Post on 26-Mar-2015
Enter/Edit Data
CAPT Ralph T. SouleSupervisor of Shipbuilding Newport News
Career Goals: Shipyard CommandSupervisor of Shipbuilding Command
Qualifications: Surface Warfare Officer
Acquisition Certifications: APM; AG2; AG3
12/14/2006 5:10:27 PM Career Planner (ver 1.6b1 03-25-02)
Year
YCS 0
1985
5
1990
10
1995
15
2000
20
2005
25
2010
30
20/30 TYS
Now
Bryan K ELEM JRHI HS COL
Beau K ELEM JRHI HS COL
CareerPlan
SWOS
Student
FF 108
7 Kirk
EMO
FFG 48 Vande-
grift
ERO, CICO
Nuc Pwr School
Nuc Prototyp
CGN 40
Miss- issippi
MPA
MIT
Student
CVN 65 Enter- prise
(RCOH)
Station Officer
PSNS
Nuclear APS, Carrier Avail Improvement
CN
AL N43
Deputy
Supship Newport
News
Carrier Overhaul Project Officer, PMR
CVN 69 Dwight D.
Eisen- hower
Reactor Officer
PHNSY
OPS
Comm Naval
Air Force
ACOS Ship
Materiel N43
Supship Newport
News
Supervisor
ED/EDQPBoards
PromotionFitReps
ENS LTjg LT LCDR CDR CAPT
YCS
Year
0
1985
5
1990
10
1995
15
2000
20
2005
25
2010
30
20/30 TYS
Now
Supship Newport News
Super-visor
2
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
Why You Should “Do” CarriersWhy You Should “Do” Carriers
• The problems you encounter are really the Navy’s highest priorities.
• The resource sponsors understand and value maintenance.
• While the problems are complex, you get great support and rapid attention.
• Carriers have enough money to work ahead of most of their problems.
3
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
Career Planning Insight (Soule’s view)Career Planning Insight (Soule’s view)
• Keep options open, 2 paths to O6/Command as long as possible
– No one path to O6/Command
• Performance will always be #1 factor
• Develop the KSAs you need for future jobs, it’s not just about OJT
– Always think one or two jobs ahead
– Observe and get mentoring from senior officers
– Personal development plan
• Have fun!
4
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
CV/N MaintenanceCV/N Maintenance
• Governance
– Life Cycle Management Group
• Management of Life Cycle material and programmatic issues
– CV/N Team One
• Manages the “white space” in the CV/N CNO availability process (planning and execution)
5
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
Current Interests and Reading Current Interests and Reading
6
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
My Personal Development ThemesMy Personal Development Themes
• Leadership Development (of course!)
• Human Performance Capabilities and Models
• Systems Thinking
• Safety Culture/High Reliability Organizations/Error Management
• Risk (Crisis) Management/Failure Analysis
• Distributed Cognition
• Critical Thinking
7
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
Recent ReadingRecent Reading
• Recently finished
– Irrationality, Sutherland
– Safety at the Sharp End, Flinn et al
– The Checklist Manifesto, Gwande
– How the Mighty Fall, Collins
8
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
Current ReadingCurrent Reading
• Power Rules, Gelb
• 7 Deadly Scenarios, Krepinevich
• Upgrade Your Life, Trapani
9
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
Suggested ReadingSuggested Reading
• Havard Business Review
– What Makes a Leader, Goleman
– The Hidden Traps in Decision Making, Hammond et al
– What You Don’t Know About Making Decisions
– What Is Strategy?, Porter
• The New Economics, Deming
• Fifth Discipline, FD Fieldbook, Senge et al
• Leadership and the Art of Communication, Krisco
• Seven Habits, Covey
• Getting Things Done, Allen
• Managing the Unexpected, Weick
• Intuition at Work, Klein
• The New Rational Manager, Kepner-Tregoe
• Becoming a Critical Thinker, Diestler
• Boyd, Coram
10
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
JO Industrial Tour Success StrategiesJO Industrial Tour Success Strategies
• Know your customers and what they value.
• Read “Lean Thinking” and “The Toyota Way;” think about where and why we fall short.
• Read and understand the Shipyard Business Plan.
• Get involved in Carrier or Sub Team One.
• Update your career planner and always have available for "drive by career counseling" opportunities. You will get better mentoring if you frequently ask “Why do we …?”
• Complete all DAWIA quals possible during this tour.
• Always be thinking about what you want to learn and get better at doing. What skill sets are you building for Navy problems?
