Post on 09-Jun-2020
Task 1.3.3 – “Cryomodule”
Paolo PieriniINFN Sezione di Milano - LASA
PP 2
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
Outline
• Schedule borrowed from Alex Karlsruhe presentation• Aim of the task & work split• Comment on existing cryomodule designs, trying to sort
out the rationales behind them– TTF – SNS
• First educated guesses towards work
FI6W-CT-2004-516520: Integrated Project on European Transmutation (EUROTRANS)
GOAL:
Design, construction and test of a full prototypicalcryomodule of the high energy section of the proton linac.
CO-ORDINATING CONTRACTOR:
INFN (I) – Paolo Pierini
MILESTONES:
M1.3.9: Preliminary cryomodule specifications (+9)
M1.3.10: Cryomodule design finalized (+15)
M1.3.11: Cryomodule is ready for test (+30)
M1.3.12: Experimental results of performances (+39)
M1.3.13: Final report: synthesis and design proposals (+42)
DELIVERABLES:
D1.3.7: Preliminary report: specifications for the cryomodule (INFN, +9)
D1.3.8: Report on cryomodule design and schedule (CNRS, +15)
D1.3.9: Final report: test results, synthesis and design proposals (INFN, +42)
TASK 1.3.3
PP 4
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
Aim of the task (contractual 18 months)
• My understanding• Specifications (D1.15 = D1.3.7)
– Make architectural choices to deal with ADS needs– Review possible design with respect to the state of the art (SNS, TTF)
» Get what we can, but “no free meal”– Sketches (not drawings!)– “Back of the envelope” calculations and estimations to support the choices
• Design and Schedule (D1.16 = D1.3.8)– Milestone to see if it makes sense to go ahead (production) with the given
funding and schedule, if we want to make a significative activity– Proceed to confirm (or suggest alternatives) for choices above– Somewhat detailed drawings of the vessel, shields and lines– Checks with mechanical/thermal analysis the main choices– Interfaces and logistics (RF, Cryo, …)
Q: 9?
Q: 15?
PP 5
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
Split of the work for D1.3.7 (Specs)
• Architecture of the system– Specifications: INFN with CNRS
• Dynamic load range– Straightforward from design
• Alignment tolerances– We did not start beam dynamics tolerances estimations in PDS-XADS,
should be possibly a task for 1.3.5. Less straightforward right now, assume SNS?
– Layout of the cold mass: INFN– Interface to cryogenics: CNRS– Interface to RF: CEA or CNRS?
– Couplers?• Still weak point by now in terms of resources
• +9 form April means January 2006– Better start soon
PP 6
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
Commentary on cryomodule designs
• TESLA […borrowing transparencies from Carlo]
• SNS [… commenting published/unpublished material]
• APT• TRASCO
What are the rationales for each design?We cannot adopt any scheme if incompatible with ADS!
PP 7
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
TESLA Cryomodule Design Rationales
• High Performance Cryomodule was central for the TESLA Mission– More then one order of magnitude was to be gained in term of capital and
operational cost
– Low static losses
• High filling factor: to maximize real estate gradient– Long sub-units with many cavities (and quad): cryomodules (12-17 m)
– Sub-units connected in longer strings (2-3 km)
– Cooling and return pipes integrated into a unique cryomodule
• Low cost per meter: to be compatible with a long TeV Collider– Cryomodule used also for feeding and return pipes
– Minimize the number of cold to warm connections for static losses
– Minimize the use of special components and materials
– Modular design using the simplest possible solution
• Easy to be aligned and stable: to fullfil beam requirements
PP 8
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
Performing Cryomodules
Required plug power for static losses < 5 kW/(12 m module)
Reliable Alignment Strategy
Sliding Fixtures @ 2 K
“Finger Welded” Shields
Three cryomodule generations to:improve simplicity and performances minimize costs
2 thermal shields(4 K and 50-70 K)
PP 9
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
Cryomodules installed in TTF II
RF gun
400 MeV 120 MeV800 MeV
ACC 1ACC 2ACC 3ACC 4ACC 5
4 MeV
ACC 4 & ACC 5 ACC 2 & ACC 3
PP 10
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
1 Prototype and 3 generations
Cry 1 Cry 2Cry 3
Module 1 Module 2 & 3 Module 4 & 5
Mainly: Simplification of assembling & alignment strategy
HeGRP is dominant in the cross-section
PP 11
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
From Prototype to Cry 3
Extensive FEA modeling (ANSYS™) of the entire cryomodule
– Transient thermal analysis during cooldown/warmup cycles,
– Coupled structural/thermal simulations
– Full nonlinear material properties Detailed sub-modeling of new components and Laboratory tests
– Finger-welding tests at ZANON– Cryogenic tests of the sliding
supports at INFN-LASA
PP 12
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
•Four C-Shaped stainless steel elements clamps a titanium pad welded to the helium tank.
