Post on 03-Jan-2016
description
Student Achievement Data DisplaysStudent Achievement Data DisplaysMathematics, Reading, Mathematics, Reading,
Writing and Science – Grade 10Writing and Science – Grade 10
Note: Unless otherwise noted, these data include all students enrolled in grade 10, even if they took the test as ninth graders.
Revised: October 16, 2009
Official WASL ResultsOfficial WASL Results
AYP StatusAYP Status
District Reading & Writing Baseline District Reading & Writing Baseline ResultsResults
2
WASL WASL MathematicsMathematics: 2004-2009: 2004-2009
Grade 10Grade 10
Sequoia High School
3
Grade 10 WASL: Grade 10 WASL: Mathematics PerformanceMathematics Performance
Percent Meeting Standard in Math
0
20
40
60
80
100
% m
eeti
ng
sta
nd
ard
Sequoia High School 12 16 24 24 20
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
4
Grade 10 WASL: Grade 10 WASL: Mathematics PerformanceMathematics Performance
Percent Meeting Standard in MathSchool, District, & State
0
20
40
60
80
100
% m
eeti
ng
sta
nd
ard
2004-05 12 47 44
2005-06 16 46 48
2006-07 24 53 50
2007-08 24 54 49
2008-09 20 52 45
Sequoia High School District State
5
OSPI Report CardOSPI Report CardParticipation DetailParticipation Detail
6
Grade 10 WASL Mathematics: Grade 10 WASL Mathematics: Proficiency Level TrendsProficiency Level Trends
Percent of Students Scoring in Each Performance Level Math Grade 10
48
10 10
1
47
29
12
4
56
21 20
4
60
1812
0
69
23
3 5
0
20
40
60
80
100
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Performance Level
Pe
rce
nt
in L
ev
el 2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
Does not meet standard Meets standard
Sequoia High School
Caution: High School proficiency level trends only include the results from Spring 2009, Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.
7
Grade 10 Number Sense:Grade 10 Number Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-39
-13-21
-26-32
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Number Sense
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ila
r p
erf
orm
an
ce
% 11.1 22.1 42.8
Sequoia High School
District State
Caution: High School strand scores only include the results from Spring 2009, Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.
8
Grade 10 Measurement:Grade 10 Measurement:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-29 -32
-18
-30 -30
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Measurement
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ila
r p
erf
orm
an
ce
% 11.1 30.2 40.9
Sequoia High School
District State
9
Grade 10 Geometric Sense:Grade 10 Geometric Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-21-13
-27-32
-25
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Geometric Sense
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ila
r p
erf
orm
an
ce
% 25.0 38.2 49.9
Sequoia High School
District State
10
Grade 10 Probability & Statistics:Grade 10 Probability & Statistics:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-21 -20-25 -28
-22
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Probability & Statistics
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ila
r p
erf
orm
an
ce
% 11.1 21.0 33.2
Sequoia High School
District State
11
Grade 10 Algebraic Sense:Grade 10 Algebraic Sense:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-28 -31 -29 -26 -30
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Algebraic Sense
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ila
r p
erf
orm
an
ce
% 19.4 31.7 49.4
Sequoia High School
District State
12
Grade 10 Solves Problems/Reasons Logically:Grade 10 Solves Problems/Reasons Logically:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-30 -27 -24 -26 -27
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Solves Problems/Reasons Logically
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ila
r p
erf
orm
an
ce
% 8.3 16.7 35.3
Sequoia High School
District State
13
Grade 10 Communicates Understanding:Grade 10 Communicates Understanding:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-29 -31 -32-21 -19
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Communicates Understanding
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ila
r p
erf
orm
an
ce
% 22.2 34.1 41.4
Sequoia High School
District State
14
Grade 10 Makes Connections:Grade 10 Makes Connections:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-23
-36
-24-31 -34
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Makes Connections
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ila
r p
erf
orm
an
ce
% 22.2 41.3 55.9
Sequoia High School
District State
15
16
17
WASL WASL ReadingReading: 2004-2009: 2004-2009
Grade 10Grade 10
Sequoia High School
18
Grade 10 WASL Grade 10 WASL Reading PerformanceReading Performance
Percent Meeting Standard in Reading
0
20
40
60
80
100
% m
eeti
ng
sta
nd
ard
Sequoia HighSchool
43 72 78 83 69
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
19
Grade 10 WASL Grade 10 WASL Reading PerformanceReading Performance
Percent Meeting Standard in ReadingSchool, District, & State
0
20
40
60
80
100
% m
eeti
ng
sta
nd
ard
2004-05 43 76 65
2005-06 72 80 73
2006-07 78 85 81
2007-08 83 86 81
2008-09 69 86 81.2
Sequoia High School District State
20
OSPI Report CardOSPI Report CardParticipation DetailParticipation Detail
21
Grade 10 WASL Reading Grade 10 WASL Reading Proficiency Level TrendsProficiency Level Trends
Percent of Students Scoring in Each Performance Level Reading Grade 10
21
11
32
11
2
2633
39
3
25
35 36
3
21
3339
11
46
25
11
0
20
40
60
80
100
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Performance Level
Per
cen
t in
Lev
el 2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
Does not meet standard Meets standard
Sequoia High School
Caution: High School proficiency level trends only include the results from Spring 2009, Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.
22
Grade 10 Literary Comprehension:Grade 10 Literary Comprehension:Comparison of School and StateComparison of School and State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-4
-15-10
-1
-31
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Comprehension - Literary Text
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 42.3 55.7 73.6
Sequoia High School
District State
Caution: High School strand scores only include the results from Spring 2009, Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.