• If there is a Shipyard CO shadow program at your command, get on the schedule ASAP.
11
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
Decision Games/Case StudiesDecision Games/Case Studies
• Running out of money in CVN RCOH
• What to do when you realize your new construction ship is going to be late.
12
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
Recommended ReadingRecommended Reading
• Managing the Unexpected
• Asking the Right Questions
• New Rational Manager
• Intuiton at Work
• The $5B Misunderstanding
• The Checklist Manifesto
13
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
Increasing Aircraft Carrier AoIncreasing Aircraft Carrier AoOperations Drives MaintenanceOperations Drives Maintenance
32 vs 27 month Op Cycle• Eliminates 2 DPIAs and
4PIAs• Implements CIA concept• Drydock Extension
Program (8 vs 6 year periodicity)
RCOH incorporating SRA• Eliminates post-RCOH
SRA• C4I mod insertion• PMA 251 LLTM risk
reductions
Aircraft Carrier Class Maintenance Plan
Deployment Workups MCO Surge Ready
Industrial Period (RCOH) ModInsertion
Increased
Ao
RCOHPreps CMAV
39 Months 3 Months 10 Months 5 Monthsfrom Notional10.2 months
from Historical Average
PSA/SRA DeploymentWorkups
MCO Surge Ready
RCOHPreps
Industrial Period(Refueling Complex Overhaul (RCOH))
36 Months(41.5 mos)
3 Months(3.7 mos)
4 Months(4.5 mos)
4 Months(4 mos)
10 Months(8.5 mos)
Shakedown Period
FOA PDTT
52 Months
57 Months(62.2 mos)
Deployment Workups MCO Surge Ready
Industrial Period (RCOH) ModInsertion
Increased
Ao
RCOHPreps CMAV
39 Months 3 Months 10 Months 5 Monthsfrom Notional10.2 months
from Historical Average
PSA/SRA DeploymentWorkups
MCO Surge Ready
RCOHPreps
Industrial Period(Refueling Complex Overhaul (RCOH))
36 Months(41.5 mos)
3 Months(3.7 mos)
4 Months(4.5 mos)
4 Months(4 mos)
10 Months(8.5 mos)
Shakedown Period
FOA PDTT
52 Months
57 Months(62.2 mos)
DPIAPIAPIA PIAPIAPIAPIA
DPIA
Mid life plan with 27-Month OP Cycle
Mid life plan with 32-Month OP Cycle
45 months increased Ao over each 50 year life cycle. Eliminated 2 DPIAs and 4 PIAs.
New Con / RCOH
New Con / ROCH
RCOH / Inact
CVN 68 Class Incremental Maintenance Plan
CVN 68 Class Refueling Complex Overhaul
OLD
OLD
NEW
NEW
14
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
Supervisors of ShipbuildingSupervisors of Shipbuilding
15
SUPSHIPs Today
SUPSHIP Newport NewsCVN 78Carrier RepairCarrier RefuelingSSN 774Submarine Repair
SUPSHIP Newport NewsCVN 78Carrier RepairCarrier RefuelingSSN 774Submarine Repair
SUPSHIP GrotonSSN 774Submarine Repair
SUPSHIP GrotonSSN 774Submarine Repair
SUPSHIP Gulf CoastDDG51 // DDG1000 (Deck House) //
LPD 17 // LHA 6 //TAGM // TAGS66 //
Marinette, WILCS
SUPSHIP Gulf CoastDDG51 // DDG1000 (Deck House) //
LPD 17 // LHA 6 //TAGM // TAGS66 //
Marinette, WILCS
SUPSHIP Bath DDG51 // DDG1000
Mobile, ALLCS // JHSV
DetachmentSan Diego
TAKE // MLP
SUPSHIP Bath DDG51 // DDG1000
Mobile, ALLCS // JHSV
DetachmentSan Diego
TAKE // MLP
$110+ Billion Contracts Administered
SEA 04Z
1 Military10 Civilian
4 SUPSHIPs 1 Det, 2 On-Site Offices
Civilians1087 Direct 114 Military1201 Total
~$130 M O&MN
5 Major Shipbuilders
55,900Employees
$110+ B Contract Value
~$10 B Annual
ContractorProgressPaymentsSWFT-PM addresses funding
16
NAVSEA 04Z
4 SUPSHIPs + 1 Detachment
And 3 On-Site Offices
5 Major Shipbuilders
1 Military1 Military11 Civilian11 Civilian
CiviliansCivilians1064 Direct (EOB1064 Direct (EOB))
113 Military113 Military1177 Total1177 Total
~$126M EOB~$126M EOB
54,00054,000EmployeesEmployees
$100B+ $100B+ Contract ValueContract Value
$9.75B $9.75B AnnualAnnual
ShipbuilderShipbuilderProgressProgressPaymentsPayments
SUPSHIP Community
•Requirements•Program Execution
•Resources•Policy
•Reporting
•Contract Administration•Project Management
•Engineering Tech Auth•Quality Assurance
•ShipBuilding Contract Execution
•Planning
•Nuclear Repair
17
SUPSHIP Functions
Traditional Contract Management Functions:- Administrative Contracting Officer
- Naval Supervisory Authority
- NAVSEA field engineering
- Program management
- Quality Assurance for key shipbuilder processes
Non-traditional Functions: Field Pricing Support for new contractsField Pricing Support for new contracts Customer interface Customer interface Solution facilitationSolution facilitation Program management interfaceProgram management interface Program reviewsProgram reviews Work Integration of non NGSB contractors
