STAR3

Parent Advisory Council

UPDATE 2013

Questions to Parents

Fact: More than 28% of children enter kindergarten more than 1 year below age level in language, literacy and numeracy skills.

1.If you were a teacher, how would you want to be judged?

A. Number of students who are proficient

B. Actual growth of student

Final Question

Fact: Incentive bonuses work in many industries. They have not been adequately tested in public schools.

3.Do you think bonuses based on more than state average growth would work for teachers?

A. Yes

B. No

Another Question…..

Fact: Growing students above the state average in core subjects is hard work but necessary to close gaps for individual students.

2.Would you be willing to experiment with giving bonuses to teachers who grow students more than the state average?

A. No

B. Yes

National Goal for STAR3The impact of a PBCS

STAR3 Support

8 schools with PBCS

7 schools with 1% bonus

Outcomes:

• Quality of SIP

• Quality of unit lesson plans

• Quality of teacher observations

• Achievement outcomes – measured primarily in terms of growth at multiple levels

• PLC outcomes

Notes on Growth

• Goal: Growth above the state average.

• Objective: Close performance gap between individual students and “typical”.

• Three levels:.5 SE for Classroom Level (Increasing bonus

up to 2.0 SE)1 SE for Grade Level 1 SE for Whole School Level

Bonus (Growth) Payout Summary2011-12 Growth

Total Number

Lowest Median Highest

Principal Bonus

7 1000 1500 2750

Teacher and TA Bonus

392 100 1000 8500

SAS Institute calculated growth measures.ITSB: Used as the Kindergarten – 2nd grade measure.Growth: .5 SE above state average.

Local EvaluationSupport for District Initiatives

RtI: Response to Instruction

PLC: Professional

Learning Communities

PDP: Targeted Professional Development

Quality Lesson Planning

Results to Date

• One year of implementation……

• 22 indicators in favor of the incentive schools (bonus schools)

• 2 indicators in favor of the non-incentive school

• 13 indicators are equal

We will keep you posted on the progress!!!!!!

Elementary EOGs: Percent Proficient

40

42

44

46

48

Reading Percent Proficient 4th and 5th Grade EOG: 2011-12

Series1 47.9 42.8

PBCS Non-PBCS66

68

70

72

74

Math Percent Proficient 4th and 5th Grade EOG: 2011-12

Series1 73.5 68.8

PBCS Non-PBCS

Elementary EOGs:Growth in Percent Proficient Grade 3 to Grade 4

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

8.0

Reading: % Proficient Growth from Grade 3 (2011) to Grade 4 (2012)

Series1 7.4 1.5

PBCS Non-PBCS-1.5

-1.0

-0.5

0.0

0.5

1.0

Math: % Proficient Growth from Grade 3 (2011) to Grade 4 (2012)

Series1 0.9 -1.3

PBCS Non-PBCS

Elementary EOGs:Growth in Percent Proficient Grade 4 to Grade 5

-6.0

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

2.0

4.0

6.0

Reading: % Proficient Growth from Grade 4 (2011) to Grade 5 (2012)

Series1 4.9 -5.4

PBCS Non-PBCS-8.0

-6.0

-4.0

-2.0

0.0

Math: % Proficient Growth from Grade 4 (2011) to Grade 5 (2012)

Series1 -1.4 -7.1

PBCS Non-PBCS

Elementary: ITBSKindergarten Percentile Growth BOY to EOY

0

10

20

30

40

Growth in ITBS Percentile BOY to EOY

Series1 32.5 25.37

PBCS Non-PBCS

Note: No difference for 1st and 2nd grades.

Middle School EOGs: Percent Proficient

58

60

62

64

66

68

Middle School Math EOG: 2011-12

Series1 67.8 62.2

PBCS Non-PBCS0

20

40

60

Middle School Science EOG: 2011-12

Series1 51.4 39.3

PBCS Non-PBCS

Middle School EOGs:Growth in Percent Proficient Grade 6 to Grade 7

-15

-10

-5

0

Reading: Change in % Proficient from 6th grade (2011) to 7th grade (2012)

Series1 -12.8 -12.8

PBCS Non-PBCS-3

-2

-1

0

Math: Change in % Proficient from 6th grade (2011) to 7th grade (2012)

Series1 -2.45 -0.85

PBCS Non-PBCS

Middle School EOGs:Growth in Percent Proficient Grade 7 to Grade 8

-1

0

1

2

3

4

Reading: Change in % Proficient from 7th grade (2011) to 8th grade (2012)

Series1 3.25 -0.15

PBCS Non-PBCS0

5

10

Math: Change in % Proficient from 7th grade (2011) to 8th grade (2012)

Series1 8.9 2.65

PBCS Non-PBCS

Teacher ObservationsPBCS Schools Numerically Greater in 7 of 9 Standards

Teacher Efficacy Surveys

3.8

3.85

3.9

3.95

4

4.05

4.1

4.15

Fall Spring

Teacher Efficacy

PBCS

Non-PBCS

The change from BOY to EOY was

significant for the non-PBCS schools.

Growth Measures: Teacher Level

0

5

10

15

20

25

PBCS Non-PBCS

Whole-School Payout Qualification:

Average of at least 1 SE of

growth across all students.

Growth Measures: Grade Level

0

10

20

30

40

PBCS Non-PBCS

Grade-Level PayoutsQualification:

At least 1 SE of growth across all

students at a grade level.

PBCS: 15 of 42 grade levels

Non-PBCS: 4 of 42 grade levels

Growth Measures: Whole-School Level

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

PBCS Non-PBCS

Teacher Level Payouts Qualification:

At least .5 SE of growth for

students in the classroom.

PBCS: 53 of 167 teachers

Non-PBCS: 34 of 155 teachers