23
Grade 10 Literary Analysis:Grade 10 Literary Analysis:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-23
-12 -11
12
-35-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Analyze & Interpret - Literary Text
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 42.3 57.7 76.9
Sequoia High School
District State
24
Grade 10 Literary Thinking Critically: Grade 10 Literary Thinking Critically: Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-13 -13 -12
7
-26
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Critical Thinking - Literary Text
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 50.0 56.0 76.1
Sequoia High School
District State
25
Grade 10 Informational Comprehension: Grade 10 Informational Comprehension: Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-26
-10 -11-3
-19
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Comprehension - Informational Text
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 53.8 52.8 73.2
Sequoia High School
District State
26
Grade 10 Informational Analysis:Grade 10 Informational Analysis:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-16-12 -15
-3
-38-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Analyze & Interpret - Informational Text
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 42.3 62.4 80.2
Sequoia High School
District State
27
Grade 10 Informational Thinking Critically: Grade 10 Informational Thinking Critically: Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-35
-4 -3-11
-38-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Critical Thinking - Informational Text
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 38.5 59.8 76.6
Sequoia High School
District State
28
29
WASL WASL WritingWriting: 2004-2009: 2004-2009
Grade 10Grade 10
Sequoia High School
30
Grade 10 WASL Grade 10 WASL Writing PerformanceWriting Performance
Percent Meeting Standard in Writing
0
20
40
60
80
100
% m
eeti
ng
sta
nd
ard
Sequoia HighSchool
20 54 84 85 79
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
31
Grade 10 WASL Grade 10 WASL Writing PerformanceWriting Performance
Percent Meeting Standard in WritingSchool, District, & State
0
20
40
60
80
100
% m
eeti
ng
sta
nd
ard
2004-05 20 68 65
2005-06 54 79 65
2006-07 84 85 84
2007-08 85 89 86
2008-09 79 88 87
Sequoia High School District State
32
Grade 10 WASL Writing Grade 10 WASL Writing Performance Levels TrendsPerformance Levels Trends
Percent of Students Scoring in Each Performance LevelWriting - Grade 10
1116 18
25
3731
24
1
18
62
19
6
1711
31
7.4
29.6
40.7
18.5
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Performance Level
Per
cen
t in
Lev
el
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
Sequoia High School
Meets StandardDoes Not Meet Standard
Caution: High School proficiency level trends only include the results from Spring 2009, Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.
33
Grade 10 Content, Organization, and Style:Grade 10 Content, Organization, and Style:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-28-23
-11-6
-38-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Content, Organization, Style - Writing
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 42.3 46.9 80.5
Sequoia High School
District State
Caution: High School strand scores only include the results from Spring 2009 Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.
34
Grade 10 Conventions (CON): Grade 10 Conventions (CON): Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference Between School and State Percents
-22-29
-11-5
-14
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Conventions - Writing
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ila
r p
erf
orm
an
ce
% 76.9 73.6 90.9
Sequoia High School
District State
35
36
37
WASL Science: 2004-2009WASL Science: 2004-2009
Grade 10Grade 10
Sequoia High School
Note: These data include all students enrolled in grade 10, even if they took the test as ninth-graders.
38
Grade 10 WASL Grade 10 WASL Science PerformanceScience Performance
Percent Meeting Science StandardSchool
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Per
cen
t M
eeti
ng
Sta
nd
ard
Sequoia High School 6 6 10 21 15
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
39
Grade 10 WASL Grade 10 WASL Science PerformanceScience Performance
Percent Meeting Science StandardSchool, District, & State
0
20
40
60
80
100
Pe
rce
nt
Me
eti
ng
Sta
nd
ard
2004-05 6 34 36
2005-06 6 27 35
2006-07 10 40 36
2007-08 21 54 40
2008-09 15 51 39
Sequoia High School District State
40
WASL Science:WASL Science:Proficiency Level TrendsProficiency Level Trends
Percent of Students Scoring in Each Performance Level Science Grade 10
46
9 60
62
16
60
51
6 50
51
1913
0
44.1
20.614.7
0.00
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4
Performance Level
Per
cent
in L
evel
2004-05
2005-06
2006-07
2007-08
2008-09
Does not meet standard Meets standard
Sequoia High School
Caution: High School proficiency level trends only include the results from Spring 2009, Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.
41
Grade 10 Properties, Structures, & Changes in Grade 10 Properties, Structures, & Changes in Systems: Comparison of School to StateSystems: Comparison of School to State
Properties of Systems
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 18.5 50.8 41.4
Sequoia High School
District State
0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Difference between School and State Percents
-10-17
3
-27 -23
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce
Caution: High School strand scores only include the results from Spring 2009 Grade 10 students. There is no previously passed data. Use these results carefully.
42
Grade 10 Inquiry in Science:Grade 10 Inquiry in Science:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference between School and State Percents
-30-23
-31-21
-28
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Inquiry in Science
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 14.8 53.3 43.1
Sequoia High School
District State
43
Grade 10 Applications in Science:Grade 10 Applications in Science:Comparison of School to StateComparison of School to State
Difference between School and State Percents
-28 -30-23
-17 -21
-50
-25
0
25
50
2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
% p
oin
t d
iffe
ren
ce 0%10%20%30%40%50%60%70%80%90%100%LiteraryInformationalPerc
en
tSchool 1997School 1998School 1999District 1997District 1998District 1999School 2000District 2000School 2001District 2001Designing Solutions
0
20
40
60
80
100
% w
ith
sim
ilar
per
form
ance
% 25.9 52.6 46.6
Sequoia High School
District State