18
SUPSHIPNN Mission and Goals
Mission of SUPSHIP Newport News
Administer contracts for new ship construction, overhauls, and conversion
Execute NAVSEA contractual, technical, and fiduciary responsibilities
Program management and technical oversight of ship construction and repair (NSA responsibilities)
Command Goals Inspect to get what the gov’t expects Improve mission capability Support lower cost of production
Assure that NGSB NN adheres to Navy contracts and provide onsite technical/program support between NGSNN and Navy activities.
19
SUPSHIP Manning Bath, Groton, Newport News, Gulf Coast
SUPSHIPs Bath, Groton, Newport News, Gulf Coast
• SUPSHIP Manning directly linked to CNO (N8) Navy Shipbuilding Plan• OPNAV (N81) accredited SUPSHIP model (SWFT) calculates manning
& funding requirements across the FYDP• Change in Shipbuilding plan = Change in SUPSHIP requirements• SWFT accounts for geographic disparities, shipbuilder competence, &
ship design complexity
In FY07:
• NAVSEA agreed to fund FY08 -09 SUPSHIP CIVPERS shortfalls via CDRs Reserve
– Not sustainable long term
• OPNAV N8F agreed to fund POM10 and future
– FY10 requirement funded!!– Divergence from requirement
beginning in FY11
20000
25000
30000
35000
40000
45000
50000
55000
60000
65000
70000
500
750
1000
1250
1500
1750
2000
BES 11 Actuals PB10 POM12 (R7)
SUPSHIP Manning Out of Synch with Workload
Con
tract
or M
en P
er D
ay
SU
PS
HIP
Civilian FTE
Actual Projected
CIVPERS ControlCIVPERS Control
POM12 CIVPERSPOM12 CIVPERSRequirementRequirement
20
Direct Manning (Production + Engineering) 14735 Equivalent Men
25%
20%32%
22%
1%
CVN NC
SSN NC
CVN RCOH
GOVT DESIGN
OTHER
Northrop Grumman ShipbuildingShipbuilder Summary
Issues:
CVN71 RCOH (execution) Delivery schedule Feb 12
CVN72 RCOH (planning) Delivery scheduled for April 09
SUB REPAIR Planning Yard and AIT Installations
Virginia Class Submarine (shared with EB)SSN 781, 783 – Cost performance concerns.
CVN 65 InactivationConcern with resources, engineering and workers, to accomplish. CVN 78 Construction
CVN 79 Planning
21
Navy Private Sector Management - NGSB
Tactical
– Formal Contracts
• CVN 68 Class RCOHs
• CVN 78 Design and Construction
• CVN 65 Maintenance RSLP availabilities
• Selected other Carrier maintenance availabilities
Strategic
– Joint Executive Management (JEM)
• PEO Carriers/Subs
• DASN Ships
• NAVSEA 00B
• NAVSEA 08
Regulatory
Naval Nuclear Propulsion Audit – NAVSEA 08
• Virginia Class New Construction
• SSN 688 Planning Yard Services
• SSN 21 Planning Yard Services
• SSN AIT Installations
• Select Submarine maintenance availabilities
• President, NGNN
• Support from NAVSEA Senior Leadership and SUPSHIP
– Contracts, Cost Estimating, Engineering
Roles and ResponsibilitiesPEO Carriers/Subs Executive Mgmt and Program Management
NAVSEA 08 Program Mgmt, Contracting, and Technical Authority for Naval Nuclear Propulsion Systems
NAVSEA 02 Subs and Carriers Contracting Authority
NAVSEA 05 Subs and Carriers Technical Authority
SUPSHIP On-Site Project, Contracts, Business, Q/A, and Eng Mgmt
22
2006 RAND Evaluation of Shipbuilding Costs
Highlights of Findings• 7.4%-10.8% annual inflation from 1950- 2000 for Battle Force Ships (Amphibs, Combatants, CVNs, Attack Subs)• ~50% due to economic factors such as labor and commodities• ~50% due to customer-driven factors such as capability (requirements creep) and build rate
Recommendations• Increase investments in producibility• Increase procurement stability• Fund technology and efficiency improvements• Improve management stability• Change GFE-program management controls• Employ batch production scheduling• Consolidate the industrial base• Encourage international competition/participation• Build ships as a vehicle• Change the design life of ships• Buy a mix of mission focused and multi-role ships• Build commercial-like ships
23
Affordability of the 313 Ship Navy
The Navy currently builds 4-6 ships per year at a cost of $8.9 billion
Navy needs to build 200 ships over the next 20 years at a average annual cost of $14 billion (forty percent increase above the current budget).
