Statistics & Probability in Mechanical Design...Mechanical Development Process Development Flow...

Post on 07-Mar-2021

1 views 0 download

Transcript of Statistics & Probability in Mechanical Design...Mechanical Development Process Development Flow...

MOTOROLA and the Stylized M Logo are trademarks or registered trademarks of Motorola Trademark Holdings, LLC.

All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners. © 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. All rights reserved.

Statistics & Probability in

Mechanical Design

Jason Wojack

Monday, March 12th, 2012

Why Statistical Methods

• Disciplined Approach

•Repeatable Results

• Quantifiable Decision Criteria

• Optimization

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Statistics Review

Parameters:

µ, σ

Population Sampling

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Probability Distributions

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

ƒ (x) = σ(2π)1/2

e-(x-µ) / (2σ2)

µ = mean

σ = standard deviation

2

Normal (Gaussian) Distribution

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

-6 -4.8 -3.6 -2.4 -1.2 -0 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6

Pro

bability D

ensity

Pro

babili

ty D

ensity

1σ 1σ

68.27%

-3σ 3σ

99.7%

95.45%

6σ -6σ

99.9999998%

Normal Distribution

Process Capability

Allowable Variation

Actual Variation Cp =

Allowable

Actual

Normal (Gaussian) Distribution

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

-6 -4.8 -3.6 -2.4 -1.2 -0 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6

Pro

bability D

ensity

USL LSL

Allowable

Actual

Normal Distribution

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Normal (Gaussian) Distribution

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

-6 -4.8 -3.6 -2.4 -1.2 -0 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6

Pro

bability D

ensity

USL LSL

Cp =2.0

USL LSL

Normal (Gaussian) Distribution

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

-6 -4.8 -3.6 -2.4 -1.2 -0 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6

Pro

bability D

ensity

2.0 distributions can fit within the specification

Process Capability

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

< 1.0 Poor Capability

1.0 – 1.5 Marginal Capability

> 1.5 Good Capability

> 2.0 Motorola 6σ Capability

Best

Bad

Process Capability

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Normal (Gaussian) Distribution

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

-6 -4.8 -3.6 -2.4 -1.2 -0 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6

Pro

bability D

ensity

USL LSL

Normal (Gaussian) Distribution

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

-6 -4.8 -3.6 -2.4 -1.2 -0 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6

Pro

bability D

ensity

USL LSL

Normal (Gaussian) Distribution

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

-6 -4.8 -3.6 -2.4 -1.2 -0 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6

Pro

bability D

ensity

USL LSL

Cp = 2.0

Cp Independent

of the

target.

Process Capability

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Cp = USL - LSL

Cpk = min USL - µ , µ - LSL

3σ 3σ

Cp = 2.0 Cpk = 1.0

USL LSL µ

USL LSL

Cp = 1.0 Cpk = 1.0

µ

Process Capability; Cp & Cpk

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Cp, Cpk Example

Chip set Stack Up

Package Height Prediction (post-reflow) Min. Nom. Max. Tol. Min. Nom. Max. Tol.

Memory Mold Cap (2-die) 0.330 0.340 0.350 0.010 0.340 0.370 0.400 0.030

Memory Substrate Thk. 0.110 0.140 0.170 0.030 0.110 0.140 0.170 0.030

Memory Ball Ht. (after reflow) 0.140 0.190 0.240 0.050 0.240 0.290 0.340 0.050

OMAP Mold Cap (Ref.) 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.220 0.250 0.280 0.030

OMAP / W3G Die Thickness (um) 0.095 0.100 0.105 0.005 0.095 0.100 0.105 0.005

Die-to-Substrate Gap (um) 0.020 0.025 0.030 0.005 0.020 0.025 0.030 0.005

OMAP Top Ball Ht. 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.160 0.190 0.220 0.030

OMAP/W3G Substrate Thk. (w/o SM) 0.408 0.448 0.488 0.040 0.244 0.284 0.324 0.040

OMAP/W3G Ball Ht. (after reflow) 0.168 0.206 0.244 0.038 0.110 0.160 0.210 0.050

OMAP/W3G Ball Ht. (before reflow) 0.180 0.230 0.280 0.050 0.140 0.190 0.240 0.050

Total 2-Package POP Height (post-reflow): 1.24 1.32 1.40 1.15 1.24 1.34

Max. 2-Package POP Height (post-reflow): 1.40 RSS: 0.081 1.34 RSS: 0.096

Delta to OMAP4 0.06

delta reference

W3G (current) OMAP4430 TMV

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Chipset Stack Up

-6σ +6σ

Etna Targa

0.1154mm

+0.16mm

Cp = 2.8

Cpk = 2.7

Chipset Height Cp, Cpk

Mechanical Development

Process

Development Flow (simplified)

part / process

design Concept

Tolerance

Analysis Good?

yes

no trial run

Measurement Systems

Analysis

spec / print

Good? Improve

Measurement

Measure

Quantity ?

no

Measurements Analyze

Data Good?

