

alu

e

Cry

op

reci

pit

ate

un

its

(mea

SD

)

1.8

±5

.70

.2±

2.1

0.0

02

0.6

±2

.90

.2±

2.1

0.0

40

0.5

±2

.60

.2±

2.2

0.0

38

Ery

thro

po

ieti

nu

se1

/18

(5.6

%)

38

/79

4(4

.8%

)0

.59

21

7/1

28

(13

.3%

)2

2/6

84

(3.2

%)

\0

.00

12

4/1

87

(12

.8%

)1

5/6

25

(2.4

%)

\0

.00

1

p-V

alu

esw

ere

esti

mat

edu

sin

gF

ish

er’s

exac

tte

sto

rP

ears

on

’sC

hi-

squ

are

for

cate

go

rica

lv

aria

ble

s,an

dth

ein

dep

end

ent

t-te

stw

asu

sed

for

con

tin

uo

us

var

iab

les

O. Okoye et al.

123

TBI outcomes have used varying definitions of anemia,

resulting in a lack of consensus management guidelines.

Carlson et al. [9] studied the impact of anemia and trans-

fusions on the neurological outcomes in TBI patients,

establishing that a hematocrit\30 % was associated with a

significantly higher discharge GCS and Glasgow Outcome

Scale (GOS) scores. Contrary to this, Steyerberg et al.

performed a post-hoc analysis of several randomized con-

trolled trials (RCTs) and concluded that a lower Hb was

associated with poor outcomes at 3–6 months [17]. Salim

et al. [12] demonstrated that anemia as low as 9 g/dl was

safe and only associated with increased morbidity and

mortality in the presence of pRBC transfusion in patients

with TBI. The results of the current study show that anemia

down to 8 g/dl is not associated with a negative impact on

morbidity or mortality.

There is increasing evidence that blood transfusions in

critically injured patients may not be associated with a

negligible risk. The CRIT trial, which reviewed data from

284 ICUs, identified pRBC transfusion as a significant risk

factor for mortality in the ICU [18]. The same was true for

the subgroup analysis of trauma patients in 111 ICUs [19].

The TRICC trial demonstrated a significant in-hospital

survival advantage in patients randomized to the transfu-

sion-restrictive strategy [1]. In a prospective study of

15,534 patients over a 3-year period at a level 1 trauma

center, blood transfusion was identified as a strong inde-

pendent predictor of mortality and ICU admission [13].

The mechanism of this transfusion-related risk is likely

multifactorial, including an immunomodulatory pathway

ultimately leading to an increased risk of infectious com-

plications, prolonged mechanical ventilation, and organ

dysfunction [20, 21]. Available in vitro studies show that

pRBC reduce T cell proliferation in a dose-dependent

manner [22]. This finding is supported by the results of a

large registry analysis of 29,829 trauma patients over

15 years in Germany, which found that incremental units

of pRBC transfusion were associated with a significantly

increased risk of developing sepsis [23]. Transfusion-rela-

ted acute lung injury (TRALI) is now the most common

cause of transfusion-related mortality reported to the Food

and Drugs Administration [24].

In TBI patients, concerns about anemia-related cerebral

hypoperfusion and hypoxia complicate decision-making.

Recent literature has failed to show any benefit of a more

liberal transfusion strategy in this population [25, 26]. Data

in both multi-system trauma and isolated TBI patients

suggest that pRBC transfusions are linked with adverse

outcomes. Carlson et al. noted that increasing pRBC unit

transfusions negatively impacted discharge GCS and GOS

significantly [9]. These findings are echoed by Salim

et al.’s analysis of the impact of pRBC transfusions in

anemic TBI patients [12].Ta

ble

2R

isk

of

dev

elo

pin

gco

mp

lica

tio

ns

Acu

tere

nal

fail

ure

AR

DS

Sep

sis

AO

R(9

5%

CI)

p-V

alu

eA

OR

(95

%C

I)p

-Val

ue

AO

R(9

5%

CI)

p-V

alu

e

Hb

B8

6.7

(0.4

,1

31

.7)

0.2

08

0.0

00

.99

82

.2(0

.4,

14

.3)