Navy assumes no real growth in the Navy's top line—how can we buy the ships we need?
Lower maintenance costs for in service ships
No cost growth: personnel, ship cost, operations
Increased commonality between ship classes at the component level
24
Other Navy Shipbuilding Challenges
Maintaining the industrial base
Current ship designs are too expensive for the funds available
Cost growth on lead ships of a class
Lifecycle support costs of all weapons systems and platforms are on unsustainable trend lines
25
SUPSHIP ChallengesSignificant Challenges
• AT/FP and physical security requirements across all contractor sites
• Balance PEO desires with SUPSHIP mission and manning
• Bridging the gap between now and FY12 manning increases
• NMCI model does not apply well to Supship
• Resources to support ERP • Impact of BRAC decisions on
crew QOL
Major Initiatives/Actions
• Supship Back to Basics• SupshipNN Performance
Improvement Plan• ABS collaboration• Maintain Customer-focus• ERP implementation• Military manning (PMRs) to grow
future COs• Training all the new hires as
“graybeards” retire
26
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50
RCOH
Only 37% through the service life of the NIMITZ-Class 313carrier-years remaining.as of today
In-Service Aircraft Carriers Years of Service
Years of
Service Life
- ENTERPRISE will be 51 at her FY12 inactivation- NIMITZ-Class: 500 total carrier-years, serving from 1975 until 2059
27
CDRs Conference Task
SUPSHIP Health: Back to Basics
• Implement Actions to make SUPSHIPs a more proactive organization in driving quality performance and execution at private shipyards
Lead: SEA04/Vice Commander NAVSEA
28
SUPSHIP Back to Basics FY10
Code 300 Quality– Implement results CY Q1-Q2Team Lead – Capt Elkin (SSGR)
Code 150 Project Oversight– Gap ID & Analysis CY Q1; Implement Q3Team Lead – Capt Soule (SSNN)
Code 400 Contracts – Gap ID, Analysis CY Q1-Q2; Implement CYQ3-Q4Team Lead – Capt Krestos (SSBA) and Capt Barnard (SEA02)
Code 200 Engineering – Gap ID, Analysis CYQ2-Q3; Implement CY Q4Team Lead – Capt Galinis (SSGC)
1
2
3
4
29
SUPSHIP Back to Basics
1. C300 Quality Improvement - Implement CY 2010 Q1-2• Chain of Accountability:
• SEA04 QA Audits of SUPSHIPs (note: completed 2 SUPSHIPs and 2 Det to date)• SUPSHIP Code 300 Audit of Shipbuilder QMS
• Changing waterfront behavior on a daily basis• Develop and implement a structured QA planning process• Standardized CAR process• Documented QA standards/requirements• Ensure safe and reliable operations• Clearly identify, communicate and follow up with the shipbuilders defects and corrective actions
• Ship Quality Metric reporting by Class, hull, CCP, sector• Better engagement with Shipbuilder/PEO/SEA04/SEA00
• Audits and oversight of Shipbuilder’s Quality Management Systems (QMS)• Major shift toward Process Evaluation (PE) vice Product Verification Inspection (PVI)
2. C150 Project Management Improvement - Gap ID CY 2010 Q1• Better Cost/Schedule Performance Analysis (EVM)• Change Management• Enhance Project Analysis & Reporting• Better engagement with Shipbuilder/PEO on Project Mgmt & Tech Issues