Process

Control

Modify

Spec.

yes no

yes

Improve

Manf. Process

trial run

Reliability

Modeling

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Tolerance Analysis

Development Flow (simplified)

part / process

design Concept

Tolerance

Analysis Good?

yes

no trial run

Measurement Systems

Analysis

spec / print

Good? Improve

Measurement

Measure

Quantity ?

no

Measurements Analyze

Data Good?

Process

Control

Modify

Spec.

yes no

yes

Improve

Manf. Process

trial run

Reliability

Modeling

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

part / process design

TA Acceptable?

yes

no

Concept Tolerance Analysis

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Development Flow (simplified)

?? +/- 0.13

A 0.50 +/- 0.05 1.00 +/- 0.07 1.50 +/- 0.10 1.25 +/- 0.10

B

C

D

Components

A B C D

0.55 + 1.07 + 1.60 + 1.35

4.54

Envelope Size

A B C D

4.67

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Tolerance Analysis

σgap =

+ Te

3Cp (

( 2

Tpi

3Cpi (

( 2

i = 1

m

Σ

Variances can be added……

σ2 = σ2 + σ2 + σ2 + σ2 + σ2 A B C D Envelope

σgap = 0.035

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Root Sum Squared (RSS)

?? +/- 0.13

A 0.50 +/- 0.05 1.00 +/- 0.07 1.50 +/- 0.10 1.25 +/- 0.10

B

C

D

Components

Gap Size

A B C D

σgap = 0.035

3σgap = 0.105

6σgap = 0.210

Envelope = A+B+C+D+6σgap = 4.46

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Root Sum Squared (RSS)

A B C D

Statistical = 4.46

Worst Case = 4.67

A B C D ∆ = 4.5%

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

RSS vs. Worst Case

TA Example:

uUSB and HDMI

Connectors

Measurement Systems

Analysis

(MSA)

Development Flow (simplified)

part / process

design Concept

Tolerance

Analysis Good?

yes

no trial run

Measurement Systems

Analysis

spec / print

Good? Improve

Measurement

Measure

Quantity ?

no

Measurements Analyze

Data Good?

Process

Control

Modify

Spec.

yes no

yes

Improve

Manf. Process

trial run

Reliability

Modeling

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Measurement Systems Analysis

trial run

…..

spec / print (requirement)

Good TA

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Development Flow (simplified)

WHY?

Measurement Error Bad Decisions

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Measurement Systems Analysis

Characteristics:

Stability Discrimination Accuracy (Bias)

Linearity

Precision

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Measurement Systems Analysis

Total Variation:

Precision:

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Measurement Systems Analysis

% GR&R

<10% Acceptable

10% - 30% Ok; non-critical

measurements

>30% Unacceptable

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

MSA; %GR & R

Measurement Systems

Analysis

Example:

Glue Weight

Measurement Size

Development Flow (simplified)

part / process

design Concept

Tolerance

Analysis Good?

yes

no trial run

Measurement Systems

Analysis

spec / print

Good? Improve

Measurement

Measure

Quantity ?

no

Measurements Analyze

Data Good?

Process

Control

Modify

Spec.

yes no

yes

Improve

Manf. Process

trial run

Reliability

Modeling

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Sample Size

• Dependent on the type of analysis to be performed

• Apply applicable formula

• Example: Sample Mean to a known population

n = (Zα + Zβ) • σ2

δ2

α = level of acceptability of a false positive (0.05 is typical)

β = level of acceptability of a false negative (0.10 is typical)

σ = known standard deviation

m = amount of difference that matters (practical difference)

Perform Measurements

yes

Determine Quantity to Measure

5 or 20 or 100 ???

MSA

Improve the Measurement System

MSA Acceptable?

no

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Development Flow (simplified)

Data Analysis

Development Flow (simplified)

part / process

design Concept

Tolerance

Analysis Good?

yes

no trial run

Measurement Systems

Analysis

spec / print

Good? Improve

Measurement

Measure

Quantity ?

no

Measurements Analyze

Data Good?

