Supplementing Fat to the Cow Herd

Post on 10-Jan-2016

44 views 4 download

Tags:

description

Supplementing Fat to the Cow Herd. Bret W. Hess Beef Cattle Nutritionist. Levels of Consideration. Reproductive diseases and conditions cost. $441,000,000 to $502,000,000 /year. Animal Factors Affecting Profitability. (Bellows et al., 2002). The Beef Cow’s Annual Life Cycle. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Supplementing Fat to the Cow Herd

UWUW

Supplementing Fat to the Cow Herd

Bret W. Hess

Beef Cattle Nutritionist

UWUW

Levels of Consideration

UWUW

Animal Factors Affecting ProfitabilityReproductive diseases and conditions cost

$441,000,000 to $502,000,000/year

(Bellows et al., 2002)

66.7

185.4

249.4

0

100

200

300

400

500

Lost Income

$ Million

Others Dystocia Infertility

UWUW

The Beef Cow’s Annual Life Cycle

1st 85% of pregnancy

Last 15% of pregnancy

1st 30% of lactation

245 days

40 days

60 days

Time to rebreed (~20 days)

UWUW

• Postpartum Cows

• Prepartum Cows

• Neonatal/Suckling Calves

Supplemental Fat ThroughoutThe Beef Cow’s Lifecycle

UWUW

Review of the Cow’s Estrous Cycle

UWUW

Positive Responses to Supplemental Fat

Enhanced ovarian follicular growth and function

Increased growth and development of cells destine to form the corpus luteum

UWUW

7466

75

0

25

50

75

Control Fat-supplemented

Prepartumcomparison

days

Postpartum Interval

(P = 0.47) (P = 0.25)

UWUW

Detection of Estrus

81.684.5

0

15

30

45

60

75

90

Control Fat Prepartum

%

129 Cows 212 Cows

(P = 0.49)

UWUW

Detection of Estrus

73.469.7

0

25

50

75

Control Fat Postpartum

%

99 Cows 143 Cows

(P = 0.53)

UWUW

First Service Conception Rates

67.064.3

0

15

30

45

60

75

Control Fat Prepartum

%140 Cows 194 Cows

(P = 0.60)

UWUW

First Service Conception Rates

58.465.1

0

15

30

45

60

75

Control Fat Postpartum

%146 Cows

173 Cows

(P = 0.22)

UWUW

73.770.0

0

15

30

45

60

75

Control Fat Postpartum

%

First Service Conception RatesLiterature

110 Cows 114 Cows

(P = 0.54)

UWUW

76.0

62.0

0

20

40

60

80

Control Fat Postpartum

%

First Service Conception Rates Burns et al. (2002)

42 Cows

42 Cows

(P = 0.12) ~56 g/day

UWUW

28.8

50.0

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

Control Fat Postpartum

%

First Service Conception Rates UW Cows

36 Cows

59 Cows

(P = 0.04)

UWUW

BCS 6.0 0.3

BCS 4.2 0.3

CON LIN OLECON LIN OLE

UW Study Design

Lake et al. (2003)~420 g fat/day ~420 g fat/day

UWUW

8.4

27.8

9.7

0

10

20

30

Control Oleate Linoleate

g/d

Doudenal Flow of Linoleic Acid

Scholljegerdes et al. (2001)

(P < 0.001)

UWUW

COOH

CH3 Linoleic Acid

COOH

CH3Arachidonic Acid

CH3

COOH

OHOH

OH

PGF2

CH3

COOH

OOH

OH

PGFM

Desaturases and Elongases

COX

Prostaglandin dehydrogenase and 13-reductase

UWUW

371

647

452

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

Control Oleate Linoleate

pg/mL

Serum PGFM in Cows

Grant et al. (2002)

(P = 0.01)

UWUW

84.284.5

0

20

40

60

80

100

Control Fat Postpartum

%

Overall Pregnancy Rates

219 Cows 247 Cows

(P = 0.94)

UWUW

91.886.3

0

20

40

60

80

100

Control Fat Prepartum

%

Overall Pregnancy Rates

197 Cows 281 Cows

(P = 0.05)

UWUWAlexander et al. (2002)

Plasma 18:2 of Cows Fed Lipids Prepartum

UWUW

97.397.4

0

20

40

60

80

100

Control Fat Prepartum

%

Overall Pregnancy RatesUW Herd

79 Cows 76 Cows

(P = 0.96)

UWUW

Calf Responses to Cow’s Diet

UWUW

Birth Weights

76.876.3

0

15

30

45

60

75

90

Control Fat Prepartum

pounds

(P = 0.84)

UWUW

Newborn Calves Exposed to 0°C

39.4

39.139.0

39.2

39.4

39.6

Control Fat supplemented

Rectal temperature,

oC

(P < 0.01)

Lammoglia et al. (1999)

UWUW

1.11.2

0

0.5

1

1.5

Control Fat supplemented

vigor score

(P = 0.48)

Vigor Scores of Newborn Calves

UWUW

0.09

0.06

0

0.05

0.1

Control Fat Supplemented

absorbance

(P < 0.05)

Small et al.

Immune Response of Calves

UWUW

1.31.1

0

0.5

1

1.5

2

Control Fat Supplemented

mg/g of dry plasma

(P < 0.05)

Small et al.

Plasma Linoleic Acid of Newborn Calves

UWUW

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

0 5 10 15 20Milk (g FA/ 24 h)

Calf (mg FA/ g tissue)

r = 0.69; P < 0.0001

Relationship Between Milk 18:2 and Calf Adipose Tissue 18:2

Lake et al. (2003)

UWUW

Summary of Responsesfor Cows Fed Fat Postpartum

• Increases Ovarian Follicular Growth and Development

• Enhances Luteal Activity

• Does NOT Affect Postpartum Interval

• May Reduce First Service Conception Rates

• Does NOT Improve Reproduction

UWUW

Summary of Responsesfor Cows Fed Fat Prepartum

• Does NOT Appear to Affect Postpartum Interval

• Does NOT Appear to Affect First Service Conception Rates

• May Improve Overall Pregnancy Rates

• Increases the Cow’s Linoleic Acid Status

UWUW

Summary of Responsesfor Cows Fed Fat Prepartum

• Does NOT Appear to Affect Calf Birth Weight

• May Increase the Calf’s Cold Tolerance

• May Bolster the Calf’s Immune Response

• Improves the Calf’s Linoleic Acid Status

UWUW

AcknowledgmentsSponsors: USDA-NRICGP, ADM, and UWCollaborators: Dan Rule, Doug Hixon, Gary Moss,

Paul Ludden, Steve Paisley, Lee Beldon, Dennis Hallford, Rick Funston, Danny Simms, and Steve Bartle

Research Associates: Venerand Nayigihugu, Brenda Alexander, Chuck Murrieta, Lisa Balstad, and Ed Van Kirk

Graduate Students: Eric Scholljegerdes, Scott Lake, Wade Small, Becky Atkinson, Mark Grant, Bridget Johnson, Lisa Brokaw, Jeff Bottger, Jared Gould, Ben Garrett, and Rick Landeis

UWUW

THANK YOU