• Quality Data Schedule Analysis• Tracking and resolving Open Issues• Readiness for Milestones
• Reassert the role of the "Supervisor" of Shipbuilding• Give the PMs the “Story behind the Story”
30
SUPSHIP Back to Basics
3. C400 Contracts Improvement - Gap ID CY 2010 Q1-2
• Improve Selected Shipbuilding Contract Clauses, SEA02/PEO/SUPSHIP• Streamlined way of doing business for Shipbuilder & SUPSHIP
• Shipbuilder's Cost/Schedule Performance Analysis (EVM)
4. C200 Engineering Improvement - Gap ID CY 2010 Q3
• Revitalize Waterfront Engineering Organization• More time on the ships
• Collaboration with SUPSHIP Code 300 Quality team
• Focus on quicker decisions (more local decisions, faster TWH decision cycle time)
• Refine Tech Authority workload during design & construction phase• Clear definition of responsibilities for Code 200
31
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
USS ENTERPRISE (CVN 65)
USS NIMITZ (CVN 68)
USS EISENHOWER (CVN 69)
USS CARL VINSON (CVN 70)
USS THEODORE ROOSEVELT (CVN 71)
USS ABRAHAM LINCOLN (CVN 72)
USS GEORGE WASHINGTON (CVN 73)
USS JOHN C. STENNIS (CVN 74)
USS HARRY S. TRUMAN (CVN 75)
USS RONALD REAGAN (CVN 76)
USS GEORGE H. W. BUSH (CVN 77)
Enterprise Class Nimitz Class
RCOH
RCOH
RCOH
RCOH
RCOH
RCOH
RCOH
33 34 3522 23 24Fiscal Year
29 30 31 3225 26 27 282117 18 19 2013 14 15 1609 10 11 1205 06 07 08
AIRCRAFT CARRIER
RCOH
3325 26 27 2821 22 24 34 3529 30 31 3214 15 16 2317 18 19 20Fiscal Year
09 10 11 1205 06 07 08 13
Carrier Maintenance PlanCarrier Maintenance Plan
32
Summary
Roles of SUPSHIP
ACO, NSA, Tech Authority, Quality AssuranceContract delineates requirement
Unfunded Reqts – Contract Change
On Site Govt Representatives
Program Office, NAVSEA, Fleet, Govt Vendors
SUPSHIP commands cannot easily grow/contract for workload
Crew Support - Ship’s Force is often caught in the middle of repair/construction problems. SUPSHIP has to be prepared to stand up for the things they need to be successful
33
UNCLAS
UNCLAS
QuestionsQuestions
34
Backup
Check out my blog at: www.rtsoule.squarespace.com
35
Public vs. Private Shipyard – Execution
More Similar More Different Workload Management/NSA Alignment NRRO Interface Delivery (NewCon) Hazmat / Mixed Waste / Environmental TWDs/DR/DL/IR Project Management IT (SAP vs AIM) Industrial Procedures Funding ECC Size WPC LBOD SUBSAFE New Ship Construction EVMS No production work In-Service Project Execution No nuclear tech authority In-Service Work Certification Contracting Outsourcing to MSRs New work mgmtCVN Team One, LEAN, Co-Yard, One SY/Resource Sharing, Navy Acqusition Programs, BRAC, Enterprise Construct have all Driven Convergence in Operations, Practices, Similarities, and Workload Sharing
Top Level Similarities / Differences
36
SUPSHIP Customers and Stakeholders
Major Customers: the direct recipients or beneficiaries of the services that SUPSHIP provides.
- The Fleet: Warfare Enterprises (SUB, SURF, and AIR)
- NAVSEA (Program Offices, Naval Shipyards)
- Private Shipyards
Major Stakeholders: those who influence the budget, funding and resource allocations; fill a stewardship or regulatory role.
