Post on 29-Jan-2021
SY 2017-18 CHOICE APPLICATION ANALYSIS
Joe Gramelspacher, Special Assistant to the SuperintendentPatrick Herrel, Director of Enrollment and Options
June 2017
overview
2
1
2
4
5
3
Review of Choice Process Changes
3 September 2016 Board Approved Changes
narrow & uniform proximity priority zones
implement multiple-round application process to increase equitable access
analyze SY 2016-17 application data to inform recommendations2
Previous ‘Proximity’ Boundaries
4dsfdf
2016-17 K-8 ‘Proximity’ Boundaries
Approved SY 2017-18 Proximity Boundaries
5 Reduced boundaries projected increase KG seats available by 200+
dsfdf
2016-17 K-8 ‘Proximity’ Boundaries
Proximity Change Effects
6 Reduced Proximity Boundaries opened 219 seats compared to the previous year
374, 57%281, 43%
KG Seat Offers SY 2016-17
In Proximity BoundaryNot in Proximity Boundary
155, 24%
488, 76%
KG Seat Offers SY 2017-18
In Proximity BoundaryNot in Proximity Boundary
Multiple Round Application Process
7 Board Approved Process for SY 2017-18 Application Cycle
Key Points single offer per applicant repeat application permitted without risk gradual release of seats5 (grades Kg, 7th & 9th only) waitlist begins after round 3
Round 1• 70% of seats • Nov 19 – Jan 6• Jan 9 lottery week
Round 2• 20% of seats• Jan 16 – March 3• March 3 Round 1
response deadline• March 6 lottery week
Round 3• 10% of seats • March 13 – April 21• April 21 Round 2
response deadline• April 17 lottery week• Waitlists begin
Multiple Round Application Process
8 Race/Ethnicity by Round
36%28%
42%51%
25%
24%
27%21%
10%
11%
9% 8%
29%37%
22% 20%
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Total Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
White
Multiracial
Hispanic
Black orAfricanAmerican
Multiple Round Application Process
9 Income Quartile by Round
25% 31% 19% 18%
25%24%
26% 26%
22%19%
24% 26%
28%26% 31% 30%
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Total Round 1 Round 2 Round 3
4 - LowestIncome
3
2
1 - HighestIncome
ApplicationsBy Round
Disproportionality Effects
10 High Demand Programs (CFI 2, CFI 84, William Bell/Butler Lab)
86%
68%
28%
2%
11%
4%
5%
5%
24%
7%15%
44%
SY 2016-17 KG SY 2017-18 KG (Off + Acc) IPS 2016-17 KG ADMBlack or African American Hispanic/Latino Multiracial White
Disproportionality Effects
11 IPS Choice Programs (excluding 2, 84 & 60)
22%15%
24%
37% 38%28%
4%12%
4%
38% 35%44%
SY 2016-17 KG SY 2017-18 KG (Off + Acc) IPS 2016-17 KG ADM
Looking Ahead
12
• Maintain narrow & uniform proximity priorities• Continue multiple lottery rounds
Increase seats offered in later lottery rounds• Currently: 70/20/10• Proposed: 50/30/20
Recommendations
Next Steps
questions and answers
13
SY 2017-18 Choice Application AnalysisoverviewReview of Choice Process ChangesPrevious ‘Proximity’ BoundariesApproved SY 2017-18 Proximity BoundariesProximity Change EffectsMultiple Round Application ProcessMultiple Round Application ProcessMultiple Round Application ProcessDisproportionality EffectsDisproportionality EffectsLooking Aheadquestions and answers