Process

Control

Modify

Spec.

yes no

yes

Improve

Manf. Process

trial run

Reliability

Modeling

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Data Analysis

Development Flow (simplified)

part / process

design Concept

Tolerance

Analysis Good?

yes

no trial run

Measurement Systems

Analysis

spec / print

Good? Improve

Measurement

Measure

Quantity ?

no

Measurements Analyze

Data Good?

Process

Control

Modify

Spec.

yes no

yes

trial run

Reliability

Modeling

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Improve

Manf. Process

Comparative Analysis

&

Design of Experiments

(DOE)

• Analytical method to evaluate changes & differences.

• Examples: • Different vendors • Change to a process

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Comparative Methods

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Comparative Methods

Comparative Analysis

Example:

PCB Bow

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Design of Experiments

• Efficient Experimental Method

• Optimizes Processes and Designs

• Allows for the Analysis of Interactions

Process Control

part / process design

Concept Tolerance Analysis

Good? yes

no trial run

Measurement Systems Analysis

spec / print

Good? Improve

Measurement

Measure Quantity ?

no

Measurements Analyze

Data Good?

Process Control

Modify Spec.

yes no

yes

Improve Manf. Process

trial run

Reliability Analysis

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Development Flow (simplified)

Process Control

SPC Goals: • Predicable process

• Consistent σ (Cp)

• Centered distribution (Cpk)

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Statistical Process Control

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Control Charts

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Control Charts

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Control Charts (X-bar / R)

part / process design

Concept Tolerance Analysis

Good? yes

no trial run

Measurement Systems Analysis

spec / print

Good? Improve

Measurement

Measure Quantity ?

no

Measurements Analyze

Data Good?

Process Control

Modify Spec.

yes no

yes

Improve Manf. Process

trial run

Reliability Analysis

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Development Flow (simplified)

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Reliability Analysis

Decreasing

Failure

Rate

bad region

Constant

Failure

Rate

desired region

Increasing

Failure

Rate

bad region

Useful Life

time

Fa

ilu

re R

ate

Infant Mortality

b < 1

Normal Operation

b = 1

Wearout

b > 1

This region is not always perfectly flat.

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Reliability Analysis

Failure Analysis

Example:

Display Breakage

Process Control

yes

Modify Specification

3.65

Data Acceptable?

no

Improve Manf. Process

Cp= 2.0 Cpk = 2.0

Reliability Analysis

Analyze Data

Normal (Gaussian) Distribution

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

-6 -4.8 -3.6 -2.4 -1.2 -0 1.2 2.4 3.6 4.8 6

Pro

babili

ty D

ensi

ty

USL LSL Cp = 2.0 Cpk =0.0

Measurement Data

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Development Flow (simplified)

Tools Used

Tolerance Analysis

Measurement System Analysis

Process Capability

Comparitive Methods

Design of Experiments

Reliability Modeling

Monte Carlo Simulation

DACE

Etc…. © 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

DFSS Tools

part / process design

Concept Tolerance Analysis

Good? yes

no trial run

Measurement Systems Analysis

spec / print

Good? Improve

Measurement

Measure Quantity ?

no

Measurements Analyze

Data Good?

Process Control

Modify Spec.

yes no

yes

Improve Manf. Process

trial run

Reliability Modeling

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Development Flow (simplified)

Why Statistical Methods

• Disciplined Approach

•Repeatable Results

• Quantifiable Decision Criteria

• Optimization

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Q & A

Back Up Slides

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

6 Sigma Methodology

DFSS – Design for Six Sigma

CDOV

Concept

•Prioritize Customer Needs

•Select Superior Concept

Design

•Baseline Design

•Customer needs captured in Design Requirements

Optimize

•Optimize “Critical to Quality” Parameters

Verify

•Ensure long term performance

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

DFSS – CDOV Process

Concept

Design

Optimize

Verify

MSA Process Capability

Confidence Intervals

Comparative Methods

Monte Carlo

CPM FMEA Control Charts

Regression DOE RSM Robust Design

Tolerance Analysis

DACE

Major Steps

VOC KJ Analysis

Initiate CPM

Pugh Analysis

Reliability Modeling

System Reliability

System Availability

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

CDOV Process

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Measurement Systems Analysis

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Design of Experiments

LevelFactors -> 22 = 4 Runs

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Design of Experiments

2k -> LevelFactors

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Design of Experiments

© 2010 Motorola Mobility, Inc. - Motorola Confidential Proprietary

13-Mar-12

Design of Experiments