•Rolling needles for longitudinal friction
•Cavities longitudinal position independent from the HeGRP contraction.
•x and y defined by reference screws
•Longitudinal position defined through an Invar Rod
A model has been developed to measure real friction force and test extreme conditions
Friction force: < 1 N
Sliding Supports and Invar Rod
PP 13
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
TESLA Cryomodule Concept Peculiarities
Positive• Very low static losses• Very good filling factor: Best real estate gradient• Low cost per meter in term both of fabrication and assembly
Project Dependent• Long cavity strings, few warm to cold transitions• Large gas return pipe inside the cryomodule • Cavities and Quads position settable at ± 300 µm (rms)• Reliability and redundancy for longer MTTR (mean time to repair)• Lateral access and cold window natural for the coupler
Negative• Longer MTTR in case of non scheduled repair• Moderate (± 1 mm) coupler flexibility required
PP 14
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
SNS Cryomodule
• Possibly more similar to ADS requirements
Peculiarities!!
PP 15
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
Design Rationales• Fast module exchange and independent
cryogenics (bayonet connections)1 day2K production in CM
• Warm quad doubletModerate filling factor
• Designed for shipment 800 km from TJNAF to ORNL
• No need to achieve small static lossessingle thermal shield
PP 16
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
Design for shipment (TJNAF to ORNL)
g/2
5 g
4 g
Spaceframe concept
PP 17
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3Around the cold mass
Tank
50 K thermal shield
Magnetic shields
Vacuum chamberEnd Plate
• Helium to cool the SRF linac is provided by the central helium liquefier• He then piped to the 4.5K cold box and sent through cryogenic transfer lines to
the cryomodules• Joule Thomson valves on the cryomodules produce 2.1 K (0.041 bar) LHe for
cavity cooling, and 4.5 K He for fundamental power coupler cooling• Boil-off goes to four cold-compressors recompressing the stream to 1.05 bar
and 30 K for counter-flow cooling in the 4.5K cold box
PP 18
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
SNS He Flow
HEATER ATWINDOW
BAR20
BAR20
50K SHIELD
LHe
SEPARATORPHASE
CONDUCTOROUTERCOUPLERPOWER
GUARD VACUUM & RELIEFCOOLDOWN & POWER COUPLER RETURN
SUPPLY HP HELIUMHELIUM RETURN T.L.
HELIUM SUPPLY T.L.
4 BARSURGE
TANK
END FLANGEHEAT STATION COUPLER HEAT
STATIONS (2)COUPLER HEATSTATIONS (2)
END FLANGEHEAT STATION
SUBCOOLER2K
20BAR
He Supply 4.5 KHe Return
2 K
50 K Shield
Coupler and flange thermalization with 4.5 K flow
PP 19
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
SNS Cryomodule Assembly
PP 20
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
Alignment strategy
• Cavity string is supported by the spaceframe
• Each target sighted along a line between set monuments (2 ends and sides)
• The nitronic rods are adjusted until all the targets are within 0.5 mm of the line set by the monuments
• Cavity string in the vacuum vessel: the alignment is verified and transferred (fiducialized) to the shell of the vacuum vessel.
• Indexing off of the beamline flanges at either end of each cavity
• Nitronic support rods used to move the cavity into alignment
• Targets on rods on two sides of each flange.
PP 21
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
Modules during tests
PP 22
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
And in ORNL (during PAC05)
PP 23
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
The APT Coupler Dominated Case
• Huge power specs• 100 mA cw!• Everything built
around coupler…
PP 24
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
The TRASCO Conceptual DesignI-DEAS Student Edition : Design
• Short module, interchangeable, sliding supports, G10 frame• Alignment transferred to rails in vessel
• Slide-in from side
PP 25
EUR
OTR
AN
S D
M1/
WP3
Kic
koff
–Ta
sk 1
.3.3
First guesses for EUROTRANS
• Assuming two cavities, β=0.47– Coupler? Important component for boundaries on cryo design
• Preserve independence of modules (à la SNS)– Easy connection/disconnection– 2 K production at module– Reliable interfaces (most troubles in SNS are leaks in iso vacuum)
• CNRS has much more cryogenics expertise than INFN
• CW machine, no need to design for low static losses– Single thermal shielding at 40-50 K is enough
• Choose an alignment strategy– Fast and reliable
• Borrow, as much as possible, technologies from proven designs– E.g. welding techniques for shields and sliding supports from TESLA