0.3

94

Hb

B9

3.1

(0.1

,1

88

.1)

0.5

93

0.6

(0.1

,4

.3)

0.6

12

1.5

(0.3

,6

.7)

0.5

82

Hb

B1

00

.4(0

.1,

20

.1)

0.6

25

1.3

(0.2

,7

.5)

0.7

63

0.8

(0.2

,3

.7)

0.7

69

Pac

ked

cell

tran

sfu

sio

n1

.2(0

.1,

10

.3)

0.8

69

0.5

(0.1

,3

.0)

0.4

64

3.2

(1.5

,1

3.7

)0

.03

0

Od

ds

rati

os

esti

mat

edu

sin

ga

log

isti

cre

gre

ssio

nm

od

elad

just

ing

for

var

iab

les

inth

eu

niv

aria

tean

aly

sis

wit

hp

\0

.05

The impact of anemia in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

123

The present study is a 7-year review of 812 patients who

sustained isolated TBI. Our aim was to examine the out-

comes associated with varying degrees of anemia, as well

as the impact of red blood cell transfusion in this patient

cohort.

Here, pRBC transfusion was associated with a five-fold

increase in septic complications. No difference in the

incidence of ARDS or ARF was noted between the groups;

however, the numbers of these complications were low.

Transfusion had no effect on mortality in this population.

Anemia at cut-points of 10 and 9 g/dl was associated

with increased length of both hospital and ICU stay. This is

consistent with previous studies in this population [12, 26].

No difference in LOS was observed in the 8 g/dl group.

This is presumably due to the lack of power.

TBI patients in our study demonstrated a 40 % inci-

dence of anemia (Hb B10 g/dl), consistent with previously

reported rates of 40–50 % [27]. Numerous mechanisms

contribute to the development of anemia in critically ill

patients, including: repeated blood draws [28–30], blunted

response of erythrocytes to erythropoietin [31–33], and

impaired iron metabolism [34, 35]. These patients had an

average of four blood draws in the first 24 h, translating to

45–60 ml of phlebotomized whole blood. This volume and

sampling practice is consistent with findings from other

institutions [2], and remains a target for reducing the

incidence of anemia in the ICU.

In summary, anemia in the presence of TBI is a common

problem facing physicians caring for victims of neuro-

trauma. This study was limited by its retrospective nature

and the inability to report on the neurological outcomes of

patients. The low sample size in the Hb \8 cohort did not

allow for a robust multivariate analyses, and the results

reported in that group may be imprecise. Another limita-

tion of the study is the inability to determine the rationale

for packed cell transfusions in non-anemic patients. These

transfusions were probably given for active bleeding or

drops in hemoglobin treated before the next day. The ret-

rospective nature of this study does not allow for distin-

guishing a clear cause and effect relationship between

transfusions and the patient outcomes. Within these limi-

tations however, the use of a restrictive transfusion policy

in patients with TBI is supported by the results.

Conflict of interest We confirm that the manuscript has been read

and approved by all named authors and that there are no other persons

who satisfied the criteria for authorship but are not listed. We further

confirm that the order of authors listed in the manuscript has been

approved by all of us. We wish to confirm that there are no known

conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been

no significant financial support for this work that could have influ-

enced its outcome.

References

1. Hebert PC, Wells G, Blajchman MA, et al. A multicenter, ran-

domized, controlled clinical trial of transfusion requirements in

critical care. Transfusion Requirements in Critical Care Investi-

gators, Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. N Engl J Med.

1999;340(6):409–17.

2. Vincent JL, Baron JF, Reinhart K, et al. Anemia and blood

transfusion in critically ill patients. JAMA. 2002;288(12):

1499–507.

3. McIntyre L, Hebert PC, Wells G, et al. Is a restrictive transfusion

strategy safe for resuscitated and critically ill trauma patients?

J Trauma. 2004;57(3):563–8; discussion 568.