NAVSEA HQ, ASN (RD&A), OPNAVNAVSEA HQ, ASN (RD&A), OPNAV PEO, OSD, Congress, EPA, OSHA PEO, OSD, Congress, EPA, OSHA NRC, State & Local GovernmentsNRC, State & Local Governments
37
Tasking #1
Affirmation of theSupervisors of Shipbuilding Role
SUPSHIP Back to Basics
38
1) Establish clear lines of communication, accountability and authority• Goal: “One Navy Voice” to the Shipbuilder – Q2• SUPSHIP, NAVSEA HQ and PEO teams to develop SUPSHIP common
business processes – IT (Q1), Project Office (Q2), Contracts (Q3), Testing & Engineering (Q4) - FY10
• SEA04 Council (PEO, NAVSEA 02/05/07/08) to address SUPSHIP Community issues – Q2
2) Establish SUPSHIP input to Ship Program Acquisition Strategies• Need: Consistent Shipbuilding Contract Requirements – 04/02/SS - Q4• Define: SUPSHIP (C200) Responsibility in design process – 04/05/SS - Q3• Acquisition Strategy and Alignment – 04/PEO/SS - Q3• Shipbuilding lessons learned process – SS/PEO - Q4• Define Post-Delivery responsibilities – 04/PEO/05 – Q2
Tasking #1: Affirmation of theSupervisors of Shipbuilding Role
39
Tasking #2
Standardize SUPSHIP Organization and Functions
SUPSHIP Back to Basics
40
1) Establish standard SUPSHIP organization• Establish SUPSHIP Standard Codes & Org Chart – Q2
• Re-Establish independent SUPSHIP Bath QA Department – Q2• Define SUPSHIP Products & Services by functional area – Q4
2) Establish standard SUPSHIP metrics to assess and influence shipbuilders• Define common Quality (C300) metrics – Q1• Define cost and schedule metrics, including EVMS – Q3
3) Establish Common Business Processes by functional area• Implement SUPSHIP Quality Team (C300) Results - Q1• Common IT (C800) functionality – Q1• Common Comptroller (C700) functions – Q1• Programmatic Oversight (C150) – Q3• Engineering (C200) functionality – Q4• Common Contract (C400) functionality – Q4
Tasking #2: Standardize SUPSHIP Functions and Organization
41
Tasking #3
Ensure SUPSHIP resources ($$ and People) are properly allocated
SUPSHIP Back to Basics
42
1) Efficient alignment of SUPSHIP manning – 04Z/SS – Q4 Annually
2) Evaluate Manning vs Workload Changes• Align $$ and CIVPERS requirements across SUPSHIPs
• Execution/Budget years• Are we properly staffed? • Is workload accounted for/has it shifted? Q4 Annually• CDRs Reserve Request? Annual review Q4
3) Update SWFT manning model to determine required resources over FYDP – 04Z/SS• OPNAV (N81) Full Accreditation of SWFT-PM - Q1 FY10• POM/PR input to (N8F) resource sponsor – Q1 Annually
4) Determine efficient & effective alignment of remote sites• Site analysis (Mobile, Marinette, San Diego, New Orleans) - Q1• Establish Detachments (if necessary) – Q4 FY10
5) NAVSEA In-Sourcing – SUPSHIP BOD – Q1 FY10
Tasking #3: Ensure SUPSHIP resources ($$ and People) are properly allocated
43
Tasking #4
Recruit, hire, train and retain the talent needed at the SUPSHIPs
SUPSHIP Back to Basics
44
1) Recruit & Hire• Establish a THREE year plan) to meet CIVPERS manning requirement – Q4
• Based on SWFT output and updated annually• Surge Capability using contract vehicles• SUPSHIPs Team with local HRSC/HRO
• Participate on NAVSEA recruiting teams – SEA10/04/SS• College recruiting for diversity and new employees – Q2 each SS• Military TAP class recruiting for experienced employees• Obtain & deploy lessons learned from SS Gulf Coast hiring success – Q1
2) Train/Mentor • Broaden SUPSHIP Skill sets, increase diversity, retain required expertise• Continue to deliver SOM training- class schedule Q1
• 9 classes delivered in FY09 (~225 SUPSHIP personnel @ 7 locations)• 12 classes scheduled in FY 10 (~300 SUPSHIP personnel targeted)
• Develop specific required training at SUPSHIPs – Q2• Establish Rotation billets across SUPSHIPs/PEO/NAVSEA – Q1• Continue development of SUPSHIP Training Continuum – Q1 thru Q4
3) Retain/Mentor • Monitor retention information at each SUPSHIP - Annually• Establish individual succession-readiness Plans – Q4• Incentive tools for CIVPERS ($$, awards, promotion, NSPS) – Q2 SS• Develop/codify experience required for critical SUPSHIP positions – Q2 SS
Tasking #4: Recruit, Hire, Train and Retain the talent needed at the SUPSHIPs
Slide 45
Revised Project Oversight Team Timeline
Summary of Changes: Extended Roles Team activity completion into early Apr
2010 Project Analysis and Reporting Team start shifted to Apr
2010 due to shift in completion of Roles Team Recognized Implementation & Sustainment Actions June 2010 completion timeframe maintained