Table 3 Comparison of outcomes in blunt traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with and without anemia

Anemia B8 g/dl 9 3 days (18) Non-anemic (794) AOR/adjusted mean

difference (95 % CI)

p-Value

HLOS, days (including deaths) 16.7 ± 12.4 12.2 ± 12.0 10.9 (0.8, 21.0) 0.035

HLOS, days (excluding deaths) 18.6 ± 12.7 12.5 ± 12.3 3.9 (-6.0, 13.8) 0.440

ICU LOS, days (including deaths) 8.9 ± 7.7 7.4 ± 7.8 -1.1 (-7.6, 5.4) 0.731

Mortality 3/18 (16.7 %) 70/794 (8.8 %) 0.8 (0.2, 3.2) 0.771

Anemia B9 g/dl 9 3 days (128) Non-anemic (684)

HLOS, days (including deaths) 18.3 ± 15.4 11.2 ± 10.9 -23.2 (-80.8, 34.4) 0.429

HLOS, days (excluding deaths) 19.9 ± 15.9 11.4 ± 11.2 -6.8 (-22.6, 36.3) 0.648

ICU LOS, days (including deaths) 10.5 ± 8.8 6.8 ± 7.5 -32.1 (-68.2, 4.0) 0.082

Mortality 19/128 (14.8 %) 54/794 (7.9 %) 0.8 (0.4, 1.6) 0.531

Anemia B10 g/dl 9 3 days (187) Non-anemic (625)

HLOS, days (including deaths) 18.2 ± 14.6 10.5 ± 10.5 14.7 (-8.0, 37.5) 0.204

HLOS, days (excluding deaths) 19.6 ± 15.0 10.7 ± 10.8 19.2 (-3.4, 42.0) 0.097

ICU LOS, days (including deaths) 10.9 ± 10.3 6.3 ± 6.6 7.0 (-8.0, 22.0) 0.359

Mortality 26/187 (13.9 %) 47/625 (7.5 %) 0.6 (0.3, 1.3) 0.233

O. Okoye et al.

123

4. Smith MJ, Stiefel MF, Magge S, et al. Packed red blood cell

transfusion increases local cerebral oxygenation. Crit Care Med.

2005;33(5):1104–8.

5. Zygun DA, Nortje J, Hutchinson PJ, Timofeev I, Menon DK,

Gupta AK. The effect of red blood cell transfusion on cerebral

oxygenation and metabolism after severe traumatic brain injury.

Crit Care Med. 2009;37(3):1074–8.

6. Kramer AH, Zygun DA. Anemia and red blood cell transfusion in

neurocritical care. Crit Care. 2009;13(3):R89.

7. Sheth KN, Gilson AJ, Chang Y, et al. Packed red blood cell

transfusion and decreased mortality in intracerebral hemorrhage.

Neurosurgery. 2011;68(5):1286–92.

8. Robertson CS, Gopinath SP, Goodman JC, Contant CF, Valadka

AB, Narayan RK. SjvO2 monitoring in head-injured patients.

J Neurotrauma. 1995;12(5):891–6.

9. Carlson AP, Schermer CR, Lu SW. Retrospective evaluation of

anemia and transfusion in traumatic brain injury. J Trauma.

2006;61(3):567–71.

10. Schirmer-Mikalsen K, Vik A, Gisvold SE, Skandsen T, Hynne H,

Klepstad P. Severe head injury: control of physiological vari-

ables, organ failure and complications in the intensive care unit.

Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007;51(9):1194–201.

11. Karkouti K, Stukel TA, Beattie WS, et al. Relationship of

erythrocyte transfusion with short- and long-term mortality in a

population-based surgical cohort. Anesthesiology. 2012;117(6):

1175–83.

12. Salim A, Hadjizacharia P, DuBose J, et al. Role of anemia in

traumatic brain injury. J Am Coll Surg. 2008;207(3):398–406.

13. Malone DL, Dunne J, Tracy JK, Putnam AT, Scalea TM,

Napolitano LM. Blood transfusion, independent of shock sever-

ity, is associated with worse outcome in trauma. J Trauma.

2003;54(5):898–905; discussion 905–7.

14. Adam RC, Lundy JS. Anesthesia in cases of poor surgical risk:

some suggestions for decreasing the risk. Surg Gynecol Obstet.

1942;74:1011–9.

15. Hebert PC, Yetisir E, Martin C, et al. Is a low transfusion

threshold safe in critically ill patients with cardiovascular dis-

eases? Crit Care Med. 2001;29(2):227–34.

16. Johnson RG, Thurer RL, Kruskall MS, et al. Comparison of two

transfusion strategies after elective operations for myocardial

revascularization. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1992;104(2):

307–14.

17. Steyerberg EW, Mushkudiani N, Perel P, et al. Predicting out-

come after traumatic brain injury: development and international

validation of prognostic scores based on admission characteris-

tics. PLoS Med. 2008;5(8):e165; discussion e165.

18. Corwin HL, Gettinger A, Pearl RG, et al. The CRIT Study:

anemia and blood transfusion in the critically ill—current clinical

practice in the United States. Crit Care Med. 2004;32(1):39–52.

19. Shapiro MJ, Gettinger A, Corwin HL, et al. Anemia and blood

transfusion in trauma patients admitted to the intensive care unit.

J Trauma. 2003;55(2):269–73; discussion 273–4.

20. Vamvakas EC. Possible mechanisms of allogeneic blood trans-

fusion-associated postoperative infection. Transfus Med Rev.

2002;16(2):144–60.

21. Vamvakas EC, Carven JH. Allogeneic blood transfusion and

postoperative duration of mechanical ventilation: effects of red

cell supernatant, platelet supernatant, plasma components and

total transfused fluid. Vox Sang. 2002;82(3):141–9.

22. Bernard A, Meier C, Ward M, et al. Packed red blood cells

suppress T-cell proliferation through a process involving cell–cell

contact. J Trauma. 2010;69(2):320–9.

23. Wafaisade A, Lefering R, Bouillon B, et al. Epidemiology and

risk factors of sepsis after multiple trauma: an analysis of 29,829

patients from the Trauma Registry of the German Society for

Trauma Surgery. Crit Care Med. 2011;39(4):621–8.

24. Goldman M, Webert KE, Arnold DM, et al. Proceedings of a

consensus conference: towards an understanding of TRALI.

Transfus Med Rev. 2005;19(1):2–31.

25. George ME, Skarda DE, Watts CR, Pham HD, Beilman GJ.

Aggressive red blood cell transfusion: no association with

improved outcomes for victims of isolated traumatic brain injury.

Neurocrit Care. 2008;8(3):337–43.

26. Warner MA, O’Keeffe T, Bhavsar P, et al. Transfusions and long-

term functional outcomes in traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg.

2010;113(3):539–46.

27. Walsh TS, Saleh EE. Anaemia during critical illness. Br J Ana-

esth. 2006;97(3):278–91.

28. Smoller BR, Kruskall MS. Phlebotomy for diagnostic laboratory

tests in adults. Pattern of use and effect on transfusion require-

ments. N Engl J Med. 1986;314(19):1233–5.

29. Tarpey J, Lawler PG. Iatrogenic anaemia? A survey of vene-

section in patients in the intensive therapy unit. Anaesthesia.

1990;45(5):396–8.

30. Zimmerman JE, Seneff MG, Sun X, Wagner DP, Knaus WA.

Evaluating laboratory usage in the intensive care unit: patient and

institutional characteristics that influence frequency of blood

sampling. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(5):737–48.

31. Scharte M, Fink MP. Red blood cell physiology in critical illness.

Crit Care Med. 2003;31(12 Suppl):S651–7.

32. Rogiers P, Zhang H, Leeman M, et al. Erythropoietin response is

blunted in critically ill patients. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23(2):

159–62.

33. van Iperen CE, Gaillard CA, Kraaijenhagen RJ, Braam BG, Marx

JJ, van de Wiel A. Response of erythropoiesis and iron metabo-

lism to recombinant human erythropoietin in intensive care unit

patients. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(8):2773–8.

34. Darveau M, Denault AY, Blais N, Notebaert E. Bench-to-bedside

review: iron metabolism in critically ill patients. Crit Care.

2004;8(5):356–62.

35. Corwin HL, Krantz SB. Anemia of the critically ill: ‘‘acute’’

anemia of chronic disease. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(8):3098–9.

The impact of anemia in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

123